Difference between revisions of "Jeong Dojeon" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
{{koreanname
 
{{koreanname
|img=Chung_DoJeon.jpg.jpg
+
|img=Jeong_DoJeon.jpg.jpg
 
|hangul=정도전
 
|hangul=정도전
 
|hanja=鄭道傳
 
|hanja=鄭道傳
|rr=Chung Do-jeon
+
|rr=Jeong Do-jeon
 
|mr=Jung Dojŏn
 
|mr=Jung Dojŏn
 
|hangulja=종지
 
|hangulja=종지
Line 16: Line 16:
 
|mrho=Sambong
 
|mrho=Sambong
 
}}
 
}}
'''Chung Dojeon''' (1342-1398), also known by the pen name '''Sambong''', was the most powerful medieval [[Korea]]n noble and politician in the early [[Joseon Dynasty|Joseon]] dynasty. He was also an influential [[Neo-Confucian]] ideologue and was the number one supporter and a close advisor to [[Taejo of Joseon|Taejo(King)Yi Seonggye]], who founded the Joseon dynasty.   
+
'''Chung Dojeon''' (Jeong Dojeon; 1342-1398), also known by the pen name '''Sambong''', was the most powerful medieval [[Korea]]n noble and politician of the early [[Joseon Dynasty|Joseon]] dynasty. He was an influential [[Neo-Confucian]] ideologue, and a strong supporter and a close advisor to [[Taejo of Joseon|Taejo(King)Yi Seonggye]]( 태조 太祖 李成桂), who founded the Joseon dynasty. Jeong Dojeon’s thought played a major role in the development of the political structure of the new Joseon dynasty.
 +
In the late fourteenth century, the decaying Goryeo dynasty (918-1392) was deeply entangled with a corrupt Buddhist monastic system.  Buddhist monasteries were exempt from paying taxes, and many Buddhist leaders enjoyed wealth, power and privileged positions in the court. Neo-Confucian scholars in Korea, motivated by a desire to overthrow the Goryeo dynasty, took the Neo-Confucianism of Zuxhi and the Cheng brothers in a philosophical direction which it never achieved in China. Jeong Dojeon wrote a number of essays criticizing Buddhism, but his final treatise, the Bulssi japbyeon ( "Array of Critiques of Buddhism") summarized all of the arguments against Buddhism that had been developed by Hanyu, the Cheng brothers, and Zhuxi into a powerful attack on every aspect of the Seon Buddhist tradition. He argued that Buddhist practices were antisocial and avoided dealing with the actual world, and that the Buddhist doctrine was nihilistic, and that Buddhism, led people to abandon respect for the norms of society and to neglect the importance of cultivating one's character through relationships within human society.
 +
==Life==
 +
Jeong was born in 1342 to a noble family in [[Jeongcheongbuk-do|Jeongcheongbuk-do Danyanggun, Sambong]]( 충청 북도 忠清北道), in present-day [[South Korea]].  His family had emerged from commoner status some four generations before, and had slowly climbed up the ladder of government service.  His father was the first in the family to obtain a high government post.  His mother, however, was a slave, which made it difficult for him to gain political status.  Jeong’s father died while he was still a young boy, and in spite of his high position, he left a poor household and almost no property for his heir. This experience of poverty during his childhood seems to have affected Jeong's thought. Despite his difficulties, he became a student of [[Yi saek]]( (李穡 ) and with other leading thinkers of the time such as [[Jeong Mong-ju]]( 정몽주 鄭夢周), came to have an important influence on  Korean politics.
  
