Lorenz, Konrad

From New World Encyclopedia
({{Contracted}})
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Started}}{{Claimed}}{{Contracted}}
+
{{Submitted}}{{Images OK}}{{Approved}}{{Paid}}{{Copyedited}}
[[Category:Politics and social sciences]]
+
[[Category:Psychologists]]
[[Category:Psychology]]
 
[[Category:Biography]]
 
  
 +
{{epname|Lorenz, Konrad}}
 +
{{Infobox Scientist
 +
| name = Konrad Lorenz
 +
| image = Konrad lorenz-rusky lagr 1944-fotka.jpg
 +
| birth_date = November 7, 1903
 +
| birth_place = [[Image:Austria-Hungary flag 1869-1918.svg|25px]]  [[Vienna]], [[Austria-Hungary]]
 +
| death_date = February 27, 1989
 +
| death_place = {{flagicon|AUT}} [[Vienna]], [[Austria]]
 +
| residence = [[Austria]], [[Germany]]
 +
| nationality = [[Austria]]n
 +
| field = [[Ethology]]|
 +
| known_for = [[Imprinting (psychology)|Imprinting]] 
 +
| prizes = [[Image:Nobel.svg|20px]] [[Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine]] (1973)
 +
| field = [[zoology|Zoologist]], [[ethology|ethologist]]
 +
| alma_mater = University of Vienna
 +
| religion =
 +
| footnotes =
 +
}}
 +
'''Konrad Zacharias Lorenz''' (November 7, 1903 – February 27, 1989) was an [[Austria|Austrian]] [[zoology|zoologist]], [[animal psychology|animal psychologist]], and [[ornithology|ornithologist]]. He is considered one of the founders of modern [[ethology]]. Lorenz studied [[instinct|instinctive behavior]] in [[animal]]s, especially in [[Goose|greylag geese]] and [[jackdaw]]s. Working with geese, he re-discovered the principle of [[imprinting (psychology)|imprinting]] (originally described by [[Douglas Spalding]] in the nineteenth century) in the behavior of [[nidifugous]] [[bird]]s. Lorenz was a close associate of [[Niko Tinbergen]], and together with [[Karl von Frisch]] the three were awarded the [[Nobel Prize]] in [[Physiology]] or [[Medicine]] in 1973.
 +
{{toc}}
 +
Lorenz's most enduring contributions include his work on instincts, particularly imprinting; his influence on a younger generation of ethologists; his methods of carrying out research with animals without cruelty; and his popular works, which were enormously important in bringing [[ethology]] to the attention of the general public. Lorenz saw humankind as different from animals, in that we have overcome our instincts and are free from the constraints of the environment, free to act for both [[good]] or [[evil|ill]]. He recognized that such freedom requires responsibility to tame it, if we are not to destroy ourselves and our world. Thus, his final contribution may be the warning that the most significant problems humanity faces today are [[morality|moral]] and [[ethics|ethical]] ones.
  
{{epname}}
+
== Life ==
 +
'''Konrad Zacharias Lorenz''' was born in Altenberg, near [[Vienna]], [[Austria]], on November 7, 1903 to Adolf Lorenz and Emma Lecher Lorenz, both medical doctors. Always fascinated with animals, he kept a [[menagerie]] at home.
  
'''Konrad Zacharias Lorenz''' ([[November 7]], [[1903]] in [[Vienna]] – [[February 27]], [[1989]] in [[Vienna]]) was an [[Austria|Austrian]] [[zoology|zoologist]], [[animal psychology|animal psychologist]], and [[ornithologist]]. He is often regarded as one of the founders of modern [[ethology]], developing an approach that began with an earlier generation, including his teacher [[Oskar Heinroth]]. Lorenz studied [[instinct|instinctive behavior]] in [[animal]]s, especially in [[Greylag Goose|greylag geese]] and [[jackdaw]]s. Working with geese, he rediscovered the principle of [[imprinting (psychology)|imprinting]] (originally described by [[Douglas Spalding]] in the [[19th century]]) in the behavior of [[nidifugous]] [[bird]]s.  
+
However, his father insisted that he become a [[physician]], and so Konrad Lorenz began a premedical curriculum in 1922 at [[Columbia University]]. He returned to Vienna in 1923 to continue his studies at the [[University of Vienna]] until 1928. Konrad Lorenz received his medical degree in 1928. A year before, he married Margarethe Gebhart, also a doctor. Then, studying at Ferdinand Hochstetter's Anatomical Institute at the University, he received his doctorate in [[zoology]], in 1933.  
  
At the request of his father, Lorenz began a premedical curriculum in 1922 at [[Columbia University]], but he returned to Vienna in 1923 to continue his studies at the [[University of Vienna]] until [[1928]]. At this university he became an assistant professor from [[1928]] to [[1935]]. In [[1940]] he became a professor of [[psychology]] at the [[Immanuel Kant University]] in Königsberg (later the [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] [[port]] of [[Kaliningrad]]). He was drafted into the [[Wehrmacht]] in [[1941]]. He sought to be a motorcycle mechanic, but instead he was assigned as a medic. He was a [[prisoner of war]] in the Soviet Union from [[1944]] to [[1948]]. The [[Max Planck Society]] established the Lorenz Institute for Behavioral Physiology in [[Buldern]], [[Germany]], in [[1950]].  
+
During his early period, he set up many of his hypotheses on animal behavior, such as [[imprinting (psychology)|imprinting]], "innate releasing mechanism," and "fixed action patterns." After serving as an assistant in the Anatomical Institute, Lorenz was a ''Privatdozent'' (unpaid instructor) at the [[University of Vienna]] from 1937 to 1940.
  
