Difference between revisions of "Subsistence farming" - New World Encyclopedia
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
'''Subsistence farming''', or subsistence agriculture, is a mode of [[agriculture]] in which a plot of land produces only enough food to feed the family or small community working it. All produce grown is intended for consumption purposes as opposed to market sale or trade. Depending on [[climate]], [[soil]] conditions, agricultural practices and the crop grown, it generally requires between 1,000 and 40,000 m² (0.25 and 10 acres) per person. | '''Subsistence farming''', or subsistence agriculture, is a mode of [[agriculture]] in which a plot of land produces only enough food to feed the family or small community working it. All produce grown is intended for consumption purposes as opposed to market sale or trade. Depending on [[climate]], [[soil]] conditions, agricultural practices and the crop grown, it generally requires between 1,000 and 40,000 m² (0.25 and 10 acres) per person. | ||
| − | A recognizably harsh way of living, subsistence farmers can experience a rare surplus of produce goods under conditions of good weather which may allow farmers to sell or [[trade]] such goods at market. Because such surpluses are rare, subsistence farming does not allow for economic growth and development, the accumulation of capital, or the [[specialization of labor]]. Diets of subsistence communities are confined to little else than what is produced by community farmers. Subsistence crops are usually [[Organic farming|organic]] due to a lack of [[finances]] to buy or trade for industrial inputs such as [[fertilizer]], [[pesticide]]s or [[genetically modified organism|genetically modified seed]]s. | + | A recognizably harsh way of living, subsistence farmers can experience a rare surplus of produce goods under conditions of good weather which may allow farmers to sell or [[trade]] such goods at market. Because such surpluses are rare, subsistence farming does not allow for consistent economic growth and development, the accumulation of capital, or the [[specialization of labor]]. Diets of subsistence communities are confined to little else than what is produced by community farmers. Subsistence crops are usually [[Organic farming|organic]] due to a lack of [[finances]] to buy or trade for industrial inputs such as [[fertilizer]], [[pesticide]]s or [[genetically modified organism|genetically modified seed]]s. |
==History== | ==History== | ||
| − | For countries like [[Botswana]], [[Bolivia]], [[Rwanda]], [[Sierra Leone]], [[Zambia]], [[Mexico | + | For countries like [[Botswana]], [[Bolivia]], [[Rwanda]], [[Sierra Leone]], [[Zambia]], [[Mexico]], and [[Vietnam]], subsistence farming continues to be a way of life. Subsistence farming, which exists most commonly throughout areas of Sub-Saharan Africa, Southeast Asia and parts of South and Central America, is an extension of primitive [[foraging]] practiced by early civilizations. Within early foraging communities, like [[hunter-gatherer]] societies, small communities consumed only what was hunted or gathered by members of the community. As the [[domestication]] of certain plants and animals evolved, a more advanced subsistence agricultural society developed in which communities practiced small-scale, low-intensity farming to produce an efficient amount of goods to meet the basic consumption needs of the community. Subsistence farming is believed to have been practiced by most early civilizations until, over time, population densities rose, intensive farming methods developed and the movement toward commercial farming and industrialization became more prominent. |
| − | Historically, most [[farmer]]s engaged in subsistence farming for survival. Today, subsistence farming is most prevalent within the poorest [[developing nation]]s on earth where over one billion people live on less than $ | + | Historically, most [[farmer]]s engaged in subsistence farming for survival. Today, subsistence farming is most prevalent within the poorest [[developing nation]]s on earth where over one billion people live on less than $1 U.S. dollar per day, and more than two billion more live for less than $5 US dollars per day. To more than half of the human population on [[Earth]], money is a minor consideration in how agriculture works, what crops are planted, and what tools and methods are used. |
==Techniques== | ==Techniques== | ||
| − | Techniques of subsistence farming include [[slash and burn]] clearing in which farmers clear plots of farmland by cutting down all brush, allowing the debris to dry, and later burning the fallen refuse. This works to clear the field for cultivation, while the leftover ash serves as a natural fertilizer. This type of clearing technique is often employed by subtropical communities throughout lush areas of South and Central America. | + | Techniques of subsistence farming include [[slash and burn]] clearing in which farmers clear plots of farmland by cutting down all brush, allowing the debris to dry, and later burning the fallen refuse. This works to clear the field for [[cultivation]], while the leftover ash serves as a natural [[fertilizer]]. This type of clearing technique is often employed by [[subtropical]] communities throughout lush areas of South and Central America, and parts of [[Indonesia]]. |
