Difference between revisions of "Collective bargaining" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
[[Category:Sociology]]
 
[[Category:Sociology]]
 
[[Category:Economics]]
 
[[Category:Economics]]
 +
{{Copyedited}}{{Paid}}{{Approved}}{{Images OK}}{{Submitted}}
  
 +
'''Collective bargaining''' is the process of negotiation between a group of employees (often represented by a [[labor union]]) and their employer. Collective bargaining works toward accords on issues such as wages, hours of work, working conditions, and grievance-procedures. The parties often refer to the result of the negotiation as a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) or as a Collective Employment Agreement (CEA). The process of collective bargaining necessarily contains an element of negotiation and hence is distinct from processes of consultation, in which employers determine outcomes unilaterally. While collective bargaining is widespread and generally effective in developed nations, it is less so in those developing nations in which a large labor population exists.
 +
{{toc}}
 +
Collective bargaining may take place through the vehicle of trade unions or representatives specific to the issue under debate. In either case, the smooth and efficient functioning of society requires that, as technological and other advances continually change the working conditions for employees, these conditions be continuously monitored and adjusted. The process to achieve this must harmonize the input of both management and labor representatives, in service of the common goal of achieving the purpose of the whole, while simultaneously taking care of the needs of individuals. When this is done successfully, the entire [[community]] operates harmoniously.
  
A '''collective agreement''' is a [[labor contract]] between an [[employer]] and one or more [[trade union | union]]s.
+
==Introduction==
 +
The [[Great Britain|British]] academic [[Beatrice Webb|Beatrice Potter Webb]] reputedly coined the term ''collective bargaining'' in the late nineteenth century, using it in her 1891 publication ''Cooperative Movement'' to refer to the ongoing process of negotiation between representatives of employers and workers to establish conditions of employment. Webb aimed to characterize a process alternative to that of individual bargaining between an employer and individual employees. Others have emphasized the [[conflict resolution]] aspects of collective bargaining. The inclusion of a process of negotiation distinguishes collective bargaining from the consultation process through which employers determine outcomes unilaterally. In Britain, the most important refinement in usage defined collective bargaining as a process of rule-making, leading to joint regulation in [[industry]].  
  
'''Collective bargaining''' consists of the process of [[negotiation]] between representatives of a [[trade union|union]] and employers (represented by [[management]], in some countries by [[employers' organization]]) in respect of the terms and conditions of [[employment]] of employees, such as [[wage]]s, hours of work, working conditions and [[grievance]]-procedures, and about the rights and [[Social responsibility|responsibilities]] of [[trade union]]s. The parties often refer to the result of the negotiation as a ''Collective Bargaining Agreement'' (CBA) or as a ''Collective Employment Agreement'' (CEA).
+
The results of collective bargaining, known as the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), may include changes in [[wages]], hiring practices, working conditions and hours, layoffs and termination procedures, and benefit programs.  
  
== United Kingdom ==
+
Collective bargaining existed in Britain throughout the nineteenth century, developing later in continental [[Europe]]an countries. [[Samuel Gompers]] introduced its effective use in the [[United States]] during his leadership of the American Federation of Labor (1886 to 1924). Although a successful tool in the relationship between management and workers in developed nations, collective bargaining is less effective in developing countries that have a large labor population.
The [[Great Britain|British]] academic [[Beatrice Webb]] reputedly coined the term "collective bargaining" in the late [[19th century]]: the [[OED]] quotes her use of it in 1891 in ''Cooperative Movement''. Webb aimed to characterise a process alternative to that of individual [[bargaining]] between an employer and individual employees. Other writers have emphasised the [[conflict resolution | conflict-resolution]] aspects of collective bargaining, but in Britain the most important refinement in usage came from [[Allan Flanders]], who defined collective bargaining as a process of rule-making leading to joint regulation in [[industry]]. Most commentators see the process of collective bargaining as necessarily containing an element of negotiation and hence as distinct from processes of [[Consultant|consultation]], which lack the element of negotiation and where employers determine outcomes unilaterally.
 
