Difference between revisions of "Environmental ethics" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
m (Robot: Remove claimed tag)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Ethics}}
 +
'''Environmental ethics''' is the part of [[environmental philosophy]] which considers the [[Ethics|ethical]] relationship between [[human beings]] and the [[natural environment]]. It exerts influence on a large range of disciplines including [[Environmental law|law]], [[Environmental sociology|sociology]], [[Ecotheology|theology]], [[Ecological economics|economics]], [[ecology]] and [[Environmental geography|geography]].
  
−
'''Environmental ethics''' is the part of [[environmental philosophy]] which considers the [[Ethics|ethical]] relationship between [[human beings]] and the [[natural environment]].  It exerts influence on a large range of disciplines including [[Environmental law|law]], [[Environmental sociology|sociology]], [[Ecotheology|theology]], [[Ecological economics|economics]], [[ecology]] and [[Environmental geography|geography]].  There are many ethical decisions that human beings make with respect to the environment. For example:
+
There are many ethical decisions that human beings make with respect to the environment. For example:
−
 
 
 
*Should we continue to [[clear cut]] forests for the sake of human consumption?   
 
*Should we continue to [[clear cut]] forests for the sake of human consumption?   
 +
*Should we continue to propogate, when our planet is already 2/3 above its [[overpopulation|maximum carrying capacity]] ?
 
*Should we continue to make [[internal combustion engine|gasoline powered vehicles]], depleting [[fossil fuel]] resources while the technology exists to create [[zero-emission vehicle]]s?   
 
*Should we continue to make [[internal combustion engine|gasoline powered vehicles]], depleting [[fossil fuel]] resources while the technology exists to create [[zero-emission vehicle]]s?   
−
*What environmental obligations do we need to keep for future generations?  
+
*What environmental obligations do we need to keep for future generations?<ref>[http://www.christian-aid.org.uk/indepth/605caweek/index.htm Climate change victims estimated at millions in the near future, according to Christian Aid]</ref><ref>[http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2003/12/61562 150000 people killed already by climate change]</ref>
 
*Is it right for humans to  knowingly cause the [[extinction]] of a species for the (perceived or real) convenience of humanity?
 
*Is it right for humans to  knowingly cause the [[extinction]] of a species for the (perceived or real) convenience of humanity?
  
−
Environmental ethics is properly but a sub-section of [[environmental philosophy]], which includes [[environmental aesthetics]], [[environmental theology]], and indeed all the branches of philosophical investigation (e.g., [[epistemology]], [[metaphysics]], [[philosophy of science]], etc).
+
The academic field of environmental ethics grew up in response to the work of scientists such as [[Rachel Carson]] and events such as the first [[Earth Day]] in 1970, when environmentalists started urging philosophers to consider the philosophical aspects of environmental problems. Two papers published in Science had a crucial impact: [[Lynn White]]'s "The Historical Roots of our Ecologic Crisis" (March 1967)<ref>{{cite journal|journal=Science| title=[http://www.gnn.tv/headlines/9038/The_Historical_Roots_of_Our_Ecologic_Crisis The Historical Roots of our Ecologic Crisis]| first=Lynn| last=White| month=March| year=1967}}</ref> and [[Garrett Hardin]]'s "[http://www.garretthardinsociety.org/articles_pdf/tragedy_of_the_commons.pdf The Tragedy of the Commons]" (December 1968).<ref>{{cite journal| journal=Science| title=The Tragedy of the Commons| first=Garrett| last=Hardin| month=December| year=1968| doi=10.1126/science.162.3859.1243| volume=162| pages=1243| pmid=5699198}}</ref> Also influential was Garett Hardin's later essay called "Exploring New Ethics for Survival," as well as an essay by [[Aldo Leopold]] in his ''[[A Sand County Almanac]]'', called "The Land Ethic," in which Leopold explicitly claimed that the roots of the ecological crisis were philosophical (1949).<ref>{{cite book|title=A Sand County Almanac| first=Aldo| last=Leopold| year=1949| chapter=The Land Ethic}}</ref>
  
