Difference between revisions of "Cardinal Cajetan" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
(New page: * ''For the saint, see Saint Cajetan.'' thumb|300px|[[Martin Luther and Cardinal Cajetan, 1557.]] '''Thomas Cardinal Cajetan''' (''Ca'jê-tan'' o...)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
[[Image:Luther-vor-Cajetan.jpg|thumb|300px|[[Martin Luther]] and Cardinal Cajetan, [[1557]].]]
 
[[Image:Luther-vor-Cajetan.jpg|thumb|300px|[[Martin Luther]] and Cardinal Cajetan, [[1557]].]]
  
'''Thomas Cardinal Cajetan''' (''Ca'jê-tan'' or ''Caj'e-tan'', also known as '''Gaetanus'''),  real name '''Tommaso de Vio''' ([[February 20]], [[1469]] - [[August 9]], [[1534]]) was an [[Italy|Italian]] [[cardinal (Catholicism)|cardinal]] best known for his opposition to the teachings of [[Martin Luther]] and the [[Protestant Reformation]].  He is not to be confused with his contemporary, [[Saint Cajetan]], the founder of the Theatines.
+
'''Thomas Cardinal Cajetan''' (''Ca'jê-tan'' or ''Caj'e-tan'', also known as '''Gaetanus'''),  real name '''Tommaso de Vio''' (February 20, 1469 - August 9, 1534) was an [[Italy|Italian]] [[Roman Catholicism|cardinal]] and theologian who represented the reformation of Scholasticism during the fifteenth and sixteenth century, in response to the revival of humanism.  He joined the Dominican order at the age of fifteen and rose to be its Master General in 1508. His primary concern was to uphold the Roman Catholic church and the status of the Pope.  Extremely intelligent and highly educated, he used learning, tact, and charity to pacify opponents, correct errors, stem the tide of heresy, and prevent division within the church. He defended the doctrine of papal infallibility against the Council of Pisa and at the Fifth Lateran Council. His works included commentaries on Thomas Aquinas’ Summa Theologica and on Aristotle. He often startled conservatives with his independence of judgment, expressing liberal views on marriage and divorce, denying the existence of a material [[Hell]] and advocating the celebration of public prayers in the vernacular.
  
 +
Cardinal Cajetan is best known for his opposition to the teachings of [[Martin Luther]] and the [[Protestant Reformation]].  At the Diet of Augsburg in 1518, at the request of  Frederick III, Elector of Saxony, Cajetan was entrusted the task of examining and testing the teachings of [[Martin Luther]].  He composed several works directed against [[Martin Luther]], and because he recognized that he would require a deeper knowledge of the Scriptures than he possessed to fight the Reformers, he translated, with commentaries, the greater part of the Old and the New Testaments. 
 +
 +
He is not to be confused with his contemporary, [[Saint Cajetan]], the founder of the Theatines.
 
==Life==
 
==Life==
De Vio was born in [[Gaeta]] in the kingdom of [[Naples]], [[Italy]] on [[February 20]], [[1469]] as '''Jacopo Vio'''. The name Tommaso was taken as a [[monastery|monastic]] name, while the surname Cajetan derives from its native city.  At the age of fifteen he entered the [[Dominican order]], and, devoting himself to studies in [[Thomist philosophy|philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas]] (he is the founder of Neothomism), became, before the age of thirty, a doctor of [[theology]] at [[university of Padua|Padua]], where he was subsequently professor of [[metaphysics]].  
+
De Vio was born to a noble family in Gaeta in the kingdom of Naples, [[Italy]] on February 20, 1469 as '''Jacopo Vio.''' The name Tommaso was taken as a monastic name, while the surname Cajetan derives from his native city of GaetaHe was a devout and studious child, and at the age of fifteen he entered the [[Dominican order]], against the will of his parents.  He studied in Naples, Bologna and Padua, devoting himself to the philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas.  He became a bachelor of theology on March 19, 1492, and then a master of students at the university of Padua, where he was subsequently professor of [[metaphysics]].  He studied the humanism and philosophism which was sweeping Europe at that time, and opposed the Scotism of Trombetta and the Averroism of such men as Vernias, Pompanazzi, and Niphus, composing his treatise on Aquinas’ "De Ente et Essentiâ" (1494).  
  