  
In the [[United Kingdom]] collective bargaining has become, and has received endorsement for many years as, the dominant and most appropriate means of regulating [[worker]]s' terms and conditions of employment, in line with [[ILO Convention]] No. 84. However, the importance of collective bargaining in the United Kingdom and elsewhere in the industrialized world has declined considerably since the early [[1980s]]. Its decline in the [[public sector]] stems in part from the growth of [[Review Body (United Kingdom)| Review-Body]] arrangements provided through the [[Office of Manpower Economics]] for groups of workers, including for the majority of [[National Health Service]] staff.
+
==Collective Bargaining around the World==
 +
Collective bargaining is particularly effective in [[Collective bargaining#Europe|European nations]], [[Collective bargaining#United Kingdom|the United Kingdom]], [[Collective bargaining#Australia|Australia]], and the [[Collective bargaining#United States|the United States]]. The agreements reached by this process vary in the extent of their influence. Thus, in certain countries in Europe, there may be requirements that the terms of the negotiated settlement be extended to all those involved in the industry, whereas in Britain, their application depends on the goodwill of those involved.  
  
Despite its significance, in the United Kingdom there remains no statutory basis for collective bargaining in the fields of [[learning]] and [[training]], a situation that has attracted the attention of both the [[Trades Union Congress]] and members of the [[Royal College of Nursing]]. A coalition has formed which actively seeks to remedy this situation by expanding the scope of collective bargaining to encompass learning and training.
+
Similarly, there is variation in the particularity of agreements. In the realm of wages, for instance, a CBA may establish actual wages or merely set a minimum level. Contract negotiations may occur on the national level, or be confined to regional or local levels, depending on the structure of the industry involved.
  
== United States ==
+
===Australia===
In the [[United States]], the [[National Labor Relations Act]] covers most collective agreements in the private sector.
+
In [[Australia]], Collective Bargaining Agreements have been known as Enterprise Bargaining Agreements (EBA), consisting of an agreement between employers and groups of employees or [[labor union|unions]]. The industrial reform of 2005-2006, known as "WorkChoices" (with its corresponding amendments to the Workplace Relations Act of 1996) changed the name of such agreement documents to "Collective Agreement." State industrial legislation can also prescribe collective agreements, but the enactment of the WorkChoices reform has made such agreements less likely to occur. Parties to Australian federal collective agreements now lodge and certify these with the Office of the Employment Advocate. At the state level, the appropriate state Industrial Relations Commission certifies state agreements.
  
Many notable collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) in the [[United States]] involve major [[professional sports]] [[sports league | league]]s. Because of a history of poor relations between the players' unions and owners of all the various major leagues, as well as because of the tremendous amounts of money involved, it has become difficult in [[as of 2006 | recent years]] to work out agreements. A total breakdown in talks between the sides wiped out the entire 2004 2005 [[NHL]] [[hockey]] season, making the NHL the first major American sports league to lose an entire season to labor issues (the relevant parties reached an agreement in time to play the 2005-06 season).
+
Unlike Australian industrial relations awards, which provide similar standards for all workers in the entire [[industry]] covered by a specific award, collective agreements usually apply only to workers for one employer, although on occasion a short-term collaborative agreement (for example, on a building-site) yields a multi-employer/employee agreement.
  
The [[National Football League]] (NFL) had fears that disagreements over revenue allocation might force teams in [[2006]] to cut numerous star players in order to stay under the agreed-upon [[salary cap]].  Beyond this year, without an agreement  for [[2007]], the salary cap provisions would have sunset.  This could have caused players and owners both to seek substantially disparate compensation guidelines in their next CBA (e.g., sizes of pay increases year-to-year, the effect of signing bonuses on a team's cap, etc), raising the spectre of a strike in [[2008]]. However, on [[March 8]], [[2006]] the owners agreed in a 30-2 vote (the Buffalo Bills and Cincinnati Bengals voting against it) to accept the [[National Football League Players' Association]]'s proposal, and also settled the revenue-sharing controversy, forestalling the above scenario.
+
===Europe===
 +
Many continental [[Europe]]an countries, including [[Austria]], [[Netherlands]], and [[Sweden]], have a social market [[economics|economy]] where collective bargaining over wages is done on the national level between national federations of [[labor union]]s and employers' organizations.
  
