Difference between revisions of "Emanationism" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
m
(re-importing the lastest version from wiki)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Contracted}}
 
{{Contracted}}
[[Media:Example.ogg]]
 
'''Emanationism''' is a component in the [[cosmology]] or [[cosmogony]] of certain [[religion|religious]] or [[philosophy|philosophical]] systems that argue a [[sentient]], self-aware [[Supreme Being]] did not create the [[physical universe]], but instead an insentient [[The Absolute]] ''emanated'' lower and lower spiritual modalities and lastly matter as the resultant efflux of the Absolute. Other perspectives argue that this emanation originated in The Absolute, unmanifested "Root of Existence", through the action of the Supreme Being ('The One') at the dawn of manifestation. The only lasting place where the totality of emanationism is still observed is by [[Neoplatonism|Neoplatonists]] and some [[Advaita Vedanta|Advaita Vedantists]].
 
  
 +
{{planes of existence}}
 +
'''Emanationism''' is a component in the [[cosmology]] or [[cosmogony]] of certain [[religion|religious]] or [[philosophy|philosophical]] systems that argue that a [[sentient]], self-aware [[Great Architect of the Universe|Supreme Being]], born from an unmanifested [[Absolute (philosophy)|The Absolute]] ("Root of Existence") beyond comprehension, ''emanated'' lower and lower [[Spirituality|spiritual]] modalities and lastly [[matter]] (the [[physical universe]]) as the resultant efflux of the Absolute.
 +
 +
==Key principles==
 
Specifically, that [[complexity|complex]] things are [[creation (theology)|created]] in [[nature]] is not in question either by [[Creationism|Creationists]] ([[Abrahamic religions]], etc.), Emanationists, or [[nihilism|nihilists]] and [[atheism|atheists]]; the two matters that are in question are the [[locus]] for creation and whether a [[sentience|sentient]], self-aware Absolute (‘God’) is a necessity for creation. Emanationists such as [[Pythagoras]], [[Plato]], [[Plotinus]], [[Gotama]], and others argued that complex patterns in nature were a natural consequence of procession from the One (Hen, Absolute).
 
Specifically, that [[complexity|complex]] things are [[creation (theology)|created]] in [[nature]] is not in question either by [[Creationism|Creationists]] ([[Abrahamic religions]], etc.), Emanationists, or [[nihilism|nihilists]] and [[atheism|atheists]]; the two matters that are in question are the [[locus]] for creation and whether a [[sentience|sentient]], self-aware Absolute (‘God’) is a necessity for creation. Emanationists such as [[Pythagoras]], [[Plato]], [[Plotinus]], [[Gotama]], and others argued that complex patterns in nature were a natural consequence of procession from the One (Hen, Absolute).
  
Plotinus (a key expositor of Emanationism) in particular argued that there is no knowledge or sentience in the Absolute, and that all things [[noesis|noetic]] and [[corporeal]] were as well a [[logos]] or proportional [[phenomenon|phenomena]] of the emanation of and by the One. In Plotinian Emanationism, there are lesser and lesser potencies of [[will (philosophy)|will]] as [[procession]] occurs beginning from the One, through the noetic, or the [[soul]], finally ending in base [[matter]], which is generally seen as utter privation.
+
According to Emanationism, the Absolute, its nature and its activity must be inseparably one thing only, namely will, such that the nature and activity of the Absolute is both one and the same (again, will) and by its very nature is also its activity ‘to will’ and wills things to be or occur, thereby maintaining the center of the logical system of Emanationism. In addition, agnosis, or the lack of Subjective gnosis, is a primordial privation which must be corrected before a metaphysical "Oneing" (Plotinus) can occur. Through this process, the [[transcendence (philosophy)|transcendent]] yet [[immanent]] will of individuals is made self-reflexive by recollecting back further and further. Eventually it will reach that nature, the Noetic (and real) self, which is antecedent to the phenomenal, corporeal self. The ontologically trascendent yet immanent Self is seen as being one's unactualized nature, and this nature will remain unactualized until [[contemplation]] is brought to fruition, thereby bringing into actuality what had been merely [[potential]].
 
