Difference between revisions of "Donatist" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
Line 13: Line 13:
 
== The Donatist churches ==
 
== The Donatist churches ==
  
Donatist primary disagreement with the rest of the Church was over the treatment of those who renounced their faith during the Persecution ([[303]]–[[305]]) of [[Diocletian]], a disagreement that had implications both for the Church's understanding of the Sacrament of Penance and of the other sacraments in general.
+
The Donatist's primary disagreement with the rest of the Church over the question of the legitimacy of sacraments dispensed by ''traditores''.
 +
The Donatists refused to accept the sacraments and spiritual authority of the priests and bishops who had fallen away from the faith during the persecution.  Under the Emperor Constantine, the issue became particularly intense, as many fallen-away priests returned to the Church to take advantage of the favored positions they would now having under Constantine's protection and support. The Donatists, however, proclaimed that any sacraments celebrated by these ''lapsed'' priests and bishops were invalid.
  
The rest of the Church was far more forgiving of these people than the Donatists were. The Donatists refused to accept the sacraments and spiritual authority of the priests and bishops who had fallen away from the faith during the persecution. Many church leaders had gone so far as to turn Christians over to Roman authorities and had handed over sacred religious texts to authorities to be publicly burned. These people were called [[traditors]] ("people who had handed over"). These ''traditors'' had returned to positions of authority under Constantine, and the Donatists proclaimed that any sacraments celebrated by these priests and bishops were invalid.
+
Two theological questions now confronted the Church as a result of the schism. The first was whether the sacrament of ''[[penance]]'' can effect a reconciliation whereby the apostate, specifically the ''traditor'', may be returned to full communion. The Catholic position was "yes, although at the time the Church still followed a tradition in which the penitent for such a grievous offense might spend years of public contrition before being admitted to the [[Eucharist]] again. The Donatists, on the other hand, held that such a crime, after the forgiveness of [[baptism]], rendered one unfit for further membership in the Church. Indeed, the term "''Catholic'' (universal) Church" came into use during this time to express the universality of the Catholic position versus the more narrow definition of holiness expressed by the Donatists.
  
The first question, therefore, was whether the Sacrament of Penance can effect a reconciliation whereby the apostate, or in some cases specifically the traditor, may be returned to full communion. The Catholic position was that the sacrament was for precisely such cases, though at the time the Church still followed the discipline of public penance whereby a penitent for such a grievous offense would spend years, even decades, first outside the doors of the church begging for the prayers of those entering, then kneeling inside the church building during services, then standing with the congregation, and finally receiving the Eucharist again in a long progress toward full reconciliation. The Donatists held that such a crime, after the forgiveness of Baptism, rendered one unfit for further membership in the Church, a position of extreme rigorism.
+
The second question was the validity of sacraments conferred by priests and bishops who had been apostates under the persecution. The Donatists held that such sacraments were invalid. By their sinful act, ''lapsed'' clerics had rendered themselves incapable of celebrating valid sacraments. The Catholic position was that the validity of the sacrament depends upon the holiness of God, not the minister being a mere instrument of God's work, so that any priest or bishop, even one in a state of mortal sin, is capable of adminstering a valid sacrament. The pertained not only the Eucharist, which was administered on a weekly or even a daily basis, but also to baptisms, ordinations, marriages, and last rites.  
  
The second question was the validity of sacraments confected by priests and bishops who had been apostates under the persecution. The Donatists held that all such sacraments were invalid: by their sinful act, such clerics had rendered themselves incapable of celebrating valid sacraments. This is known as ''ex opere operandi'' — Latin for "from the work of the one doing the working," that is, that the validity of the sacrament depends upon the worthyness and holiness of the minister confecting it. The Catholic position was (and is) ''ex opera operato'', "from the work having been worked" in other words, that the validity of the sacrament depends upon the holiness of God, the minister being a mere instrument of God's work, so that any priest or bishop, even one in a state of mortal sin, who speaks the formula of the sacrament with valid matter and the intent of causing the sacrament to occur acts validly. Hence, to the Donatists, a priest who had been an apostate but who repented could speak the words of consecration forever, but he could no longer confect the Eucharist. To the Catholics, a person who received the Eucharist from the hands of even an unrepentant sinning priest still received Christ's Body and Blood, their own sacramental life being undamaged by the priests faults.  
+
Many towns were divided between Donatist and non-Donatist congregations. Constantine, as emperor, soon involved himself in the dispute. His edict of 313 promised the Church of Africa his protection and favor, but not the Donatists. In 314 Constantine called a council at [[Arles]] in France. The issue was debated and the decision went against the Donatists. The Donatists, already suspicious of any cooperation between the Church and the Empire, refused to accept the decision of the council. After Donatus was officially deposed as bishop by a council headed by the Bishop of Rome, the Donatists uncharacteristically appealed directly to the Emperor. At Milan in 316, Consantine ruled that Cæcilianus, not Donatus was the rightful bishop of Catharge.
  
