Difference between revisions of "Johannes Pfefferkorn" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
==Against Hebrew books==
 
==Against Hebrew books==
Convinced that the principal source of the obduracy of the Jews lay in their books, he tried to have them seized and destroyed.<ref name=catholic/>  He obtained from several Dominican convents recommendations to [[Kunigunde of Austria|Kunigunde]], the sister of the [[Emperor Maximilian]], and through her influence to the emperor himself. On 19 August 1509, Maximilian, who already had expelled the Jews from his own domains of [[Styria]], [[Duchy of Carinthia|Carinthia]], and [[Carniola]],<ref name=deutsch/> ordered the Jews to deliver to Pfefferkorn all books opposing Christianity;<ref name=catholic/> or the destruction any Hebrew book except the [[Hebrew Bible]] ([[Old Testament]]).<ref name=deutsch/> Pfefferkorn began the work of confiscation at [[Frankfort-on-the-Main]],<ref name=catholic/>  or possibly [[Magdeburg]];<ref name=rodkinson/> thence he went to [[Worms, Germany|Worms]], [[Mainz]], [[Bingen]], [[Lorch]], [[Lahnstein]], and [[Cologne-Deutz|Deutz]].<ref name=catholic/> 
+
Pfefferkorn did not limit his campaign against the Jews to writing. He obtained recommendations from several Dominican convents addressed to [[Kunigunde of Austria|Kunigunde]], the sister of the [[Emperor Maximilian]], and through her influence to the emperor himself. On August 19, 1509, Maximilian, who already had expelled the Jews from his own domains of [[Styria]], [[Duchy of Carinthia|Carinthia]], and [[Carniola]], ordered the Jews to deliver to Pfefferkorn all books opposing Christianity or else to destroy any Hebrew book except the [[Old Testament]]. Pfefferkorn began the work of confiscation at eitehr [[Frankfort-on-the-Main]] or [[Magdeburg]] and them proceeded to [[Worms, Germany|Worms]], [[Mainz]], [[Bingen]], [[Lorch]], [[Lahnstein]], and [[Cologne-Deutz|Deutz]].  
  
Through the help of the Elector and [[Archbishop of Mainz]], [[Uriel von Gemmingen]], the Jews asked the emperor to appoint a commission to investigate Pfefferkorn's accusations.<ref name=rodkinson/> A new imperial mandate of 10 November 1509, gave the direction of the whole affair to Uriel von Gemmingen, with orders to secure opinions from the Universities of [[Mainz]], [[Cologne]], [[Erfurt]], and [[Heidelberg]], from the inquisitor [[Jakob Hochstraten]] of Cologne, from the priest [[Victor von Carben]], and from [[Johann Reuchlin]].<ref name=catholic/> Pfefferkorn, in order to vindicate his action and to gain still further the good will of the emperor, wrote ''In Lob und Eer dem allerdurchleuchtigsten grossmechtigsten Fürsten und Herrn Maximilian'' (Cologne, 1510).<ref name=catholic/> In April he was again at Frankfort, and with the delegate of the Elector of Mainz and Professor [[Hermann Ortlieb]], he undertook a new confiscation.<ref name=catholic/>
+
Through the help of the elector and [[archbishop of Mainz]], [[Uriel von Gemmingen]], the Jews asked the emperor to appoint a commission to investigate Pfefferkorn's accusations. A new imperial mandate of November 10, 1509, gave the direction of the whole affair to archbishop, with orders to secure opinions from the universities of [[Mainz]], [[Cologne]], [[Erfurt]], and [[Heidelberg]], as well as from the inquisitor [[Jakob Hochstraten]] of Cologne, from the priest [[Victor von Carben]], and from the [[humanist]] scholar [[Johann Reuchlin]]. To justify his views, Pfefferkorn, now wrote ''In Lob und Eer dem allerdurchleuchtigsten grossmechtigsten Fürsten und Herrn Maximilian''. In April, 1510 he was again at Frankfort, and with the delegate of the elector of Mainz and Professor [[Hermann Ortlieb]], he undertook a new confiscation of Jewish books.
  
