Golden Rule
The Golden Rule of Ethics is a cross-cultural moral principle found in virtually all the religions of the world. Also known as the "Ethic of Reciprocity," the Golden Rule can be phrased either positively or negatively. Most formulations take a passive form, as expressed by the Jewish sage Hillel: "What is hateful to you, do not to your fellow neighbor. This is the whole Law, all the rest is commentary" (Talmud, Shabbat 31a). In Christianity, however, the principle is expressed affirmatively by Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount - "Do unto others as you would have others do unto you" (Gospel of Matthew 7:12). This principle has for centuries been known in English as the Golden Rule in recognition of it's high value and importance in ethical living and reflection.
Arising as it does in nearly all cultures, the ethic of reciprocity is a principle and precept that can be readily used in handling conflicts and promoting greater harmony and unification. Given the modern global trend of political, social, and economic integreation and globalization, the golden rule of ethics may become even more relevant in the years ahead to foster intercultural and interreligioius understanding.
The "Ethic of Reciprocity" Principle
Philosopers disagree about the nature of the Golden Rule: some have classified it as a form of Deontological ethics (from the Greek Deon meaning obligation) whereby decisions are made primarily by considering one's duties and the rights of others. Deontology posits the existence of a priori moral obligations suggesting that people ought to live by a set of permanently defined principles that do not change merely as a result of a change in circumstances. However, other philosophers have argued that most religious understandings of the Golden Rule imply its use as a virtue toward greater mutual respect for one's neighbour rather than as a deontological formulation. They argue that the Golden Rule depends on everyone's ability to accept and respect differences because even religious teachings vary. Thus, many philosophers have suggested that the Golden Rule can be best understood in term of what it is not (through the via negativa):
First, they note that the Golden Rule should not be confused with revenge, an eye for an eye, tit for tat, retributive justice or the law of retaliation. A key element of the ethic of reciprocity is that a person attempting to live by this rule treats all people, not just members of his or her in-group, with due consideration.
The Golden Rule should also not be confused with another major ethical principle, often known as Wiccan Rede, or liberty principle, which is an ethical prohibition against aggression. This rule is also an ethical rule of "licence" or "right", that is people can do anything they like as long as it does not harm others. This rule does not compel one to help the other in need. On the other hand, "the golden rule is a good standard which is further improved by doing unto others, wherever possible, as they want to be done by." Karl Popper (The Open Society and Its Enemies, Vol. 2)
Lastly, the Golden Rule of ethics should not be confused with a "rule" in the semantic or logical sense. A logical loophole in the positive form of Golden "rule" is that it would require a masochist to harm others, even without their consent, if that is what the masochist would wish for themselves. This loophole can be addressed by invoking a supplementary rule, which is sometimes called the silver rule. This states "treat others in the way that they wish to be treated". However, the silver rule may create another logical loophole. In a situation where an individual's background or belief may offend the sentiment of the majority (such as homosexuality or blasphemy), the silver rule may imply ethical majoritarianism if the Golden Rule is enforced as if it were a law.
Under ethic of reciprocity, a person of atheist persuation may have a (legal) right to insult religion under the right of freedom of expression but, as a personal choice, may refrain to do so in public out of respect to the sensitivity of the other. Conversely, a person of religious persuation may refrain from taking action against such public display out of respect to the sensitivity of other about the right of freedom of speech. Conversely, the lack of mutual respect might mean that each side might deliberately violate the golden rule as a provocation (to assert one's right) or as a intimidation (to prevent other from making offence).
This understanding is crucial because it shows how to apply the golden rule. In 1963, John F. Kennedy ordered Alabama National Guardsmen to help admit two clearly qualified "Negro" students to the University of Alabama. In his speech that evening JFK appealed to every American to "stop and examine his conscience about this and other related incidents throughout America." If an American, because his skin is dark, cannot eat lunch in a restaurant open to the public, if he cannot send his children to the best public school available, if he cannot vote for the public officials who will represent him, .... then who among us would be content to have the color of his skin changed and stand in his place? .... The heart of the question is .... whether we are going to treat our fellow Americans as we want to be treated." (Reference found at end needed to be inserted here.)
It could be argued that the ethics of reciprocity may replace all other moral principles, or at least that it is superior to them. Though this guiding rule may not explictly tell one which actions or treatments are right or wrong, it can provide one with moral coherence — it is a consistency principle. One's actions are to be consistent with mutual love and respect to other fellow humans.
The Golden Rule in the World's Religions
A survey of the religious scriptures of the world reveals striking congruance and similrities among their respectice articulations of the Golden Rule of ethics. Not only do the world's religious scriptures reveal that the Golden Rule is a cross-cultural and ancient precept, but they also show that there is almost unanimous agreement about this principle ought to govern human affairs. Virtually all of the world's religions offer formulations of the Golden rule somewhere in their scriptures, chorus of sup[port raise voices in unision of this principle. Consequently, the Golden rule has been one of the seminal operating ideathat has governed human ethics cross-culturall over thousands of years. Examples of the Golden Rule found in the world's religions are provided below:.
(Please expand this paragraph.)
Buddhism
In Buddhism, the first of the Five Precepts (Panca-sila) of Buddhism is to abstain from destruction of life. The justification of the precept is given in Chapter 10 of the Dhammapada, which states:
- "Everyone fears punishment; everyone fears death, just as you do. Therefore do not kill or cause to kill. Everyone fears punishment; everyone loves life, as you do. Therefore do not kill or cause to kill."