As a result, many towns were divided between Donatist and non-Donatist congregations. The sect had particularly developed and grown in North Africa. Constantine, as emperor, began to get involved in the dispute, and in 314 he called a council at [[Arles]] in France; the issue was debated and the decision went against the Donatists. The Donatists refused to accept the decision of the council, their distaste for bishops who had collaborated with Rome came out of their broader view of the Roman empire.
+
In 317 Constantine sent troops to force the Donatists in Carthage to submit. Thus, for the first time, the Christians of one faction used the military and police power of the state to persecute other Christians. Constantine's actions resulted in banishments and even executions. It also failed completely, as the Donatists grew all the more fierce in their convictions, and Constantine was forced to withdraw in 321.
  
After the [[Constantinian shift]], when other Christians accepted the emperor as a leader in the church, the Donatists continued to see the emperor as the devil. In particular, the birth of the Donatist movement came out of opposition to the appointment of [[Caecilian (bishop)|Caecilian]] as bishop of Carthage in 312, because of his pro-government stance. In 317 Constantine sent troops to deal with the Donatists in Carthage, for the first time Christian persecuting Christian. It resulted in banishments and even executions. It failed completely and Constantine had to withdraw and cancel the persecutions in 321.
+
Constantine's son, Constans, launched a new wave of persecutions against the Donatists. Elements of the Donatists coalesced with the more radical Circumcelliones in opposition. By the time Cæcilianus in 345, all hope of peaceful reconciliation of the two Donatists and Catholics had past. Constans succeeded in repressing the movement somewhat, and Donatus himself was banished. The accession of Julian the Apostate, however, relaxed the restrictions against the Donatists as Julian sought to encourage those who opposed the Catholics' power. Althogh Donatus had by this time died, Julian appointed Parmenianus
  
More laws against the Donatists were issued by [[Valentinian I]], after the defeat of the Donatist [[Roman usurper|usurper]] [[Firmus (4th century usurper)|Firmus]] in Northern Africa.
+
For a time, the Donatist [[Roman usurper|usurper]] [[Firmus (4th century usurper)|Firmus]] ruled an independent Donatist government in North Africa. AFter his revolt was put down, however, more laws against the Donatists were issued by Emperor [[Valentinian I]].
  
Donatists were more than just an opposition movement. They also had a distinctive worship style, emphasizing ‘mystical union of the righteous inspired by the Holy Spirit and instructed by the Bible.<ref>Murray, Stuart, [http://www.anabaptistnetwork.com/donatists The Donatists] &mdash; A fairly in-depth article on the origins of the Donatists, their fluctuating fortunes between 317 and 535, and their beliefs.</ref> [[Anabaptists]] and other church traditions have looked to Donatists as historical predecessors because of their opposition to the union of state and church, their emphasis on discipleship and, in some cases, their commitment to nonviolence and social justice.  Like those in the [[Protestant Reformation#The Radical Reformation|Radical Reformation]] in the [[16th century]], the Donatists saw the [[Roman Catholic Church|Catholics]] as impure and corrupted.
+
In addition to their theological and political differences with the Catholics, the Donatists also evolved a distinctive worship style, emphasizing what one commentor calls "mystical union of the righteous inspired by the Holy Spirit and instructed by the Bible."<ref>Murray, Stuart, [http://www.anabaptistnetwork.com/donatists The Donatists] &mdash; A fairly in-depth article on the origins of the Donatists, their fluctuating fortunes between 317 and 535, and their beliefs.</ref> In this they may have inherited some of the former zeal of an earlier heretical movement centered in Carthage, namely the Montanists. Indeed, the Donatists consciouly drew from the writings of the pietist Church Father [[Tertullian]], who had been a Montanist in his later years, as well as his fellow Carthaginian and champion of holiness, Saint[[Cyprian]]. Later, [[Anabaptists]] and other Protestant traditions have looked to Donatists as historical predecessors because of their opposition to the union of [[Church and state]], their emphasis on discipleship and, in some cases, their opposition to the corruption of the Catholic hierarchy.
  
The Donatists also drew their beliefs from the writings of [[Tertullian]] and [[Cyprian]].
+
In the early fifth century Saint [[Augustine of Hippo|Augustine]] campaigned strongly against the Donatist belief throughout his tenure as Bishop of Hippo, and through his efforts the Catholic Church gained the upper hand. His view, which was also the majority view within the Church, was that it was the office of priest, not the personal character of the incumbent, that gave validity to the celebration of the sacraments. Augustine's writings also provided a justification for the state's use of violence to intervene on behalf of orthodoxy, a view which was put to much use by the medieval Church in its various campaigns against [[heresy]].
  