The [[National Basketball Association]]'s [[NBA Salary Cap|CBA]] also expired in summer [[2005]], and though the two sides ultimately reached an agreement, its last expiration caused the cancellation of one-half of the [[1998-99 NBA season]] due to [[lockout (industry)|lockout]]. The NBA league has historically had poor labor relations, resulting in numerous lockouts of players and the shortening of a season.
+
=== United Kingdom ===
 +
In the [[United Kingdom]], collective bargaining has become, and has received endorsement for many years as, the dominant and most appropriate means of regulating workers' terms and conditions of employment, in line with ILO Convention No. 84. However, the importance of collective bargaining in the United Kingdom has declined considerably since the early 1980s. Its decline in the public sector stems in part from the growth of Review-Body arrangements provided through the Office of Manpower Economics for groups of workers.
  
==European experience==
+
Despite its significance in the United Kingdom, there has been no statutory basis for collective bargaining in the fields of [[education|learning]] and training. This situation attracted the attention of both the Trades Union Congress and members of the Royal College of Nursing, leading to the formation of a coalition to actively seek to remedy this situation.
Many contintental European countries, like [[Austria]], [[Netherlands]] and [[Sweden]], have a [[social market economy]] where collective bargaining over wages, is done on the national level between national federations of labour unions and [[employers' organization]]s.  
 
  
==Enterprise Bargaining Agreements in Australia==
+
=== United States ===
An '''Enterprise Bargaining Agreement''' (EBA) consists of a collective [[industrial relations|industrial]] [[agreement]] between either:
+
In the [[United States]], the National Labor Relations Act covers most collective agreements in the private sector.
# an [[employer]] and a [[trade union]] acting on behalf of [[employee]]s, or:
 
# an employer and employees acting for themselves.
 
  
On the one hand [[collective bargaining agreement|collective agreement]]s, at least in principle, benefit employers, as they allow for improved "flexibility" in such areas as ordinary [[hours of work|hours]], flat rates of hourly [[pay]], and [[performance]]-related conditions. On the other hand collective agreements benefit [[worker]]s, as they usually provide higher pay, [[bonus (disambiguation )|bonus]]es, additional [[leave]] and enhanced [[entitlement]]s (such as [[layoff|redundancy]] pay) than an [[award (industrial relations) | award]] does.  
+
Notable collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) include those between owners and players in professional [[athletics|sports]] leagues. The National Football League (NFL), National Basketball Association (NBA), and National Hockey League (NHL) all have negotiated CBAs on issues such as percentage of revenues paid to players, salary caps, pay increases, number of teams in the league, and the ease with which teams can cut players.
  
 +
Other examples of CBAs in the United States include those done by powerful [[labor union|unions]] like the United Auto Workers and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. [[Jimmy Hoffa]]'s work on the National Master Freight Agreement in 1964 led to similar wage levels and benefits for teamsters across the country, as well as the elimination of discrimination in pay based on race. The United Auto Workers has reached CBA agreements with large American automotive companies regarding the same issues.
  
Unlike [[award (Australian industrial relations)|award]]s, which provide similar standards for all workers in the entire [[industry]] covered by a specific award, collective agreements usually apply only to workers for one employer - although on occasion a short-term collaborative agreement (for example, on a building-site) yields a multi-employer/employee agreement. 
+
==CBAs in Society==
 
+
CBAs have been used as an effective method of [[conflict resolution]] in labor disputes around the world. Their use has not come without controversy however. Putting the bargaining power of an entire group of people into the hands of a few limits the voices of members, some of whom may not be pleased with decisions reached by their leaders.  
Parties endorse proposed enterprise bargaining agreements between themselves (in the case of employers the matter goes to a vote). The [[Australian Industrial Relations Commission]] then certifies them. (With the introduction of [[Workchoices]], agreements [[as of 2006 | now]] renamed "collective [[workplace agreements]]" are lodged with the [[Office of the Employment Advocate]] and are not checked for breaches of the Act.)
 
 
 
===History of enterprise bargaining agreements===
 
 
 
The Federal [[Paul Keating|Keating]] government of 1991 - 1996 introduced enterprise bargaining agreements into the Australian industrial scene.
 
 
 
===Use of enterprise bargaining agreements===
 
 
 
Enterprise agreements have proved quite popular; on 30th of June 2006, 14383 Collective Agreements were active. [http://www.workplace.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/A8262658-77DE-4BB8-B0A4-F8E5DE422C0B/0/TrendsJ06.pdf June Trends in Enterprise Bargaining]
 
 
 
In practice they served to complement [[award (Australian industrial relations)|award]]s, and in combination they became the basic mechanisms for setting [[wage]]s and [[working conditions | condition]]s in Australia.
 