==Background and early career==
+
Jeong was a strong supporter and a close advisor of [[Taejo of Joseon|Taejo(King)Yi Seonggye]]( 태조 太祖 李成桂), who founded the Joseon dynasty.  He is said to have compared his relationship with Yi  to that between [[Zhang Liang]] and [[Gaozu of Han]]. The two first became acquainted in 1383, when Jeong visited Yi at his quarters in [[Hamgyong]] province. Near the end of the fourteenth century, the political and economic problems of the Goryeo dynasty had come to a head, and Neo-Confucian activists sided with the rebel general Yi Seonggye (李成桂 1335-1408). In 1392, Yi toppled the Goryeo government  and proclaimed the Joseon dynasty, installing a cabinet composed of Neo-Confucian advisors.
Chung was born from the noble family in [[Chungcheongbuk-do|Chungcheongbuk-do Danyanggun, Sambong]], in the present-day of [[South Korea]]. His family had emerged from commoner status some four generations before, and slowly climbed up the ladder of government service. His father was the first in the family to obtain a high post. However, unfortunately Chung's mother was a slave, which made him very difficult to gain power in his early days. Despite his difficulties, he became a student of [[Yi saek]] and with other leading thinkers of the time such as [[Jeong Mong-ju]], his penetrating intelligents started to effect on Korean politics.
+
The essays of Jeong Dojeon played a major role in the development of the political structure of the new Joseon dynasty. Jeong's political ideas had a lasting impact on [[Joseon Dynasty politics]] and laws. Using Cheng-Zhu [[Neo-Confucianism|Neo-Confucian philosophy]] as the basis of his anti-Buddhist polemic, he criticized Buddhism in a number of treatises as being corrupt in its practices, and nihilistic and antinomian in its doctrines. The most famous of these treatises was the ''[[Bulssi japbyeon]]'' ("Array of Critiques Against Buddhism" ), completed just before his assassination in 1398. After the establishment of the Joseon dynasty, the Buddhists were purged from positions of political power and relegated to mountain monasteries, prohibited from setting foot in the cities.  
  
==Relationship with Yi Seonggye==
+
Jeong Dojeon was a founding member of the [[Seonggyungwan]], the royal Confucian academy, and one of its early faculty members.
Chung's ties with Yi Seonggye and the foundation of Joseon, were extremely close.  He is said to have compared his relationship to Yi to that between [[Zhang Liang]] and [[Gaozu of Han]].  Chung's political ideas had a lasting impact on [[Joseon Dynasty politics]] and laws.
 
  
The two first became acquainted in 1383, when Chung visited Yi at his quarters in [[Hamgyong]] province.
+
==Thought==
 +
=== Neo-Confucianism in Korea ===
 +
The Neo-Confucianism of the Cheng-Zhu school became established as a government ideology in Korea, and became much more the focus of philosophical inquiry than it ever was in China. While Chinese Neo-Confucianism primarily aimed to win intellectuals back from Buddhism, it developed into various schools and sects, some of which, including the Wang Yangming school, resembled Zen Buddhism more closely than Zuxhi’s Confucian doctrines. In Korea, however, Neo-Confucianism was closely associated with political circumstances which did not exist in China.  The decaying Goryeo dynasty  (918-1392) was deeply entangled with a corrupt Buddhist monastic system.  Buddhist monasteries were exempt from paying taxes, and many Buddhist leaders enjoyed wealth, power and a lavish lifestyle that included the possession of prize lands and slaves, and appointment to privileged positions in the court. Neo-Confucian intellectuals increasingly targeted these excesses, and Neo-Confucianism became closely associated with the resistance movement which sought the overthrow of the Goryeo dynasty.
 +
The political ambitions of Neo-Confucian intellectuals resulted in the development of strong philosophical arguments against Buddhism. Neo-Confucianists argued that Buddhist practices were antisocial and avoided dealing with the actual world, and that the Buddhist doctrine was nihilistic. Buddhism, they claimed, led people to abandon respect for the norms of society and to neglect the importance of cultivating one's character through relationships within human society.
 +
Attacks on Buddhism began in Korea as early as 982, but did not reach maturity until the mid-fourteenth century, with scholars such as Yi Saek (李穡 1328-1396),  Jo Inok (?-1396) and Jeong Mongju (鄭夢周 1337-1392). Their criticisms were primarily political and economic. They complained that excessive government patronage of privileged individuals was deleterious to the well being of the state, and that political authority should be assigned according to merit rather than social status. Gong Hoebaek (1357-1402), Ho Ung (?-1411), and Jeong Chong (1358-1397) developed their criticisms on more philosophical grounds.
 +
Jeong’s major work, Bulssi japbyeon ("Array of Critiques Against Buddhism" ) critiqued every major aspect of contemporary Buddhist doctrine, focusing primarily on the Seon sect. Almost all of Jeong’s examples and illustrations were citations from one of the Cheng brothers’ commentaries on Zhuxi. <ref> http://www.acmuller.net/jeong-gihwa/introduction.html Retrieved 9/15/2007</ref>
  
