Encyclopedia, Difference between revisions of "Alexander Goldenweiser" - New World

Revision as of 14:07, 25 November 2006

Alexander Alexandrovich Goldenweiser (January 29, 1880 – July 6, 1940) was an Ukrainian-born, American anthropologist and sociologist, famous for his work on totemism and the idea of the "principle of limited possibilities".

Life

Alexander Goldenweiser was born on January 29, 1880 in Kiev, Russian Empire (today Ukraine), the son of a lawyer. In 1900 his father brought his whole family to the United States. Upon his arrival Goldenweiser decided to study anthropology at Columbia University. His mentor there was the famous Franz Boas, who greatly influenced Goldenweiser. He earned his bachelors degree in 1902, his masters in 1904, and his Ph.D. in 1910. His doctoral dissertation on totemism immediately became a well-known work, and ensured him fame.

After obtaining his Ph.D. Goldenweiser started to teach. His first teaching post was at Columbia University from 1910 to 1919. In 1919 he joined the group of distinguished scholars, among others Charles Beard, Thorstein Veblen, James Harvey Robinson, and John Dewey, in the New School for Social Research, in the New York City. He stayed there for the next seven years. At the same time he was a lecturer at the Rand School for Social Science (1915-1929). He was known as a great lecturer, who supplemented his classes with discussion groups on current affairs in social science.

After the New School decided not to hire a full-time faculty staff in his position, Goldenweiser moved on. He first became a member of the editorial board of the Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, where he helped launch this multi-volume encyclopedia. After that he taught at the University of Oregon (1930-1938). He also worked as a visiting professor of sociology, Reed College (1933-1939), visiting professor at the University of Wisconsin (1937-1938), and lecturer in psychology and anthropology at Rand School (1915-1929), and a professor of anthropology at the University of Washington (1923).

Goldenweiser lectured on a variety of topics, from race and gender, to cultural diffusion and psychoanalysis. He never held a full-time academic post. In addition to teaching he wrote many books, articles, and reviews. Among his most popular are Early Civilization, 1922; Robots or Gods, 1931; History, Psychology and Culture, 1933; Anthropology, An Introduction to Primitive Culture, 1937.

Alexander Goldenweiser died on July 6, 1940, in his home in Portland, Oregon.

Work

Goldenweiser was not much interested in fieldwork. He carried out only a few field studies, less than ten months total, on six trips to study the Iroquois on the Grand River reservation in Ontario (1911-13). He focused his whole energy in teaching, and was among the most popular professors at any university he went to.

Goldenweiser believed that the conceptual world of primitive people was not essentially different from the world of modern man. His 1922 book Early Civilization (in 1937 revised and renamed Anthropology) was among the first textbooks of anthropology in the United States. In it he explained, in simple and practical terms, the life of people. The book was used for several generations of anthropologists.

The main concerns in his studies were theory and methodology, writing often about folk psychology, social organization, religion and magic. Unlike many of his contemporaries, he was more preoccupied with the present then with the past.

His work on totemism, however, is what made him famous. He believed that totemism is founded on symbolic, mystical relationships, every tribe having its own set of totemic practices, which are meaningful only within that particular tribe. Being deeply interested in psychology, especially psychoanalysis, Goldenweiser saw psychological factors as playing a significant role in totemism.

As with totemism and religion in general, Goldenweiser believed that psychological factors play a significant role in cultural diffusion. He rejected the notion held by many of his contemporary colleagues that cultural diffusion can explain the passing of traits from one culture to another. He rather believed that it depends in part on the receptiveness of a culture to proffered traits. Goldenweiser coined the term “principle of limited possibilities,” to combat the idea of hyper-diffusionist theory. This principle explains that there are only so many ways to build a building, or to paint a vase. The human mind cannot create something that cannot be created. That is why similar rituals or similar architecture can be found in distinct cultures around the world. Similarities do not necessarily mean that the transmission of culture occurred.

