Difference between revisions of "Emanationism" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
(re-importing the lastest version from wiki)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
{{planes of existence}}
 
{{planes of existence}}
'''Emanationism''' is a component in the [[cosmology]] or [[cosmogony]] of certain [[religion|religious]] or [[philosophy|philosophical]] systems that argue that a [[sentient]], self-aware [[Great Architect of the Universe|Supreme Being]], born from an unmanifested [[Absolute (philosophy)|The Absolute]] ("Root of Existence") beyond comprehension, ''emanated'' lower and lower [[Spirituality|spiritual]] modalities and lastly [[matter]] (the [[physical universe]]) as the resultant efflux of the Absolute.
 
  
==Key principles==
+
'''Emanationism''' is the doctrine that emanation (Lat. emanare, "to flow from") is the mode by which all things are derived from the First Reality, First Absolute, or Principle. ''Emanationism'' is a component in the [[cosmology]] or [[cosmogony]] of certain [[religion|religious]] or [[philosophy|philosophical]] systems that argue that a sentient, self-aware Supreme Being, born from an unmanifested [[Absolute (philosophy)|The Absolute]] ("Root of Existence") beyond comprehension, ''emanated'' lower and lower [[Spirituality|spiritual]] modalities and finally matter (the physical universe) as the resultant efflux of the Absolute.  Thus Creation is seen as an unwilled, necessary and spontaneous outflow of contingent beings from an infinite, unchanging primary substance. 
Specifically, that [[complexity|complex]] things are [[creation (theology)|created]] in [[nature]] is not in question either by [[Creationism|Creationists]] ([[Abrahamic religions]], etc.), Emanationists, or [[nihilism|nihilists]] and [[atheism|atheists]]; the two matters that are in question are the [[locus]] for creation and whether a [[sentience|sentient]], self-aware Absolute (‘God’) is a necessity for creation. Emanationists such as [[Pythagoras]], [[Plato]], [[Plotinus]], [[Gotama]], and others argued that complex patterns in nature were a natural consequence of procession from the One (Hen, Absolute).
+
Emanation is characteristic of Neoplatonism and of Gnosticism, and is frequently encountered in Hindu metaphysics. Aspects of emanationism can be found in the doctrines of Philo (c. 20 B.C.E. – c. 50 C.E.), a Hellenistic Jewish philosopher whose synthesis of Platonic, Stoic and Jewish values became a foundation for Christian, and later Jewish and Islamic, rational theology.  Early Christian writers modified the concept of emanation to explain the Trinity and the divine status of Jesus. The writings of Dionysius the Areopagite, which were translated into Latin around 858 by Scotis Eriugena and widely studied by the medieval scholastics.  
  
According to Emanationism, the Absolute, its nature and its activity must be inseparably one thing only, namely will, such that the nature and activity of the Absolute is both one and the same (again, will) and by its very nature is also its activity ‘to will’ and wills things to be or occur, thereby maintaining the center of the logical system of Emanationism. In addition, agnosis, or the lack of Subjective gnosis, is a primordial privation which must be corrected before a metaphysical "Oneing" (Plotinus) can occur. Through this process, the [[transcendence (philosophy)|transcendent]] yet [[immanent]] will of individuals is made self-reflexive by recollecting back further and further. Eventually it will reach that nature, the Noetic (and real) self, which is antecedent to the phenomenal, corporeal self. The ontologically trascendent yet immanent Self is seen as being one's unactualized nature, and this nature will remain unactualized until [[contemplation]] is brought to fruition, thereby bringing into actuality what had been merely [[potential]].
+
 