 
According to Emanationism, the Absolute, its nature and its activity must be inseparably one thing only, namely will, such that the nature and activity of the Absolute is both one and the same (again, will) and by its very nature is also its activity ‘to will’ and wills things to be or occur, thereby maintaining the center of the logical system of Emanationism. In addition, agnosis, or the lack of Subjective gnosis, is a primordial privation which must be corrected before a metaphysical "Oneing" (Plotinus) can occur. Through this process, the [[transcendence (philosophy)|transcendent]] yet [[immanent]] will of individuals is made self-reflexive by recollecting back further and further. Eventually it will reach that nature, the Noetic (and real) self, which is antecedent to the phenomenal, corporeal self. The corporeal self is seen as being one's unactualized nature, and this nature will remain unactualized until [[contemplation]] is brought to fruition, thereby bringing into actuality what had been merely [[potential]].
 
  
 
According to this [[paradigm]], creation proceeds as an effulgence from the First Principle (the Absolute or [[Godhead]]).  The Supreme Light or Consciousness descends through a series of stages, gradations, worlds or [[Hypostasis|hypostases]], becoming progressively more material and embodied. In time it will turn around to return to the One (epistrophe), retracing its steps through spiritual knowledge and contemplation. {{fact}}
 
According to this [[paradigm]], creation proceeds as an effulgence from the First Principle (the Absolute or [[Godhead]]).  The Supreme Light or Consciousness descends through a series of stages, gradations, worlds or [[Hypostasis|hypostases]], becoming progressively more material and embodied. In time it will turn around to return to the One (epistrophe), retracing its steps through spiritual knowledge and contemplation. {{fact}}
  
 +
==Origins==
 
The primary classical exponent of Emanationism was Plotinus, wherein his work, the [[Enneads]], all things phenomenal and otherwise were an emanation from the One (Hen). In Ennead 5.1.6, Emanationism is compared to a diffusion from the One, of which there are three primary hypostases, the One (hen), the Intellect/will (nous), and the Soul (psyche tou pantos). For Plotinus, emanation, or the "soul's descent", is a result of the Indefinite Dyad, or tolma, the primordial agnosis inherent to and within the Absolute, the Godhead.
 
The primary classical exponent of Emanationism was Plotinus, wherein his work, the [[Enneads]], all things phenomenal and otherwise were an emanation from the One (Hen). In Ennead 5.1.6, Emanationism is compared to a diffusion from the One, of which there are three primary hypostases, the One (hen), the Intellect/will (nous), and the Soul (psyche tou pantos). For Plotinus, emanation, or the "soul's descent", is a result of the Indefinite Dyad, or tolma, the primordial agnosis inherent to and within the Absolute, the Godhead.
  
 +
Plotinus (a key expositor of Emanationism) in particular argued that there is no knowledge or sentience in the Absolute, and that all things [[noesis|noetic]] and [[corporeal]] were as well a [[logos]] or proportional [[phenomenon|phenomena]] of the emanation of and by the One. In Plotinian Emanationism, there are lesser and lesser potencies of [[will (philosophy)|will]] as [[procession]] occurs beginning from the One, through the noetic, or the [[soul]], finally ending in base [[matter]], which is generally seen as utter privation.
 +
 +
==Relationship to other belief systems==
 
Emanationism is opposed to both Creationism (wherein the universe is created by a sentient God who knowingly creates it) and nihilism (which posits no underlying subjective and/or ontological nature behind phenomena). Creation itself is merely a logos (''[[Republic (Plato)|Republic]]'' 509d-511) of the Absolute which "pours forth" as lesser and lesser potencies of the One, proceeding from the One, to the Nous, then to the Soul, and lastly as utter privation, matter (hyle), or, as Plotinus called matter, "an image of an image" (cf. Plato's [[Allegory of the cave]]). The emanationist paradigm for the cosmos can be seen as the model that most logically corrects the inconsistencies, paradoxes and philosophical incongruities that are found in Creationism and nihilism. {{fact}}
 
Emanationism is opposed to both Creationism (wherein the universe is created by a sentient God who knowingly creates it) and nihilism (which posits no underlying subjective and/or ontological nature behind phenomena). Creation itself is merely a logos (''[[Republic (Plato)|Republic]]'' 509d-511) of the Absolute which "pours forth" as lesser and lesser potencies of the One, proceeding from the One, to the Nous, then to the Soul, and lastly as utter privation, matter (hyle), or, as Plotinus called matter, "an image of an image" (cf. Plato's [[Allegory of the cave]]). The emanationist paradigm for the cosmos can be seen as the model that most logically corrects the inconsistencies, paradoxes and philosophical incongruities that are found in Creationism and nihilism. {{fact}}
  
