Difference between revisions of "Blue law" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
Line 29: Line 29:
  
 
===Court cases===
 
===Court cases===
The [[Supreme Court of Canada]], in the case of ''[[Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Canada v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd.]]'', <nowiki>[</nowiki>1985<nowiki>]</nowiki> (1 S.C.R. 295) ruled that the 1906 ''Lord's Day Act'' that required most places to be closed on Sunday did not have a legitimate [[secular]] purpose, and was an unconstitutional attempt to establish a [[religion|religious]]-based closing law in violation of the [[Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms]]. However, the court later concluded, in [[R. v. Edwards Books and Art Ltd.]], <nowiki>[</nowiki>1986<nowiki>]</nowiki> (2 S.C.R. 713) that Ontario's Retail Business Holiday Act, which required some Sunday closings, did not violate the Charter because it did not have a religious purpose.
+
The Supreme Court of [[Canada]], in the case of ''Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Canada v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd.'', <nowiki>[</nowiki>1985<nowiki>]</nowiki> (1 S.C.R. 295) ruled that the 1906 ''Lord's Day Act'' that required most places to be closed on Sunday did not have a legitimate secular purpose, and was an unconstitutional attempt to establish a [[religion|religious]]-based closing law in violation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. However, the court later concluded, in ''R. v. Edwards Books and Art Ltd.'', <nowiki>[</nowiki>1986<nowiki>]</nowiki> (2 S.C.R. 713) that Ontario's Retail Business Holiday Act, which required some Sunday closings, did not violate the Charter because it did not have a religious purpose.
  
The [[Supreme Court of the United States]] held in ''[[McGowan v. Maryland]]'' (1961) that [[Maryland]]'s blue laws violated neither the [[Free Exercise Clause]] nor the [[Establishment Clause]] of the [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution]]. While such laws originated to encourage attendance at [[Christian]] churches, the contemporary Maryland laws were intended to promote the secular values of "health, safety, recreation, and general well-being" through a common day of rest. That this day coincides with the Christian [[Sabbath]] neither reduces its effectiveness for secular purposes nor prevents adherents of other religions from observing their own holy days. The status of blue laws [[vis-à-vis]] the Free Exercise Clause conceivably would have to be re-evaluated if challenged by an adherent of a religion which required the conduct of commerce on Sunday.
+
The [[Supreme Court of the United States]] held in ''McGowan v. Maryland'' (1961) that Maryland's blue laws violated neither the Free Exercise Clause nor the Establishment Clause of the [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution]]. While such laws originated to encourage attendance at [[Christian]] churches, the contemporary Maryland laws were intended to promote the secular values of "health, safety, recreation, and general well-being" through a common day of rest. That this day coincides with the Christian [[Sabbath]] neither reduces its effectiveness for secular purposes nor prevents adherents of other religions from observing their own holy days. The status of blue laws vis-à-vis the Free Exercise Clause conceivably would have to be re-evaluated if challenged by an adherent of a religion which required the conduct of commerce on Sunday.
  
According to [[KVIA-TV]] in El Paso, as recently as March 2006, Texas judges were still ruling to uphold the state Blue Law that requires car dealerships to close one day each weekend. They must now choose to open either Saturday or Sunday.
+
In El Paso, as recently as March 2006, Texas judges were still ruling to uphold the state Blue Law that requires car dealerships to close one day each weekend. They must now choose to open either Saturday or Sunday.
  