A public disputation at [[Ferrara]] ([[1494]]) with [[Pico della Mirandola]] gave him a great reputation as a [[theology|theologian]]. He was made general procurator in [[1507]] and [[superior|general]] of his order a year later in [[1508]]. For his zeal in defending the [[papal]] rights against the [[council of Pisa]], in a series of works which were condemned by the [[Collège de Sorbonne|Sorbonne]] and publicly burnt by order of [[Louis XII of France|King Louis XII]], he obtained the bishopric of Gaeta, and in [[1517]] [[Pope Leo X|Pope Leo X]] made him a [[Cardinal (Catholicism)|cardinal]] and archbishop of Palermo.
+
At Ferrara in 1494, Cajetan was selected to conduct the customary defense of theses in a public dispute before the assembled dignitaries of his order, facing, among others, [[Pico della Mirandola]]. He did this so successfully that the students lifted him on their shoulders and carried him to receive the congratulations of the master general.  This episode sealed his reputation as a theologian, and he was soon made master of sacred theology. For several years he taught the "Summa" of St. Thomas at Brescia and Pavia, where he had been invited by the Duke of Milan, Ludovico Sforza. In 1500, Cardinal Oliviero Caraffa procured his transfer to Rome. In 1501 he was made procurator general of his order and appointed to the chairs of philosophy and exegesis at the Sapienza. On the death of the master general, John Clérée, in 1507, Cajetan was named vicar-general , and in 1508 he was elected Master-General of the Dominican order.  He worked constantly at promoting higher studies among the Dominicans.
 +
In 1511, Cajetan appeared in support of the pope against the claims of the [[Council of Pisa]], composing in defense of his position the ''Tractatus de Comparatione auctoritatis Papeœ et conciliorum ad invicem,'' which was condemned by the Collège de Sorbonne and publicly burned by order of Louis XII of France. At the Fifth Lateran Council (1512-17), which Pope Julius II set up in opposition to that of Pisa, Cajetan played the leading role. During the second session of the council, he brought about a decree recognizing the infallibility of the pope and the superiority of papal authority to that of councils. Under Pope Julius II, Cajetan was also instrumental in granting to Ferdinand of Spain the first Dominican missionaries who devoted themselves  to the organized  conversion of the American natives.
 +
For his services, in 1517 Pope Leo X made him cardinal presbyter of  Saint Sisto in [[Rome]], and in 1518, bishop of Palermo. Opposition from the Sicilian senate prevented him from taking office, and he resigned as bishop of Palermo in February, 1518. He was then sent as Apostolic legate to Germany, bringing the insignia of the cardinalate to Albert of Brandenburg, and a sword blessed by the pope to Emperor Maximilian, with whom he was empowered to speak about the terms of an alliance to defeat the Turks.  
  
Faithful to the traditions of the Dominicans, he appears in [[1511]] as a supporter of the pope against the claims of the [[Council of Pisa]], composing in defense of his position the ''Tractatus de Comparatione auctoritatis Papeœ et conciliorum ad invicem''. At the [[Fifth Lateran Council]] (1512-17) which Pope [[Julius II]] set up in opposition to that of Pisa, De Vio played the leading role. During the second session of the council, he brought about a decree recognizing the [[Papal infallibility|infallibility of the pope]] and the superiority of papal authority to that of councils.
+
At the Diet of Augsburg, at the request of  Frederick III, Elector of Saxony, Cajetan was entrusted the task of examining and testing the teachings of [[Martin Luther]]. Treatises written by Cajetan in 1517, before he had any knowledge of Luther's theses, show that Luther was justified in his assertion that the Church had not yet arrived at a firmly established position on the doctrine of dispensation; Cajetan also seemed to regard the doctrine of confession as a subject open to controversy. Yet he was a shrewd politician and a representative of the Pope, and appeared in all the splendor of ecclesiastical pomp which Luther associated with Rome and despised as hateful to Germans and German Christianity.  Witnesses have testified that Cajetan displayed a spirit of moderation and a lofty character, but neither his pleading nor conciliatory words had any effect on Luther. In 1519, Cajetan helped draw up the bill of excommunication against Luther.
  
For his services [[Leo X]] made him in 1517 [[cardinal (Catholicism)|cardinal presbyter]] of [[Saint Sisto]] in [[Rome]], and made him in the following year [[bishop]] of [[Palermo]]. He resigned as bishop of Palermo in 1519 to become bishop of Gaeta, as granted him by the [[Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor|Emperor Charles V]], for whose election De Vio had labored zealously.  
+
In 1519, Cajetan also represented the pope at the Diet of Frankfort , and took an active part in the election of Charles V as Holy Roman Emperor.  As a gesture of  friendship and gratitude, Charles V granted him the position of bishop of Gaeta.
 
[[Image:Luther and cajetan.gif|thumb|right|250px|The meeting of [[Martin Luther]] (left) and De Vio (right, before the book).]]
 