| − | In the absence of technology, the area of land that a farmer can cultivate each season is limited by factors such as available tools and the quality of the soil. Tools used by subsistence farmers are often | + | In the absence of [[technology]], the area of land that a farmer can cultivate each season is limited by factors such as available tools and the quality of the soil. Tools used by subsistence farmers are often primitive. Most farmers do not have access to large domesticated work animals, and therefore clear, toil and harvest their goods using pointed sticks, hoes, or by hand. If the land does not produce a surplus, due to the fertility of the soil, climate conditions, tools and techniques, or available crop types, the farmer can do no more than hope to subsist on it. Under these conditions, subsequent years with poor harvests often result in food scarcity and [[famine]]. |
| − | Not all subsistence farmers have access to as much land as they can cultivate. Many times, socioeconomic conditions prevent an expansion of farming plots and | + | Not all subsistence farmers have access to as much land as they can cultivate. Many times, socioeconomic conditions prevent an expansion of farming plots and any increase in produce levels. If [[inheritance]] traditions require that a plot be split among an owner's children upon the owner’s death, plot sizes can steadily decrease. |
==Obstacles to Industrial Development== | ==Obstacles to Industrial Development== | ||
| − | The Peruvian [[economist]] [[Hernando de Soto (economist)|Hernando de Soto]] has argued that one obstacle to industrial development is that subsistence farmers | + | The Peruvian [[economist]] [[Hernando de Soto (economist)|Hernando de Soto]] has argued that one obstacle to industrial development is that subsistence farmers cannot convert their work into [[capital]] which could ultimately be used to start new businesses and trigger [[industrialization]]. De Soto has argued that these obstacles exist often because [[subsistence farmer]]s do not have clear titles to the land which they work and to the crops which they produce. |
| − | In addition to the problems presented by undefined property rights, monetary demands on industrial producers, like produce [[ | + | In addition to the problems presented by undefined [[property rights]], monetary demands on industrial producers, like produce [[taxes]], often dissuade subsistence farmers from entering the commercial farming [[sector]]. Moreover, the [[marginal benefit]] of surplus production is limited, and any extra effort to increase production is poorly rewarded. |
| − | Subsistence farmers in underdeveloped countries also lack | + | Subsistence farmers in [[underdeveloped]] countries also lack equal access to trade markets. Despite attempts to [[specialize]] in the production and distribution of certain crops, many subsistence communities would still lack access to open market systems in which the sale or trade of such goods are possible. In addition, educational studies have shown certain industrial growth techniques to depend on various infrastructures, climates, or resources that are not available in all communities relying on subsistence farming. In this way, subsistence farming may represent the only way many deeply [[rural]] communities can survive. |
==Industrial Intervention== | ==Industrial Intervention== | ||
Many techniques have been attempted, with varying degrees of success, to help subsistence farmers to produce consistent surpluses so that small underdeveloped communities can begin the path toward commercial farming, [[economic growth]] and development. | Many techniques have been attempted, with varying degrees of success, to help subsistence farmers to produce consistent surpluses so that small underdeveloped communities can begin the path toward commercial farming, [[economic growth]] and development. | ||
| − | [[Education]] about modern agricultural techniques has proven to have limited success in areas practicing subsistence farming. Though some subsistence communities lack the basic infrastructure for industrial growth, a second approach to education has been to provide community farmers with non-agricultural | + | [[Education]] about modern agricultural techniques has proven to have limited success in areas practicing subsistence farming. Though some subsistence communities lack the basic infrastructure for industrial growth, a second approach to education has been to provide community farmers with non-agricultural marketable skills. Under this appraoch, subsistence farmers are given an opportunity to leave the subsistence community to seek employment in an area where greater resources are available. This technique has been met with marginal success as it often ignores the human desire to stay within one’s community. |