==Intellectual activity==
+
==Political Thought==
Chung Dojeon was a major opponent of [[Buddhism]] at the end of the [[Goryeo]] period. He was a student of [[Zhuxi]]'s thought. Using Cheng-Zhu [[Neo-Confucianism|Neo-Confucian philosophy]] as the basis of his anti-Buddhist polemic, he criticized Buddhism in a number of treatises as being corrupt in its practices, and nihilistic and antinomian in its doctrines. The most famous of these treatises was the ''[[Bulssi japbyeon]]'' ("Array of Critiques Against Buddhism" ). He was a founding member of the [[Seonggyungwan]], the royal Confucian academy, and one of its early faculty members.
+
Jeong argued that the government, including the [[monarch|king]] himself, exists for the sake of the people.  Its [[legitimacy]] could only come from benevolent public service. It was largely on this basis that he legitimized the overthrow of the [[Goryeo]] dynasty, arguing that the Goryeo rulers had given up their right to rule.
  
Chung was among the first Korean scholars to refer to his thought as ''silhak'', or "practical learning." However, he is not usually numbered among the members of the [[Silhak]] tradition, which arose much later in the Joseon period.
+
Jeong divided society into three classes:  a large lower class of agricultural laborers and craftsmen, a middle class of [[literati]], and a small upper class of [[bureaucrat]]sAnyone outside this system, including Buddhist monks, [[shaman]]s, and [[entertainer]]s, he considered a "vicious" threat to the social fabric.
  
==Political thought==
+
Jeong was among the first Korean scholars to refer to his thought as ''silhak'', or "practical learning." However, he is not usually numbered among the members of the [[Silhak]] tradition, which arose much later in the Joseon period.
Chung argued that the government, including the [[monarch|king]] himself, exists for the sake of the peopleIts [[legitimacy]] could only come from benevolent public service.  It was largely on this basis that he legitimized the overthrow of the [[Goryeo]] dynasty, arguing that the Goryeo rulers had given up their right to rule.
 
  
Chung divided society into three classes: a large lower class of agricultural laborers and craftsmen, a middle class of [[literati]], and a small upper class of [[bureaucrat]]s. Anyone outside this system, including Buddhist monks, [[shaman]]s, and [[entertainer]]s, he considered a "vicious" threat to the social fabric.
+
== Confucian – Buddhist Debate ==
 +
The confrontation between Neo-Confucianism and Buddhism, had its earliest origins in the tracts of the Tang dynasty scholar Hanyu (768-824), and culminated in the writings of Jeong Dojeon and Gihwa (1376-1433) in Korea during the end of Goryeo and beginning of the Joseon dynasties. Jeong wrote a number of essays criticizing Buddhism, but his final treatise, the Bulssi japbyeon ( "Array of Critiques of Buddhism") summarized all of the arguments against Buddhism that had been developed by Hanyu, the Cheng brothers, and Zhuxi into one final attack on the Seon Buddhist tradition. Along with the arguments of these earlier Neo-Confucian thinkers, which were comprised largely of criticisms of Song Chan nihilism and antinomianism, Jeong Dojeon  deplored the decadent practices of the current Goryeo Buddhist saṅgha.
 +
In China, the Neo-Confucian condemnations of Buddhism had been largely ignored, but this was not the case in Korea. The monk Gihwa, the leading figure of the Buddhist saṅgha at the outset of the Joseon, who had himself been an acclaimed Confucian scholar, felt compelled to respond to Jeong's criticism with a treatise entitled Hyeonjeong non ("Exposition of the Correct").  His response was conciliatory, but reproved the Confucians for the disparity between what was said in their classical texts, and what they actually did in practice.
 +
==References==
 +
* De Bary, William Theodore, and JaHyun Kim Haboush. 1985. The Rise of Neo-Confucianism in Korea. Neo-Confucian studies. New York: Columbia University Press.
  