According to the second of Four Noble Truths of Buddhism, egoism (desire, craving or attachment) are rooted in ignorance and is considered as the cause of all suffering. Consequently, kindness, compassion and equanimity is regarded as the untainted aspect of human nature.
- ~500 B.C.E. "Hurt not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful." - Udana-Varga 5:18, Buddhism.
Ancient Egypt
- ~1970-1640 B.C.E. "Do for one who may do for you, / That you may cause him thus to do." - The Tale of the Eloquent Peasant 109-110, Ancient Egypt, tr. R.B. Parkinson.
Judaism
- ~100 C.E. "What is hateful to you, do not to your neighbor. This is the whole Torah, all the rest is commentary." - Hillel the Elder; Talmud, Shabbat 31a, Judaism.
- ~200 B.C.E. "What you hate, do not do to anyone." - Deuterocanonical Bible, NRSV, Tobit 4:15, Roman Catholic Church and Judaism.
Christianity
- ~100 C.E. "In everything, do unto others as you would like them to do unto you; that is the meaning of the law and the prophets." - Sermon on the Mount, NRSV, Gospel of Matthew 7:12, Christianity
- ~200 B.C.E. "What you hate, do not do to anyone." - Deuterocanonical Bible, NRSV, Tobit 4:15, Roman Catholic Church
- "Do unto others as you would have others do unto you" (Gospel of Matthew 7:12)
Hinduism
- ~150 B.C.E. "This is the sum of duty: Do naught unto others which would cause you pain if done to you." - Mahabharata 5:1517, Brahmanism and Hinduism.
Islam
- ~7th century C.E. "Do unto all men as you would wish to have done unto you; and reject for others what you would reject for yourself." - Hadith, Islam.
Jainism
- ~500 B.C.E. "Therefore, neither does he cause violence to others nor does he make others do so." - Acarangasutra 5.101-2, Jainism.
Judaism
- ~1280 B.C.E. "You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against your countrymen. Love your fellow as yourself: I am the Lord." - Tanakh, new JPS translation, Leviticus 19:18, Judaism.
Zoroastrianism
- ~700 B.C.E. "That nature only is good when it shall not do unto another whatever is not good for its own self." - Dadistan-i-Dinik 94:5, Zoroastrianism.
- ? BCE "Whatever is disagreeable to yourself do not do unto others." - Shayast-na-Shayast 13:29, Zoroastrianism.
Taoism
- ~500 B.C.E. "The Sage...makes the self of the people his self." Dao De Jing Ch 49, tr. Ch'u Ta-Kao, Unwin Paperbacks, 1976. Daoism
Confucianism
- ~500 B.C.E."one word that can serve as a principle of conduct for life [is] reciprocity. Do not impose on others what you yourself do not desire." - Doctrine of the Mean 13.3, Confucianism.
- ~500 B.C.E. "What you do not want done to yourself, do not do to others." Analects of Confucius 15:24, Confucianism, tr. James Legge.[1]
- ~500 B.C.E. "Now the man of perfect virtue, wishing to be established himself, seeks also to establish others; wishing to be enlarged himself, he seeks also to enlarge others. To be able to judge of others by what is near in ourselves; this may be called the art of virtue." Analects of Confucius 6:30, Confucianism, tr. James Legge. [2]
Baha'i Faith
- "And if thine eyes be turned towards justice, choose thou for thy neighbour that which thou choosest for thyself." - Epistle to the Son of the Wolf, 30, Bahá'í Faith.
- ~1870 C.E. "He should not wish for others what he does not wish for himself." - Bahá'u'lláh, Epistle to the Son of the Wolf Bahá'í Faith.
Criticisms of the Golden Rule
Conclusion
Due to it's widespread acceptance in the world's cultures, it has been suggested that the Golden Rule may be related to innate aspects of human nature. Arising as it does in nearly all cultures, the ethic of reciprocity is a tool that can readily be used by all cultures in handling conflicts. Given the modern global trend of political, social, and economic integreation and globalization, the golden rule of ethic may be becoming even more relevant and important than ever.
(Please expand this paragraph.)
ReferencesISBN links support NWE through referral fees
- JFK's 11 June, 1963 "Radio and Television Report to the American People on Civil Rights," transcript from the JFK library. Partly described (and multiply quoted) in the text above. As described in graphic 1963 events, President Kennedy sent his civil rights bill to Congress on 19 June, 1963 leading to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 via the Congressional give-and-take described there.
- Harry Gensler's essay, The Golden Rule, published in the Blackwell Dictionary of Business Ethics (Routledge 1997 ISBN 1557869421). For more background, and for more information about the golden rule, plus links and lists of books about it, see his website The Golden Rule. His links include his teaching website, Web Exercises.
See also
External links
Practical applications of the golden rule to our real world problems
- Application to racism in the United States in 1963, 1964, partly described in the text and the above [1c].
- Application to terrorism.
- UNESCO report on global ethics.
- A sample of applications to business. The golden rule is also in business books, e.g., the Blackwell book in the above [2b].
The general application of the golden rule
- Bill McGinnis's Committee for the Golden Rule.
- How to conduct a workshop on the golden rule.
- Application to moral education.
Other external links
- The Rules of the Game
- The Golden Rule in Religion
- The Golden Rule in World Religions
- Shared belief in the Golden Rule
- Rosicrucians: The Golden Rule
- Center for Global Ethics [[3]]
- Global Ethic Foundation [[4]]
Credits
New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:
The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:
Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.