 +
=== Basic Term: Emanation ===
 +
The term emanation (Lat. emanare, "to flow from") is used in many contexts which are not religious or philosophical. There are also religions and philosophical systems which adhere to a doctrine of emanation without using the term at all. In religion and philosophy, the concept of emanation is always interwoven with theories on other subjects, and it is difficult to separate the fundamental aspects of emanation from these contingent  doctrines.  In modern usage, emanationism refers more to a system of cosmogony than to theology, concerning the way in which things originate from God rather than the nature of God. Basically, emanationism holds that all things proceed from one divine substance in a progression or series, where each reality arises from the previous one and the ultimate source is God.  Every derived being is regarded as being less perfect than its source, but the source itself loses none of its perfection. God, the First Source, is the ultimate, sublime perfection and remains undiminished and unchanged. 
 +
==Origins==
 +
The primary classical exponent of Emanationism was Plotinus, whose Enneads elaborated a system in which all phenomena and all beings were an emanation from the One (Hen). In Ennead 5.1.6, emanation is compared to a diffusion from the One, in three primary stages: the One (hen), the Intellect/will (nous), and the Soul (psyche tou pantos). For Plotinus, emanation, or the "soul's descent", is a result of the Indefinite Dyad, or tolma, the primordial agnosis inherent to and within the Absolute, the Godhead.
 +
 
 +
Plotinus in particular argued that there is no knowledge or sentience in the Absolute, and that all things noetic (spiritual, intellectual) and corporeal were a logos, or proportional [[phenomenon|phenomena]], of the emanation of and by the One. In Plotinian Emanationism, there are lesser and lesser potencies of [[will (philosophy)|will]] as procession occurs beginning from the One, through the noetic, or the [[soul]], finally ending in base [[matter]], which is generally seen as utter privation (total absence of conscious will).
 +
 
 +
=== Emanation, Pantheism and Creation ex nihilo===
 +
 
 +
Some scholars classify emanationism with pantheism, but there are considerable differences between the two concepts.  Pantheism is a system of reality, identifying all things as manifestations or modes of the one substance; emanation is primarily concerned with the process by which all things derive. Emanation does not necessarily imply that God is immanent in the finite world, nor that all things are substantially one. Some conceive of emanation in a pantheistic sense, as an expansion of the Divine substance within itself.  However, many emanationists regard the derived beings as being separate from their source.   
 +
 
 +
Pure emanationism regards God as the first origin of all things, from the highest spiritual realms to the most basic matter, with matter being the last and most imperfect emanation.  Some emanationist views, however, combine the idea of eternal, pre-existent matter with the theory of emanation, making God’s role one of organizing matter rather than originating it.
 +
 
 +
The doctrine of creation teaches that all things are distinct from God, but that God is their efficient cause, producing things by an act of  His will, not out of His own substance or from pre-existing matter, but out of nothing (ex nihilo).  Emanationism teaches that Divine substance is the reality from which all things derive, not by any divine act of will, but out of necessity. It is the essential nature of Divine substance to originate emanation.  Emanationism also teaches that all things are not produced instantaneously, but through gradual stages, and that the lower realms of existence are separated from God by intermediaries. 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
=== Emanation and Evolution ===
 +
The term “evolution” implies the development of one thing into something else.  When a new being is derived from a previous being by emanation, the previous being remains as it was and exists concurrently with the new being.  The process of evolution is usually regarded as progress, a movement upwards towards a more perfect existence.  Emanation, on the other hand, is a movement downwards from the infinitely perfect towards the less perfect, less pure and less divine. Perfection is the starting point rather than the end result, and those who wish to reach a higher degree of perfection must do so by regressing upwards through the stages of emanation. Ancient metaphors for emanation included water flowing from a spring or an overflowing water jar; the stem, branches and leaves a plant emerging from the roots; light or heat emanating from the sun; ripples generated by a stone dropped in a lake; and wisdom emanating from a teacher. 
 +
===  Emanationism in Judaism, Islam and Christianity ===
 +
Aspects of emanationism can be found in the doctrines of Philo (c. 20 B.C.E. – c. 50 C.E.), a Hellenistic Jewish philosopher whose synthesis of Platonic, Stoic and Jewish values became a foundation for Christian, and later Jewish and Islamic, rational theology.  It was also elaborated in the writings of Basilides (c.120-140 C.E.) and Valentinus (died c. 161 C.E.), both of whom were founders of Gnostic schools. It occupied a place of importance in esoteric teachings, including Gnostic religions and the Jewish Kabbala. The Islamic scholar Al-Farabi (870-950 C.E.) replaced the Q’uranic notion of ex nihilo with emanation, introducing the idea of salvation through rising through the stages of emanation to become one with the “Active Intellect.”
 +
Early Christian writers modified the concept of emanation to explain the Trinity and the divine status of Jesus. Origen (c.185 - c. 254) developed the idea of Logos, eternally generated out of the divine substance; the universal principle of everything particular, inner word and self-manifestation of God, one substance with God and yet lesser than God. The Logos, manifested in Jesus, originated in the divinity of God and yet was less than God. The system of emanation developed by Proclus, Plotinus and other Neoplatonists was modified in the writings of Dionysius the Areopagite, which were translated into Latin around 858 by Scotis Eriugena and widely studied by the medieval scholastics. God was portrayed as the essence of goodness and love, and other beings as emanations from His goodness.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==Key Principles==
 +
Neither [[Creationism|Creationists]] (Abrahamic religions, etc.), Emanationists, [[nihilism|nihilists]] or [[atheism|atheists]] question that [[complexity|complex]] things are [[creation (theology)|created]] in [[nature]]; the two matters that are in question are the locus for creation and whether a sentient, self-aware Absolute (‘God’) is a necessity for creation. Emanationists such as [[Pythagoras]], [[Plato]], [[Plotinus]], [[Gotama]], and others argued that complex patterns in nature were a natural consequence of procession from the One (Hen, Absolute).
 +
 