[[Image:Luther and cajetan.gif|thumb|right|250px|The meeting of [[Martin Luther]] (left) and De Vio (right, before the book).]]
  
In 1518 he was sent as legate to the [[Diet of Augsburg]] and to him, at the wish of the [[Frederick III, Elector of Saxony|Saxon elector]], was entrusted the task of examining and testing the teachings of [[Martin Luther|Luther]]. Treatises of his own, written, without knowledge of Luther's theses, in 1517 show that Luther was justified in his assertion that on the doctrine of dispensation the Church had as yet arrived at no firmly established position; the doctrine of confession De Vio seemed also to regard as a subject open to controversy. Yet more than investigator and thinker he was politician and prelate, and it was before him that the [[Protestant Reformation|Reformer]] appeared at the diet of Augsburg, his appearance in all the splendor of ecclesiastical pomp only serving to reveal him to Luther as the type of Roman curialist hateful to Germans and German Christianity. In [[1519]], De Vio helped in drawing up the bill of excommunication against Luther.
+
Cajetan was involved in several other important negotiations and political transactions. In the  conclave of 1521‑1522, in collaboration with Cardinal Giulio de'Medici, he secured the election of Adrian Boeyens, bishop of Tortosa, as pope Adrian VI. In 1523 he was sent by Adrian VI to King Louis of Hungary to encourage the Christians in their resistance to the Turks. Recalled to Rome the following year by Clement VII, he became one of the pope's chief advisors. During the sack of Rome by the Constable of Bourbon and by Frundsberg (1527), Cajetan suffered a short term of imprisonment, and obtained the release of himself and household only by payment of five thousand Roman crowns of gold, which he had to borrow and later made up by strictest economy in the affairs of his diocese. He retired to his bishopric, but returned to Rome in 1530 to his post as advisor to Clement VII. He was one of the nineteen cardinals who, on March 23, 1534, upheld the validity of the marriage of Henry VIII of England and Catherine of Aragon, and wrote, on behalf of the Pope, the decision rejecting Henry VIII’s appeal for divorce. Nominated by Clement VII a member of the committee of cardinals appointed to report on the "Nuremberg Recess", he recommended, in opposition to the majority, certain concessions to the Lutherans, notably the marriage of the clergy as in the [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Greek Church]], and communion in both kinds according to the decision of the council of Basel.  
 +
 
 +
Cardinal Cajetan died in Rome on August 9, 1534, and was buried, as he requested, in a humble tomb in the vestibule of the church of Santa Maria sopra Minerva.
 +
 
 +
==Thought and Works==
 +
Cajetan has been described as small in stature but a giant in intellect. In contrast to the majority of Italian cardinals of his day, Cajetan was a man of austere piety and fervent zeal. In all his responsibilities and public offices, he never neglected his daily study and writing, nor the practices of religious life. Committed to the Dominican idea of the supreme necessity of maintaining ecclesiastical discipline, he defended the rights of the papacy and proclaimed that the pope should be "the mirror of God on earth."
 +
His primary concern was to uphold the Roman Catholic church and the status of the Pope, and he used learning, tact, and charity to pacify opponents, correct errors, stem the tide of heresy, and prevent division within the church. Within the Dominican order he emphasized religious discipline and the study of theology, encouraging every member to study for at least four hours daily. "Let others rejoice in their prerogatives", he once wrote, "but the work of our Order is at an end unless sacred doctrine be our commendation."
  
De Vio was employed in several other negotiations and transactions, being as able in business as in letters. In conjunction with Cardinal Giulio de' Medici in the conclave of [[1521]][[1522]], he secured the election of Adrian Boeyens, bishop of Tortosa, as [[pope Adrian VI|Adrian VI]]. He retained influence under [[Clement VII]], suffered a short term of imprisonment after the storming of Rome by the [[Constable of Bourbon]] and by [[Frundsberg]] (1527), retired to his bishopric for a few years, and, returning to Rome in 1530, assumed his old position of influence about the person of Clement, in whose behalf he wrote the decision rejecting the appeal for divorce from [[Catharine of Aragon]] made by [[Henry VIII of England|Henry VIII]] of England. Nominated by [[pope Clement VII|Clement VII]] a member of the committee of cardinals appointed to report on the "Nuremberg Recess", he recommended, in opposition to the majority, certain concessions to the Lutherans, notably the marriage of the clergy as in the [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Greek Church]], and communion in both kinds according to the decision of the council of Basel.
+
Cajetan was part of the revival of Scholasticism which took place during the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. Though in his theology he was a scholastic of the older [[Thomism|Thomist]] type, Cajetan desired to retain the best elements of the humanist revival in harmony with [[Catholic]] orthodoxy, illumined by a revived appreciation of the Augustinian doctrine of justification. In the field of [[Thomism|Thomistic]] philosophy he showed striking independence of judgment, expressing liberal views on marriage and divorce, denying the existence of a material [[Hell]] and advocating the celebration of public prayers in the vernacular. The [[Collège de Sorbonne|Sorbonne]] in [[Paris]] found some of these views heterodox, and in the 1570 edition of his celebrated commentary on [[Thomas Aquinas|Aquinas]]' ''Summa,'' the objectionable passages were expunged. In this spirit he wrote commentaries upon portions of [[Aristotle]], and upon the ''Summa'' of [[Thomas Aquinas|Aquinas]], and towards the end of his life, made a careful translation of the [[Old Testament|Old]] and [[New Testament|New]] Testaments, excepting [[Song of Solomon|Solomon's Song]], the [[Prophets]] and the [[Book of Revelation|Revelation of St John]].
  