Goldenweiser believed that every culture is a closed system in itself, with its own rules and distinctive patterns of behavior. As such, any externally induced change is perceived as a threat, and even innovation from within is discouraged. Change, if it takes place, is only a slight modification in the existing pattern, but only with limited consequences. A good example of this is a ritual, where exact practices are preserved over thousands of years. Changes were made only by modifying some small parts of it, not changing the whole. So at the end the ritual, and it can be argued the culture in genera,) did not evolve, but "involve." Goldenweiser wrote:

This feature has often been commented on by observers of primitive life. The all pervading ceremonialism of the Todas, the interminable exchanges of presents attending Trobriand marriages, the minute apportionment of a hunting booty among the Central Australians (just such and such apiece to such and such a relative), the elaborateness of Maori or Marquesan Art (arts that overreach themselves), the ravages of taboo in Polynesia (taboo run amuck) - all of these and many similar cultural traits exhibit development by involution. (Anthropology, p.414).

In Goldenweiser's account, innovation and progress were thus rather limited in primitive societies, while tradition was respected over all.

Legacy

Goldenweiser was a famous lecturer who influenced many generations of anthropologists. Among his most famous students was Ruth Benedict. His principle of limited opportunities explained how and why cultures develop a structural resistance to change. The principle is still in use today in economics, sociology, and other social sciences.

Publications

Goldenweiser, Alexander A. 1910. Totemism: An analytical study. The Journal of American Folklore.
Goldenweiser, Alexander A. 1913. Remarks on the social organization of the Crow Indians. New Era Printing Co.
Goldenweiser, Alexander A.1918. History, psychology and culture: A set of categories for an introduciton to social science. New Era Printing Co.
Goldenweiser, Alexander A. 1922. Early civilization, An Introduction to Anthropology. Alfred A. Knopf
Goldenweiser, Alexander A.1931. Race and race relations, with special reference to alleged racial inferiority and superiority. American Council, Institute of Pacific Relations
Goldenweiser, Alexander A. 1931. Robots or gods: An essay on craft and mind. A. A. Knopf
Goldenweiser, Alexander A. 1967 (original from 1918). Form and content in totemism. Bobbs-Merrill
Goldenweiser, Alexander A. 1971 (original from 1937). Anthropology: An Introduction to Primitive Culture. Johnson Reprint Corp. ISBN 0384190901
Goldenweiser, Alexander A. 1990 (original from 1933). History, psychology and culture. Peter Smith Publisher Inc. ISBN 0844606472
Goldenweiser, Alexander & Ogburn, William F. 1974. Social Sciences and Their Interrelations. Ayer Co Pub. ISBN 0405055161

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

Barnard, Alan. 2002. Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology. Routledge. ISBN 0415285585
Moore, Jerry D. 1996. Visions of Culture: An Introduction to Anthropological Theories and Theorists. AltaMira Press. ISBN 0803970978
Sapir, Edward. 1912. Review of A. A. Goldenweiser, Totemism: An Analytical Study. Psychological Bulletin, 9, 454-461.
Wallers, Wilson D. 1941. Goldenweiser, Alexander A. American Anthropologist, 43, 250-253

External links

Alexander A. Goldenweiser – Biography on Encyclopedia Britannica website
Alexander Goldenweiser Papers – Papers related to Goldenweiser’s Iroquois fieldwork

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

Alexander_Alexandrovich_Goldenweiser ^history

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

History of "Alexander Goldenweiser"