 
 
A standard enterprise bargaining agreement would last for three years.
 
 
 
EBAs had one unique feature in Australia: whilst negotiating a federal enterprise bargaining agreement, a group of employees or a trade union could, without legal penalties, undertake [[industrial action]] (including [[strikes]]) in pursuit of their claims .
 
 
 
===Issues regarding enterprise bargaining agreements===
 
 
 
A major legal question associated with enterprise agreements stemmed from the [[High Court of Australia]]'s decision in the case of [[Electrolux v AWU | Electrolux v The Australian Workers' Union]]. The question revolved around what these industrial instruments could cover. The [[Australian Industrial Relations Commission]] determined the matter in 2005 in the [[Three certified agreements case]].
 
 
 
=== The future of EBAs in Australian industrial law ===
 
 
 
In the context of [[Australian labour law]], the industrial reform of 2005 - 2006, known as "[[WorkChoices]]" (with its corresponding amendments to the [[Workplace Relations Act 1996 | Workplace Relations Act (1996)]]) changed the name of such agreement documents to "Collective Agreement". [[States of Australia|State]] industrial legislation can also prescribe collective agreements, but the enactment of the WorkChoices reform will make such agreements less likely to occur.
 
 
 
Parties to Australian federal collective agreements [[as of 2006 | now]] lodge and certify these with the [[Office of the Employment Advocate]]. At state level, the appropriate state Industrial Relations Commission certifies state agreements.
 
 
 
  
 +
Additionally, as the power of organized labor has dwindled in many [[industrialization|industrialized]] countries, the efficacy of CBAs has become more limited.
  
 +
Nonetheless, an ongoing process whereby employers and employees can reach agreements over the ever-changing conditions of work in each industry is essential to the efficient functioning of any society. Whether [[labor union]]s can fulfill the role of monitoring conditions, raising issues and reaching agreements with management, or whether specific situations need ad hoc groups to further the issue, remains to be seen. In either case, successful negotiations depend on the ability of representatives of both management and workers to work together harmoniously for the benefit of all involved.
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
* Buidens, Wayne, and others. "Collective Gaining: A Bargaining Alternative." PHI DELTA KAPPAN 63 (1981): 244-245.  
+
* Buidens, Wayne. ''Collective Gaining: A Bargaining Alternative''. Phi Delta Kappan 63: 244-245, 1981.
* DeGennaro, William, and Kay Michelfeld. "Joint Committees Take the Rancor out of Bargaining with Our Teachers." THE AMERICAN SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL 173 (1986): 38-39.  
+
* DeGennaro, William, and Kay Michelfeld. ''Joint Committees Take the Rancor out of Bargaining with Our Teachers''. The American School Board Journal 173: 38-39, 1986.
* Herman, Jerry J. "With Collaborative Bargaining, You Work WITH the Union—Not Against It." THE AMERICAN SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL 172 (1985): 41-42, 47.  
+
* Herman, Jerry J. ''With Collaborative Bargaining, You Work With the Union—Not Against It''. The American School Board Journal 172. 41-42, 47, 1985.
* Huber, Joe; and Jay Hennies. "Fix on These Five Guiding Lights, and Emerge from the Bargaining Fog." THE AMERICAN SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL 174 (1987): 31.  
+
* Huber, Joe and Jay Hennies. ''Fix on These Five Guiding Lights, and Emerge from the Bargaining Fog''. The American School Board Journal 174. 31, 1987.
* Liontos, Demetri. COLLABORATIVE BARGAINING: CASE STUDIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Eugene: Oregon School Study Council, University of Oregon, September 1987. OSSC Bulletin Series. 27 pages. ED number not yet assigned.  
+
* Liontos, Demetri. ''Collaborative Bargaining: Case Studies and Recommendations''. Oregon School Study Council, University of Oregon. OSSC Bulletin Series, 1987.
* McMahon, Dennis O. "GETTING TO YES." Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association of School Administrators, New Orleans, LA, February 20-23, 1987. ED 280 188.  
+
* McMahon, Dennis O. ''Getting to Yes''. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association of School Administrators. New Orleans, LA, February 20-23, 1987.
* Namit, Chuck; and Larry Swift. "Prescription for Labor Pains: Combine Bargaining with Problem Solving." THE AMERICAN SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL 174 (1987): 24.  
+
* Namit, Chuck and Larry Swift. ''Prescription for Labor Pains: Combine Bargaining with Problem Solving''. The American School Board Journal 174: 24, 1987.  
* Nyland, Larry. "Win/Win Bargaining Takes Perseverance." THE EXECUTIVE EDUCATOR 9 (1987): 24.  
+
* Nyland, Larry. ''Win/Win Bargaining Takes Perseverance''. The Executive Educator: 9, 24, 1987.
* Smith, Patricia; and Russell Baker. "An Alternative Form of Collective Bargaining." PHI DELTA KAPPAN 67 (1986): 605-607.
+
* Potter, Beatrice. '''The Co-operative Movement in Great Britain''. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., 1891.
 