| − | In recent years, some attention has been given to developing [[:Category:underutilized crops|underutilized crops]], particularly in areas of [[Africa]] and [[South-East Asia]]. [[Genetically modified crop]]s, such as [[golden rice]], have also been used to educate farmers within subsistence communities. Such crops are proven to have higher nutrient content or disease resistance than natural varieties, and represent an increase in farming efficiency. This technique has been highly successful in some parts of the world, though | + | In recent years, some attention has been given to developing [[:Category:underutilized crops|underutilized crops]], particularly in areas of [[Africa]] and [[South-East Asia]]. [[Genetically modified crop]]s, such as [[golden rice]], have also been used to educate farmers within subsistence communities. Such crops are proven to have higher nutrient content or disease resistance than natural varieties, and represent an increase in farming efficiency. This technique has been highly successful in some parts of the world, though long-term [[ecology| ecological]] and [[epidemiology| epidemiological]] effects of these crops are often poorly understood. |
| − | + | Proper [[irrigation]] techniques can also dramatically improve the productivity of subsistence [[farmland]] and have been introduced to certain rural communities in hopes of promoting output surpluses. Traditional irrigation methods, if in place, have been shown to be extremely labor-intensive, wasteful of [[water]], and may require a community-wide infrastructure which is difficult to implement. Certain programs have helped to introduce new types of irrigation equipment available, which are both inexpensive and water-efficient, to subsistence farming communities. Many subsistence farmers, however, are often unaware of such technologies, are unable to afford them, or have difficulties marketing their crops after investing in irrigation equipment. | |
| − | [[Microloan]]s, loans of | + | [[Microloan]]s, or government loans of small sums of money, have also been shown to enable farmers to purchase [[agricultural equipment|equipment]] or [[draft animal]]s. Alternatively, microloans can also enable farmers to find non-agricultural occupations within their communities. |
==Subsistence Farming & the Modern World== | ==Subsistence Farming & the Modern World== | ||
Despite its difficulties, subsistence farming remains a part of the modern world today. For many underdeveloped nations, subsistence farming represents the only option to prevent [[starvation]]. | Despite its difficulties, subsistence farming remains a part of the modern world today. For many underdeveloped nations, subsistence farming represents the only option to prevent [[starvation]]. | ||
| − | + | Subsistence farming has been argued to be economically efficient within various subtropical regions of [[Columbia]] and [[Papua New Guinea]]. Under these subtropical conditions, rainfall levels are often high and various crops can be produced year round. Due to these conditions, production levels often prove adequate enough to provide for small susistence farming communities. | |
| − | + | This argument does not hold for many [[Sub-Saharan]] regions of [[Africa]], where poverty and famine levels are some of the highest in the world. In parts of rural [[Zambia]], much of the population relies on subsistence farming to survive. As [[irrigation]] systems are few, most Zambians must rely on seasonal rains to ensure crop production. In 1995, Zambia underwent a severe drought which vastly diminished production levels throughout subsistence farming communities. Similar impoverishment has been observed throughout parts of the [[Amazon Basin]] of [[Brazil]] and the [[Indonesian islands]] of [[Sumatra]] and [[Borneo]], which also rely heavily on subsistence farming and production. | |
| − | Many [[developmental economists]] argue against the use of subsistence farming and promote commercial farming and economic industrialization as the solution to worldwide hunger. Economist [[Ronald E. Seavoy]], author of ''Subsistence and Economic Development'', argues that subsistence farming is to blame for high levels of poverty and increasing instances of famine. He suggests the first priority of central governments to be the transformation of subsistence agriculture into commercial agriculture which will ultimately promote [[economic growth]] and [[development]] among economically [[underdeveloped]] nations. | + | Many [[developmental economists]] argue against the use of subsistence farming and promote commercial farming and economic industrialization as the solution to worldwide hunger. Economist [[Ronald E. Seavoy]], author of ''Subsistence and Economic Development'', argues that subsistence farming is to blame for high levels of [[poverty]] and increasing instances of [[famine]]. He suggests the first priority of central governments to be the transformation of subsistence agriculture into commercial agriculture which will ultimately promote [[economic growth]] and [[development]] among economically [[underdeveloped]] nations. |
==External Links== | ==External Links== | ||
Revision as of 01:56, 21 February 2007
Subsistence farming, or subsistence agriculture, is a mode of agriculture in which a plot of land produces only enough food to feed the family or small community working it. All produce grown is intended for consumption purposes as opposed to market sale or trade. Depending on climate, soil conditions, agricultural practices and the crop grown, it generally requires between 1,000 and 40,000 m² (0.25 and 10 acres) per person.