Other models of Emanationism than that found in Neoplatonism are that of Advaita Vedanta and presecular [[Buddhism]], both of which posit agnosis/nescience as the principle whereby emanation (proodos) occurs, by means of contemplative and assimilative techniques, the Soul is able to assimilate (epistrophe) itself in union with the One, its nature. {{fact}}
+
===Similar belief systems===
 +
Other models of Emanationism than that found in Neoplatonism are that of Advaita Vedanta and presecular [[Buddhism]], both of which posit agnosis/nescience as the principle whereby emanation (proodos) occurs, by means of contemplative and assimilative techniques, the Soul is able to assimilate (epistrophe) itself in union with the One, its nature. {{fact}} Specifically that Gotama the Buddha said, in his 'Contingent Manifestion' (paticca-samuppada) philosophical model for the cosmos, that avijja (agnosis, nescience) was the 1st principle of 'becoming' (bhava), in a 12fold chain culminating lasting in death and reincarnation; i.e. that agnosis (avijja) of the will (citta) as pertains its unrealized natural Divinity was the uncaused cause of all becoming.
  
 
Emanationist views are found in:
 
Emanationist views are found in:
Line 26: Line 31:
 
*[[Kabbalah]]
 
*[[Kabbalah]]
 
*[[Surat Shabd Yoga|Surat Shabda Yoga]]
 
*[[Surat Shabd Yoga|Surat Shabda Yoga]]
*[[Rosicrucian|Rosicrucianism]]
+
*[[Sufism]]
*[[Esoteric Christianity]]
+
*[[Druze]]
And arguably some variants of [[Hinduism]] and [[Buddhism]] and the ancient [[Egyptian religion]].
+
*[[Rosicrucian|Rosicrucianism]] ([[Esoteric Christianity|Esoteric Christian]])
 +
*etc.
 +
And arguably some variants of [[Hinduism]] and [[Buddhism]] and the [[ancient Egyptian religion]].
  
 
Emanations are sometimes featured in [[fiction]] as well, especially in [[fantasy]] fiction. Some examples include:
 
Emanations are sometimes featured in [[fiction]] as well, especially in [[fantasy]] fiction. Some examples include:
*[[J. R. R. Tolkien]]'s [[Ainur]] of the world of [[Middle-earth]].
+
*[[J. R. R. Tolkien]]'s [[Ainu (Middle-earth)|Ainur]] of the world of [[Middle-earth]].
 
*[[Clive Barker]]'s [[Imajica]]
 
*[[Clive Barker]]'s [[Imajica]]
 
*[[Phillip Pullman]]'s [[His Dark Materials]]
 
*[[Phillip Pullman]]'s [[His Dark Materials]]
Line 41: Line 48:
  
  
[[Category:Religious philosophy and doctrine]]
+
[[Category:Theology]]
 
[[Category:Esoteric cosmology]]
 
[[Category:Esoteric cosmology]]
 
[[Category:Spiritual evolution]]
 
[[Category:Spiritual evolution]]
Line 48: Line 55:
 
[[Category:Shabd paths]]
 
[[Category:Shabd paths]]
 
[[Category:Singular God]]
 
[[Category:Singular God]]
 +
 +
 +
[[de:Emanation]]
 +
[[et:Emanatsioon]]
 +
[[nl:Emanatie]]
 +
[[ja:流出説]]
 +
[[ru:Эманация]]
 +
[[fi:Emanaatio]]
 +
[[sv:Emanation]]
 +
 +
 
[[Category:Philosophy and religion]]
 
[[Category:Philosophy and religion]]
  
{{Credit|64241053}}
+
{{Credit|87588662}}

Revision as of 16:52, 22 December 2006


Template:Planes of existence Emanationism is a component in the cosmology or cosmogony of certain religious or philosophical systems that argue that a sentient, self-aware Supreme Being, born from an unmanifested The Absolute ("Root of Existence") beyond comprehension, emanated lower and lower spiritual modalities and lastly matter (the physical universe) as the resultant efflux of the Absolute.