+
* Smith, Patricia and Russell Baker. ''An Alternative Form of Collective Bargaining''. Phi Delta Kappan 67: 605-607, 1986.
 
 
==External links==
 
* [http://www.ericdigests.org/pre-926/education.htm Collaborative Bargaining in Education]
 
* [http://www.ericdigests.org/2001-3/graduate.htm Graduate Student Unionization in Higher Education]
 
* [http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/lwp Labor & Worklife Program at Harvard Law school]
 
  
  
  
 
{{Credit2|Collective_bargaining|74269822|Enterprise_bargaining_agreement|74304582|}}
 
{{Credit2|Collective_bargaining|74269822|Enterprise_bargaining_agreement|74304582|}}

Latest revision as of 22:33, 7 January 2024


Collective bargaining is the process of negotiation between a group of employees (often represented by a labor union) and their employer. Collective bargaining works toward accords on issues such as wages, hours of work, working conditions, and grievance-procedures. The parties often refer to the result of the negotiation as a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) or as a Collective Employment Agreement (CEA). The process of collective bargaining necessarily contains an element of negotiation and hence is distinct from processes of consultation, in which employers determine outcomes unilaterally. While collective bargaining is widespread and generally effective in developed nations, it is less so in those developing nations in which a large labor population exists.

Collective bargaining may take place through the vehicle of trade unions or representatives specific to the issue under debate. In either case, the smooth and efficient functioning of society requires that, as technological and other advances continually change the working conditions for employees, these conditions be continuously monitored and adjusted. The process to achieve this must harmonize the input of both management and labor representatives, in service of the common goal of achieving the purpose of the whole, while simultaneously taking care of the needs of individuals. When this is done successfully, the entire community operates harmoniously.

Introduction

The British academic Beatrice Potter Webb reputedly coined the term collective bargaining in the late nineteenth century, using it in her 1891 publication Cooperative Movement to refer to the ongoing process of negotiation between representatives of employers and workers to establish conditions of employment. Webb aimed to characterize a process alternative to that of individual bargaining between an employer and individual employees. Others have emphasized the conflict resolution aspects of collective bargaining. The inclusion of a process of negotiation distinguishes collective bargaining from the consultation process through which employers determine outcomes unilaterally. In Britain, the most important refinement in usage defined collective bargaining as a process of rule-making, leading to joint regulation in industry.

The results of collective bargaining, known as the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), may include changes in wages, hiring practices, working conditions and hours, layoffs and termination procedures, and benefit programs.

Collective bargaining existed in Britain throughout the nineteenth century, developing later in continental European countries. Samuel Gompers introduced its effective use in the United States during his leadership of the American Federation of Labor (1886 to 1924). Although a successful tool in the relationship between management and workers in developed nations, collective bargaining is less effective in developing countries that have a large labor population.

Collective Bargaining around the World

Collective bargaining is particularly effective in European nations, the United Kingdom, Australia, and the the United States. The agreements reached by this process vary in the extent of their influence. Thus, in certain countries in Europe, there may be requirements that the terms of the negotiated settlement be extended to all those involved in the industry, whereas in Britain, their application depends on the goodwill of those involved.

Similarly, there is variation in the particularity of agreements. In the realm of wages, for instance, a CBA may establish actual wages or merely set a minimum level. Contract negotiations may occur on the national level, or be confined to regional or local levels, depending on the structure of the industry involved.

Australia

In Australia, Collective Bargaining Agreements have been known as Enterprise Bargaining Agreements (EBA), consisting of an agreement between employers and groups of employees or unions. The industrial reform of 2005-2006, known as "WorkChoices" (with its corresponding amendments to the Workplace Relations Act of 1996) changed the name of such agreement documents to "Collective Agreement." State industrial legislation can also prescribe collective agreements, but the enactment of the WorkChoices reform has made such agreements less likely to occur. Parties to Australian federal collective agreements now lodge and certify these with the Office of the Employment Advocate. At the state level, the appropriate state Industrial Relations Commission certifies state agreements.

