Stukeley, William

From New World Encyclopedia
Line 33: Line 33:
 
Stukeley's ideas, while in some cases fanciful, were nonetheless based on serious inquiry and a substantial scientific background. He was the first to recognize that alignment of Stonehenge on the [[solstice]]s. Stukeley's work on Stonehenge was one of the first to attempt to date the monument.<ref>{{cite book | author = Hawkins, Gerald S. | title = Stonehenge Decoded | year = 1988 }}</ref> He proposed that the builders of Stonehenge knew about [[magnetism]], and had aligned the monument with magnetic north. Stukeley used some incomplete data about the variation of the [[North Magnetic Pole]]; he extrapolated that it oscillated in a regular pattern. Today it is known that the North Magnetic Pole wanders in an irregular fashion. However, Stukeley inferred that Stonehenge was completed in 460 B.C.E., which as we now know is several thousand years too late.
 
Stukeley's ideas, while in some cases fanciful, were nonetheless based on serious inquiry and a substantial scientific background. He was the first to recognize that alignment of Stonehenge on the [[solstice]]s. Stukeley's work on Stonehenge was one of the first to attempt to date the monument.<ref>{{cite book | author = Hawkins, Gerald S. | title = Stonehenge Decoded | year = 1988 }}</ref> He proposed that the builders of Stonehenge knew about [[magnetism]], and had aligned the monument with magnetic north. Stukeley used some incomplete data about the variation of the [[North Magnetic Pole]]; he extrapolated that it oscillated in a regular pattern. Today it is known that the North Magnetic Pole wanders in an irregular fashion. However, Stukeley inferred that Stonehenge was completed in 460 B.C.E., which as we now know is several thousand years too late.
  
 +
==Legacy==
 
[[Image:Stukelykitscoty.jpg|thumb|300px|Stukeley's drawings such as this 1722 prospect of [[Kit's Coty House]] have provided valuable information on monuments since damaged]]
 
[[Image:Stukelykitscoty.jpg|thumb|300px|Stukeley's drawings such as this 1722 prospect of [[Kit's Coty House]] have provided valuable information on monuments since damaged]]
 +
Despite his extravagant theorizing, William Stukeley was an excellent [[archeology|archaeologist]]. His surveys remain of interest and value to this day.
  
 +
Stukeley's illustrations and records have been invaluable in helping us realize what magnificent and extensive undertakings the [[Avebury]] and [[Stonehenge]] monuments were. During his visits to Avebury he witnessed much of the unforgivable destruction that took place. Without his meticulous notes and sketches researchers would have great difficulty in interpreting what remains there today. Discoveries such as those in the Beckhampton Avenue  occurred as a result of Stukeley's earlier observations.
  
 +
Although his passion for the [[Druid]]s, and his romantic characterizations of their lives in some part confused our understanding of these monumental [[stone circle]]s, his vision and enthusiasm brought about an interest in the ancient cultures and people who built such incredible structures. Although he focused his energies on the Druids, the purpose of stone circles must indeed have been connected with prehistoric peoples' beliefs, and their construction can be used to infer much about their knowledge of about [[mathematics]], [[engineering]], and [[astronomy]], as well as their social organization, and religion, just as Stukeley did.
  
 
==Publications==
 
==Publications==

Revision as of 21:38, 7 May 2008


William Stukeley

The Rev. Dr William Stukeley FRS, FRCP, FSA (November 7, 1687 – March 3, 1765) was an English antiquary who pioneered the archaeological investigation of Stonehenge and Avebury and was one of the founders of field archaeology. Stukeley also was one of the first biographers of Isaac Newton.

Life

William Stukeley was born the son of a lawyer at Holbeach in Lincolnshire on the site of Stukeley Hall, a primary school that now bears his name. After taking his M.B. degree at Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, Stukeley went to London and studied medicine at St Thomas' Hospital. In 1710, he started in practice in Boston, Lincolnshire, returning in 1717 to London. In the same year, he became a Fellow of the Royal Society and, in 1718, joined in the establishment of the Society of Antiquaries, acting for nine years as its secretary. In 1719 Stukeley took his M.D. degree, and in 1720 became a Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians, publishing in the same year his first contribution to antiquarian literature.

Stukeley was one of the first learned gentlemen to be attracted to speculative freemasonry, newly fashionable after the appointment of the first noble Grand Master. His Diary and Commonplace Book of June 6, 1721 says "I was made a Freemason at the Salutation Tav., Tavistock Street, with Mr. Collins, Capt. Rowe, who made the famous diving Engine."[1] The same entry says he was the first person for many years who had been so made in London; there was great difficulty in finding sufficient members to perform the Ceremony; and immediately thereafter "Freemasonry took a run and ran itself out of breath through the folly of its members." His diary and papers are among the earliest sources on the subject of the new Grand Lodge.

In 1729 he was ordained in the Church of England and served as vicar in the parish of All Saints, Stamford, Lincolnshire, where he did a considerable amount of further research, not least on the town's lost Eleanor Cross. He was subsequently appointed rector of a parish in Bloomsbury, London.

Stukeley was a friend of Isaac Newton and wrote a memoir of his life (1752).

William Stukeley died in London on March 3, 1765.