−
The academic field of environmental ethics grew up in response to the work of scientists such as [[Rachel Carson]] and events such as the first [[Earth Day]] in 1970, when environmentalists started urging philosophers to consider the philosophical aspects of environmental problems. Two papers published in Science had a crucial impact: [[Lynn White]]'s "The Historical Roots of our Ecologic Crisis" (March 1967)<ref>{{cite journal|journal=Science| title=[http://www.gnn.tv/headlines/9038/The_Historical_Roots_of_Our_Ecologic_Crisis The Historical Roots of our Ecologic Crisis]| first=Lynn| last=White| month=March| year=1967}}</ref> and [[Garrett Hardin]]'s "[http://www.garretthardinsociety.org/articles_pdf/tragedy_of_the_commons.pdf The Tragedy of the Commons]" (December 1968).<ref>{{cite journal| journal=Science| title=The Tragedy of the Commons| first=Garrett| last=Hardin| month=December| year=1968}}</ref> Also influential was an essay in [[Aldo Leopold]]'s ''[[A Sand County Almanac]]'', "The Land Ethic," in which Leopold explicitly claimed that the roots of the ecological crisis were philosophical (1949).<ref>{{cite book|title=A Sand County Almanac| first=Aldo| last=Leopold| year=1949| chapter=The Land Ethic}}</ref>
+
The first international academic journals in this field emerged from North America in the late 1970s and early 1980s – the US-based journal, ''[[Environmental Ethics]]'' in 1979 and the Canadian based journal ''[[The Trumpeter: Journal of Ecosophy]]'' in 1983. The first British based journal of this kind, ''[[Environmental Values]]'', was launched in 1992.
  
−
In the ''Journal of Applied Philosophy'' [[Alan Marshall]] writes of a natural ecological balance between the animate (living entities) and the inanimate (non-living entities) that existed for centuries (1993).<ref>{{cite journal| journal=Journal of Applied Philosophy| title=Unknown title| year=1993| first=Alan| last=Marshall}}</ref> For Marshall however, the rapid industrialization of the last 300 years has led to a major imbalance. Today growing concerns about global warming underline the general acceptance that environmental preservation is of vital importance. However, it is the grounds upon which one justifies the argument for or against preservation that is the subject of ethical debate, and this invariably includes a personal stance on non-human animal and non-animal rights.
+
== Marshall's categories of environmental ethics ==
 +
There have been many attempts to categorize the different attempts to justify the importance of the preservation of the environment. Alan Marshall and [[Michael Smith(philosopher)|Michael Smith]] are two recent examples of this, as cited by [[Peter Vardy (theologian)|Peter Vardy]] in "The Puzzle of Ethics".<ref>{{cite book|title=The Puzzle of Ethics| first=Peter| last=Vardy}}</ref> For Marshall, three general ethical approaches have emerged over the last 20 years. Marshall uses the following terms to describe them: Libertarian Extension, the Ecologic Extension and Conservation Ethics.  
  
−
There have been many attempts to categorize the different attempts to justify the importance of the preservation of the environment. Alan Marshall and [[Michael Smith(philosopher)|Michael Smith]] are two recent examples of this, as cited by [[Peter Vardy (theologian)|Peter Vardy]] in "The Puzzle of Ethics".<ref>{{cite book|title=The Puzzle of Ethics| first=Peter| last=Vardy}}</ref>
+
(For more on Marshall's environmental ethics, see also: A. Marshall, 2002, The Unity of Nature, Imperial College Press: London. Alan Marshall is currently at [[Curtin University of Technology]]).
  
−
For Marshall, three ethical approaches have emerged over the last 20 years; the Libertarian Extension, the Ecologic Extension and Conservation Ethics.
+
=== Libertarian extension ===
 +
Marshall’s Libertarian extension echoes a civil liberty approach (i.e. a commitment to extend equal rights to all members of a community). In environmentalism, though, the community is generally thought to consist of non-humans as well as humans.
  
−
== Libertarian extension ==
+
Andrew Brennan was an advocate of ecologic humanism (eco-humanism), the argument that all ontological entities, animate and in-animate, can be given ethical worth purely on the basis that they exist. The work of [[Arne Næss]] and his collaborator Sessions also falls under the libertarian extension, although they preferred the term "[[deep ecology]]." Deep ecology is the argument for the intrinsic value or inherent worth of the environment – the view that it is valuable in itself. Their argument, incidentally, falls under both the libertarian extension and the ecologic extension.
  