In [[1958]], Lorenz transferred to the [[Max Planck|Max Planck Institute for Behavioral Physiology]] in [[Seewiesen]]. He shared the [[1973]] [[Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine]] "for discoveries in individual and social behavior patterns" with two other important early ethologists, [[Niko Tinbergen]] and [[Karl von Frisch]]. In 1969, he became the first recipient of the [[Prix mondial Cino Del Duca]].
+
During the 1930s, Lorenz established the major theoretical foundations of classical [[ethology]]. His basic insight, shared with predecessors and teachers, was that some [[instinct]]ive behavior patterns were fixed in form and just as characteristic of [[species]] as [[organ]]s. Lorenz planned to analyze instinctive behavior using comparative techniques. It was during this period that he met and began a close personal and working relationship with [[Niko Tinbergen]].
  
Lorenz retired from the Max Planck Institute in [[1973]] but continued to research and publish from [[Altenberg, Austria|Altenberg]] (his family home, near Vienna) and [[Grünau im Almtal]] in Austria.  
+
Lorenz joined the [[National Socialist German Workers Party|Nazi Party]] in 1938 and accepted a university chair under the [[Nazism|Nazi regime]]. In his application for membership to the Nazi-party in 1938 he wrote: "I'm able to say that my whole scientific work is devoted to the ideas of the National Socialists." His publications during that time led in later years to allegations that his scientific work had been contaminated by Nazi sympathies: his published writing during the Nazi period included support for Nazi ideas of "[[racial hygiene]]" couched in pseudoscientific [[metaphor]]s.
 +
 
 +
In 1940, Lorenz became a professor of [[psychology]] at the [[Immanuel Kant University]] in Königsberg (later the [[Russia]]n [[port]] of [[Kaliningrad]]). He was drafted into the [[Wehrmacht]] in 1941. He sought to be a [[motorcycle]] mechanic, but instead he was assigned as a medic. Sent to the front near Witebsk in 1942 he was taken as a [[prisoner of war]] in the [[Soviet Union]], where he worked with doctors in various camps from 1944 to 1948. During this time he observed the parallels between the psychological effects of Nazi and [[Marxism|Marxist]] education.
 +
 
 +
The [[Max Planck Society]] established the Lorenz Institute for Behavioral Physiology in [[Buldern]], [[Germany]], in 1950. In 1958, Lorenz transferred to the [[Max Planck Institute for Behavioral Physiology]] in [[Seewiesen]]. In 1969, he became the first recipient of the [[Prix mondial Cino Del Duca]]. Lorenz retired from the Max Planck Institute in 1973 but continued to research and publish from [[Altenberg, Austria|Altenberg]] (his family home, near Vienna) and [[Grünau im Almtal]] in Austria.
 +
 
 +
He shared the 1973 [[Nobel Prize]] in [[Physiology]] or [[Medicine]] "for discoveries in individual and social behavior patterns" with two other important early ethologists, [[Nikolaas Tinbergen]] and [[Karl von Frisch]]. When accepting the Nobel Prize, he apologized for a 1940 publication that included Nazi views of [[science]], saying that "many highly decent scientists hoped, like I did, for a short time for good from National Socialism, and many quickly turned away from it with the same horror as I." It seems highly likely that Lorenz's ideas about an inherited basis for behavior patterns were congenial to the Nazi authorities, but there is no evidence to suggest that his experimental work was either inspired or distorted by Nazi ideas.
 +
 
 +
During the final years of his life Lorenz supported the fledgling [[Austrian Green Party]] and in 1984 became the figurehead of the Konrad Lorenz Volksbegehren, a grass-roots movement that was formed to prevent the building of a [[power plant]] at the [[Danube]] near [[Hainburg an der Donau]] and thus the destruction of the yet untouched woodland surrounding the planned site.
  
 
Konrad Lorenz died on February 27, 1989, in Altenberg.
 
Konrad Lorenz died on February 27, 1989, in Altenberg.
  
Lorenz was also a friend and student of renowned biologist [[Sir Julian Sorell Huxley]] (grandson of "Darwin's bulldog," [[Thomas Henry Huxley]]).
+
== Work ==
 +
In several seminal papers, Lorenz set forth the theoretical concerns, findings, investigatory methods, and remaining problems of [[Ethology]]. Lorenz's methods were always conventional. He never did a formal experiment, and his descriptive observations were often anecdotal. He infuriated his more conventional colleagues by saying, "If I have one good example, I don't give a fig for statistics." By this he meant that if he had seen an animal do something striking, he did not need to see a lot of other animals do the same thing to confirm what he already knew.  
  
==Politics==
+
[[Image:V31-d-Graugans.JPG|right|thumb|200px|The egg-rolling behavior of the greylag goose is a widely cited example of a ''fixed-action pattern'', one of the key concepts used by ethologists to explain animal behavior.]]
 +
The comparative study of human and animal behavior and learning was a dominant theme throughout Lorenz's work. He loved animals and kept an enormous variety, including [[jackdaw]]s, [[goose|geese]], [[dog]]s, and [[fish]]. He argued that perceptual and cognitive apparatus could be treated like other organs that had evolved in relation to the environment. Even the "disposition to learn" items crucial to survival could be so explained. [[Evolutionary psychology]] and [[sociobiology]] are among the contemporary developments that build on these foundations.
  