Hochstraten and the Universities of Mainz and Cologne decided in October 1510 against the Jewish books.<ref name=catholic/> Reuchlin declared that only those books obviously offensive (as the ''Nizachon'' and ''[[Toldoth Jeschu]]'') would be destroyed.<ref name=catholic/> The elector sent all the answers received at the end of October to the emperor through Pfefferkorn.<ref name=catholic/> Reuchlin reported in favor of the Jews, and on May 23, 1510, the emperor suspended his edict of 10 November 1509, and the books were returned to the Jews on June 6.<ref name=deutsch/>
+
In October 1510, the inquisitor Hochstraten and the universities of Mainz and Cologne decided in favor of Pfefferkorn's allegations that Talmud and other Jewish works deserved to be taken from the Jews. Reuchlin, on the other hand, declared that only sections of the Talmud which were specifically and virulently anti-Christian should be destroyed. The elector/archbishop, Uriel von Gemmingen, sent all the answers received at the end of October to the emperor through Pfefferkorn. Reuchlin reported independently in favor of the Jews, and on May 23, 1510, the emperor suspended his edict of 1509, and the confiscated books were returned to the Jews.
  
 
==Battle of pamphlets==
 
==Battle of pamphlets==

Revision as of 19:33, 4 August 2008

Illustration showing the humanist Johannes Reuchlin (kneeling) and wringing his hands while Johannes Pfefferkorn stands by him in a master's robes. Woodcut, Cologne 1521

Johannes (Josef) Pfefferkorn (1469 – 1523) was a Jewish-German Catholic theologian and writer who converted from Judaism and became an infamous anti-Jewish preacher. Pfefferkorn actively preached against the Jews and attempted to destroy copies of the Talmud, and engaged in a long running pamphleteering campaign against Johann Reuchlin.

Anti-Jewish writings

Born a Jew, possibly in Nuremberg, Pfefferkorn moved to Cologne after many years of wandering. After allegedly committing a burglary, he was imprisoned and released in 1504. He converted to Christianity in 1505 and was baptized together with his family.

Pfefferkorn became an assistant to Jacob van Hoogstraaten, the prior of the Dominican monastery at Cologne, and under the auspices of the Dominicans published several pamphlets alleging that the Jewish religious writings of the Talmud were extremely hostile to Christianity. The tone of his writings and the anti-Jewish policies he espoused became increasingly extreme with time and as he encountered bitter opposition from his former co-religionists.

In Der Judenspiegel (1507), he demanded that the Jews should give up the practice of lending at interest, attend Christian sermons, and do away with the books of the Talmud. On the other hand, he condemned the outright persecution of the Jews as an obstacle to their conversion, and, in Warnungsspiegel, defended the Jews against charges of murdering Christian children for ritual purposes.

In the pamphlet entitled Warnungsspiegel, he portrayed himself as a friend of the Jews who desired to introduce Christianity among them for their own good. However, he also advocated seizing the Talmud by force from the Jews. "The causes which hinder the Jews from becoming Christians," he wrote, "are three: first, usury; second, because they are not compelled to attend Christian churches to hear the sermons; and third, because they honor the Talmud."

Bitterly opposed by the Jews on account of this work, he virulently counter-attacked in Wie die blinden Jüden ihr Ostern halten (1508), Judenbeicht (1508), and Judenfeind (1509). In Judenfeind, he contradicted his earlier defense of the Jewish violence against Christians and insisted that every Jew considers it a good deed to kill, or at least to mock, a Christian. "It is the duty of the people to ask permission of the rulers to take from the Jews all their books except the Bible," he declared. He also deemed it the duty of all true Christians to expel the Jews from all Christian lands. If the law should forbid such a deed, he claimed, Christians do not need to obey it. He even went so far as to preach that Jewish children should be taken away from their parents and educated as Catholics. In conclusion he wrote: "Who afflicts the Jews is doing the will of God, and who seeks their benefit will incur damnation."

Against Hebrew books

Pfefferkorn did not limit his campaign against the Jews to writing. He obtained recommendations from several Dominican convents addressed to Kunigunde, the sister of the Emperor Maximilian, and through her influence to the emperor himself. On August 19, 1509, Maximilian, who already had expelled the Jews from his own domains of Styria, Carinthia, and Carniola, ordered the Jews to deliver to Pfefferkorn all books opposing Christianity or else to destroy any Hebrew book except the Old Testament. Pfefferkorn began the work of confiscation at eitehr Frankfort-on-the-Main or Magdeburg and them proceeded to Worms, Mainz, Bingen, Lorch, Lahnstein, and Deutz.