==References==
+
*Han Yeong-u.  (1974).  Jeong Do-jeon's philosophy of political reform.  ''Korea Journal 14''(7-8).  Reprinted in Lee et al. (2004), ''Korean philosophy: Its tradition and modern transformation'', pp. 55-74.  Seoul:  Hollym.  ISBN 1-56591-178-4  
*Han Yeong-u.  (1974).  Chung Do-jeon's philosophy of political reform.  ''Korea Journal 14''(7-8).  Reprinted in Lee et al. (2004), ''Korean philosophy: Its tradition and modern transformation'', pp. 55-74.  Seoul:  Hollym.  ISBN 1-56591-178-4  
 
  
 
*Korean Institute of Philosophical Thought.  (1995).  ''강좌 한국철학'' (Gangjwa Hanguk Cheolhak, ''Guide to Korean philosophy''), pp. 333-345.  Seoul: Yemoon Seowon.  ISBN 89-7646-032-4.
 
*Korean Institute of Philosophical Thought.  (1995).  ''강좌 한국철학'' (Gangjwa Hanguk Cheolhak, ''Guide to Korean philosophy''), pp. 333-345.  Seoul: Yemoon Seowon.  ISBN 89-7646-032-4.
 +
 +
* Kŭm, Chang-tʻae. 2000. Confucianism and Korean thoughts. Seoul, Korea: Jimoondang Pub. Co. ISBN:8988095103 9788988095102
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
Line 64: Line 75:
 
[[Category:Korean literature]]
 
[[Category:Korean literature]]
 
[[Category:People from Yeongju]]
 
[[Category:People from Yeongju]]
 +
  
  
  
 
{{credits|Jeong_Dojeon|156656868}}
 
{{credits|Jeong_Dojeon|156656868}}

Revision as of 23:22, 17 September 2007


Jeong Dojeon
Jeong_DoJeon.jpg.jpg
Korean name
Hangul 정도전
Hanja 鄭道傳
Revised Romanization Jeong Do-jeon
McCune-Reischauer Jung Dojŏn
Pen name
Hangul 삼봉
Hanja 三峰
Revised Romanization Sambong
McCune-Reischauer Sambong


Courtesy name
Hangul 종지
Hanja 宗之
Revised Romanization Jongji
McCune-Reischauer Jongji


Chung Dojeon (Jeong Dojeon; 1342-1398), also known by the pen name Sambong, was the most powerful medieval Korean noble and politician of the early Joseon dynasty. He was an influential Neo-Confucian ideologue, and a strong supporter and a close advisor to Taejo(King)Yi Seonggye( 태조 太祖 李成桂), who founded the Joseon dynasty. Jeong Dojeon’s thought played a major role in the development of the political structure of the new Joseon dynasty. In the late fourteenth century, the decaying Goryeo dynasty (918-1392) was deeply entangled with a corrupt Buddhist monastic system. Buddhist monasteries were exempt from paying taxes, and many Buddhist leaders enjoyed wealth, power and privileged positions in the court. Neo-Confucian scholars in Korea, motivated by a desire to overthrow the Goryeo dynasty, took the Neo-Confucianism of Zuxhi and the Cheng brothers in a philosophical direction which it never achieved in China. Jeong Dojeon wrote a number of essays criticizing Buddhism, but his final treatise, the Bulssi japbyeon ( "Array of Critiques of Buddhism") summarized all of the arguments against Buddhism that had been developed by Hanyu, the Cheng brothers, and Zhuxi into a powerful attack on every aspect of the Seon Buddhist tradition. He argued that Buddhist practices were antisocial and avoided dealing with the actual world, and that the Buddhist doctrine was nihilistic, and that Buddhism, led people to abandon respect for the norms of society and to neglect the importance of cultivating one's character through relationships within human society.