 
==Conclusion==
 
==Conclusion==
  
While the orgin of the term "Blue Law" can be debated, the orginal purpose of the laws is not open to such scrutiny. These laws were passed as a governmental enforcement of Christian dogma. As American society has grown more secularized these laws have faded away and in many places been erased. In areas where these blue laws are still enforced, they have come under fire and nonreligious justifications must be found for these theological mandates. What ever facade is laid to justify these laws, whether it be reduced traffic or a day of required rest, the ecclesiastical underbelly can not be denied.  One could argue that these laws go against the goverment pretected freedoms off people regarless of religious background or level of fundamentalism.  After all the right to worship as one chooses implies that we also have the right to not practice at all.
+
While the orgin of the term "Blue Law" can be debated, the orginal purpose of the laws is clear. These laws were passed as a governmental enforcement of [[Christianity|Christian]] practice. As American society has grown more secularized these laws have faded away, and in many places been erased. In areas where these blue laws are still enforced, they have come under fire, and nonreligious justifications must be found for these mandates. Whatever facade is laid to justify these laws, whether it be reduced traffic or a day of required rest, the ecclesiastical underpinings remain.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 +
One could argue that such laws go against the goverment protected freedoms of people regardless of religious background or level of fundamentalism.  After all the right to worship as one chooses implies that we also have the right to not practice at all.
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 
+
* Jones, Alonzo T. 1996. ''The National Sunday Law: Argument of Alonzo T. Jones before the United States Senate Committee on Education and Labor, Dec. 13, 1888''. Teach Services ISBN 1572580569
  
 
== External link ==
 
== External link ==
*[http://www.seventh-day.org/Read_NSL.htm National Sunday Law]
+
* [http://www.sundaylaw.net/ A Sunday Law is Coming!]
 
+
* [http://www.ellenwhite.org/nsl/egw22c.htm National Sunday Law - Fact or Fiction?]
 +
* [http://www2.potsdam.edu/hansondj/InMyOpinion/BlueLawCrimp.html ''Blue Laws Restrict Personal Freedom'' by Ari Armstrong]
  
  
 
{{Credit1|Blue_law|72064382|}}
 
{{Credit1|Blue_law|72064382|}}

Revision as of 00:22, 25 September 2006


Definition

A blue law, in the United States and Canada, is a type of law designed to enforce moral standards, particularly the observance of the Sabbath. Most have been repealed or are simply unenforced, although prohibitions on the sale of alcoholic beverages, and occasionally almost all commerce, on Sundays are still enforced in some areas. Blue laws often prohibit an activity only during certain hours and there are usually exceptions to the prohibition of commerce, like stores selling essential items such as food and medicines. Places that still have and enforce blue laws generally have strong religious fundamentalism, but some have been retained as a matter of tradition or out of convenience. [1]


Coining the term "Blue Law"

The term blue law may have been first used by Reverend Samuel Peters (1735-1826) in his book General History of Connecticut first published in 1781, to refer to various laws first enacted by Puritan colonies in the seventeenth century prohibiting the selling of certain types of merchandise or business activity of any kind on certain days of the week, usually Sunday.

In Texas, for example, blue laws prohibited selling housewares such as pots, pans, and washing machines on Sunday until 1985; Texas as well as Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, and Pennsylvania car dealerships have continued to operate under blue-law prohibitions in which an automobile may not be purchased or traded on a Sunday. Many U.S. states maintain prohibition on the sale of alcohol on Sunday, or at least before noon on Sunday.

History

Contrary to popular belief, there is no evidence to support the assertion that the blue laws were originally printed on blue paper. Rather, the word "blue" was commonly used in the eighteenth century as a disparaging reference to rigid moral codes and those who observed them ("bluenoses"). Moreover, although Reverend Peters claimed that the term "blue law" was originally used by Puritan colonists, his work has since been found to be unreliable, and it is more likely that he simply invented the term himself[2]. In any event, Peters never asserted that the blue laws were originally printed on blue paper, and this has come to be regarded as an example of fake etymology. Another version is that the laws were first bound in books with blue covers.

Southern and mid-western states also passed numerous laws to protect the Sabbath during the mid to late nineteenth century. Laws targeted numerous groups including saloon owners, Jews, Seventh-Day Adventists, and non-religious peoples. The Sabbath laws were an excellent of example of state and local governments trying to socially control citizens by punishing them for doing non-religious activities on Sunday. Numerous people were arrested for playing cards, baseball, and even fixing wagon wheels on Sunday. Some of these laws still exist today.