[[Augustine of Hippo|Augustine]] campaigned against this heterodox belief throughout his tenure as bishop of Hippo, and through his efforts the Catholic Church gained the upper hand. His view, which was also the majority view within the Church, was that it was the office of priest, not the personal character of the incumbent, that gave validity to the celebration of the sacraments.
+
In [[409]], [[Marcellinus of Carthage]], Emperor [[Honorius (emperor)|Honorius]]'s secretary of state, decreed the group heretical and demanded that they give up their churches. The Donastists were so harshly persecuted by the Roman authorities, and even Augustine, who had earlier justified the state's intervention, protested at their treatment.
  
In [[409]], [[Marcellinus of Carthage]], Emperor [[Honorius (emperor)|Honorius]]'s secretary of state, decreed the group heretical and demanded that they give up their churches.  They were harshly persecuted by the Roman authorities, and even Augustine protested at their treatment.
+
Honorius' successes in putting down the Donatists, however, were reversed when the [[Vandals]] conquered [[North Africa]]. Donatism survived the Vandal occupation and also the [[Byzantine Empire|Byzantine]] reconquest under [[Justinian I]], although it was substantially weakened. It persisted even into the [[Muslim]] period.
 
 
Nevertheless, his successes were reversed when the [[Vandals]] conquered [[North Africa]]. Donatism survived the Vandal occupation and the [[Byzantine Empire|Byzantine]] reconquest under [[Justinian I]]. It is unknown how long this belief persisted into the [[Muslim]] period, but some Christian historians believe the Donatist schism and the discord it caused in the Christian community made the takeover of the region by Islam easier.{{citation needed}}
 

Revision as of 03:53, 11 August 2007

The Donatist movement was a branch of Christianity in north Africa which began in 311 C.E. and flourished for a century until the Council Carthage in 411. Named for

Background

The Donastist movement's roots can be found in the persecution of the Christian church under Emperor Diocletian. On February 24, 303 the Emperor banned the Christian religion and commanded both the destruction of the churches and the buring of Christian scriptures. In 304, he issued an edicting declaring the Christians must be willing to offer incense at the altars of the state or face death. The persecution lasted only a brief time in Africa but it was particularly severe there. Many martyrs met their death as a result, some willingly informing authorities that they possessed sacred scriptures but refused to give them up. Mensurius, the Bishop of Carthage, forbade such practices and admitted to handing over "heretical" scriptures to the authorities while hiding legitimate scriptures in his home. On the other handSecundus, the Bishop of Numidia praised the martyrs of his province who had been put to death for refusing to deliver up the scriptures. He declared himself "not a traditor"—a term refering to those who had cooperated with authorities by giving them either holy scriptures, sacred church vessels, or the names and persons of fellow Christians.

Some of the Christians of Carthage and other cities broke off relations with Mensurius, considering him, rightly or wrongly, a traditor. Minutes of state investations indeed show that some bishops cooperated with the state, being willing to hand over all that the state required, except, in some cases, their fellow Christians.

By 305 the persecution had abated and a church council, or synod, was held at the African city of Cirta. Bishop Secundus, however, launched an investigation to ensure that there were no traditores present. Shockingly, it was determined that most of the bishops present fell under one definition or another of the term. Later, when Mensurius died in 311, his archdeacon, Cæcilianus, succeeded him, but without consultation with the Secundus and the nother Numidian bishops. Numidian bishops felt much offended at the slight shown to them, and allied themselves with the rigorists. Secundus now convened another synod, and when Cæcilianus failed to appear to defend himself, he was deposed and excommunicated. The synod elected Majorinus in his place as Bishop of Catharge. When Majorinus himself soon died in 313, his successor would be Donatus. It is from this Donatus that the Donatist schism received its name.

Cathage, the captial city, now had two bishops and two competing congregations. The schism soon spread throughout the whole province, with a majority of the people, as well as a sizeable number of bishops, supporting Donatus. Outside of Africa, however, the bishops generally recognized Cæcilianus.

The Donatist churches

The Donatist's primary disagreement with the rest of the Church over the question of the legitimacy of sacraments dispensed by traditores. The Donatists refused to accept the sacraments and spiritual authority of the priests and bishops who had fallen away from the faith during the persecution. Under the Emperor Constantine, the issue became particularly intense, as many fallen-away priests returned to the Church to take advantage of the favored positions they would now having under Constantine's protection and support. The Donatists, however, proclaimed that any sacraments celebrated by these lapsed priests and bishops were invalid.