 +
According to Emanationism, the essential nature of the Absolute is the impulse, or will, to realize itself; this will manifests itself in the creative activity which gives rise to successive levels of being. This will is expressed less intensely in each progressive emanation, .
 +
 
 +
, its nature and its activity must be inseparably one thing only, namely will, such that the nature and activity of the Absolute is both one and the same (again, will) and by its very nature is also its activity ‘to will’ and wills things to be or occur, thereby maintaining the center of the logical system of Emanationism. In addition, agnosis, or the lack of Subjective gnosis, is a primordial privation which must be corrected before a metaphysical "Oneing" (Plotinus) can occur. Through this process, the [[transcendence (philosophy)|transcendent]] yet [[immanent]] will of individuals is made self-reflexive by recollecting back further and further. Eventually it will reach that nature, the Noetic (and real) self, which is antecedent to the phenomenal, corporeal self. The ontologically trascendent yet immanent Self is seen as being one's unactualized nature, and this nature will remain unactualized until [[contemplation]] is brought to fruition, thereby bringing into actuality what had been merely [[potential]].
  
 
According to this [[paradigm]], creation proceeds as an effulgence from the First Principle (the Absolute or [[Godhead]]).  The Supreme Light or Consciousness descends through a series of stages, gradations, worlds or [[Hypostasis|hypostases]], becoming progressively more material and embodied. In time it will turn around to return to the One (epistrophe), retracing its steps through spiritual knowledge and contemplation. {{fact}}
 
According to this [[paradigm]], creation proceeds as an effulgence from the First Principle (the Absolute or [[Godhead]]).  The Supreme Light or Consciousness descends through a series of stages, gradations, worlds or [[Hypostasis|hypostases]], becoming progressively more material and embodied. In time it will turn around to return to the One (epistrophe), retracing its steps through spiritual knowledge and contemplation. {{fact}}
  
==Origins==
 
The primary classical exponent of Emanationism was Plotinus, wherein his work, the [[Enneads]], all things phenomenal and otherwise were an emanation from the One (Hen). In Ennead 5.1.6, Emanationism is compared to a diffusion from the One, of which there are three primary hypostases, the One (hen), the Intellect/will (nous), and the Soul (psyche tou pantos). For Plotinus, emanation, or the "soul's descent", is a result of the Indefinite Dyad, or tolma, the primordial agnosis inherent to and within the Absolute, the Godhead.
 
 
Plotinus (a key expositor of Emanationism) in particular argued that there is no knowledge or sentience in the Absolute, and that all things [[noesis|noetic]] and [[corporeal]] were as well a [[logos]] or proportional [[phenomenon|phenomena]] of the emanation of and by the One. In Plotinian Emanationism, there are lesser and lesser potencies of [[will (philosophy)|will]] as [[procession]] occurs beginning from the One, through the noetic, or the [[soul]], finally ending in base [[matter]], which is generally seen as utter privation.
 