−
Marshall’s Libertarian extension encompasses those theories that extend human rights to non-human animals and possibly even the inanimate. Michael Smith classified the extension of rights to non-human animals a [[biocentric]] ethic, since it focuses on the rights of biotic entities. Andrew Brenmann however was an advocate of ecologic humanism (eco-humanism), the argument that all ontological entities, animate and in-animate, can be given ethical worth purely on the basis that they exist. The work of [[Arne Næss]] and his collaborator Sessions also falls under the libertarian extension, although they preferred the term "[[deep ecology]]." Deep ecology is the argument for the intrinsic value or inherent worth of the environment – the view that it is valuable in itself. Their argument, incidentally, falls under both the libertarian extension and the ecologic extension.  
+
[[Peter Singer]]'s work can be categorized under Marshall's ecologic extension. He reasoned that the "expanding circle of moral worth" should be redrawn to include the rights of non-human animals, and to not do so would be guilty of [[speciesism]]. Singer found it difficult to accept the argument from intrinsic worth of a-biotic or "non-sentient" (non-conscious) entities, and concluded in his first edition of "Practical Ethics" that they should not be included in the expanding circle of moral worth.<ref>{{cite book|title=Practical Ethics |first=Peter| last=Singer| edition=1}}</ref> This approach is essentially then, bio-centric. However, in a later edition of "Practical Ethics" after the work of Naess and Sessions, Singer admits that, although unconvinced by deep ecology, the argument from intrinsic value of non-sentient entities is plausible, but at best problematic. We shall see later that Singer actually advocated a humanist ethic.....
  
−
[[Peter Singer]]'s work can be categorized under Marshall's ecologic extension. He reasoned that the "expanding circle of moral worth" should be redrawn to include the rights of non-human animals, and to not do so would be guilty of [[speciesism]]. Singer found it difficult to accept the argument from intrinsic worth of a-biotic or "non-sentient" (non-conscious) entities, and concluded in his first edition of "Practical Ethics" that they should not be included in the expanding circle of moral worth.<ref>{{cite book|title=Practical Ethics |first=Peter| last=Singer| edition=1}}</ref> This approach is essentially then, bio-centric. However, in a later edition of "Practical Ethics" after the work of Naess and Sessions, Singer admits that, although unconvinced by deep ecology, the argument from intrinsic value of non-sentient entities is plausible, but at best problematic. We shall see later that Singer actually advocated a humanist ethic.
+
=== Ecologic extension ===
−
 
+
Alan Marshall's ecologic extension places emphasis not on human rights but on the recognition of the fundamental interdependence of all biological and abiological entities and their essential diversity. Where as Libertarian Extension can be thought of as flowing from a political reflection of the natural world, Ecologic Extension is best thought of as a scientific reflection of the natural world. Ecological Extension is roughly the same classification of Smith’s eco-holism, and it argues for the intrinsic value inherent in collective ecological entities like ecosystems or the global environment as a whole entity.
−
== Ecologic extension ==
 
−
 
 
−
Marshall's ecologic extension places emphasis not on human rights but on the fundamental interdependence of all biological and a-biological entities and their essential diversity. This is the same classification of Smith’s eco-holism, and argues for the intrinsic value inherent in eco-systems or the environment as a whole entity.
 
  
 
This category includes James Lovelock's [[Gaia hypothesis]]; the theory that the planet earth alters its geo-physiological structure over time in order to ensure the continuation of an equilibrium of evolving organic and inorganic matter. The planet is characterized as a unified, [[holistic]] entity with ethical worth of which the human race is of no particular significance in the long run.
 
This category includes James Lovelock's [[Gaia hypothesis]]; the theory that the planet earth alters its geo-physiological structure over time in order to ensure the continuation of an equilibrium of evolving organic and inorganic matter. The planet is characterized as a unified, [[holistic]] entity with ethical worth of which the human race is of no particular significance in the long run.
  