Life

Jeong was born in 1342 to a noble family in Jeongcheongbuk-do Danyanggun, Sambong( 충청 북도 忠清北道), in present-day South Korea. His family had emerged from commoner status some four generations before, and had slowly climbed up the ladder of government service. His father was the first in the family to obtain a high government post. His mother, however, was a slave, which made it difficult for him to gain political status. Jeong’s father died while he was still a young boy, and in spite of his high position, he left a poor household and almost no property for his heir. This experience of poverty during his childhood seems to have affected Jeong's thought. Despite his difficulties, he became a student of Yi saek( (李穡 ) and with other leading thinkers of the time such as Jeong Mong-ju( 정몽주 鄭夢周), came to have an important influence on Korean politics.

Jeong was a strong supporter and a close advisor of Taejo(King)Yi Seonggye( 태조 太祖 李成桂), who founded the Joseon dynasty. He is said to have compared his relationship with Yi to that between Zhang Liang and Gaozu of Han. The two first became acquainted in 1383, when Jeong visited Yi at his quarters in Hamgyong province. Near the end of the fourteenth century, the political and economic problems of the Goryeo dynasty had come to a head, and Neo-Confucian activists sided with the rebel general Yi Seonggye (李成桂 1335-1408). In 1392, Yi toppled the Goryeo government and proclaimed the Joseon dynasty, installing a cabinet composed of Neo-Confucian advisors. The essays of Jeong Dojeon played a major role in the development of the political structure of the new Joseon dynasty. Jeong's political ideas had a lasting impact on Joseon Dynasty politics and laws. Using Cheng-Zhu Neo-Confucian philosophy as the basis of his anti-Buddhist polemic, he criticized Buddhism in a number of treatises as being corrupt in its practices, and nihilistic and antinomian in its doctrines. The most famous of these treatises was the Bulssi japbyeon ("Array of Critiques Against Buddhism" ), completed just before his assassination in 1398. After the establishment of the Joseon dynasty, the Buddhists were purged from positions of political power and relegated to mountain monasteries, prohibited from setting foot in the cities.

Jeong Dojeon was a founding member of the Seonggyungwan, the royal Confucian academy, and one of its early faculty members.

Thought

Neo-Confucianism in Korea

The Neo-Confucianism of the Cheng-Zhu school became established as a government ideology in Korea, and became much more the focus of philosophical inquiry than it ever was in China. While Chinese Neo-Confucianism primarily aimed to win intellectuals back from Buddhism, it developed into various schools and sects, some of which, including the Wang Yangming school, resembled Zen Buddhism more closely than Zuxhi’s Confucian doctrines. In Korea, however, Neo-Confucianism was closely associated with political circumstances which did not exist in China. The decaying Goryeo dynasty (918-1392) was deeply entangled with a corrupt Buddhist monastic system. Buddhist monasteries were exempt from paying taxes, and many Buddhist leaders enjoyed wealth, power and a lavish lifestyle that included the possession of prize lands and slaves, and appointment to privileged positions in the court. Neo-Confucian intellectuals increasingly targeted these excesses, and Neo-Confucianism became closely associated with the resistance movement which sought the overthrow of the Goryeo dynasty. The political ambitions of Neo-Confucian intellectuals resulted in the development of strong philosophical arguments against Buddhism. Neo-Confucianists argued that Buddhist practices were antisocial and avoided dealing with the actual world, and that the Buddhist doctrine was nihilistic. Buddhism, they claimed, led people to abandon respect for the norms of society and to neglect the importance of cultivating one's character through relationships within human society. Attacks on Buddhism began in Korea as early as 982, but did not reach maturity until the mid-fourteenth century, with scholars such as Yi Saek (李穡 1328-1396), Jo Inok (?-1396) and Jeong Mongju (鄭夢周 1337-1392). Their criticisms were primarily political and economic. They complained that excessive government patronage of privileged individuals was deleterious to the well being of the state, and that political authority should be assigned according to merit rather than social status. Gong Hoebaek (1357-1402), Ho Ung (?-1411), and Jeong Chong (1358-1397) developed their criticisms on more philosophical grounds. Jeong’s major work, Bulssi japbyeon ("Array of Critiques Against Buddhism" ) critiqued every major aspect of contemporary Buddhist doctrine, focusing primarily on the Seon sect. Almost all of Jeong’s examples and illustrations were citations from one of the Cheng brothers’ commentaries on Zhuxi. [1]