  
==Relationship to other belief systems==
+
=== Emanationism and Hinduism===
Emanationism is opposed to both Creationism (wherein the universe is created by a sentient God who knowingly creates it) and nihilism (which posits no underlying subjective and/or ontological nature behind phenomena). Creation itself is merely a logos (''[[Republic (Plato)|Republic]]'' 509d-511) of the Absolute which "pours forth" as lesser and lesser potencies of the One, proceeding from the One, to the Nous, then to the Soul, and lastly as utter privation, matter (hyle), or, as Plotinus called matter, "an image of an image" (cf. Plato's [[Allegory of the cave]]). The emanationist paradigm for the cosmos can be seen as the model that most logically corrects the inconsistencies, paradoxes and philosophical incongruities that are found in Creationism and nihilism. {{fact}}
+
Most of the Hindu religions portray a monistic, pantheistic view of created existence, which emanates and is inseparable from the Godhead. The following commentary on a Shakta Tantric text cites several earlier writings concerning the relationship between the Godhead and the world:
 +
<blockquote>"...(Brahman, the Godhead, said) `May I be many and born as many', and thus He made Himself into the world as it exists within Himself.  So it has been (also) said `By His mere wish He throws out and withdraws the universe in its enturety.' Also it is elsewhere said - `The Great Lord having drawn on Himself the picture of the world by the brush of His own Will is pleased when looking thereon.'  S'ruti also says `As the spider throws out and takes back its thread, so Ishvara (God) projects and withdraws the universe.' Thus the one great Lord becomes the material cause from which the world is made, as says the Text, `May I be many.'..."
 +
[Kama-Kala-Vilasa, Translated by Sir John Woodroffe, Ganesh &mp; Co. Madras, 1971, p.142] </blockquote>
 +
Some Hindu teachings portray emanation as a cyclical process which repeats endlessly.
  
===Similar belief systems===
 
Other models of Emanationism than that found in Neoplatonism are that of Advaita Vedanta and presecular [[Buddhism]], both of which posit agnosis/nescience as the principle whereby emanation (proodos) occurs, by means of contemplative and assimilative techniques, the Soul is able to assimilate (epistrophe) itself in union with the One, its nature. {{fact}} Specifically that Gotama the Buddha said, in his 'Contingent Manifestion' (paticca-samuppada) philosophical model for the cosmos, that avijja (agnosis, nescience) was the 1st principle of 'becoming' (bhava), in a 12fold chain culminating lasting in death and reincarnation; i.e. that agnosis (avijja) of the will (citta) as pertains its unrealized natural Divinity was the uncaused cause of all becoming.
 
  
 
Emanationist views are found in:
 
Emanationist views are found in:

Revision as of 02:52, 9 February 2007


Template:Planes of existence

Emanationism is the doctrine that emanation (Lat. emanare, "to flow from") is the mode by which all things are derived from the First Reality, First Absolute, or Principle. Emanationism is a component in the cosmology or cosmogony of certain religious or philosophical systems that argue that a sentient, self-aware Supreme Being, born from an unmanifested The Absolute ("Root of Existence") beyond comprehension, emanated lower and lower spiritual modalities and finally matter (the physical universe) as the resultant efflux of the Absolute. Thus Creation is seen as an unwilled, necessary and spontaneous outflow of contingent beings from an infinite, unchanging primary substance. Emanation is characteristic of Neoplatonism and of Gnosticism, and is frequently encountered in Hindu metaphysics. Aspects of emanationism can be found in the doctrines of Philo (c. 20 B.C.E. – c. 50 C.E.), a Hellenistic Jewish philosopher whose synthesis of Platonic, Stoic and Jewish values became a foundation for Christian, and later Jewish and Islamic, rational theology. Early Christian writers modified the concept of emanation to explain the Trinity and the divine status of Jesus. The writings of Dionysius the Areopagite, which were translated into Latin around 858 by Scotis Eriugena and widely studied by the medieval scholastics.