−
== Conservation ethics ==
+
=== Conservation ethics ===
−
 
 
 
Marshall's conservation ethics looks only at the worth of the environment in terms of its utility or usefulness to humans. It is the opposite of deep ecology, hence is often referred to as shallow ecology, and argues for the preservation of the environment on the basis that it has extrinsic value – instrumental to the welfare of human beings. Conservation is therefore a means to an end and purely concerned with mankind and intergenerational considerations. It could be argued that it is this ethic that formed the underlying arguments proposed by Governments at the [[Kyoto Protocol|Kyoto summit]] in 1997 and three agreements reached in Rio in 1992.{{Fact|date=February 2007}}
 
Marshall's conservation ethics looks only at the worth of the environment in terms of its utility or usefulness to humans. It is the opposite of deep ecology, hence is often referred to as shallow ecology, and argues for the preservation of the environment on the basis that it has extrinsic value – instrumental to the welfare of human beings. Conservation is therefore a means to an end and purely concerned with mankind and intergenerational considerations. It could be argued that it is this ethic that formed the underlying arguments proposed by Governments at the [[Kyoto Protocol|Kyoto summit]] in 1997 and three agreements reached in Rio in 1992.{{Fact|date=February 2007}}
  
 
== Humanist theories ==
 
== Humanist theories ==
−
 
 
Following the bio-centric and eco-holist theory distinctions, Michael Smith further classifies Humanist theories as those that require a set of criteria for moral status and ethical worth, such as sentience.{{Fact|date=February 2007}} This applies to the work of Peter Singer who advocated a hierarchy of value similar to the one devised by [[Aristotle]] which relies on the ability to reason. This was Singer's solution to the problem that arises when attempting to determine the interests of a non-sentient entity such as a garden weed.  
 
Following the bio-centric and eco-holist theory distinctions, Michael Smith further classifies Humanist theories as those that require a set of criteria for moral status and ethical worth, such as sentience.{{Fact|date=February 2007}} This applies to the work of Peter Singer who advocated a hierarchy of value similar to the one devised by [[Aristotle]] which relies on the ability to reason. This was Singer's solution to the problem that arises when attempting to determine the interests of a non-sentient entity such as a garden weed.  
  
 
Singer also advocated the preservation of "world heritage sites," unspoilt parts of the world that acquire a "scarcity value" as they diminish over time. Their preservation is a bequest for future generations as they have been inherited from our ancestors and should be passed down to future generations so they can have the opportunity to decide whether to enjoy unspoilt countryside or an entirely urban landscape. A good example of a world heritage site would be the tropical rainforest, a very specialist ecosystem or climatic climax vegetation that has taken centuries to evolve. Clearing the rainforest for farmland often fails due to soil conditions, and once destroyed can never be replaced.
 
Singer also advocated the preservation of "world heritage sites," unspoilt parts of the world that acquire a "scarcity value" as they diminish over time. Their preservation is a bequest for future generations as they have been inherited from our ancestors and should be passed down to future generations so they can have the opportunity to decide whether to enjoy unspoilt countryside or an entirely urban landscape. A good example of a world heritage site would be the tropical rainforest, a very specialist ecosystem or climatic climax vegetation that has taken centuries to evolve. Clearing the rainforest for farmland often fails due to soil conditions, and once destroyed can never be replaced.
  
−
==Anthropocentrism==
+
== Anthropocentrism ==
 
{{main|Anthropocentrism}}
 
{{main|Anthropocentrism}}
  
−
What Humanist theories do not allow for is the fact that a system of ethics formulated from a human perspective may not be entirely accurate; humans are not necessarily the centre of reality. The philosopher [[Baruch Spinoza]] argued that we tend to assess things wrongly in terms of their usefulness to us.{{Fact|date=February 2007}} Spinoza reasoned that if we were to look at things objectively we would discover that everything in the universe has a unique value. Likewise, it is possible that a human-centred or anthropocentric/androcentric ethic is not an accurate depiction of reality, and there is a bigger picture that we may or may not be able to understand from a human perspective.
+
Anthropocentrism simply places humans at the centre of the universe; the human race must always be its own primary concern. Therefore, everything else in existence should be evaluated in terms of its utility for us.  
  
−
[[Peter Vardy (theologian|Peter Vardy]] distinguished between two types of anthropocentrism.{{Fact|date=February 2007}} A strong thesis anthropocentric ethic argues that humans are at the centre of reality and it is right for them to be so. Weak thesis however argues that reality can only be interpreted from a human point of view, thus humans have to be at the centre of reality as they see it.
+
What Anthropocentric theories do not allow for is the fact that a system of ethics formulated from a human perspective may not be entirely accurate; humans are not necessarily the centre of reality. The philosopher [[Baruch Spinoza]] argued that we tend to assess things wrongly in terms of their usefulness to us.{{Fact|date=February 2007}} Spinoza reasoned that if we were to look at things objectively we would discover that everything in the universe has a unique value. Likewise, it is possible that a human-centred or anthropocentric/androcentric ethic is not an accurate depiction of reality, and there is a bigger picture that we may or may not be able to understand from a human perspective.
  