Cardinal De Vio died in [[Rome]] in [[1534]].
+
Cajetan wrote with calm and moderation, although he was often caught up in philosophical and theological controversies.  His more than one-hundred-and-fifteen works  include commentaries on Aquinas’ Summa Theologica; on the Categories, Posterior Analytics and De anima of Aristotle; the Praedicabilia of Porphyry; and his own writings De nominum analogia, De subiecto naturalis philosophiae, De conceptu entis, De Dei infinitate, and De ente et essentia.  Cajetan was conscious of the intellectual needs of the Church, and sought, with judgment and frankness, to provide tentative solutions for some of the theological problems which were still unsettled.  His writings on real-life moral problems covered a wide field and sometimes surprised the more conservative; he had numerous critics who attacked him just as zealously as his friends defended him.
  
==Views==
+
Cajetan did not believe that there existed a philosophically demonstrable argument for the immortality of the soul, and that it was instead something to be believed by faith alone. He therefore objected to a proposed decree of the Fifth Lateran Council, calling upon professors of philosophy to justify the doctrine of the immortality of the soul in their lectures
Though as a theologian De Vio was a scholastic of the older [[Thomism|Thomist]] type, his general position was that of the moderate reformers of the school to which [[Reginald Pole]], later [[archbishop of Canterbury]], also belonged; i.e., he desired to retain the best elements of the humanist revival in harmony with [[Catholic]] orthodoxy illumined by a revived appreciation of the Augustinian doctrine of justification. In the field of [[Thomism|Thomistic]] philosophy he showed striking independence of judgment, expressing liberal views on marriage and divorce, denying the existence of a material [[Hell]] and advocating the celebration of public prayers in the vernacular. The [[Collège de Sorbonne|Sorbonne]] in [[Paris]] found some of these views heterodox, and in the 1570 edition of his celebrated commentary on [[Thomas Aquinas|Aquinas]]' ''Summa'', the objectionable passages were expunged. In this spirit he wrote commentaries upon portions of [[Aristotle]], and upon the ''Summa'' of [[Thomas Aquinas|Aquinas]], and towards the end of his life, made a careful translation of the [[Old Testament|Old]] and [[New Testament|New]] Testaments, excepting [[Song of Solomon|Solomon's Song]], the [[Prophets]] and the [[Book of Revelation|Revelation of St John]].
 
  
Of the [[Reformation]] he remained a steadfast opponent, composing several works directed against [[Martin Luther]], and taking an important share in shaping the policy of the papal delegates in Germany. De Vio  bore witness to Luther's ability when he exclaimed, "Ego nolo amplius cum hac bestia colloqui: habet enim profundos oculos et mirabiles speculationes in capite suo." ("I do not want to have any further parley with that beast; for he has sharp eyes and fantastical speculations in his head.") Learned though he was in the [[scholastic theology|scholastics]], he recognized that to fight the Reformers with some chance of success a deeper knowledge of the Scriptures than he possessed was necessary. To this study he devoted himself with characteristic zeal, wrote commentaries on the greater part of the Old and the New Testament, and, in the exposition of his text, which he treated critically, allowed himself considerable latitude in departing from the literal and traditional interpretation.
 