Basic Term: Emanation

The term emanation (Lat. emanare, "to flow from") is used in many contexts which are not religious or philosophical. There are also religions and philosophical systems which adhere to a doctrine of emanation without using the term at all. In religion and philosophy, the concept of emanation is always interwoven with theories on other subjects, and it is difficult to separate the fundamental aspects of emanation from these contingent  doctrines.  In modern usage, emanationism refers more to a system of cosmogony than to theology, concerning the way in which things originate from God rather than the nature of God. Basically, emanationism holds that all things proceed from one divine substance in a progression or series, where each reality arises from the previous one and the ultimate source is God.  Every derived being is regarded as being less perfect than its source, but the source itself loses none of its perfection. God, the First Source, is the ultimate, sublime perfection and remains undiminished and unchanged.  

Origins

The primary classical exponent of Emanationism was Plotinus, whose Enneads elaborated a system in which all phenomena and all beings were an emanation from the One (Hen). In Ennead 5.1.6, emanation is compared to a diffusion from the One, in three primary stages: the One (hen), the Intellect/will (nous), and the Soul (psyche tou pantos). For Plotinus, emanation, or the "soul's descent", is a result of the Indefinite Dyad, or tolma, the primordial agnosis inherent to and within the Absolute, the Godhead.

Plotinus in particular argued that there is no knowledge or sentience in the Absolute, and that all things noetic (spiritual, intellectual) and corporeal were a logos, or proportional phenomena, of the emanation of and by the One. In Plotinian Emanationism, there are lesser and lesser potencies of will as procession occurs beginning from the One, through the noetic, or the soul, finally ending in base matter, which is generally seen as utter privation (total absence of conscious will).

Emanation, Pantheism and Creation ex nihilo

Some scholars classify emanationism with pantheism, but there are considerable differences between the two concepts. Pantheism is a system of reality, identifying all things as manifestations or modes of the one substance; emanation is primarily concerned with the process by which all things derive. Emanation does not necessarily imply that God is immanent in the finite world, nor that all things are substantially one. Some conceive of emanation in a pantheistic sense, as an expansion of the Divine substance within itself. However, many emanationists regard the derived beings as being separate from their source.

Pure emanationism regards God as the first origin of all things, from the highest spiritual realms to the most basic matter, with matter being the last and most imperfect emanation. Some emanationist views, however, combine the idea of eternal, pre-existent matter with the theory of emanation, making God’s role one of organizing matter rather than originating it.

The doctrine of creation teaches that all things are distinct from God, but that God is their efficient cause, producing things by an act of His will, not out of His own substance or from pre-existing matter, but out of nothing (ex nihilo). Emanationism teaches that Divine substance is the reality from which all things derive, not by any divine act of will, but out of necessity. It is the essential nature of Divine substance to originate emanation. Emanationism also teaches that all things are not produced instantaneously, but through gradual stages, and that the lower realms of existence are separated from God by intermediaries.


Emanation and Evolution

The term “evolution” implies the development of one thing into something else. When a new being is derived from a previous being by emanation, the previous being remains as it was and exists concurrently with the new being. The process of evolution is usually regarded as progress, a movement upwards towards a more perfect existence. Emanation, on the other hand, is a movement downwards from the infinitely perfect towards the less perfect, less pure and less divine. Perfection is the starting point rather than the end result, and those who wish to reach a higher degree of perfection must do so by regressing upwards through the stages of emanation. Ancient metaphors for emanation included water flowing from a spring or an overflowing water jar; the stem, branches and leaves a plant emerging from the roots; light or heat emanating from the sun; ripples generated by a stone dropped in a lake; and wisdom emanating from a teacher.