Through the help of the elector and archbishop of Mainz, Uriel von Gemmingen, the Jews asked the emperor to appoint a commission to investigate Pfefferkorn's accusations. A new imperial mandate of November 10, 1509, gave the direction of the whole affair to archbishop, with orders to secure opinions from the universities of Mainz, Cologne, Erfurt, and Heidelberg, as well as from the inquisitor Jakob Hochstraten of Cologne, from the priest Victor von Carben, and from the humanist scholar Johann Reuchlin. To justify his views, Pfefferkorn, now wrote In Lob und Eer dem allerdurchleuchtigsten grossmechtigsten Fürsten und Herrn Maximilian. In April, 1510 he was again at Frankfort, and with the delegate of the elector of Mainz and Professor Hermann Ortlieb, he undertook a new confiscation of Jewish books.

In October 1510, the inquisitor Hochstraten and the universities of Mainz and Cologne decided in favor of Pfefferkorn's allegations that Talmud and other Jewish works deserved to be taken from the Jews. Reuchlin, on the other hand, declared that only sections of the Talmud which were specifically and virulently anti-Christian should be destroyed. The elector/archbishop, Uriel von Gemmingen, sent all the answers received at the end of October to the emperor through Pfefferkorn. Reuchlin reported independently in favor of the Jews, and on May 23, 1510, the emperor suspended his edict of 1509, and the confiscated books were returned to the Jews.

Battle of pamphlets

The ensuing battle of pamphlets between Pfefferkorn and Reuchlin reflected the struggle between the Dominicans and the humanists.[1] Thus informed of Reuchlin's vote Pfefferkorn was greatly excited, and answered with Handspiegel (Mainz, 1511), in which he attacked Reuchlin unmercifully.[2] Reuchlin complained to the Emperor Maximilian, and answered Pfefferkorn's attack with his Augenspiegel, against which Pfefferkorn published his Brandspiegel.[2] In June 1513, both parties were silenced by the emperor.[2] Pfefferkorn however published in 1514 a new polemic, Sturmglock, against both the Jews and Reuchlin.[2] During the controversy between Reuchlin and the theologians of Cologne, Pfefferkorn was assailed in the Epistolæ obscurorum virorum by the young Humanists who espoused Reuchlin's cause.[2] He replied with Beschirmung, or Defensio J. Pepericorni contra famosas et criminales obscurorum virorum epistolas (Cologne, 1516), Streitbüchlein (1517).[2] In 1520, Pope Leo X declared Reuchlin guilty with a condemnation of Augenspiegel, and Pfefferkorn wrote as an expression of his triumph Ein mitleidliche Klag (Cologne, 1521).[2]

Diarmaid MacCulloch writes in his book The Reformation: A History (2003)[3] that Desiderius Erasmus was another opponent of Pfefferkorn, on the grounds that he was a converted Jew and therefore could not be trusted.

Works

  • Der Judenspiegel (Speculum Adhortationis Judaicæ ad Christum), Nuremberg, 1507
  • Der Warnungsspiegel (The Mirror of Warning), year?
  • Die Judenbeicht (Libellus de Judaica Confessione sive Sabbate Afflictionis cum Figuris), Cologne, 1508
  • Das Osterbuch (Narratio de Ratione Pascha Celebrandi Inter Judæos Recepta), Cologne and Augsburg, 1509
  • Der Judenfeind (Hostis Judæorum), ib. 1509
  • In Lib und Ehren dem Kaiser Maximilian (In Laudem et Honorem Illustrissimi Imperatoris Maximiliani), Cologne, 1510
  • Handspiegel (Mayence, 1511)
  • Der Brandspiegel (Cologne, 1513)
  • Die Sturmglocke (ib. 1514)
  • Streitbüchlein Wider Reuchlin und Seine Jünger (Defensio Contra Famosas et Criminales Obscurorum Virorum Epistolas (Cologne, 1516)
  • Eine Mitleidige Clag Gegen den Ungläubigen Reuchlin (1521)

See also

Notes

  1. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named rodkinson
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named catholic
  3. Diarmaid MacCulloch: Reformation: A History. New York: Penguin Books Ltd. (2004) p. 665

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • This article incorporates text from the public-domain Catholic Encyclopedia of 1913.
  • This article incorporates text from the 1901–1906 Jewish Encyclopedia, a publication now in the public domain.


External links

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.