Key principles

Specifically, that complex things are created in nature is not in question either by Creationists (Abrahamic religions, etc.), Emanationists, or nihilists and atheists; the two matters that are in question are the locus for creation and whether a sentient, self-aware Absolute (‘God’) is a necessity for creation. Emanationists such as Pythagoras, Plato, Plotinus, Gotama, and others argued that complex patterns in nature were a natural consequence of procession from the One (Hen, Absolute).

According to Emanationism, the Absolute, its nature and its activity must be inseparably one thing only, namely will, such that the nature and activity of the Absolute is both one and the same (again, will) and by its very nature is also its activity ‘to will’ and wills things to be or occur, thereby maintaining the center of the logical system of Emanationism. In addition, agnosis, or the lack of Subjective gnosis, is a primordial privation which must be corrected before a metaphysical "Oneing" (Plotinus) can occur. Through this process, the transcendent yet immanent will of individuals is made self-reflexive by recollecting back further and further. Eventually it will reach that nature, the Noetic (and real) self, which is antecedent to the phenomenal, corporeal self. The ontologically trascendent yet immanent Self is seen as being one's unactualized nature, and this nature will remain unactualized until contemplation is brought to fruition, thereby bringing into actuality what had been merely potential.

According to this paradigm, creation proceeds as an effulgence from the First Principle (the Absolute or Godhead). The Supreme Light or Consciousness descends through a series of stages, gradations, worlds or hypostases, becoming progressively more material and embodied. In time it will turn around to return to the One (epistrophe), retracing its steps through spiritual knowledge and contemplation. [citation needed]

Origins

The primary classical exponent of Emanationism was Plotinus, wherein his work, the Enneads, all things phenomenal and otherwise were an emanation from the One (Hen). In Ennead 5.1.6, Emanationism is compared to a diffusion from the One, of which there are three primary hypostases, the One (hen), the Intellect/will (nous), and the Soul (psyche tou pantos). For Plotinus, emanation, or the "soul's descent", is a result of the Indefinite Dyad, or tolma, the primordial agnosis inherent to and within the Absolute, the Godhead.

Plotinus (a key expositor of Emanationism) in particular argued that there is no knowledge or sentience in the Absolute, and that all things noetic and corporeal were as well a logos or proportional phenomena of the emanation of and by the One. In Plotinian Emanationism, there are lesser and lesser potencies of will as procession occurs beginning from the One, through the noetic, or the soul, finally ending in base matter, which is generally seen as utter privation.

Relationship to other belief systems

Emanationism is opposed to both Creationism (wherein the universe is created by a sentient God who knowingly creates it) and nihilism (which posits no underlying subjective and/or ontological nature behind phenomena). Creation itself is merely a logos (Republic 509d-511) of the Absolute which "pours forth" as lesser and lesser potencies of the One, proceeding from the One, to the Nous, then to the Soul, and lastly as utter privation, matter (hyle), or, as Plotinus called matter, "an image of an image" (cf. Plato's Allegory of the cave). The emanationist paradigm for the cosmos can be seen as the model that most logically corrects the inconsistencies, paradoxes and philosophical incongruities that are found in Creationism and nihilism. [citation needed]

Similar belief systems

Other models of Emanationism than that found in Neoplatonism are that of Advaita Vedanta and presecular Buddhism, both of which posit agnosis/nescience as the principle whereby emanation (proodos) occurs, by means of contemplative and assimilative techniques, the Soul is able to assimilate (epistrophe) itself in union with the One, its nature. [citation needed] Specifically that Gotama the Buddha said, in his 'Contingent Manifestion' (paticca-samuppada) philosophical model for the cosmos, that avijja (agnosis, nescience) was the 1st principle of 'becoming' (bhava), in a 12fold chain culminating lasting in death and reincarnation; i.e. that agnosis (avijja) of the will (citta) as pertains its unrealized natural Divinity was the uncaused cause of all becoming.

Emanationist views are found in:

And arguably some variants of Hinduism and Buddhism and the ancient Egyptian religion.

Emanations are sometimes featured in fiction as well, especially in fantasy fiction. Some examples include:

  • J. R. R. Tolkien's Ainur of the world of Middle-earth.
  • Clive Barker's Imajica
  • Phillip Pullman's His Dark Materials
  • The Elder Scrolls series by Bethesda Softworks, in which Order and Chaos and the unity thereof are used to create a type dual Emanationism.

External links


de:Emanation et:Emanatsioon nl:Emanatie ja:流出説 ru:Эманация fi:Emanaatio sv:Emanation

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.