Lorenz joined the [[National Socialist German Workers Party|Nazi Party]] in [[1938]] and accepted a university chair under the [[Nazi Germany|Nazi regime]]. In his application for membership to the Nazi-party [[National Socialist German Workers Party|NSDAP]] he wrote in [[1938]]: "I'm able to say that my whole scientific work is devoted to the ideas of the [[Nazism|National Socialists]]." <!-- full text cited in de.Wikipedia --> His publications during that time led in later years to allegations that his scientific work had been contaminated by Nazi sympathies: his published writing during the Nazi period included support for Nazi ideas of "[[racial hygiene]]" couched in pseudoscientific metaphors.
+
Konrad Lorenz discovered several concepts still in use in contemporary behavioral sciences:
 +
#The fixed action pattern—an inherited characteristic, relatively complex movement pattern shared by all members of a species;
 +
#The releaser or sign stimulus—a specific environmental stimulus, the perception of which is sufficient to cause the performance of a fixed action pattern;
 +
#[[imprinting (psychology)|Imprinting]], a rapid, quite stable form of [[learning]] in which a social animal's early experiences affect its later social or sexual behavior, apparently without the need for [[reinforcement]].
 +
[[Image:Graugaense Familie 3.jpg|thumb|200px|left|Family of greylag geese. The goslings [[imprinting (psychology)|imprint]] on the first suitable moving object, in this case their parents, and follow them constantly imitating their behavior.]]
 +
His doctrine of [[imprinting (psychology)|imprinting]] is still a focus of research interest. Filial imprinting, when a young animal recognizes the characteristics of its parent, was first noted by [[biology|biologist]] Douglas Spalding in the nineteenth century and rediscovered by the early [[ethology|ethologist]] Oskar Heinroth, Lorenz' teacher. This phenomenon is most obvious in nidifugous [[bird]]s (who leave the nest shortly after hatching) and [[reptile]]s. Lorenz demonstrated how [[incubator]]-hatched geese would imprint on the first suitable, moving stimulus they saw within what he called a "critical period" of about 36 hours shortly after hatching. Being present with the goslings during their hatching, Lorenz found that the goslings would imprint on himself. As a result of this he is often depicted being followed by a gaggle of geese who had imprinted on him.
  
When accepting the Nobel Prize, he apologized for a 1940 publication that included Nazi views of science, saying that "many highly decent scientists hoped, like I did, for a short time for good from National Socialism, and many quickly turned away from it with the same horror as I." It seems highly likely that Lorenz's ideas about an inherited basis for behavior patterns were congenial to the Nazi authorities, but there is no evidence to suggest that his experimental work was either inspired or distorted by Nazi ideas.
+
Lorenz always believed that humanity was in danger from the allegedly deleterious effects of civilization. He hypothesized varied causes for these effects, successfully postulating racial degeneration, uninhibited [[aggression]], and environmental degradation during his career. In his book ''On Aggression'' (1966), Lorenz claimed that intraspecies aggression, normally an adaptive phenomenon in animals, has turned deadly in humans because our development of new [[weapon]]s that can kill at a distance (which has outrun our innate inhibitions against killing). According to Lorenz, aggression involves stored instinctive energy and needs to be discharged. Then follows a refractory phase to build up the energy that has been flushed much like the flushing and refilling of a toilet. This approach incited an international debate on the biological bases of human behavior.
  
During the final years of his life Lorenz supported the fledgling [[Austrian Green Party]] and in 1984 became the figurehead of the Konrad Lorenz Volksbegehren, a grass-roots movement that was formed to prevent the building of a power plant at the Danube near [[Hainburg an der Donau]] and thus the destruction of the yet untouched woodland surrounding the planned site.
+
Konrad Lorenz also contributed to [[philosophy]]. In his book ''Behind the Mirror'', Lorenz considers the old philosophical question of whether our [[sense]]s correctly inform us about the world as it is, or provide us only with an illusion. His answer comes from [[evolutionary biology]]. Only traits that help us survive and reproduce are transmitted. If our senses gave us wrong information about our environment, we would soon be extinct. Therefore we can be sure that our senses give us correct information, for otherwise we would not be here to be deceived.
  
==Contributions and legacy==
+
==Lorenz's vision of humankind==
{{Cleanup|January 2007}}
 
Together with [[Nikolaas Tinbergen]], Lorenz developed the idea of an [[innate releasing mechanism]] to explain instinctive behaviors ([[fixed action pattern]]s). Influenced by the ideas of [[William McDougall]], Lorenz developed this into a "[[psychohydraulic]]" model of the [[motivation]] of behavior. These ideas were influential as ethology became more popular in the [[1960s]], but they are now regarded as outda  Lorenz's writings about [[evolution]] are also now regarded as outdated {{Fact|date=January 2007}}<!--- [[Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words#Examples]] --->, because he tended towards [[group selection]]ist ideas which have been heavily reinterpreted since the rise of [[sociobiology]] in the [[1970]]s.  Lorenz's most enduring contributions thus seem to be his empirical work, especially on imprinting; his influence on a younger generation of ethologists; and his popular works, which were enormously important in bringing ethology to the attention of the general public.
 
  
There are three Konrad Lorenz Institutes in Austria; one is housed in his family mansion at Altenberg [http://www.kli.ac.at/], and another at his field station in Grünau.
+
In his book ''Civilized Man's Eight Deadly Sins'', Lorenz addressed the following paradox:
 +
<blockquote>All the advantages that man has gained from his ever-deepening understanding of the natural world that surrounds him, his technological, chemical and medical progress, all of which should seem to alleviate human suffering... tends instead to favor humanity's destruction" (Lorenz 1974, 26).</blockquote>
 +
Lorenz adopts an ecological model to attempt to grasp the mechanisms behind this contradiction. Thus
 +
<blockquote>"all species... are adapted to their environment... including not only inorganic components... but all the other living beings that inhabit the locality (Lorenz 1974, 31).</blockquote>
  
===The Example of his Methodology===
+
Fundamental to Lorenz's theory of [[ecology]] is the function of [[feedback mechanism]]s, especially negative feedback mechanisms which, in hierarchical fashion, dampen impulses that occur beneath a certain threshold. The thresholds themselves are the product of the interaction of contrasting mechanisms. Thus [[pain]] and [[pleasure]] act as checks on each other:
{{weasel}}
 
Some would say that Lorenz' most significant contribution and legacy does not lie in any of his theories but in the good example he set with his methodology. He never deprived the animals of basic physical or emotional needs. He never killed them, mutilated them or tortured them. All these cruel methods were once considered indispensable for animal studies, but Lorenz proved it was possible to win a Nobel Prize without using them. Others would say that Lorenz' most enduring legacy was his almost prophetic vision of the relationship between market economics and the threat of ecological catastrophy.
 