  
De Vio is reported as declaring
+
==Opposition to the Reformation and Biblical Exegesis==
{{cquote|Now what a ruler can do in virtue of his office, so that justice may be served in the manner of riches, is to take from someone who is unwilling to dispense from what is superfluous for life or state, and to distribute it to the poor... as Basil said, it belongs to the indigent"
 
as statement that has seemed controversial to some. [http://lists.extropy.org/exi-lists/extropians.3Q01/0939.html] [http://www.anglocatholicsocialism.org/acsoc.html]
 
  
In contrast to the majority of Italian cardinals of his day, De Vio was a man of austere [[piety]] and fervent zeal; and if, from the standpoint of the Dominican idea of the supreme necessity of maintaining ecclesiastical discipline, he defended the rights of the papacy and proclaimed that the pope should be "the mirror of God on earth."
+
Cajetan remained a steadfast opponent of the [[Reformation]],  composing several works directed against [[Martin Luther]], and taking an important share in shaping the policy of the papal delegates in Germany. Cajetan  bore witness to Luther's ability when he exclaimed, "Ego nolo amplius cum hac bestia colloqui: habet enim profundos oculos et mirabiles speculationes in capite suo." ("I do not want to have any further parley with that beast; for he has sharp eyes and fantastical speculations in his head.")
 +
 
 +
Learned though he was in [[scholasticism|scholastic theology]], he recognized that to fight the Reformers with some chance of success he would require a deeper knowledge of the Scriptures than he possessed. In his later years he devoted himself, with characteristic zeal, to a translation with commentaries of the greater part of the Old and the New Testaments, and allowed himself considerable latitude in departing from the literal and traditional interpretation. This work began in 1523 and continued until his death in 1534.  He relied on the assistance of rabbis for translation from Hebrew, and on current Greek versions of the Bible. In a letter of dedication to Pope Clement VII, he declared his intention to ascertain the true literal sense of the Scriptures.  He did not hesitate to adopt new phraseology, as long as it did not conflict with the Sacred Word and the teachings of the Church.  His method was highly criticized in his time, but is commonly used by modern Catholic exegetics. 
 +
 
 +
His Biblical commentary caused distrust and alarm because of its wide departure from the Fathers and the theological schools.  He suggested an allegorical interpretation of the first chapter of Genesis, and anticipated nineteenth-century Biblical exegesis by questioning the authorship of several epistles, and the authenticity of certain passages.
  
 
==Works==
 
==Works==
Line 44: Line 55:
 
{{start box}}
 
{{start box}}
 
{{succession box|title=[[Masters General of the Dominican Order|Master General of the Dominican Order]]
 
{{succession box|title=[[Masters General of the Dominican Order|Master General of the Dominican Order]]
|before=[[Jean Clérée]]|after=[[García de Loaysa]]|years=[[1508]] – [[1518]]}}
+
|before=[[Jean Clérée]]|after=[[García de Loaysa]]|years=1508 – 1518}}
 
{{end box}}
 
{{end box}}
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
* "Aktenstücke uber das Verhalten der römischen Kurie zur Reformation, [[1524]]‑[[1531]]," in ''Quellen und Forschungen'' (Kön. Press. ''Hist. Inst., Rome''), vol. iii. p. 1‑20; TM Lindsay, ''History of the Reformation'', vol. i. (Edinburgh, [[1906]]).
+
* "Aktenstücke uber das Verhalten der römischen Kurie zur Reformation, 1524‑1531," in ''Quellen und Forschungen'' (Kön. Press. ''Hist. Inst., Rome''), vol. iii. p. 1‑20; TM Lindsay, ''History of the Reformation'', vol. i. (Edinburgh, 1906).
 +
*Baum, William W. 1958. The teaching of Cardinal Cajetan on the sacrifice of the Mass: a study in pre-tridentine theology.
 +
*Cajetan, Tommaso de Vio, and Fabian R. Larcher. 1980. Cardinal Cajetan's commentary on Aristotle's Categories.
 +
*McInerny, Ralph M. 1996. Aquinas and analogy. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press. ISBN: 0813208483 9780813208480 9780813208480 0813208483
 +
*O'Connor, Michael. 1997. Exegesis, doctrine and reform in the biblical commentaries of Cardinal Cajetan (1469-1534). University of Oxford.
 +
*Oberman, Heiko Augustinus. 1966. Forerunners of the Reformation; the shape of late medieval thought. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
 +
*Quinn, Wilfred J. 1958. Being as the object of the intellect according to Cardinal Cajetan. Thesis (M.A.)—St. John's University, 1958.  
 