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 [[Category:Anthropology]]
 [[Category:Biography]]
-{{Contracted}}
+{{Images OK}}{{Submitted}}{{Contracted}}
 {{epname}}
-Alexander Alexandrovich Goldenweiser (born January 29, 1880 – died July 6, 1940) was an Ukrainian-born, [[United States|American]] [[anthropology|anthropologist]] and [[sociology|sociologist]], famous for his work on totemism and the idea of the "principle of limited possibilities".
+Alexander Alexandrovich Goldenweiser (January 29, 1880 – July 6, 1940) was an Ukrainian-born, [[United States|American]] [[anthropology|anthropologist]] and [[sociology|sociologist]], famous for his work on totemism and the idea of the "principle of limited possibilities".
 ==Life==
-'''Alexander Goldenweiser''' was born in Kiev, Russian Empire (today [[Ukraine]]), the son of a [[lawyer]]. In 1900 his father brought his whole family to the [[United States]]. Upon his arrival Goldenweiser decided to study [[anthropology]] at the [[Columbia University]]. His mentor there was famous [[Franz Boas]], who greatly influenced Goldenweiser. He earned his AB degree in 1902, his AM degree in 1904, and his Ph.D. in 1910. His doctoral dissertation on totemism immediately became a well-known work, and ensured him fame.
+'''Alexander Goldenweiser''' was born on January 29, 1880 in Kiev, Russian Empire (today [[Ukraine]]), the son of a [[lawyer]]. In 1900 his father brought his whole family to the [[United States]]. Upon his arrival Goldenweiser decided to study [[anthropology]] at [[Columbia University]]. His mentor there was the famous [[Franz Boas]], who greatly influenced Goldenweiser. He earned his bachelors degree in 1902, his masters in 1904, and his Ph.D. in 1910. His doctoral dissertation on [[totemism]] immediately became a well-known work, and ensured him fame.
 After obtaining his Ph.D. Goldenweiser started to teach. His first teaching post was at [[Columbia University]] from 1910 to 1919. In 1919 he joined the group of distinguished scholars, among others [[Charles Beard]], [[Thorstein Veblen]], [[James Harvey Robinson]], and [[John Dewey]], in the New School for Social Research, in the [[New York City]]. He stayed there for the next seven years. At the same time he was a lecturer at the Rand School for Social Science (1915-1929). He was known as a great lecturer, who supplemented his classes with discussion groups on current affairs in [[social science]].
-After the New School decided not to hire a full-time faculty staff in his position, Goldenweiser moved on. He first became a member of the editorial board of the Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, where he helped launch the multi-volume Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. After that he started to teach at the University of Oregon (1930-1938). He also worked as a Visiting Professor of Sociology, Reed College (1933-1939), Visiting Professor at University of Wisconsin (1937-1938), and lecturer on psychology and anthropology at Rand School (1915-1929), and a professor of anthropolofy at the University of Washington (1923).
+After the New School decided not to hire a full-time faculty staff in his position, Goldenweiser moved on. He first became a member of the editorial board of the ''Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences'', where he helped launch this multi-volume [[encyclopedia]]. After that he taught at the University of Oregon (1930-1938). He also worked as a visiting professor of [[sociology]], Reed College (1933-1939), visiting professor at the [[University of Wisconsin]]* (1937-1938), and lecturer in [[psychology]] and anthropology at Rand School (1915-1929), and a professor of anthropology at the University of Washington (1923).
-Goldenweiser lectured on a variety of topics, from [[race]] and [[sex]], to [[cultural diffusion]] and [[psychoanalysis]]. He never held a full-time academic post. In addition to teaching he wrote many books, articles, and reviews. Among his most popular are ''Early Civilization'', 1922; ''Robots or Gods'', 1931; ''History, Psychology and Culture'', 1933; ''Anthropology, An Introduction to Primitive Culture'', 1937.
+Goldenweiser lectured on a variety of topics, from race and gender, to [[cultural diffusion]] and [[psychoanalysis]]. He never held a full-time academic post. In addition to teaching he wrote many books, articles, and reviews. Among his most popular are ''Early Civilization'', 1922; ''Robots or Gods'', 1931; ''History, Psychology and Culture'', 1933; ''Anthropology, An Introduction to Primitive Culture'', 1937.
-Goldenweiser died on July 6, 1940, in his home in Portland, Oregon.
+Alexander Goldenweiser died on July 6, 1940, in his home in Portland, Oregon.
 ==Work==
-Goldenweiser was not interested much in fieldwork. He did only few field studies, less than ten months total, on six trips to the Iroquois on the Grand River reservation in Ontario (1911-13). He focused his whole energy in teaching, and was among the most popular professors on any university he went to.