  
===Lorenz's Vision of the Challenges Facing Humanity===
+
<blockquote>To gain a desired prey, a dog or wolf will do things that, in other contexts, they would shy away from: run through thorn bushes, jump into cold water and expose themselves to risks which would normally frighten them. All these inhibitory mechanisms... act as a counterweight to the effects of learning mechanisms... The organism cannot allow itself to pay a price which is not worth the candle (Lorenz 1974, 53).</blockquote>
Konrad Lorenz is probably best known for his 1973 book, [[Civilized Man's Eight Deadly Sins]], in which he addresses the following paradox: ''All the advantages that man has gained from his ever-deepening understanding of the natural world that surrounds him, his technological, chemical and medical progress, all of which should seem to alleviate human suffering... tends instead to favor humanity's destruction'' (Gli otto peccati capitali della nostra civiltà - Civilized Man's Eight Deadly Sins, Adelphi edizioni, Milano, 1974, p.26; the citation is translated from the italian version of the book). Lorenz adopts an ecological model to attempt to grasp the mechanisms behind this contradiction. Thus ''all species... are adapted to their environment... including not only inorganic components... but all the other living beings that inhabit the locality'' (otto peccati, p. 31) Fundamental to Lorenz' theory of ecology is the function of feedback mechanisms, especially negative feedback mechanisms which, in hierarchical fashion, dampen impulses that occur beneath  a certain threshold. The thresholds themselves are the product of the interaction of contrasting mechanisms. Thus pain and pleasure act as checks on eachother: ''To gain a desired prey, a dog or wolf will do things that, in other contexts, they would shy away from: run through thorn bushes, jump into cold water and expose themselves to risks which would normally frighten them. All these inhibitory mechanisms... act as a counterweight to the effects of learning mechanisms... The organism cannot allow itself to pay a price which 'is not worth the candle' ''(otto peccati, p. 53). In nature, these mechanisms tend toward a 'stable state' among the living beings of an ecology: ''A closer examination shows that these beings... not only do not damage eachother, but often constitute a community of interests. It is obvious that the predator is strongly interested in the survival of that species, animal or vegetable, which constitutes its prey. ... It is not uncommon that the prey species derives specific benefits from its interaction with the predator species...'' (otto peccati, p. 31 and 33).
 
  
Lorenz asserts that humanity is the one species not bound by these mechanisms, being the one species which has defined its own environment: ''[The pace of human ecology] is determined by the progress of man's technology'' (otto peccati, p. 35). Not only, but  human ecology (economics) is governed by mechanisms of POSITIVE feedback, defined  as a mechanism which tends to encourage behavior rather than to attenuate it (otto peccati, p. 43). ''Positive feedback always involves the danger of an 'avalanche' effect... One particular kind of positive feedback occurs when individuals OF THE SAME SPECIES enter into competition among themselves... [F]or many animal species, environmental factors keep... intraspecies selection from [leading to] disaster... But there is no force which exercises this type of healthy regulatory effect on humanity's cultural development; unfortunately for itself, humanity has learned to overcome  all those environmental forces which are external to itself'' (otto peccati, p. 44)
+
In nature, these mechanisms tend toward a "stable state" among the living beings of an ecology:
  
Lorenz does not see human independence from natural ecological processes as necessarily bad. Indeed, he states that ''a completely new [ecology] which corresponds in every way to [humanity's] desires... could, theoretically, prove as durable as that which would have existed without his intervention'' (otto peccati, p. 36). However, the principle of competition, typical of Western societies, destroys any chance of this: ''The competition between human beings destroys with cold and diabolic brutality... Under the pressure of  this competitive fury we have not only forgotten what is useful to humanity as a whole, but even that which is good and advantageous to the individual. ... One asks, which is more damaging to modern  humanity: the thirst for money or consuming haste... in either case, fear plays a  very important role: the fear of being overtaken by one's competitors, the fear of becoming poor, the fear of making wrong decisions or the fear of not being up to snuff...'' (otto peccati, pp. 45-47).
+
<blockquote>A closer examination shows that these beings... not only do not damage each other, but often constitute a community of interests. It is obvious that the predator is strongly interested in the survival of that species, animal or vegetable, which constitutes its prey. ... It is not uncommon that the prey species derives specific benefits from its interaction with the predator species (Lorenz 1974, 33).</blockquote>
  
===His contribution to philosophy===
+
Lorenz asserted that humanity is the one [[species]] not bound by these mechanisms, being the one species which has defined its own environment: "[The pace of human ecology] is determined by the progress of man's technology" (Lorenz 1974, 35). Not only, but human ecology (economics) is governed by mechanisms of ''positive'' feedback, defined  as a mechanism which tends to encourage behavior rather than to attenuate it (Lorenz 1974, 43).
In his 1973 book [[Behind the Mirror]], Lorenz considers the old philosophical question of whether our senses correctly inform us about the world as it is, or provide us only with an illusion. His answer comes from [[Evolutionary Biology]]. Only traits that help us survive and reproduce are transmitted. If our senses gave us wrong information about our environment, we would soon be extinct. Therefore we can be sure that our senses give us correct information, for otherwise we would not be here to be deceived.
+
<blockquote>Positive feedback always involves the danger of an "avalanche" effect... One particular kind of positive feedback occurs when individuals of the same species enter into competition among themselves... For many animal species, environmental factors keep... intraspecies selection from [leading to] disaster... But there is no force which exercises this type of healthy regulatory effect on humanity's cultural development; unfortunately for itself, humanity has learned to overcome all those environmental forces which are external to itself (Lorenz 1974, 44).</blockquote>
 +
Lorenz does not see human independence from natural ecological processes as necessarily bad. Indeed, he states that "a completely new [ecology] which corresponds in every way to [humanity's] desires... could, theoretically, prove as durable as that which would have existed without his intervention" (Lorenz 1974, 36). However, the principle of competition, typical of Western societies, destroys any chance of this:
 +
<blockquote>The competition between human beings destroys with cold and diabolic brutality... Under the pressure of  this competitive fury we have not only forgotten what is useful to humanity as a whole, but even that which is good and advantageous to the individual. ... One asks, which is more damaging to modern  humanity: the thirst for money or consuming haste... in either case, fear plays a very important role: the fear of being overtaken by one's competitors, the fear of becoming poor, the fear of making wrong decisions or the fear of not being up to snuff (Lorenz 1974, 45-47).</blockquote>
  