*{{1911}}
 
*{{1911}}
 +
 +
==External Links==
 
*[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03145c.htm Catholic Encyclopedia article]
 
*[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03145c.htm Catholic Encyclopedia article]
  
Line 60: Line 79:
 
[[Category:Dominicans|De Vio, Thomas]]
 
[[Category:Dominicans|De Vio, Thomas]]
 
[[Category:Martin Luther|De Vio, Thomas]]
 
[[Category:Martin Luther|De Vio, Thomas]]
 
[[de:Thomas Cajetan]]
 
[[it:Tommaso De Vio]]
 
[[nl:Thomas Cajetanus]]
 
[[no:Tommaso de Vio Cajetan]]
 
[[pt:Tomás de Vito Caietanus]]
 
[[fi:Cajetanus]]
 
 
{{Credit|99552005}}
 
{{Credit|99552005}}

Revision as of 01:55, 4 April 2007

  • For the saint, see Saint Cajetan.
Martin Luther and Cardinal Cajetan, 1557.

Thomas Cardinal Cajetan (Ca'jê-tan or Caj'e-tan, also known as Gaetanus), real name Tommaso de Vio (February 20, 1469 - August 9, 1534) was an Italian cardinal and theologian who represented the reformation of Scholasticism during the fifteenth and sixteenth century, in response to the revival of humanism. He joined the Dominican order at the age of fifteen and rose to be its Master General in 1508. His primary concern was to uphold the Roman Catholic church and the status of the Pope. Extremely intelligent and highly educated, he used learning, tact, and charity to pacify opponents, correct errors, stem the tide of heresy, and prevent division within the church. He defended the doctrine of papal infallibility against the Council of Pisa and at the Fifth Lateran Council. His works included commentaries on Thomas Aquinas’ Summa Theologica and on Aristotle. He often startled conservatives with his independence of judgment, expressing liberal views on marriage and divorce, denying the existence of a material Hell and advocating the celebration of public prayers in the vernacular.

Cardinal Cajetan is best known for his opposition to the teachings of Martin Luther and the Protestant Reformation. At the Diet of Augsburg in 1518, at the request of Frederick III, Elector of Saxony, Cajetan was entrusted the task of examining and testing the teachings of Martin Luther. He composed several works directed against Martin Luther, and because he recognized that he would require a deeper knowledge of the Scriptures than he possessed to fight the Reformers, he translated, with commentaries, the greater part of the Old and the New Testaments.

He is not to be confused with his contemporary, Saint Cajetan, the founder of the Theatines.

Life

De Vio was born to a noble family in Gaeta in the kingdom of Naples, Italy on February 20, 1469 as Jacopo Vio. The name Tommaso was taken as a monastic name, while the surname Cajetan derives from his native city of Gaeta. He was a devout and studious child, and at the age of fifteen he entered the Dominican order, against the will of his parents. He studied in Naples, Bologna and Padua, devoting himself to the philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas. He became a bachelor of theology on March 19, 1492, and then a master of students at the university of Padua, where he was subsequently professor of metaphysics. He studied the humanism and philosophism which was sweeping Europe at that time, and opposed the Scotism of Trombetta and the Averroism of such men as Vernias, Pompanazzi, and Niphus, composing his treatise on Aquinas’ "De Ente et Essentiâ" (1494).

At Ferrara in 1494, Cajetan was selected to conduct the customary defense of theses in a public dispute before the assembled dignitaries of his order, facing, among others, Pico della Mirandola. He did this so successfully that the students lifted him on their shoulders and carried him to receive the congratulations of the master general. This episode sealed his reputation as a theologian, and he was soon made master of sacred theology. For several years he taught the "Summa" of St. Thomas at Brescia and Pavia, where he had been invited by the Duke of Milan, Ludovico Sforza. In 1500, Cardinal Oliviero Caraffa procured his transfer to Rome. In 1501 he was made procurator general of his order and appointed to the chairs of philosophy and exegesis at the Sapienza. On the death of the master general, John Clérée, in 1507, Cajetan was named vicar-general , and in 1508 he was elected Master-General of the Dominican order. He worked constantly at promoting higher studies among the Dominicans. In 1511, Cajetan appeared in support of the pope against the claims of the Council of Pisa, composing in defense of his position the Tractatus de Comparatione auctoritatis Papeœ et conciliorum ad invicem, which was condemned by the Collège de Sorbonne and publicly burned by order of Louis XII of France. At the Fifth Lateran Council (1512-17), which Pope Julius II set up in opposition to that of Pisa, Cajetan played the leading role. During the second session of the council, he brought about a decree recognizing the infallibility of the pope and the superiority of papal authority to that of councils. Under Pope Julius II, Cajetan was also instrumental in granting to Ferdinand of Spain the first Dominican missionaries who devoted themselves to the organized conversion of the American natives. For his services, in 1517 Pope Leo X made him cardinal presbyter of Saint Sisto in Rome, and in 1518, bishop of Palermo. Opposition from the Sicilian senate prevented him from taking office, and he resigned as bishop of Palermo in February, 1518. He was then sent as Apostolic legate to Germany, bringing the insignia of the cardinalate to Albert of Brandenburg, and a sword blessed by the pope to Emperor Maximilian, with whom he was empowered to speak about the terms of an alliance to defeat the Turks.

