Difference between revisions of "Anekantavada" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
(article imported, credit applied, category applied, foreign language links removed)
 
(ready tag added)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Unreferenced|date=March 2007}}
+
{{ready}}
  
'''Anekantavada''' is a basic principle of [[Jainism]] developed by [[Mahavira]] (599-527 BC) positing that reality is perceived differently from different points of view, and that no single point of view is completely true. Jain doctrine states that only [[Kevali]]s, those who have infinite knowledge, can know the true answer, and that all others would only know a part of the answer. Anekantavada is related to the Western philosophical doctrine of [[Subjectivism]].
+
'''Anekantavada''' is a basic principle of [[Jainism]] developed by [[Mahavira]] (599-527 B.C.E.) positing that reality is perceived differently from different [[points of view]], and that no single point of view is completely true. Jain doctrine states that only [[Kevali]]s, those who have infinite knowledge, can know the true answer, and that all others would only know a part of the answer. Anekantavada is related to the Western philosophical doctrine of [[Subjectivism]].
  
'Ekanta' is one-sidedness. Anekantavada is literally the doctrine of non-onesidedness; it is often translated as "non-absolutism".
+
'Ekanta' is one-sidedness. Anekantavada is literally the doctrine of non-onesidedness; it is often translated as "[[non-absolutism]]."
  
 
Anekantavada encourages its adherents to consider others views or beliefs. They should not reject a view simply because it uses a different perspective.  They should consider the fact there may be truth in others' views too.   
 
Anekantavada encourages its adherents to consider others views or beliefs. They should not reject a view simply because it uses a different perspective.  They should consider the fact there may be truth in others' views too.   
  
Many proponents of Anekantvada apply the principle to religion and philosophy themselves, reminding adherents that any religion or philosophy, even Jainism, that clings too dogmatically to its own tenets is committing an error based on its limited point of view. In this application, Anekantvada resembles the Western principles of cultural and moral [[relativism]].
+
Many proponents of Anekantavada apply the principle to [[religion]] and [[philosophy]] themselves, reminding adherents that any religion or philosophy, even Jainism, that clings too dogmatically to its own tenets is committing an error based on its limited point of view. In this application, Anekantavada resembles the Western principles of cultural and moral [[relativism]].
  
 
== The Blind Men and the Elephant ==
 
== The Blind Men and the Elephant ==
Line 13: Line 13:
 
The concept can be explained very well by a poem by [[John Godfrey Saxe]] that is based on an Indian story:
 
The concept can be explained very well by a poem by [[John Godfrey Saxe]] that is based on an Indian story:
  
It was six men of Indostan<br>
+
It was six men of Indostan<br/>
To learning much inclined,<br>
+
To learning much inclined,<br/>
Who went to see the Elephant<br>
+
Who went to see the Elephant<br/>
(Though all of them were blind),<br>
+
(Though all of them were blind),<br/>
That each by observation<br>
+
That each by observation<br/>
 
Might satisfy his mind
 
Might satisfy his mind
  
The First approached the Elephant,<br>
+
The First approached the Elephant,<br/>
And happening to fall<br>
+
And happening to fall<br/>
Against his broad and sturdy side,<br>  
+
Against his broad and sturdy side,<br/>  
At once began to bawl:<br>
+
At once began to bawl:<br/>
“God bless me! but the Elephant<br>  
+
“God bless me! but the Elephant<br/>  
 
Is very like a wall!”
 
Is very like a wall!”
  
The Second, feeling of the tusk,<br>
+
The Second, feeling of the tusk,<br/>
Cried, “Ho! what have we here<br>
+
Cried, “Ho! what have we here<br/>
So very round and smooth and sharp?<br>  
+
So very round and smooth and sharp?<br/>  
To me ’tis mighty clear<br>
+
To me ’tis mighty clear<br/>
This wonder of an Elephant<br>
+
This wonder of an Elephant<br/>
 
Is very like a spear!”
 
Is very like a spear!”
  
The Third approached the animal,<br>  
+
The Third approached the animal,<br/>  
And happening to take<br>
+
And happening to take<br/>
The squirming trunk within his hands,<br>  
+
The squirming trunk within his hands,<br/>  
Thus boldly up and spake:<br>
+
Thus boldly up and spake:<br/>
“I see,” quoth he, “the Elephant<br>  
+
“I see,” quoth he, “the Elephant<br/>  
 
Is very like a snake!”
 