===Bekoff on Lorenz===
+
== Legacy==
"I remember meeting Lorenz at an ethological conference in [[Parma]], [[Italy]], and his passion and enthusiasm were incredibly contagious. For hours, he told stories of the animals with whom he had shared his life and never once repeated himself. He clearly loved what he did and loved his animal friends." [[Marc Bekoff]], ''Animal Passions and Beastly Virtues" (2006), ISBN 1-59213-347-9
 
  
==Works==
+
Together with [[Nikolaas Tinbergen]], Lorenz developed the idea of an [[innate releasing mechanism]] to explain instinctive behaviors ([[fixed action pattern]]s). Influenced by the ideas of [[William McDougall]], Lorenz developed this into a "[[psychohydraulic]]" model of the [[motivation]] of behavior. These ideas were influential as ethology became more popular in the 1960s, but they are now regarded as outdated. Lorenz's writings about [[evolution]] are also now regarded as outdated, because he tended towards [[group selection]]ist ideas which have been heavily reinterpreted since the rise of [[sociobiology]] in the 1970s.  
Lorenz's best-known books are ''[[King Solomon's Ring (nonfiction)|King Solomon's Ring]]'' and ''[[On Aggression]]'', both written for a popular audience. His scientific work appeared mainly in journal articles, written in [[German language|German]]; they became widely known to English-speaking scientists through the descriptions of it in Tinbergen's [[1951 in science|1951 book]] ''The Study of Instinct'', though many of his papers were later published in English translation in the two volumes titled ''Studies in Animal and Human Behavior''.  
 
  
*''[[King Solomon's Ring (nonfiction)|King Solomon's Ring]]'' ([[1952 in science|1952]])
+
Lorenz's most enduring contributions thus seem to be his empirical work, especially on [[imprinting (psychology)|imprinting]]; his influence on a younger generation of ethologists; and his popular works, which were enormously important in bringing [[ethology]] to the attention of the general public. Though he demonstrated that the [[instinct]]ive behavior of animals could be analyzed through a repertoire of standard techniques, many of the details of his analyses of behavior appeared to be incomplete. Some would say that Lorenz' most significant contribution and legacy does not lie in any of his theories but in the good example he set with his methodology. He never deprived the animals of basic physical or [[emotion]]al needs. He never killed them, mutilated them, or [[torture]]d them. All these cruel methods were once considered indispensable for animal studies, but Lorenz proved it was possible to win a [[Nobel Prize]] without using them.
*''[[Man Meets Dog]]'' ([[1954 in science|1954]])
 
*''[[Evolution and Modification of Behavior]]'' ([[1965 in science|1965]])
 
*''[[On Aggression]]'' ([[1966 in science|1966]])
 
*''[[Studies in Animal and Human Behavior, Volume I]]'' ([[1970 in science|1970]])
 
*''[[Studies in Animal and Human Behavior, Volume II]]'' ([[1971 in science|1971]])
 
*''[[Behind the Mirror]]'' ([[1973 in science|1973]])
 
*''[[Civilized Man's Eight Deadly Sins]]'' ([[1974 in science|1974]])
 
*''[[The Year of the Greyleg Goose]]'' ([[1979 in science|1979]])
 
*''[[The Foundations of Ethology]]'' ([[1982 in science|1982]])
 
*''[[The Natural Science of the Human Species: An Introduction to Comparative Behavioral Research - The Russian Manuscript (1944-1948)]]''([[1995 in science|1995]])
 
  
==References==
+
Marc Bekoff (2006) has written about Konrad Lorenz, "I remember meeting Lorenz at an ethological conference in [[Parma]], [[Italy]], and his passion and enthusiasm were incredibly contagious. For hours, he told stories of the animals with whom he had shared his life and never once repeated himself. He clearly loved what he did and loved his animal friends."
*Boring, E.G. 1950. ''A history of experimental psychology, 2nd ed.'' Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. ISBN 0133900398
 
*Brennan, J.F. 1986. ''History and systems of psychology''. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. ISBN 0133922189
 
*Leahey, Th. H. 1991. ''A History of Modern Psychology''. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall. 3rd edition. 2000. ISBN 0130175730
 
*Ross, D. 1972. ''G. Stanley Hall: The Psychologist as a Prophet''. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
 
*Sahakian
 
 
 
==External links==
 
*[http://www.nobel.se/medicine/laureates/1973/lorenz-autobio.html Short Autobiography on the Nobel Foundation website]
 
*[http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/genocide/reviewstr18.htm Review of Biologists Under Hitler]
 
*Konrad Lorenz Institutes:
 
**[http://www.kli.ac.at/ The Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research]
 
**[http://www.univie.ac.at/zoology/nbs/gruenau Konrad Lorenz Research Station], [[Grünau im Almtal]]
 
**[http://www.oeaw.ac.at/klivv Konrad Lorenz Institute for Ethology]
 
  
 +
Some might say that Lorenz's most enduring legacy was his almost prophetic vision of the relationship between [[market]] [[economics]] and the threat of ecological catastrophe. Although he ill-advisedly professed agreement with [[Nazi]] ideas at one time, he was shocked to discover the way in which they were put into practice. His autobiographical account and thoughts at the time of receiving his Nobel Prize reflected his recognition that the problems humanity faces today are [[morality|moral]] and [[ethics|ethical]] ones. While he saw humankind as different from animals, in that we have overcome our instincts and are free from the constraints of the environment, free to act for both good or ill.
  
 +
There are three Konrad Lorenz Institutes in [[Austria]]; one of them is housed in his family mansion at Altenberg.
  