−
==Status of the Field==
+
[[Peter Vardy (theologian)|Peter Vardy]] distinguished between two types of anthropocentrism.{{Fact|date=February 2007}} A strong thesis anthropocentric ethic argues that humans are at the center of reality and it is right for them to be so. Weak anthropocentrism, however, argues that reality can only be interpreted from a human point of view, thus humans have to be at the centre of reality as they see it.
  
−
Environmental ethics became a subject of sustained academic philosophic reflection in the 1970s. Throughout the 1980s it remained marginalized within the discipline of philosophy, attacting the attention of a fairly small group of thinkers spread across the US. Only after 1990 did the field gain institutional recognition at programs such as Colorado State, the University of Montana, Bowling Green State, and the University of North Texas.  
+
== Status of the field ==
 +
Environmental ethics became a subject of sustained academic philosophic reflection in the 1970s. Throughout the 1980s it remained marginalized within the discipline of philosophy, attracting the attention of a fairly small group of thinkers spread across the English speaking world.  
 +
 
 +
Only after 1990 did the field gain institutional recognition at programs such as Colorado State, the University of Montana, Bowling Green State, and the University of North Texas. In 1991, Schumacher College of Dartington, England, was founded and now provides an MSc in Holistic Science.  
  
 
These programs began to offer a masters degree with a specialty in environmental ethics/philosophy. Beginning in 2005 the Dept of Philosophy and Religion Studies at the University of North Texas offered a PhD program with a concentration in environmental ethics/philosophy.
 
These programs began to offer a masters degree with a specialty in environmental ethics/philosophy. Beginning in 2005 the Dept of Philosophy and Religion Studies at the University of North Texas offered a PhD program with a concentration in environmental ethics/philosophy.
  
−
==References==
+
== References ==
−
<references/>
+
{{reflist}}
  
−
==See also==
+
== See also ==
 +
{{col-begin}}
 +
{{col-2}}
 +
*[[Biocentric individualism]]
 +
*[[Biocentrism]]
 
*[[Bioethics]]
 
*[[Bioethics]]
 +
*[[Climate ethics]]
 
*[[Conservation ethic]]
 
*[[Conservation ethic]]
 
*[[Conservation movement]]
 
*[[Conservation movement]]
 
*[[Deep Ecology]]
 
*[[Deep Ecology]]
 +
*[[EcoQuest]] (a series of two educational games)
 +
*[[Ecocentrism]]
 +
*[[Ecofeminism]]
 +
*[[Ecological economics]]
 +
{{col-2}}
 +
{{wikiversity|Topic:Climate change}}
 
*[[Environmental movement]]
 
*[[Environmental movement]]
 
*[[Environmentalism]]
 
*[[Environmentalism]]
 
*[[Environmental skepticism]]
 
*[[Environmental skepticism]]
 
*[[Human ecology]]
 
*[[Human ecology]]
 +
*[[List of environmental philosophers]]
 +
*[[Population control]]
 +
*[[solastalgia]]
 
*[[Sustainability]]
 
*[[Sustainability]]
 
*[[Terraforming]]
 
*[[Terraforming]]
 +
*[[Trail ethics]]
 
*[[Van Rensselaer Potter]]
 
*[[Van Rensselaer Potter]]
 +
*[[Resource depletion]]
 +
{{col-end}}
  
−
== External links==
+
== External links ==
 +
* [http://www.drze.de/BELIT?la=en- Bioethics Literature Database]
 +
* [http://www.drze.de/BELIT/thesaurus?la=en- Thesaurus Ethics in the Life Sciences]
 
* [http://www.envirolink.org/newsearch.html?searchfor=ethics&x=0&y=0 EnviroLink Library: Environmental Ethics] - online resource for environmental ethics information
 
* [http://www.envirolink.org/newsearch.html?searchfor=ethics&x=0&y=0 EnviroLink Library: Environmental Ethics] - online resource for environmental ethics information
 