Emanationism in Judaism, Islam and Christianity

Aspects of emanationism can be found in the doctrines of Philo (c. 20 B.C.E. – c. 50 C.E.), a Hellenistic Jewish philosopher whose synthesis of Platonic, Stoic and Jewish values became a foundation for Christian, and later Jewish and Islamic, rational theology. It was also elaborated in the writings of Basilides (c.120-140 C.E.) and Valentinus (died c. 161 C.E.), both of whom were founders of Gnostic schools. It occupied a place of importance in esoteric teachings, including Gnostic religions and the Jewish Kabbala. The Islamic scholar Al-Farabi (870-950 C.E.) replaced the Q’uranic notion of ex nihilo with emanation, introducing the idea of salvation through rising through the stages of emanation to become one with the “Active Intellect.” Early Christian writers modified the concept of emanation to explain the Trinity and the divine status of Jesus. Origen (c.185 - c. 254) developed the idea of Logos, eternally generated out of the divine substance; the universal principle of everything particular, inner word and self-manifestation of God, one substance with God and yet lesser than God. The Logos, manifested in Jesus, originated in the divinity of God and yet was less than God. The system of emanation developed by Proclus, Plotinus and other Neoplatonists was modified in the writings of Dionysius the Areopagite, which were translated into Latin around 858 by Scotis Eriugena and widely studied by the medieval scholastics. God was portrayed as the essence of goodness and love, and other beings as emanations from His goodness.


Key Principles

Neither Creationists (Abrahamic religions, etc.), Emanationists, nihilists or atheists question that complex things are created in nature; the two matters that are in question are the locus for creation and whether a sentient, self-aware Absolute (‘God’) is a necessity for creation. Emanationists such as Pythagoras, Plato, Plotinus, Gotama, and others argued that complex patterns in nature were a natural consequence of procession from the One (Hen, Absolute).

According to Emanationism, the essential nature of the Absolute is the impulse, or will, to realize itself; this will manifests itself in the creative activity which gives rise to successive levels of being. This will is expressed less intensely in each progressive emanation, .

, its nature and its activity must be inseparably one thing only, namely will, such that the nature and activity of the Absolute is both one and the same (again, will) and by its very nature is also its activity ‘to will’ and wills things to be or occur, thereby maintaining the center of the logical system of Emanationism. In addition, agnosis, or the lack of Subjective gnosis, is a primordial privation which must be corrected before a metaphysical "Oneing" (Plotinus) can occur. Through this process, the transcendent yet immanent will of individuals is made self-reflexive by recollecting back further and further. Eventually it will reach that nature, the Noetic (and real) self, which is antecedent to the phenomenal, corporeal self. The ontologically trascendent yet immanent Self is seen as being one's unactualized nature, and this nature will remain unactualized until contemplation is brought to fruition, thereby bringing into actuality what had been merely potential.

According to this paradigm, creation proceeds as an effulgence from the First Principle (the Absolute or Godhead). The Supreme Light or Consciousness descends through a series of stages, gradations, worlds or hypostases, becoming progressively more material and embodied. In time it will turn around to return to the One (epistrophe), retracing its steps through spiritual knowledge and contemplation. [citation needed]


Emanationism and Hinduism

Most of the Hindu religions portray a monistic, pantheistic view of created existence, which emanates and is inseparable from the Godhead. The following commentary on a Shakta Tantric text cites several earlier writings concerning the relationship between the Godhead and the world:

"...(Brahman, the Godhead, said) `May I be many and born as many', and thus He made Himself into the world as it exists within Himself. So it has been (also) said `By His mere wish He throws out and withdraws the universe in its enturety.' Also it is elsewhere said - `The Great Lord having drawn on Himself the picture of the world by the brush of His own Will is pleased when looking thereon.' S'ruti also says `As the spider throws out and takes back its thread, so Ishvara (God) projects and withdraws the universe.' Thus the one great Lord becomes the material cause from which the world is made, as says the Text, `May I be many.'..." [Kama-Kala-Vilasa, Translated by Sir John Woodroffe, Ganesh &mp; Co. Madras, 1971, p.142]

Some Hindu teachings portray emanation as a cyclical process which repeats endlessly.


Emanationist views are found in:

And arguably some variants of Hinduism and Buddhism and the ancient Egyptian religion.

Emanations are sometimes featured in fiction as well, especially in fantasy fiction. Some examples include:

  • J. R. R. Tolkien's Ainur of the world of Middle-earth.
  • Clive Barker's Imajica
  • Phillip Pullman's His Dark Materials
  • The Elder Scrolls series by Bethesda Softworks, in which Order and Chaos and the unity thereof are used to create a type dual Emanationism.

External links


de:Emanation et:Emanatsioon nl:Emanatie ja:流出説 ru:Эманация fi:Emanaatio sv:Emanation

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.