 +
==Publications==
 +
Lorenz's best-known books are ''King Solomon's Ring'' (1952) and ''On Aggression'' (1966), both written for a popular audience. His scientific work appeared mainly in journal articles, written in [[German language|German]]; they became widely known to English-speaking scientists through the descriptions of it in Tinbergen's 1951 book ''The Study of Instinct'', though many of his papers were later published in English translation in the two volumes titled ''Studies in Animal and Human Behavior''.
  
 +
*1952. ''King Solomon's Ring''
 +
*1954. ''Man Meets Dog''
 +
*1955. ''The Natural Science of the Human Species: An Introduction to Comparative Behavioral Research - The Russian Manuscript (1944-1948)''
 +
*1965. ''Evolution and Modification of Behavior''
 +
*1966. ''On Aggression''
 +
*1970. ''Studies in Animal and Human Behavior, Volume I''
 +
*1971. ''Studies in Animal and Human Behavior, Volume II''
 +
*1973. ''Behind the Mirror''
 +
*1974. ''Civilized Man's Eight Deadly Sins''
 +
*1979. ''The Year of the Greyleg Goose''
 +
*1982. ''The Foundations of Ethology''
  
 +
==References==
 +
*Bekoff, M. 2006. ''Animal Passions and Beastly Virtues''. Temple University Press. ISBN 1592133479
 +
*Boring, E.G. 1950. ''A history of experimental psychology, 2nd ed''. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. ISBN 0133900398
 +
*Brennan, J.F. 1986. ''History and systems of psychology''. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. ISBN 0133922189
 +
*Leahey, Th. H. 2000. ''A History of Modern Psychology''. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall. 3rd edition. ISBN 0130175730
 +
*Lorenz, K. Z. 1957. Comparative study of behavior. in C.H. Schiller (ed. and trans.). ''Instinctive behavior: The development of a modern concept''. London: Methuen.
 +
*Lorenz, K. Z. 1975. Kant's doctrine of the ''a priori'' in the light of contemporary biology. In Richard I. Evans, ''Konrad Lorenz: The man and his ideas''. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  
 +
==External links==
 +
All links retrieved April 23, 2018.
 +
*[http://www.nobel.se/medicine/laureates/1973/lorenz-autobio.html Autobiography on the Nobel Foundation website].
 +
*[http://www.kli.ac.at/ The Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research] – located at his family mansion in Altenburg. 
  
 +
{{Template:Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine Laureates 1951-1975}}
  
 
{{Credit1|Konrad_Lorenz|101982843|}}
 
{{Credit1|Konrad_Lorenz|101982843|}}

Latest revision as of 17:49, 7 September 2019


Konrad Lorenz

Konrad lorenz-rusky lagr 1944-fotka.jpg
Born

November 7, 1903
Austria-Hungary flag 1869-1918.svg Vienna, Austria-Hungary

Died February 27, 1989

Flag of Austria Vienna, Austria

Residence Austria, Germany
Nationality Austrian
Field Zoologist, ethologist
Alma mater University of Vienna
Known for Imprinting
Notable prizes Nobel.svg Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (1973)

Konrad Zacharias Lorenz (November 7, 1903 – February 27, 1989) was an Austrian zoologist, animal psychologist, and ornithologist. He is considered one of the founders of modern ethology. Lorenz studied instinctive behavior in animals, especially in greylag geese and jackdaws. Working with geese, he re-discovered the principle of imprinting (originally described by Douglas Spalding in the nineteenth century) in the behavior of nidifugous birds. Lorenz was a close associate of Niko Tinbergen, and together with Karl von Frisch the three were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1973.

Lorenz's most enduring contributions include his work on instincts, particularly imprinting; his influence on a younger generation of ethologists; his methods of carrying out research with animals without cruelty; and his popular works, which were enormously important in bringing ethology to the attention of the general public. Lorenz saw humankind as different from animals, in that we have overcome our instincts and are free from the constraints of the environment, free to act for both good or ill. He recognized that such freedom requires responsibility to tame it, if we are not to destroy ourselves and our world. Thus, his final contribution may be the warning that the most significant problems humanity faces today are moral and ethical ones.

Life

Konrad Zacharias Lorenz was born in Altenberg, near Vienna, Austria, on November 7, 1903 to Adolf Lorenz and Emma Lecher Lorenz, both medical doctors. Always fascinated with animals, he kept a menagerie at home.

However, his father insisted that he become a physician, and so Konrad Lorenz began a premedical curriculum in 1922 at Columbia University. He returned to Vienna in 1923 to continue his studies at the University of Vienna until 1928. Konrad Lorenz received his medical degree in 1928. A year before, he married Margarethe Gebhart, also a doctor. Then, studying at Ferdinand Hochstetter's Anatomical Institute at the University, he received his doctorate in zoology, in 1933.

During his early period, he set up many of his hypotheses on animal behavior, such as imprinting, "innate releasing mechanism," and "fixed action patterns." After serving as an assistant in the Anatomical Institute, Lorenz was a Privatdozent (unpaid instructor) at the University of Vienna from 1937 to 1940.

During the 1930s, Lorenz established the major theoretical foundations of classical ethology. His basic insight, shared with predecessors and teachers, was that some instinctive behavior patterns were fixed in form and just as characteristic of species as organs. Lorenz planned to analyze instinctive behavior using comparative techniques. It was during this period that he met and began a close personal and working relationship with Niko Tinbergen.

Lorenz joined the Nazi Party in 1938 and accepted a university chair under the Nazi regime. In his application for membership to the Nazi-party in 1938 he wrote: "I'm able to say that my whole scientific work is devoted to the ideas of the National Socialists." His publications during that time led in later years to allegations that his scientific work had been contaminated by Nazi sympathies: his published writing during the Nazi period included support for Nazi ideas of "racial hygiene" couched in pseudoscientific metaphors.

In 1940, Lorenz became a professor of psychology at the Immanuel Kant University in Königsberg (later the Russian port of Kaliningrad). He was drafted into the Wehrmacht in 1941. He sought to be a motorcycle mechanic, but instead he was assigned as a medic. Sent to the front near Witebsk in 1942 he was taken as a prisoner of war in the Soviet Union, where he worked with doctors in various camps from 1944 to 1948. During this time he observed the parallels between the psychological effects of Nazi and Marxist education.