* [http://www.envirolink.org/forum EnviroLink Forum - Environmental Ethics Discussion/Debate]
 
* [http://www.envirolink.org/forum EnviroLink Forum - Environmental Ethics Discussion/Debate]
Line 74: Line 95:
 
* [http://www.cep.unt.edu/ Center for Environmental Philosophy]
 
* [http://www.cep.unt.edu/ Center for Environmental Philosophy]
 
* [http://www.phil.unt.edu/ UNT Dept of Philosophy]
 
* [http://www.phil.unt.edu/ UNT Dept of Philosophy]
 +
* [http://rockethics.psu.edu/smtc/ Penn State University on Environmental Ethics]
 +
{{Environmental science}}
 +
 +
{{Sustainability}}
  
−
{{Environmental science}}
+
[[Category:Environmental ethics]]
 +
[[Category:Relational ethics]]
  
−
[[Category:Life sciences]]
+
[[credits|Environmental_ethics|240985952}}
−
{{credit|131581652}}
 

Revision as of 15:42, 26 September 2008

Ethics
Theoretical

Meta-ethics
Consequentialism / Deontology / Virtue ethics
Ethics of care
Good and evil | Morality

Applied

Medical ethics / Bioethics
Business ethics
Environmental ethics
Human rights / Animal rights
Legal ethics
Media ethics / Marketing ethics
Ethics of war

Core issues

Justice / Value
Right / Duty / Virtue
Equality / Freedom / Trust
Free will

Key thinkers

Aristotle / Confucius
Aquinas / Hume / Kant / Bentham / Mill / Nietzsche
Hare / Rawls / MacIntyre / Singer / Gilligan

Environmental ethics is the part of environmental philosophy which considers the ethical relationship between human beings and the natural environment. It exerts influence on a large range of disciplines including law, sociology, theology, economics, ecology and geography.

There are many ethical decisions that human beings make with respect to the environment. For example:

  • Should we continue to clear cut forests for the sake of human consumption?
  • Should we continue to propogate, when our planet is already 2/3 above its maximum carrying capacity ?
  • Should we continue to make gasoline powered vehicles, depleting fossil fuel resources while the technology exists to create zero-emission vehicles?
  • What environmental obligations do we need to keep for future generations?[1][2]
  • Is it right for humans to knowingly cause the extinction of a species for the (perceived or real) convenience of humanity?

The academic field of environmental ethics grew up in response to the work of scientists such as Rachel Carson and events such as the first Earth Day in 1970, when environmentalists started urging philosophers to consider the philosophical aspects of environmental problems. Two papers published in Science had a crucial impact: Lynn White's "The Historical Roots of our Ecologic Crisis" (March 1967)[3] and Garrett Hardin's "The Tragedy of the Commons" (December 1968).[4] Also influential was Garett Hardin's later essay called "Exploring New Ethics for Survival," as well as an essay by Aldo Leopold in his A Sand County Almanac, called "The Land Ethic," in which Leopold explicitly claimed that the roots of the ecological crisis were philosophical (1949).[5]

The first international academic journals in this field emerged from North America in the late 1970s and early 1980s – the US-based journal, Environmental Ethics in 1979 and the Canadian based journal The Trumpeter: Journal of Ecosophy in 1983. The first British based journal of this kind, Environmental Values, was launched in 1992.

Marshall's categories of environmental ethics

There have been many attempts to categorize the different attempts to justify the importance of the preservation of the environment. Alan Marshall and Michael Smith are two recent examples of this, as cited by Peter Vardy in "The Puzzle of Ethics".[6] For Marshall, three general ethical approaches have emerged over the last 20 years. Marshall uses the following terms to describe them: Libertarian Extension, the Ecologic Extension and Conservation Ethics.

(For more on Marshall's environmental ethics, see also: A. Marshall, 2002, The Unity of Nature, Imperial College Press: London. Alan Marshall is currently at Curtin University of Technology).

Libertarian extension

Marshall’s Libertarian extension echoes a civil liberty approach (i.e. a commitment to extend equal rights to all members of a community). In environmentalism, though, the community is generally thought to consist of non-humans as well as humans.