Is very like a snake!”
  
The Fourth reached out an eager hand,<br>
+
The Fourth reached out an eager hand,<br/>
And felt about the knee.<br>
+
And felt about the knee.<br/>
“What most this wondrous beast is like<br>  
+
“What most this wondrous beast is like<br/>  
Is mighty plain,” quoth he;<br>
+
Is mighty plain,” quoth he;<br/>
“ ‘Tis clear enough the Elephant<br>  
+
“ ‘Tis clear enough the Elephant<br/>  
 
Is very like a tree!”
 
Is very like a tree!”
  
The Fifth, who chanced to touch the ear,<br>  
+
The Fifth, who chanced to touch the ear,<br/>  
Said: “E’en the blindest man<br>
+
Said: “E’en the blindest man<br/>
Can tell what this resembles most;<br>  
+
Can tell what this resembles most;<br/>  
Deny the fact who can<br>
+
Deny the fact who can<br/>
This marvel of an Elephant<br>  
+
This marvel of an Elephant<br/>  
 
Is very like a fan!”
 
Is very like a fan!”
  
The Sixth no sooner had begun<br>
+
The Sixth no sooner had begun<br/>
About the beast to grope,<br>
+
About the beast to grope,<br/>
Than, seizing on the swinging tail<br>  
+
Than, seizing on the swinging tail<br/>  
That fell within his scope,<br>
+
That fell within his scope,<br/>
“I see,” quoth he, “the Elephant<br>  
+
“I see,” quoth he, “the Elephant<br/>  
 
Is very like a rope!”
 
Is very like a rope!”
  
And so these men of Indostan<br>
+
And so these men of Indostan<br/>
Disputed loud and long,<br>
+
Disputed loud and long,<br/>
Each in his own opinion<br>
+
Each in his own opinion<br/>
Exceeding stiff and strong,<br>
+
Exceeding stiff and strong,<br/>
Though each was partly in the right,<br>  
+
Though each was partly in the right,<br/>  
 
And all were in the wrong!
 
And all were in the wrong!
  
 
Moral:  
 
Moral:  
  
So oft in theologic wars,<br>
+
So oft in theologic wars,<br/>
The disputants, I ween,<br>
+
The disputants, I ween,<br/>
Rail on in utter ignorance<br>
+
Rail on in utter ignorance<br/>
Of what each other mean,<br>
+
Of what each other mean,<br/>
And prate about an Elephant<br>
+
And prate about an Elephant<br/>
 
Not one of them has seen!
 
Not one of them has seen!
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
* Jaina Theory of Multiple Facets of Reality and Truth (Anekantavada), edited by Nagin J. Shah. Delhi, Motilal Banarsidass, 2000.
+
* Nagin J. Shah ed., ''Jaina Theory of Multiple Facets of Reality and Truth (Anekantavada)''. Delhi : Motilal Banarsidass Publishers & Bhogilal Leherchand Institute of Indology, 2000. ISBN 8120817079 ISBN 9788120817074
* Philosophy East & West, vol. 50, no. 3 (July 2000), SPECIAL ISSUE: THE PHILOSOPHY OF JAINISM, Guest Editor: Kim Skoog.
+
* ''Philosophy East & West, vol. 50, no. 3 (July 2000)'', SPECIAL ISSUE: THE PHILOSOPHY OF JAINISM, Guest Editor: Kim Skoog. [Honolulu, University Press of Hawaii]. ISSN 0031-8221
 
* Sanmatti Prakaran, in Gujarati. Author Acharya Sidddhasen Divakar.  Navjeevan Trust, ahmedabad.
 