At the Diet of Augsburg, at the request of Frederick III, Elector of Saxony, Cajetan was entrusted the task of examining and testing the teachings of Martin Luther. Treatises written by Cajetan in 1517, before he had any knowledge of Luther's theses, show that Luther was justified in his assertion that the Church had not yet arrived at a firmly established position on the doctrine of dispensation; Cajetan also seemed to regard the doctrine of confession as a subject open to controversy. Yet he was a shrewd politician and a representative of the Pope, and appeared in all the splendor of ecclesiastical pomp which Luther associated with Rome and despised as hateful to Germans and German Christianity. Witnesses have testified that Cajetan displayed a spirit of moderation and a lofty character, but neither his pleading nor conciliatory words had any effect on Luther. In 1519, Cajetan helped draw up the bill of excommunication against Luther.

In 1519, Cajetan also represented the pope at the Diet of Frankfort , and took an active part in the election of Charles V as Holy Roman Emperor. As a gesture of friendship and gratitude, Charles V granted him the position of bishop of Gaeta.

The meeting of Martin Luther (left) and De Vio (right, before the book).

Cajetan was involved in several other important negotiations and political transactions. In the conclave of 1521‑1522, in collaboration with Cardinal Giulio de'Medici, he secured the election of Adrian Boeyens, bishop of Tortosa, as pope Adrian VI. In 1523 he was sent by Adrian VI to King Louis of Hungary to encourage the Christians in their resistance to the Turks. Recalled to Rome the following year by Clement VII, he became one of the pope's chief advisors. During the sack of Rome by the Constable of Bourbon and by Frundsberg (1527), Cajetan suffered a short term of imprisonment, and obtained the release of himself and household only by payment of five thousand Roman crowns of gold, which he had to borrow and later made up by strictest economy in the affairs of his diocese. He retired to his bishopric, but returned to Rome in 1530 to his post as advisor to Clement VII. He was one of the nineteen cardinals who, on March 23, 1534, upheld the validity of the marriage of Henry VIII of England and Catherine of Aragon, and wrote, on behalf of the Pope, the decision rejecting Henry VIII’s appeal for divorce. Nominated by Clement VII a member of the committee of cardinals appointed to report on the "Nuremberg Recess", he recommended, in opposition to the majority, certain concessions to the Lutherans, notably the marriage of the clergy as in the Greek Church, and communion in both kinds according to the decision of the council of Basel.

Cardinal Cajetan died in Rome on August 9, 1534, and was buried, as he requested, in a humble tomb in the vestibule of the church of Santa Maria sopra Minerva.

Thought and Works

Cajetan has been described as small in stature but a giant in intellect. In contrast to the majority of Italian cardinals of his day, Cajetan was a man of austere piety and fervent zeal. In all his responsibilities and public offices, he never neglected his daily study and writing, nor the practices of religious life. Committed to the Dominican idea of the supreme necessity of maintaining ecclesiastical discipline, he defended the rights of the papacy and proclaimed that the pope should be "the mirror of God on earth." His primary concern was to uphold the Roman Catholic church and the status of the Pope, and he used learning, tact, and charity to pacify opponents, correct errors, stem the tide of heresy, and prevent division within the church. Within the Dominican order he emphasized religious discipline and the study of theology, encouraging every member to study for at least four hours daily. "Let others rejoice in their prerogatives", he once wrote, "but the work of our Order is at an end unless sacred doctrine be our commendation."

Cajetan was part of the revival of Scholasticism which took place during the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. Though in his theology he was a scholastic of the older Thomist type, Cajetan desired to retain the best elements of the humanist revival in harmony with Catholic orthodoxy, illumined by a revived appreciation of the Augustinian doctrine of justification. In the field of Thomistic philosophy he showed striking independence of judgment, expressing liberal views on marriage and divorce, denying the existence of a material Hell and advocating the celebration of public prayers in the vernacular. The Sorbonne in Paris found some of these views heterodox, and in the 1570 edition of his celebrated commentary on Aquinas' Summa, the objectionable passages were expunged. In this spirit he wrote commentaries upon portions of Aristotle, and upon the Summa of Aquinas, and towards the end of his life, made a careful translation of the Old and New Testaments, excepting Solomon's Song, the Prophets and the Revelation of St John.