The Max Planck Society established the Lorenz Institute for Behavioral Physiology in Buldern, Germany, in 1950. In 1958, Lorenz transferred to the Max Planck Institute for Behavioral Physiology in Seewiesen. In 1969, he became the first recipient of the Prix mondial Cino Del Duca. Lorenz retired from the Max Planck Institute in 1973 but continued to research and publish from Altenberg (his family home, near Vienna) and Grünau im Almtal in Austria.

He shared the 1973 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine "for discoveries in individual and social behavior patterns" with two other important early ethologists, Nikolaas Tinbergen and Karl von Frisch. When accepting the Nobel Prize, he apologized for a 1940 publication that included Nazi views of science, saying that "many highly decent scientists hoped, like I did, for a short time for good from National Socialism, and many quickly turned away from it with the same horror as I." It seems highly likely that Lorenz's ideas about an inherited basis for behavior patterns were congenial to the Nazi authorities, but there is no evidence to suggest that his experimental work was either inspired or distorted by Nazi ideas.

During the final years of his life Lorenz supported the fledgling Austrian Green Party and in 1984 became the figurehead of the Konrad Lorenz Volksbegehren, a grass-roots movement that was formed to prevent the building of a power plant at the Danube near Hainburg an der Donau and thus the destruction of the yet untouched woodland surrounding the planned site.

Konrad Lorenz died on February 27, 1989, in Altenberg.

Work

In several seminal papers, Lorenz set forth the theoretical concerns, findings, investigatory methods, and remaining problems of Ethology. Lorenz's methods were always conventional. He never did a formal experiment, and his descriptive observations were often anecdotal. He infuriated his more conventional colleagues by saying, "If I have one good example, I don't give a fig for statistics." By this he meant that if he had seen an animal do something striking, he did not need to see a lot of other animals do the same thing to confirm what he already knew.

The egg-rolling behavior of the greylag goose is a widely cited example of a fixed-action pattern, one of the key concepts used by ethologists to explain animal behavior.

The comparative study of human and animal behavior and learning was a dominant theme throughout Lorenz's work. He loved animals and kept an enormous variety, including jackdaws, geese, dogs, and fish. He argued that perceptual and cognitive apparatus could be treated like other organs that had evolved in relation to the environment. Even the "disposition to learn" items crucial to survival could be so explained. Evolutionary psychology and sociobiology are among the contemporary developments that build on these foundations.

Konrad Lorenz discovered several concepts still in use in contemporary behavioral sciences:

  1. The fixed action pattern—an inherited characteristic, relatively complex movement pattern shared by all members of a species;
  2. The releaser or sign stimulus—a specific environmental stimulus, the perception of which is sufficient to cause the performance of a fixed action pattern;
  3. Imprinting, a rapid, quite stable form of learning in which a social animal's early experiences affect its later social or sexual behavior, apparently without the need for reinforcement.
Family of greylag geese. The goslings imprint on the first suitable moving object, in this case their parents, and follow them constantly imitating their behavior.

His doctrine of imprinting is still a focus of research interest. Filial imprinting, when a young animal recognizes the characteristics of its parent, was first noted by biologist Douglas Spalding in the nineteenth century and rediscovered by the early ethologist Oskar Heinroth, Lorenz' teacher. This phenomenon is most obvious in nidifugous birds (who leave the nest shortly after hatching) and reptiles. Lorenz demonstrated how incubator-hatched geese would imprint on the first suitable, moving stimulus they saw within what he called a "critical period" of about 36 hours shortly after hatching. Being present with the goslings during their hatching, Lorenz found that the goslings would imprint on himself. As a result of this he is often depicted being followed by a gaggle of geese who had imprinted on him.

Lorenz always believed that humanity was in danger from the allegedly deleterious effects of civilization. He hypothesized varied causes for these effects, successfully postulating racial degeneration, uninhibited aggression, and environmental degradation during his career. In his book On Aggression (1966), Lorenz claimed that intraspecies aggression, normally an adaptive phenomenon in animals, has turned deadly in humans because our development of new weapons that can kill at a distance (which has outrun our innate inhibitions against killing). According to Lorenz, aggression involves stored instinctive energy and needs to be discharged. Then follows a refractory phase to build up the energy that has been flushed much like the flushing and refilling of a toilet. This approach incited an international debate on the biological bases of human behavior.

Konrad Lorenz also contributed to philosophy. In his book Behind the Mirror, Lorenz considers the old philosophical question of whether our senses correctly inform us about the world as it is, or provide us only with an illusion. His answer comes from evolutionary biology. Only traits that help us survive and reproduce are transmitted. If our senses gave us wrong information about our environment, we would soon be extinct. Therefore we can be sure that our senses give us correct information, for otherwise we would not be here to be deceived.

Lorenz's vision of humankind

In his book Civilized Man's Eight Deadly Sins, Lorenz addressed the following paradox:

All the advantages that man has gained from his ever-deepening understanding of the natural world that surrounds him, his technological, chemical and medical progress, all of which should seem to alleviate human suffering... tends instead to favor humanity's destruction" (Lorenz 1974, 26).

Lorenz adopts an ecological model to attempt to grasp the mechanisms behind this contradiction. Thus

"all species... are adapted to their environment... including not only inorganic components... but all the other living beings that inhabit the locality (Lorenz 1974, 31).

Fundamental to Lorenz's theory of ecology is the function of feedback mechanisms, especially negative feedback mechanisms which, in hierarchical fashion, dampen impulses that occur beneath a certain threshold. The thresholds themselves are the product of the interaction of contrasting mechanisms. Thus pain and pleasure act as checks on each other:

To gain a desired prey, a dog or wolf will do things that, in other contexts, they would shy away from: run through thorn bushes, jump into cold water and expose themselves to risks which would normally frighten them. All these inhibitory mechanisms... act as a counterweight to the effects of learning mechanisms... The organism cannot allow itself to pay a price which is not worth the candle (Lorenz 1974, 53).