+Goldenweiser was not much interested in fieldwork. He carried out only a few field studies, less than ten months total, on six trips to study the [[Iroquois]] on the Grand River reservation in Ontario (1911-13). He focused his whole energy in teaching, and was among the most popular professors at any university he went to.
-Goldenweiser believed that the conceptual world of primitive people was not essentially different from the world of modern man. His 1922 book Early Civilization (in 1937 revised and renamed into Anthropology) was among the first textbooks of anthropology in the United States. In it he explains, in simple and practical terms, the life of primitive people. The book was used for several generations of anthropologists.
+Goldenweiser believed that the conceptual world of primitive people was not essentially different from the world of modern man. His 1922 book ''Early Civilization'' (in 1937 revised and renamed ''Anthropology'') was among the first textbooks of [[anthropology]] in the United States. In it he explained, in simple and practical terms, the life of [[primitive culture|people]]. The book was used for several generations of anthropologists.
-The main concerns in his studies were theory and methodology, writing often about folk psychology, social organization, [[religion]] and [[magic]]. Unlike many of his contemporaries, he was more preoccupied with present, then with the past. His work on [[totemism]], however, is what he remained famous for. He believed that totemism is founded on symbolic mystical relationship, every tribe having its own set of totemic practices, which are meaningful only within that particular tribe. Being deeply interested in [[psychology]], especially [[psychoanalysis]], Goldenweiser saw psychological factors playing significant role in totemism.
+The main concerns in his studies were theory and methodology, writing often about folk psychology, social organization, [[religion]] and [[magic]]. Unlike many of his contemporaries, he was more preoccupied with the present then with the past.
-Similar with totemism and religion in general, Goldenweiser believed that psychological factors play big role in cultural diffusion. He refused the notion of many of his contemporary colleagues that cultural diffusion can explain the passing of traits from one culture to another. He rather believed that it depends in part on the receptiveness of culture to proffered traits. Goldenweiser coined the term “principle of limited possibilities”, to combat the idea of hyper-diffusionist theory. The principle explains that there are only so many ways to build the building, or to paint the vase. Human mind cannot create something that cannot be created. That is why similar rituals or similar architecture can be found in distinct cultures around the world. Similarities do not necessarily mean that the transmission of culture occurred.
+His work on [[totemism]], however, is what made him famous. He believed that totemism is founded on [[symbol]]ic, [[mysticism|mystical]] relationships, every [[tribe]] having its own set of totemic practices, which are meaningful only within that particular tribe. Being deeply interested in [[psychology]], especially [[psychoanalysis]], Goldenweiser saw psychological factors as playing a significant role in totemism.
-Goldenweiser believed that every culture is a closed system in itself, with its own rules and distinctive patterns of behavior. As such any externally induced change is perceived as a threat, and even the innovation from within is discouraged. The change, if it takes place, is only a slight modification in the existing pattern, but only with limited consequences. Good example of this is a ritual, where exact practices are preserved over thousands of years. Changes were made only by modifying some small parts of it, not changing the whole. So at the end ritual (and we could argue - the particular culture in general) did not evolve, but involve. Goldenweiser wrote:
+As with totemism and religion in general, Goldenweiser believed that psychological factors play a significant role in cultural diffusion. He rejected the notion held by many of his contemporary colleagues that cultural diffusion can explain the passing of traits from one culture to another. He rather believed that it depends in part on the receptiveness of a culture to proffered traits. Goldenweiser coined the term “principle of limited possibilities,” to combat the idea of hyper-diffusionist theory. This principle explains that there are only so many ways to build a building, or to paint a vase. The human mind cannot create something that cannot be created. That is why similar [[ritual]]s or similar [[architecture]] can be found in distinct cultures around the world. Similarities do not necessarily mean that the transmission of culture occurred.