Unlike Australian industrial relations awards, which provide similar standards for all workers in the entire industry covered by a specific award, collective agreements usually apply only to workers for one employer, although on occasion a short-term collaborative agreement (for example, on a building-site) yields a multi-employer/employee agreement.

Europe

Many continental European countries, including Austria, Netherlands, and Sweden, have a social market economy where collective bargaining over wages is done on the national level between national federations of labor unions and employers' organizations.

United Kingdom

In the United Kingdom, collective bargaining has become, and has received endorsement for many years as, the dominant and most appropriate means of regulating workers' terms and conditions of employment, in line with ILO Convention No. 84. However, the importance of collective bargaining in the United Kingdom has declined considerably since the early 1980s. Its decline in the public sector stems in part from the growth of Review-Body arrangements provided through the Office of Manpower Economics for groups of workers.

Despite its significance in the United Kingdom, there has been no statutory basis for collective bargaining in the fields of learning and training. This situation attracted the attention of both the Trades Union Congress and members of the Royal College of Nursing, leading to the formation of a coalition to actively seek to remedy this situation.

United States

In the United States, the National Labor Relations Act covers most collective agreements in the private sector.

Notable collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) include those between owners and players in professional sports leagues. The National Football League (NFL), National Basketball Association (NBA), and National Hockey League (NHL) all have negotiated CBAs on issues such as percentage of revenues paid to players, salary caps, pay increases, number of teams in the league, and the ease with which teams can cut players.

Other examples of CBAs in the United States include those done by powerful unions like the United Auto Workers and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. Jimmy Hoffa's work on the National Master Freight Agreement in 1964 led to similar wage levels and benefits for teamsters across the country, as well as the elimination of discrimination in pay based on race. The United Auto Workers has reached CBA agreements with large American automotive companies regarding the same issues.

CBAs in Society

CBAs have been used as an effective method of conflict resolution in labor disputes around the world. Their use has not come without controversy however. Putting the bargaining power of an entire group of people into the hands of a few limits the voices of members, some of whom may not be pleased with decisions reached by their leaders.

Additionally, as the power of organized labor has dwindled in many industrialized countries, the efficacy of CBAs has become more limited.

Nonetheless, an ongoing process whereby employers and employees can reach agreements over the ever-changing conditions of work in each industry is essential to the efficient functioning of any society. Whether labor unions can fulfill the role of monitoring conditions, raising issues and reaching agreements with management, or whether specific situations need ad hoc groups to further the issue, remains to be seen. In either case, successful negotiations depend on the ability of representatives of both management and workers to work together harmoniously for the benefit of all involved.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Buidens, Wayne. Collective Gaining: A Bargaining Alternative. Phi Delta Kappan 63: 244-245, 1981.
  • DeGennaro, William, and Kay Michelfeld. Joint Committees Take the Rancor out of Bargaining with Our Teachers. The American School Board Journal 173: 38-39, 1986.
  • Herman, Jerry J. With Collaborative Bargaining, You Work With the Union—Not Against It. The American School Board Journal 172. 41-42, 47, 1985.
  • Huber, Joe and Jay Hennies. Fix on These Five Guiding Lights, and Emerge from the Bargaining Fog. The American School Board Journal 174. 31, 1987.
  • Liontos, Demetri. Collaborative Bargaining: Case Studies and Recommendations. Oregon School Study Council, University of Oregon. OSSC Bulletin Series, 1987.
  • McMahon, Dennis O. Getting to Yes. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association of School Administrators. New Orleans, LA, February 20-23, 1987.
  • Namit, Chuck and Larry Swift. Prescription for Labor Pains: Combine Bargaining with Problem Solving. The American School Board Journal 174: 24, 1987.
  • Nyland, Larry. Win/Win Bargaining Takes Perseverance. The Executive Educator: 9, 24, 1987.
  • Potter, Beatrice. 'The Co-operative Movement in Great Britain. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., 1891.
  • Smith, Patricia and Russell Baker. An Alternative Form of Collective Bargaining. Phi Delta Kappan 67: 605-607, 1986.


Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.