A recognizably harsh way of living, subsistence farmers can experience a rare surplus of produce goods under conditions of good weather which may allow farmers to sell or trade such goods at market. Because such surpluses are rare, subsistence farming does not allow for consistent economic growth and development, the accumulation of capital, or the specialization of labor. Diets of subsistence communities are confined to little else than what is produced by community farmers. Subsistence crops are usually organic due to a lack of finances to buy or trade for industrial inputs such as fertilizer, pesticides or genetically modified seeds.
History
For countries like Botswana, Bolivia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Zambia, Mexico, and Vietnam, subsistence farming continues to be a way of life. Subsistence farming, which exists most commonly throughout areas of Sub-Saharan Africa, Southeast Asia and parts of South and Central America, is an extension of primitive foraging practiced by early civilizations. Within early foraging communities, like hunter-gatherer societies, small communities consumed only what was hunted or gathered by members of the community. As the domestication of certain plants and animals evolved, a more advanced subsistence agricultural society developed in which communities practiced small-scale, low-intensity farming to produce an efficient amount of goods to meet the basic consumption needs of the community. Subsistence farming is believed to have been practiced by most early civilizations until, over time, population densities rose, intensive farming methods developed and the movement toward commercial farming and industrialization became more prominent.
Historically, most farmers engaged in subsistence farming for survival. Today, subsistence farming is most prevalent within the poorest developing nations on earth where over one billion people live on less than $1 U.S. dollar per day, and more than two billion more live for less than $5 US dollars per day. To more than half of the human population on Earth, money is a minor consideration in how agriculture works, what crops are planted, and what tools and methods are used.
Techniques
Techniques of subsistence farming include slash and burn clearing in which farmers clear plots of farmland by cutting down all brush, allowing the debris to dry, and later burning the fallen refuse. This works to clear the field for cultivation, while the leftover ash serves as a natural fertilizer. This type of clearing technique is often employed by subtropical communities throughout lush areas of South and Central America, and parts of Indonesia.
In the absence of technology, the area of land that a farmer can cultivate each season is limited by factors such as available tools and the quality of the soil. Tools used by subsistence farmers are often primitive. Most farmers do not have access to large domesticated work animals, and therefore clear, toil and harvest their goods using pointed sticks, hoes, or by hand. If the land does not produce a surplus, due to the fertility of the soil, climate conditions, tools and techniques, or available crop types, the farmer can do no more than hope to subsist on it. Under these conditions, subsequent years with poor harvests often result in food scarcity and famine.
Not all subsistence farmers have access to as much land as they can cultivate. Many times, socioeconomic conditions prevent an expansion of farming plots and any increase in produce levels. If inheritance traditions require that a plot be split among an owner's children upon the owner’s death, plot sizes can steadily decrease.
Obstacles to Industrial Development
The Peruvian economist Hernando de Soto has argued that one obstacle to industrial development is that subsistence farmers cannot convert their work into capital which could ultimately be used to start new businesses and trigger industrialization. De Soto has argued that these obstacles exist often because subsistence farmers do not have clear titles to the land which they work and to the crops which they produce.
In addition to the problems presented by undefined property rights, monetary demands on industrial producers, like produce taxes, often dissuade subsistence farmers from entering the commercial farming sector. Moreover, the marginal benefit of surplus production is limited, and any extra effort to increase production is poorly rewarded.