-:"This feature has often been commented on by observers of primitive life. The all pervading ceremonialism of the Todas, the interminable exchanges of presents attending Trobriand marriages, the minute apportionment of a hunting booty among the Central Australians (just such and such apiece to such and such a relative), the elaborateness of Maori or Marquesan Art (arts that overreach themselves), the ravages of taboo in Polynesia (taboo run amuck) - all of these and many similar cultural traits exhibit development by involution” (''Anthropology'', p.414).
+Goldenweiser believed that every culture is a closed system in itself, with its own rules and distinctive patterns of behavior. As such, any externally induced change is perceived as a threat, and even innovation from within is discouraged. Change, if it takes place, is only a slight modification in the existing pattern, but only with limited consequences. A good example of this is a ritual, where exact practices are preserved over thousands of years. Changes were made only by modifying some small parts of it, not changing the whole. So at the end the ritual, and it can be argued the culture in genera,) did not evolve, but "involve." Goldenweiser wrote:
+<blockquote>This feature has often been commented on by observers of primitive life. The all pervading ceremonialism of the Todas, the interminable exchanges of presents attending Trobriand marriages, the minute apportionment of a hunting booty among the Central Australians (just such and such apiece to such and such a relative), the elaborateness of Maori or Marquesan Art (arts that overreach themselves), the ravages of taboo in Polynesia (taboo run amuck) - all of these and many similar cultural traits exhibit development by involution. (''Anthropology'', p.414).</blockquote>
-The innovation and progress were thus rather limited in primitive societies, while tradition was respected over all.
+In Goldenweiser's account, innovation and progress were thus rather limited in primitive societies, while [[tradition]] was respected over all.
 ==Legacy==
-Goldenweiser was a famous lecturer who influenced many generations of anthropologists. Among his most famous student was [[Ruth Benedict]]. His ''principle of limited opportunities'' explained how and why cultures develop a structural resistance to change. The principle is still in use today in economics, sociology, and other social sciences.
+Goldenweiser was a famous lecturer who influenced many generations of [[anthropology|anthropologists]]. Among his most famous students was [[Ruth Benedict]]. His ''principle of limited opportunities'' explained how and why cultures develop a structural resistance to change. The principle is still in use today in [[economics]], [[sociology]], and other [[social sciences]].
 ==Publications==
 * Goldenweiser, Alexander A. 1910. Totemism: An analytical study. ''The Journal of American Folklore''.
 * Goldenweiser, Alexander A. 1913. ''Remarks on the social organization of the Crow Indians''. New Era Printing Co.
 * Goldenweiser, Alexander A.1918. ''History, psychology and culture: A set of categories for an introduciton to social science''. New Era Printing Co.
 * Goldenweiser, Alexander A. 1922. ''Early civilization, An Introduction to Anthropology''. Alfred A. Knopf
 * Goldenweiser, Alexander A.1931. ''Race and race relations, with special reference to alleged racial inferiority and superiority.'' American Council, Institute of Pacific Relations
 * Goldenweiser, Alexander A. 1931. ''Robots or gods: An essay on craft and mind''. A. A. Knopf
 * Goldenweiser, Alexander A. 1967 (original from 1918). ''Form and content in totemism''. Bobbs-Merrill
 * Goldenweiser, Alexander A. 1971 (original from 1937). ''Anthropology: An Introduction to Primitive Culture''. Johnson Reprint Corp. ISBN 0384190901
 * Goldenweiser, Alexander A. 1990 (original from 1933). ''History, psychology and culture''. Peter Smith Publisher Inc. ISBN 0844606472
 * Goldenweiser, Alexander & Ogburn, William F. 1974. ''Social Sciences and Their Interrelations''. Ayer Co Pub. ISBN 0405055161
@@ Line 63: / Line 55: @@
 * Barnard, Alan. 2002. ''Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology''. Routledge. ISBN 0415285585
 * Moore, Jerry D. 1996. ''Visions of Culture: An Introduction to Anthropological Theories and Theorists''. AltaMira Press. ISBN 0803970978
 * Sapir, Edward. 1912. Review of A. A. Goldenweiser, Totemism: An Analytical Study. ''Psychological Bulletin'', 9, 454-461.
 * Wallers, Wilson D. 1941. Goldenweiser, Alexander A. ''American Anthropologist'', 43, 250-253
@@ Line 73: / Line 62: @@
 * [http://www.britannica.com/ebc/article-9037258 Alexander A. Goldenweiser] – Biography on Encyclopedia Britannica website
 * [http://library.reed.edu/collections/findingaids/goldenweiser/aagscope.htm Alexander Goldenweiser Papers] – Papers related to Goldenweiser’s Iroquois fieldwork
 {{Credit1|Alexander_Alexandrovich_Goldenweiser|69031356|}}