The Müller-Lyer illusion is an optical illusion consisting of a set of lines that end in arrowheads. The orientation of the arrowheads affects one's ability to accurately perceive the length of the lines. Like most visual and perceptual illusions, the Müller-Lyer illusion helps neuroscientists study the way the brain and visual system perceive and interpret images. Artists have also utilized the illusion to great effect in their works.
The Müller-Lyer illusion is named for Franz Carl Müller-Lyer, a German psychiatrist and sociologist. Müller-Lyer published fifteen versions of the illusion in an 1889 issue of the German journal Zeitschrift für Psychologie.
The most well known version of the Müller-Lyer illusion consists of two parallel lines, one of which ends in inward pointing arrows, the other which ends with outward pointing arrows. When observing the two lines, the one with the inward pointing arrows appears to be significantly longer than the other. In other versions, one of each type of arrow is put at each end of a single line. The viewer attempts to identify the middle point of the line, only to find that he/she is consistently off to one side.
It is unclear exactly what causes the Müller-Lyer illusion to take place, but there are a number of theories. One of the most popular is the perspective explanation.
In the three-dimensional world, we often use angles to judge depth and distance. Living in a "carpentered world," we have grown accustomed to seeing corners everywhere. The brain is used to viewing such angles and interpreting them as far and near corners, and also uses this information to make size judgments. When looking at the Müller-Lyer arrows, the brain interprets them as far and near corners, and overrides the retinal information that says both lines are the same length.
This explanation is supported by studies comparing the response to the Müller-Lyer illusion by American children and both rural and urban Zambian children. American children were susceptible to the illusion, and the urban Zambian children were more susceptible than the rural Zambian children. Since the rural Zambian children were much less exposed to rectangular structures, this would seem to support the perspective (or "carpentered world") theory.
Interestingly enough, the illusion also persists when the arrows are replaced by circles, which have nothing to do with perspective or corners, and would seem to negate the perspective theory.
Another popular theory has been the "eye movement theory," which states that we perceive one line as longer because it takes more eye movements to view a line with inward pointing arrows than it does a line with outward pointing arrows. This explanation is largely dismissed, as the illusion persists even when there is no eye movement at all.
Also popular has been the "assimilation theory," which states that we see one line as longer because the visual system is unable to separate the figure into parts. As a whole figure, the line with inward pointing arrows is indeed longer. This theory is also generally dismissed.
Like most visual and perceptual illusions, the Müller-Lyer illusion helps neuroscientists study the way the brain and visual system perceive and interpret images. Artists have also utilized the illusion to great effect in their works.
- "Müller-Lyer Illusion" 2001. Oxford University Press. Retrieved December 4, 2007.
- "Muller-Lyer Illusion" June 2002. Retrieved December 4, 2007.
- Howe, Catherine Q. and Dale Purves. "The Müller-Lyer illusion explained by the statistics of image–source relationships" December 2004. The Center for Cognitive Neuroscience at Duke University. Retrieved December 4, 2007.
- Fineman, Mark. 1996. The Nature of Visual Illusion. Dover Publications. ISBN 0486291057
- Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2003. Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0226300633
- Gregory, Richard L. 1997. Eye and Brain. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0691048371
- Merleau-Ponty. 2002. Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge. ISBN 0415278414
- Ninio, Jacques. 2001. The Science of Illusions. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0801437709
- Robinson, J.O. 1998. The Psychology of Visual Illusion. Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0486404493
- Thomas, Ed. Gilovich. 2002. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521796792
All links retrieved October 30, 2018.
New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:
The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:
Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.