* Sanmatti Prakaran, in Gujarati. Author Acharya Sidddhasen Divakar.  Navjeevan Trust, ahmedabad.
* The Jaina Philosophy of Non-Absolutism, by Satkari Mookerjee. Asia Book Corp of Amer (Jun 1978)
+
* Satkari Mookerjee, ''The Jaina Philosophy of Non-Absolutism''. Delhi : Motilal Banarsidass, 1978.
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
* [http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~pluralsm/affiliates/jainism/workshop/Anekantvad.PDF#search=%22anekantvada%22 Pravin K. Shah on Anekantvada]
+
* [http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~pluralsm/affiliates/jainism/workshop/Anekantvad.PDF#search=%22anekantvada%22 Pravin K. Shah on Anekantvada] &ndash; Jain Study Center of North Carolina.
* [http://www.jainworld.com/jainbooks/firstep-2/indianjaina-1-1.htm The Indian-Jaina Dialectic of [[Syadvad]] in Relation to Probability] By P.C. [[Mahalanobis]]
+
* [http://www.jainworld.com/jainbooks/firstep-2/indianjaina-1-1.htm The Indian-Jaina Dialectic of Syadvad in Relation to Probability] By P.C. [[Mahalanobis]]
  
 
{{Indian Philosophy}}
 
{{Indian Philosophy}}

Revision as of 23:27, 23 September 2007


Anekantavada is a basic principle of Jainism developed by Mahavira (599-527 B.C.E.) positing that reality is perceived differently from different points of view, and that no single point of view is completely true. Jain doctrine states that only Kevalis, those who have infinite knowledge, can know the true answer, and that all others would only know a part of the answer. Anekantavada is related to the Western philosophical doctrine of Subjectivism.

'Ekanta' is one-sidedness. Anekantavada is literally the doctrine of non-onesidedness; it is often translated as "non-absolutism."

Anekantavada encourages its adherents to consider others views or beliefs. They should not reject a view simply because it uses a different perspective. They should consider the fact there may be truth in others' views too.

Many proponents of Anekantavada apply the principle to religion and philosophy themselves, reminding adherents that any religion or philosophy, even Jainism, that clings too dogmatically to its own tenets is committing an error based on its limited point of view. In this application, Anekantavada resembles the Western principles of cultural and moral relativism.

The Blind Men and the Elephant

The concept can be explained very well by a poem by John Godfrey Saxe that is based on an Indian story:

It was six men of Indostan
To learning much inclined,
Who went to see the Elephant
(Though all of them were blind),
That each by observation
Might satisfy his mind

The First approached the Elephant,
And happening to fall
Against his broad and sturdy side,
At once began to bawl:
“God bless me! but the Elephant
Is very like a wall!”

The Second, feeling of the tusk,
Cried, “Ho! what have we here
So very round and smooth and sharp?
To me ’tis mighty clear
This wonder of an Elephant
Is very like a spear!”

The Third approached the animal,
And happening to take
The squirming trunk within his hands,
Thus boldly up and spake:
“I see,” quoth he, “the Elephant
Is very like a snake!”

The Fourth reached out an eager hand,
And felt about the knee.
“What most this wondrous beast is like
Is mighty plain,” quoth he;
“ ‘Tis clear enough the Elephant
Is very like a tree!”

The Fifth, who chanced to touch the ear,
Said: “E’en the blindest man
Can tell what this resembles most;
Deny the fact who can
This marvel of an Elephant
Is very like a fan!”

The Sixth no sooner had begun
About the beast to grope,
Than, seizing on the swinging tail
That fell within his scope,
“I see,” quoth he, “the Elephant
Is very like a rope!”

And so these men of Indostan
Disputed loud and long,
Each in his own opinion
Exceeding stiff and strong,
Though each was partly in the right,
And all were in the wrong!

Moral:

So oft in theologic wars,
The disputants, I ween,
Rail on in utter ignorance
Of what each other mean,
And prate about an Elephant
Not one of them has seen!

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Nagin J. Shah ed., Jaina Theory of Multiple Facets of Reality and Truth (Anekantavada). Delhi : Motilal Banarsidass Publishers & Bhogilal Leherchand Institute of Indology, 2000. ISBN 8120817079 ISBN 9788120817074
  • Philosophy East & West, vol. 50, no. 3 (July 2000), SPECIAL ISSUE: THE PHILOSOPHY OF JAINISM, Guest Editor: Kim Skoog. [Honolulu, University Press of Hawaii]. ISSN 0031-8221
  • Sanmatti Prakaran, in Gujarati. Author Acharya Sidddhasen Divakar. Navjeevan Trust, ahmedabad.
  • Satkari Mookerjee, The Jaina Philosophy of Non-Absolutism. Delhi : Motilal Banarsidass, 1978.

External links


Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.