Cajetan wrote with calm and moderation, although he was often caught up in philosophical and theological controversies. His more than one-hundred-and-fifteen works include commentaries on Aquinas’ Summa Theologica; on the Categories, Posterior Analytics and De anima of Aristotle; the Praedicabilia of Porphyry; and his own writings De nominum analogia, De subiecto naturalis philosophiae, De conceptu entis, De Dei infinitate, and De ente et essentia. Cajetan was conscious of the intellectual needs of the Church, and sought, with judgment and frankness, to provide tentative solutions for some of the theological problems which were still unsettled. His writings on real-life moral problems covered a wide field and sometimes surprised the more conservative; he had numerous critics who attacked him just as zealously as his friends defended him.

Cajetan did not believe that there existed a philosophically demonstrable argument for the immortality of the soul, and that it was instead something to be believed by faith alone. He therefore objected to a proposed decree of the Fifth Lateran Council, calling upon professors of philosophy to justify the doctrine of the immortality of the soul in their lectures


Opposition to the Reformation and Biblical Exegesis

Cajetan remained a steadfast opponent of the Reformation, composing several works directed against Martin Luther, and taking an important share in shaping the policy of the papal delegates in Germany. Cajetan bore witness to Luther's ability when he exclaimed, "Ego nolo amplius cum hac bestia colloqui: habet enim profundos oculos et mirabiles speculationes in capite suo." ("I do not want to have any further parley with that beast; for he has sharp eyes and fantastical speculations in his head.")

Learned though he was in scholastic theology, he recognized that to fight the Reformers with some chance of success he would require a deeper knowledge of the Scriptures than he possessed. In his later years he devoted himself, with characteristic zeal, to a translation with commentaries of the greater part of the Old and the New Testaments, and allowed himself considerable latitude in departing from the literal and traditional interpretation. This work began in 1523 and continued until his death in 1534. He relied on the assistance of rabbis for translation from Hebrew, and on current Greek versions of the Bible. In a letter of dedication to Pope Clement VII, he declared his intention to ascertain the true literal sense of the Scriptures. He did not hesitate to adopt new phraseology, as long as it did not conflict with the Sacred Word and the teachings of the Church. His method was highly criticized in his time, but is commonly used by modern Catholic exegetics.

His Biblical commentary caused distrust and alarm because of its wide departure from the Fathers and the theological schools. He suggested an allegorical interpretation of the first chapter of Genesis, and anticipated nineteenth-century Biblical exegesis by questioning the authorship of several epistles, and the authenticity of certain passages.

Works

  • Opera omnia (5 vol, 1639)
  • Opuscula omnia (1530)
  • Commenatry on Saint Thomas' Summa theologiae (1540)
  • De divina institutione Pontificatus Romani Pontificis (1521)
  • In Porphyrii Isagogen (1934)
  • De comparatione auctoritatis papae u. Apologia (1936)
  • De Anima (1938)
  • Scripta philosophica (6 vols., edited by P. Zammit, M.-H. Laurent and J. Coquelle, 1934-39)
Preceded by:
Jean Clérée
Master General of the Dominican Order
1508 – 1518
Succeeded by:
García de Loaysa

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • "Aktenstücke uber das Verhalten der römischen Kurie zur Reformation, 1524‑1531," in Quellen und Forschungen (Kön. Press. Hist. Inst., Rome), vol. iii. p. 1‑20; TM Lindsay, History of the Reformation, vol. i. (Edinburgh, 1906).
  • Baum, William W. 1958. The teaching of Cardinal Cajetan on the sacrifice of the Mass: a study in pre-tridentine theology.
  • Cajetan, Tommaso de Vio, and Fabian R. Larcher. 1980. Cardinal Cajetan's commentary on Aristotle's Categories.
  • McInerny, Ralph M. 1996. Aquinas and analogy. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press. ISBN: 0813208483 9780813208480 9780813208480 0813208483
  • O'Connor, Michael. 1997. Exegesis, doctrine and reform in the biblical commentaries of Cardinal Cajetan (1469-1534). University of Oxford.
  • Oberman, Heiko Augustinus. 1966. Forerunners of the Reformation; the shape of late medieval thought. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Quinn, Wilfred J. 1958. Being as the object of the intellect according to Cardinal Cajetan. Thesis (M.A.)—St. John's University, 1958.
  • This article incorporates text from the Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition, a publication now in the public domain.

External Links

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.