Andrew Brennan was an advocate of ecologic humanism (eco-humanism), the argument that all ontological entities, animate and in-animate, can be given ethical worth purely on the basis that they exist. The work of Arne Næss and his collaborator Sessions also falls under the libertarian extension, although they preferred the term "deep ecology." Deep ecology is the argument for the intrinsic value or inherent worth of the environment – the view that it is valuable in itself. Their argument, incidentally, falls under both the libertarian extension and the ecologic extension.

Peter Singer's work can be categorized under Marshall's ecologic extension. He reasoned that the "expanding circle of moral worth" should be redrawn to include the rights of non-human animals, and to not do so would be guilty of speciesism. Singer found it difficult to accept the argument from intrinsic worth of a-biotic or "non-sentient" (non-conscious) entities, and concluded in his first edition of "Practical Ethics" that they should not be included in the expanding circle of moral worth.[7] This approach is essentially then, bio-centric. However, in a later edition of "Practical Ethics" after the work of Naess and Sessions, Singer admits that, although unconvinced by deep ecology, the argument from intrinsic value of non-sentient entities is plausible, but at best problematic. We shall see later that Singer actually advocated a humanist ethic.....

Ecologic extension

Alan Marshall's ecologic extension places emphasis not on human rights but on the recognition of the fundamental interdependence of all biological and abiological entities and their essential diversity. Where as Libertarian Extension can be thought of as flowing from a political reflection of the natural world, Ecologic Extension is best thought of as a scientific reflection of the natural world. Ecological Extension is roughly the same classification of Smith’s eco-holism, and it argues for the intrinsic value inherent in collective ecological entities like ecosystems or the global environment as a whole entity.

This category includes James Lovelock's Gaia hypothesis; the theory that the planet earth alters its geo-physiological structure over time in order to ensure the continuation of an equilibrium of evolving organic and inorganic matter. The planet is characterized as a unified, holistic entity with ethical worth of which the human race is of no particular significance in the long run.

Conservation ethics

Marshall's conservation ethics looks only at the worth of the environment in terms of its utility or usefulness to humans. It is the opposite of deep ecology, hence is often referred to as shallow ecology, and argues for the preservation of the environment on the basis that it has extrinsic value – instrumental to the welfare of human beings. Conservation is therefore a means to an end and purely concerned with mankind and intergenerational considerations. It could be argued that it is this ethic that formed the underlying arguments proposed by Governments at the Kyoto summit in 1997 and three agreements reached in Rio in 1992.[citation needed]

Humanist theories

Following the bio-centric and eco-holist theory distinctions, Michael Smith further classifies Humanist theories as those that require a set of criteria for moral status and ethical worth, such as sentience.[citation needed] This applies to the work of Peter Singer who advocated a hierarchy of value similar to the one devised by Aristotle which relies on the ability to reason. This was Singer's solution to the problem that arises when attempting to determine the interests of a non-sentient entity such as a garden weed.

Singer also advocated the preservation of "world heritage sites," unspoilt parts of the world that acquire a "scarcity value" as they diminish over time. Their preservation is a bequest for future generations as they have been inherited from our ancestors and should be passed down to future generations so they can have the opportunity to decide whether to enjoy unspoilt countryside or an entirely urban landscape. A good example of a world heritage site would be the tropical rainforest, a very specialist ecosystem or climatic climax vegetation that has taken centuries to evolve. Clearing the rainforest for farmland often fails due to soil conditions, and once destroyed can never be replaced.

Anthropocentrism

Anthropocentrism simply places humans at the centre of the universe; the human race must always be its own primary concern. Therefore, everything else in existence should be evaluated in terms of its utility for us.

What Anthropocentric theories do not allow for is the fact that a system of ethics formulated from a human perspective may not be entirely accurate; humans are not necessarily the centre of reality. The philosopher Baruch Spinoza argued that we tend to assess things wrongly in terms of their usefulness to us.[citation needed] Spinoza reasoned that if we were to look at things objectively we would discover that everything in the universe has a unique value. Likewise, it is possible that a human-centred or anthropocentric/androcentric ethic is not an accurate depiction of reality, and there is a bigger picture that we may or may not be able to understand from a human perspective.

Peter Vardy distinguished between two types of anthropocentrism.[citation needed] A strong thesis anthropocentric ethic argues that humans are at the center of reality and it is right for them to be so. Weak anthropocentrism, however, argues that reality can only be interpreted from a human point of view, thus humans have to be at the centre of reality as they see it.