In nature, these mechanisms tend toward a "stable state" among the living beings of an ecology:

A closer examination shows that these beings... not only do not damage each other, but often constitute a community of interests. It is obvious that the predator is strongly interested in the survival of that species, animal or vegetable, which constitutes its prey. ... It is not uncommon that the prey species derives specific benefits from its interaction with the predator species (Lorenz 1974, 33).

Lorenz asserted that humanity is the one species not bound by these mechanisms, being the one species which has defined its own environment: "[The pace of human ecology] is determined by the progress of man's technology" (Lorenz 1974, 35). Not only, but human ecology (economics) is governed by mechanisms of positive feedback, defined as a mechanism which tends to encourage behavior rather than to attenuate it (Lorenz 1974, 43).

Positive feedback always involves the danger of an "avalanche" effect... One particular kind of positive feedback occurs when individuals of the same species enter into competition among themselves... For many animal species, environmental factors keep... intraspecies selection from [leading to] disaster... But there is no force which exercises this type of healthy regulatory effect on humanity's cultural development; unfortunately for itself, humanity has learned to overcome all those environmental forces which are external to itself (Lorenz 1974, 44).

Lorenz does not see human independence from natural ecological processes as necessarily bad. Indeed, he states that "a completely new [ecology] which corresponds in every way to [humanity's] desires... could, theoretically, prove as durable as that which would have existed without his intervention" (Lorenz 1974, 36). However, the principle of competition, typical of Western societies, destroys any chance of this:

The competition between human beings destroys with cold and diabolic brutality... Under the pressure of this competitive fury we have not only forgotten what is useful to humanity as a whole, but even that which is good and advantageous to the individual. ... One asks, which is more damaging to modern humanity: the thirst for money or consuming haste... in either case, fear plays a very important role: the fear of being overtaken by one's competitors, the fear of becoming poor, the fear of making wrong decisions or the fear of not being up to snuff (Lorenz 1974, 45-47).

Legacy

Together with Nikolaas Tinbergen, Lorenz developed the idea of an innate releasing mechanism to explain instinctive behaviors (fixed action patterns). Influenced by the ideas of William McDougall, Lorenz developed this into a "psychohydraulic" model of the motivation of behavior. These ideas were influential as ethology became more popular in the 1960s, but they are now regarded as outdated. Lorenz's writings about evolution are also now regarded as outdated, because he tended towards group selectionist ideas which have been heavily reinterpreted since the rise of sociobiology in the 1970s.

Lorenz's most enduring contributions thus seem to be his empirical work, especially on imprinting; his influence on a younger generation of ethologists; and his popular works, which were enormously important in bringing ethology to the attention of the general public. Though he demonstrated that the instinctive behavior of animals could be analyzed through a repertoire of standard techniques, many of the details of his analyses of behavior appeared to be incomplete. Some would say that Lorenz' most significant contribution and legacy does not lie in any of his theories but in the good example he set with his methodology. He never deprived the animals of basic physical or emotional needs. He never killed them, mutilated them, or tortured them. All these cruel methods were once considered indispensable for animal studies, but Lorenz proved it was possible to win a Nobel Prize without using them.

Marc Bekoff (2006) has written about Konrad Lorenz, "I remember meeting Lorenz at an ethological conference in Parma, Italy, and his passion and enthusiasm were incredibly contagious. For hours, he told stories of the animals with whom he had shared his life and never once repeated himself. He clearly loved what he did and loved his animal friends."

Some might say that Lorenz's most enduring legacy was his almost prophetic vision of the relationship between market economics and the threat of ecological catastrophe. Although he ill-advisedly professed agreement with Nazi ideas at one time, he was shocked to discover the way in which they were put into practice. His autobiographical account and thoughts at the time of receiving his Nobel Prize reflected his recognition that the problems humanity faces today are moral and ethical ones. While he saw humankind as different from animals, in that we have overcome our instincts and are free from the constraints of the environment, free to act for both good or ill.

There are three Konrad Lorenz Institutes in Austria; one of them is housed in his family mansion at Altenberg.

Publications

Lorenz's best-known books are King Solomon's Ring (1952) and On Aggression (1966), both written for a popular audience. His scientific work appeared mainly in journal articles, written in German; they became widely known to English-speaking scientists through the descriptions of it in Tinbergen's 1951 book The Study of Instinct, though many of his papers were later published in English translation in the two volumes titled Studies in Animal and Human Behavior.

  • 1952. King Solomon's Ring
  • 1954. Man Meets Dog
  • 1955. The Natural Science of the Human Species: An Introduction to Comparative Behavioral Research - The Russian Manuscript (1944-1948)
  • 1965. Evolution and Modification of Behavior
  • 1966. On Aggression
  • 1970. Studies in Animal and Human Behavior, Volume I
  • 1971. Studies in Animal and Human Behavior, Volume II
  • 1973. Behind the Mirror
  • 1974. Civilized Man's Eight Deadly Sins
  • 1979. The Year of the Greyleg Goose
  • 1982. The Foundations of Ethology

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Bekoff, M. 2006. Animal Passions and Beastly Virtues. Temple University Press. ISBN 1592133479
  • Boring, E.G. 1950. A history of experimental psychology, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. ISBN 0133900398
  • Brennan, J.F. 1986. History and systems of psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. ISBN 0133922189
  • Leahey, Th. H. 2000. A History of Modern Psychology. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall. 3rd edition. ISBN 0130175730
  • Lorenz, K. Z. 1957. Comparative study of behavior. in C.H. Schiller (ed. and trans.). Instinctive behavior: The development of a modern concept. London: Methuen.
  • Lorenz, K. Z. 1975. Kant's doctrine of the a priori in the light of contemporary biology. In Richard I. Evans, Konrad Lorenz: The man and his ideas. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

External links

All links retrieved April 23, 2018.


Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.