Two theological questions now confronted the Church as a result of the schism. The first was whether the sacrament of penance can effect a reconciliation whereby the apostate, specifically the traditor, may be returned to full communion. The Catholic position was "yes, although at the time the Church still followed a tradition in which the penitent for such a grievous offense might spend years of public contrition before being admitted to the Eucharist again. The Donatists, on the other hand, held that such a crime, after the forgiveness of baptism, rendered one unfit for further membership in the Church. Indeed, the term "Catholic (universal) Church" came into use during this time to express the universality of the Catholic position versus the more narrow definition of holiness expressed by the Donatists.

The second question was the validity of sacraments conferred by priests and bishops who had been apostates under the persecution. The Donatists held that such sacraments were invalid. By their sinful act, lapsed clerics had rendered themselves incapable of celebrating valid sacraments. The Catholic position was that the validity of the sacrament depends upon the holiness of God, not the minister being a mere instrument of God's work, so that any priest or bishop, even one in a state of mortal sin, is capable of adminstering a valid sacrament. The pertained not only the Eucharist, which was administered on a weekly or even a daily basis, but also to baptisms, ordinations, marriages, and last rites.

Many towns were divided between Donatist and non-Donatist congregations. Constantine, as emperor, soon involved himself in the dispute. His edict of 313 promised the Church of Africa his protection and favor, but not the Donatists. In 314 Constantine called a council at Arles in France. The issue was debated and the decision went against the Donatists. The Donatists, already suspicious of any cooperation between the Church and the Empire, refused to accept the decision of the council. After Donatus was officially deposed as bishop by a council headed by the Bishop of Rome, the Donatists uncharacteristically appealed directly to the Emperor. At Milan in 316, Consantine ruled that Cæcilianus, not Donatus was the rightful bishop of Catharge.

In 317 Constantine sent troops to force the Donatists in Carthage to submit. Thus, for the first time, the Christians of one faction used the military and police power of the state to persecute other Christians. Constantine's actions resulted in banishments and even executions. It also failed completely, as the Donatists grew all the more fierce in their convictions, and Constantine was forced to withdraw in 321.

Constantine's son, Constans, launched a new wave of persecutions against the Donatists. Elements of the Donatists coalesced with the more radical Circumcelliones in opposition. By the time Cæcilianus in 345, all hope of peaceful reconciliation of the two Donatists and Catholics had past. Constans succeeded in repressing the movement somewhat, and Donatus himself was banished. The accession of Julian the Apostate, however, relaxed the restrictions against the Donatists as Julian sought to encourage those who opposed the Catholics' power. Althogh Donatus had by this time died, Julian appointed Parmenianus

For a time, the Donatist usurper Firmus ruled an independent Donatist government in North Africa. AFter his revolt was put down, however, more laws against the Donatists were issued by Emperor Valentinian I.

In addition to their theological and political differences with the Catholics, the Donatists also evolved a distinctive worship style, emphasizing what one commentor calls "mystical union of the righteous inspired by the Holy Spirit and instructed by the Bible."[1] In this they may have inherited some of the former zeal of an earlier heretical movement centered in Carthage, namely the Montanists. Indeed, the Donatists consciouly drew from the writings of the pietist Church Father Tertullian, who had been a Montanist in his later years, as well as his fellow Carthaginian and champion of holiness, SaintCyprian. Later, Anabaptists and other Protestant traditions have looked to Donatists as historical predecessors because of their opposition to the union of Church and state, their emphasis on discipleship and, in some cases, their opposition to the corruption of the Catholic hierarchy.

In the early fifth century Saint Augustine campaigned strongly against the Donatist belief throughout his tenure as Bishop of Hippo, and through his efforts the Catholic Church gained the upper hand. His view, which was also the majority view within the Church, was that it was the office of priest, not the personal character of the incumbent, that gave validity to the celebration of the sacraments. Augustine's writings also provided a justification for the state's use of violence to intervene on behalf of orthodoxy, a view which was put to much use by the medieval Church in its various campaigns against heresy.

In 409, Marcellinus of Carthage, Emperor Honorius's secretary of state, decreed the group heretical and demanded that they give up their churches. The Donastists were so harshly persecuted by the Roman authorities, and even Augustine, who had earlier justified the state's intervention, protested at their treatment.

Honorius' successes in putting down the Donatists, however, were reversed when the Vandals conquered North Africa. Donatism survived the Vandal occupation and also the Byzantine reconquest under Justinian I, although it was substantially weakened. It persisted even into the Muslim period.

  1. Murray, Stuart, The Donatists — A fairly in-depth article on the origins of the Donatists, their fluctuating fortunes between 317 and 535, and their beliefs.