Many unusual features of American culture — such as the fact that one can buy groceries, office supplies, and housewares from a drug store — are the result of blue laws, as drug stores were generally allowed to remain open on Sunday to accommodate emergency medical needs. The ubiquitous "weekend" is also a result of blue laws, although it is practiced nearly worldwide, except in some Islamic countries, which have their weekend on Thursday and Friday, and in Israel, where the weekend is from sundown on Friday to sundown on Saturday.

Many European countries still place strong restrictions on store opening hours on Sundays, an example being Germany's Ladenschlussgesetz.

Bergen County, New Jersey

One of the last remaining blue laws in the United States, that covers virtually all selling, is found in New Jersey. The Bergen County law has produced the ironic situation that one of the largest and most popular commercial shopping cores of the New York metropolitan area is almost completely closed on Sunday (only grocery stores are allowed to operate). Furthermore, Bergen County has significant Jewish and Muslim populations whose observant members would not be celebrating their Sabbath on Sunday with most of their Christian brethren. The substantial Orthodox Jewish minority is placed in the position of being unable to shop either on Sunday (due to the blue laws) or on Saturday (due to religious observance).

However, repeated attempts to lift the law have failed, as many locals either see keeping the law on the books as a protest against the growing trend toward increasing hours and days of commercial activity in American society, or enjoy the sharply reduced traffic on major roads and highways that is normally seen on the other days of the week. In fact, a large part of the reason for maintaining the laws has been a desire for relative peace and quiet one day of the week by many Bergen County residents.

This desire for relative peace is most apparent in Paramus, New Jersey, where some of the county's largest shopping malls are located. Paramus has blue laws of its own, that are even more restrictive than those enforced by Bergen County.

Court cases

The Supreme Court of Canada, in the case of Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Canada v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd., [1985] (1 S.C.R. 295) ruled that the 1906 Lord's Day Act that required most places to be closed on Sunday did not have a legitimate secular purpose, and was an unconstitutional attempt to establish a religious-based closing law in violation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. However, the court later concluded, in R. v. Edwards Books and Art Ltd., [1986] (2 S.C.R. 713) that Ontario's Retail Business Holiday Act, which required some Sunday closings, did not violate the Charter because it did not have a religious purpose.

The Supreme Court of the United States held in McGowan v. Maryland (1961) that Maryland's blue laws violated neither the Free Exercise Clause nor the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. While such laws originated to encourage attendance at Christian churches, the contemporary Maryland laws were intended to promote the secular values of "health, safety, recreation, and general well-being" through a common day of rest. That this day coincides with the Christian Sabbath neither reduces its effectiveness for secular purposes nor prevents adherents of other religions from observing their own holy days. The status of blue laws vis-à-vis the Free Exercise Clause conceivably would have to be re-evaluated if challenged by an adherent of a religion which required the conduct of commerce on Sunday.

In El Paso, as recently as March 2006, Texas judges were still ruling to uphold the state Blue Law that requires car dealerships to close one day each weekend. They must now choose to open either Saturday or Sunday.

Conclusion

While the orgin of the term "Blue Law" can be debated, the orginal purpose of the laws is clear. These laws were passed as a governmental enforcement of Christian practice. As American society has grown more secularized these laws have faded away, and in many places been erased. In areas where these blue laws are still enforced, they have come under fire, and nonreligious justifications must be found for these mandates. Whatever facade is laid to justify these laws, whether it be reduced traffic or a day of required rest, the ecclesiastical underpinings remain.

One could argue that such laws go against the goverment protected freedoms of people regardless of religious background or level of fundamentalism. After all the right to worship as one chooses implies that we also have the right to not practice at all.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Jones, Alonzo T. 1996. The National Sunday Law: Argument of Alonzo T. Jones before the United States Senate Committee on Education and Labor, Dec. 13, 1888. Teach Services ISBN 1572580569

External link


Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.