Status of the field

Environmental ethics became a subject of sustained academic philosophic reflection in the 1970s. Throughout the 1980s it remained marginalized within the discipline of philosophy, attracting the attention of a fairly small group of thinkers spread across the English speaking world.

Only after 1990 did the field gain institutional recognition at programs such as Colorado State, the University of Montana, Bowling Green State, and the University of North Texas. In 1991, Schumacher College of Dartington, England, was founded and now provides an MSc in Holistic Science.

These programs began to offer a masters degree with a specialty in environmental ethics/philosophy. Beginning in 2005 the Dept of Philosophy and Religion Studies at the University of North Texas offered a PhD program with a concentration in environmental ethics/philosophy.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  1. ↑ Climate change victims estimated at millions in the near future, according to Christian Aid
  2. ↑ 150000 people killed already by climate change
  3. ↑ White, Lynn (March 1967). The Historical Roots of our Ecologic Crisis. Science.
  4. ↑ Hardin, Garrett (December 1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162: 1243.
  5. ↑ Leopold, Aldo (1949). "The Land Ethic", A Sand County Almanac. 
  6. ↑ Vardy, Peter. The Puzzle of Ethics. 
  7. ↑ Singer, Peter. Practical Ethics, 1. 

See also

  • Biocentric individualism
  • Biocentrism
  • Bioethics
  • Climate ethics
  • Conservation ethic
  • Conservation movement
  • Deep Ecology
  • EcoQuest (a series of two educational games)
  • Ecocentrism
  • Ecofeminism
  • Ecological economics
Wikiversity
At Wikiversity, you can learn about:
Topic:Climate change
  • Environmental movement
  • Environmentalism
  • Environmental skepticism
  • Human ecology
  • List of environmental philosophers
  • Population control
  • solastalgia
  • Sustainability
  • Terraforming
  • Trail ethics
  • Van Rensselaer Potter
  • Resource depletion

External links

Environmental science
Atmospheric sciences | Ecology | Geosciences | Soil science| Hydrology |
Related fields: Biology | Chemistry | Environmental design | Environmental economics | Environmental ethics | Environmental law | Physics |

Sustainability | Waste management

Environmental technology
Sustainability
Subdisciplines
Sustainability science · Sustainability accounting · Sustainability governance
International reports
and agreements
United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (Stockholm 1972) · Brundtlandt Commission Report, 1983 (Our Common Future, 1987) · Earth Summit (1992) · Agenda 21 (1992) · Convention on Biological Diversity (1992) · Millennium Declaration (2000) · Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005)
Philosophy and
definition
Related disciplines
Conservation biology · Environmental biotechnology / chemistry / design / economics / engineering / ethics / history / law / psychology / science / sociology
Population
Birth control · Overpopulation · Population control · Zero population growth
Consumption
Anti-consumerism · Ecological footprint · Ethical consumerism · Overconsumption · Tragedy of the commons
Technology
Environmental technology
Food
Poverty · Food security · Local food · Permaculture · Sustainable agriculture · Sustainable food system · Urban horticulture
Energy
Biofuels · Carbon footprint · Emissions trading · Energy conservation · Energy descent · Peak oil · Renewable energy · Solar power · Wind power
Materials
Industrial ecology · Recycling · Waste · Zero waste
Biodiversity
Biosecurity · Biosphere · Endangered species · Invasive species
Sustainable activities
and professions
Advertising · Agriculture · Architecture · Art · Business · City · Community (UK Sustainable Communities Plan) · Design · Development · Food system · Fashion · Fisheries · Forest management · Forestry · Industries · Landscape architecture · Living · Municipal infrastructure · Packaging · Procurement · Reporting · Tourism · Transport · Urban drainage · Urban infrastructure · Yield
Lists
Association of Environmental Professionals · Climate change topics · Conservation issues / topics · Environmental agreements / health hazards / issues / organisations / topics (sound topics / studies topics) · Global sustainability statistics
Glossaries
Climate change · Environmental science
Category · Portal

[[credits|Environmental_ethics|240985952}}

Retrieved from https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/p/index.php?title=Environmental_ethics&oldid=818208

Content is available under Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License; additional terms may apply. See Terms of Use for details.
Copyright Logo
Powered by MediaWiki