Subsistence farmers in underdeveloped countries also lack equal access to trade markets. Despite attempts to specialize in the production and distribution of certain crops, many subsistence communities would still lack access to open market systems in which the sale or trade of such goods are possible. In addition, educational studies have shown certain industrial growth techniques to depend on various infrastructures, climates, or resources that are not available in all communities relying on subsistence farming. In this way, subsistence farming may represent the only way many deeply rural communities can survive.
Industrial Intervention
Many techniques have been attempted, with varying degrees of success, to help subsistence farmers to produce consistent surpluses so that small underdeveloped communities can begin the path toward commercial farming, economic growth and development.
Education about modern agricultural techniques has proven to have limited success in areas practicing subsistence farming. Though some subsistence communities lack the basic infrastructure for industrial growth, a second approach to education has been to provide community farmers with non-agricultural marketable skills. Under this appraoch, subsistence farmers are given an opportunity to leave the subsistence community to seek employment in an area where greater resources are available. This technique has been met with marginal success as it often ignores the human desire to stay within one’s community.
In recent years, some attention has been given to developing underutilized crops, particularly in areas of Africa and South-East Asia. Genetically modified crops, such as golden rice, have also been used to educate farmers within subsistence communities. Such crops are proven to have higher nutrient content or disease resistance than natural varieties, and represent an increase in farming efficiency. This technique has been highly successful in some parts of the world, though long-term ecological and epidemiological effects of these crops are often poorly understood.
Proper irrigation techniques can also dramatically improve the productivity of subsistence farmland and have been introduced to certain rural communities in hopes of promoting output surpluses. Traditional irrigation methods, if in place, have been shown to be extremely labor-intensive, wasteful of water, and may require a community-wide infrastructure which is difficult to implement. Certain programs have helped to introduce new types of irrigation equipment available, which are both inexpensive and water-efficient, to subsistence farming communities. Many subsistence farmers, however, are often unaware of such technologies, are unable to afford them, or have difficulties marketing their crops after investing in irrigation equipment.
Microloans, or government loans of small sums of money, have also been shown to enable farmers to purchase equipment or draft animals. Alternatively, microloans can also enable farmers to find non-agricultural occupations within their communities.
Subsistence Farming & the Modern World
Despite its difficulties, subsistence farming remains a part of the modern world today. For many underdeveloped nations, subsistence farming represents the only option to prevent starvation.
Subsistence farming has been argued to be economically efficient within various subtropical regions of Columbia and Papua New Guinea. Under these subtropical conditions, rainfall levels are often high and various crops can be produced year round. Due to these conditions, production levels often prove adequate enough to provide for small susistence farming communities.
This argument does not hold for many Sub-Saharan regions of Africa, where poverty and famine levels are some of the highest in the world. In parts of rural Zambia, much of the population relies on subsistence farming to survive. As irrigation systems are few, most Zambians must rely on seasonal rains to ensure crop production. In 1995, Zambia underwent a severe drought which vastly diminished production levels throughout subsistence farming communities. Similar impoverishment has been observed throughout parts of the Amazon Basin of Brazil and the Indonesian islands of Sumatra and Borneo, which also rely heavily on subsistence farming and production.
Many developmental economists argue against the use of subsistence farming and promote commercial farming and economic industrialization as the solution to worldwide hunger. Economist Ronald E. Seavoy, author of Subsistence and Economic Development, argues that subsistence farming is to blame for high levels of poverty and increasing instances of famine. He suggests the first priority of central governments to be the transformation of subsistence agriculture into commercial agriculture which will ultimately promote economic growth and development among economically underdeveloped nations.
External Links
- Mozambique Subsistence Agriculture FAO Newsroom 23 August, 2004.
- Subsistence Farming A Way of Life in Zambia.
ReferencesISBN links support NWE through referral fees
- CBC News Viewpoint. Subsistence Farming; A Way of Life in Zambia. 14 March, 2006.
- The Monitor (Kampala). Uganda: Commerical Farming is Way to Go- Serunjogi. 14 February, 2007. www.allafrica.com. Retrieved 21 February, 2007.
- Seavoy, Ronald. Subsistence and Economic Development. Praeger Publishers. Westport, CT. 2000. ISBN 0275967824.
Credits
New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:
The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:
Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.