Work

An inward view of Stonehenge from August, 1722[2]

Stukeley began his archaological observations in 1710, and for a period of 15 years he made summer expeditions on horseback around the British countryside. Trained in the medical profession, he had an eye for detailed observation and he accurately described and drew all that he found of interest on these trips. Always concerned to preserve as much as possible before the ravages of time and the advances of civilization, particularly the agricultural and industrial revolutions, destroyed monuments and other historical structures, he published the results of his travels in Itinerarium Curiosum (1924) with the appropriate subtitle "An Account of the Antiquities, and Remarkable Curiosities in Nature or Art, Observed in Travels through Great Britain."

He was not only a keen observer and accurate portrayer of details in his sketches, Stukeley also had a gift for writing that gave the reader an exciting vision of the structures. Reflecting on Hadrian's Wall, he wrote: This mighty wall of four score miles in length is only exceeded by the Chinese wall, which makes a considerable figure upon the terrestrial globe, and may be discerned at the moon.[3]

Stukeley's principal works, elaborate accounts of Stonehenge and Avebury, appeared in 1740 and 1743. These were supposed to be the first of a multi-volume universal history. Excited by John Aubrey's discoveries at Avebury in 1649, and his proposal that they were connected to Druids, Stukeley elaborated the idea that Stonehenge and Avebury were the religious products of an early Celtic Druid culture:

Our predecessors, the Druids of Britain, tho' left in the extremest west to the improvement of their own thoughts, yet advanc'd their inquiries, under all disadvantages, to such heights, as should make our moderns asham'd, to wink in the sunshine of learning and religion.[4]

His writings, although often fanciful, were so persuasive that the connection between these monuments and the Druids has been irrevocably forged in the minds of the public. He wrote copiously on other supposed Druid remains, becoming familiarly known as the "Arch-Druid." He also connected the serpentine shapes of the avenues connecting stone circles with the legends of dragons found throughout Britain.

Stukeley's ideas, while in some cases fanciful, were nonetheless based on serious inquiry and a substantial scientific background. He was the first to recognize that alignment of Stonehenge on the solstices. Stukeley's work on Stonehenge was one of the first to attempt to date the monument.[5] He proposed that the builders of Stonehenge knew about magnetism, and had aligned the monument with magnetic north. Stukeley used some incomplete data about the variation of the North Magnetic Pole; he extrapolated that it oscillated in a regular pattern. Today it is known that the North Magnetic Pole wanders in an irregular fashion. However, Stukeley inferred that Stonehenge was completed in 460 B.C.E., which as we now know is several thousand years too late.

Legacy

Stukeley's drawings such as this 1722 prospect of Kit's Coty House have provided valuable information on monuments since damaged

Despite his extravagant theorizing, William Stukeley was an excellent archaeologist. His surveys remain of interest and value to this day.

Stukeley's illustrations and records have been invaluable in helping us realize what magnificent and extensive undertakings the Avebury and Stonehenge monuments were. During his visits to Avebury he witnessed much of the unforgivable destruction that took place. Without his meticulous notes and sketches researchers would have great difficulty in interpreting what remains there today. Discoveries such as those in the Beckhampton Avenue occurred as a result of Stukeley's earlier observations.

Although his passion for the Druids, and his romantic characterizations of their lives in some part confused our understanding of these monumental stone circles, his vision and enthusiasm brought about an interest in the ancient cultures and people who built such incredible structures. Although he focused his energies on the Druids, the purpose of stone circles must indeed have been connected with prehistoric peoples' beliefs, and their construction can be used to infer much about their knowledge of about mathematics, engineering, and astronomy, as well as their social organization, and religion, just as Stukeley did.

Publications

Notes

  1. Stukeley, William (1980). The Commentarys, Diary, & Common-Place Book of William Stukeley & Selected Letters. London: Doppler Press, 54. 
  2. Stukeley, William (1740). Stonehenge, A Temple Restor'd to the British Druids. London: W. Innnys and R. Maney. 
  3. Private letter published in The Family Memoirs of the Rev. William Stukeley (1887) Vol. 3, p. 142. (original 1754)
  4. William Stukeley, Stonehenge: A Temple Restor'd to the British Druids, Preface. (1740)
  5. Hawkins, Gerald S. (1988). Stonehenge Decoded. 

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Burl, Aubrey. Rings of Stone: The Prehistoric Stone Circles of Britain and Ireland. The Harvill Press, 1999. ISBN 978-1860466618
  • Burl, Aubrey and Neil Mortimer (eds). Stukeley's Stonehenge: An Unpublished Manuscript 1721-1724. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2005. ISBN 0300098952
  • Gjertsen, Derek. The Newton Handbook. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986. ISBN 0710202792
  • Hawkins, Gerald S. Stonehenge Decoded. Hippocrene Books, 1988. ISBN 978-0880291477
  • Haycock, David Boyd. William Stukeley: Science, Religion and Archaeology in Eighteenth-century England. Boydell Press, 2002. ISBN 0851158641
  • Mortimer, Neil. Stukeley Illustrated: William Stukeley's Rediscovery of Britain's Ancient Sites. Green Magic, 2003. ISBN 0954296338
  • Piggot, Stuart. William Stukeley: An Eighteenth-Century Antiquary. New York, NY: Thames and Hudson, 1985. ISBN 0500013608

External links

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.