Political Thought

Jeong argued that the government, including the king himself, exists for the sake of the people. Its legitimacy could only come from benevolent public service. It was largely on this basis that he legitimized the overthrow of the Goryeo dynasty, arguing that the Goryeo rulers had given up their right to rule.

Jeong divided society into three classes: a large lower class of agricultural laborers and craftsmen, a middle class of literati, and a small upper class of bureaucrats. Anyone outside this system, including Buddhist monks, shamans, and entertainers, he considered a "vicious" threat to the social fabric.

Jeong was among the first Korean scholars to refer to his thought as silhak, or "practical learning." However, he is not usually numbered among the members of the Silhak tradition, which arose much later in the Joseon period.

Confucian – Buddhist Debate

The confrontation between Neo-Confucianism and Buddhism, had its earliest origins in the tracts of the Tang dynasty scholar Hanyu (768-824), and culminated in the writings of Jeong Dojeon and Gihwa (1376-1433) in Korea during the end of Goryeo and beginning of the Joseon dynasties. Jeong wrote a number of essays criticizing Buddhism, but his final treatise, the Bulssi japbyeon ( "Array of Critiques of Buddhism") summarized all of the arguments against Buddhism that had been developed by Hanyu, the Cheng brothers, and Zhuxi into one final attack on the Seon Buddhist tradition. Along with the arguments of these earlier Neo-Confucian thinkers, which were comprised largely of criticisms of Song Chan nihilism and antinomianism, Jeong Dojeon deplored the decadent practices of the current Goryeo Buddhist saṅgha. In China, the Neo-Confucian condemnations of Buddhism had been largely ignored, but this was not the case in Korea. The monk Gihwa, the leading figure of the Buddhist saṅgha at the outset of the Joseon, who had himself been an acclaimed Confucian scholar, felt compelled to respond to Jeong's criticism with a treatise entitled Hyeonjeong non ("Exposition of the Correct"). His response was conciliatory, but reproved the Confucians for the disparity between what was said in their classical texts, and what they actually did in practice.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • De Bary, William Theodore, and JaHyun Kim Haboush. 1985. The Rise of Neo-Confucianism in Korea. Neo-Confucian studies. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Han Yeong-u. (1974). Jeong Do-jeon's philosophy of political reform. Korea Journal 14(7-8). Reprinted in Lee et al. (2004), Korean philosophy: Its tradition and modern transformation, pp. 55-74. Seoul: Hollym. ISBN 1-56591-178-4
  • Korean Institute of Philosophical Thought. (1995). 강좌 한국철학 (Gangjwa Hanguk Cheolhak, Guide to Korean philosophy), pp. 333-345. Seoul: Yemoon Seowon. ISBN 89-7646-032-4.
  • Kŭm, Chang-tʻae. 2000. Confucianism and Korean thoughts. Seoul, Korea: Jimoondang Pub. Co. ISBN:8988095103 9788988095102

See also

  • List of Korean philosophers
  • Korean philosophy
  • Korean literature
  • Goryeo politics
  • Joseon Dynasty politics


Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.