Difference between revisions of "Dictionary" - New World Encyclopedia
m (Robot: Remove claimed tag) |
(updated) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | ||
[[Category:Politics and social sciences]] | [[Category:Politics and social sciences]] | ||
[[Category:Linguistics]] | [[Category:Linguistics]] | ||
− | + | A '''dictionary''' is a book of alphabetically listed [[words]] in a specific language, with definitions, etymologies, pronunciations, and other information;<ref name = Web1>Webster's New World College Dictionary, Fourth Edition, 2002</ref> or a book of alphabetically listed words in one language with their equivalents in another, also known as a [[lexicon]].<ref name = Web1/> | |
− | [[Image: | + | IIn many languages, words can appear in many different forms, but only the [[lemma (linguistics)|undeclined or unconjugated]] form appears as the [[headword]] in most dictionaries. Dictionaries are most commonly found in the form of a book, but some newer dictionaries, like [[StarDict]] and the ''[[New Oxford American Dictionary]]'' on [[Mac OS X]], are '''dictionary software''' running on [[Personal Digital Assistant|PDAs]] or [[computer]]s. There are also many '''online dictionaries''' accessible via the [[Internet]]. |
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:Latin dictionary.jpg|thumb|250px|A multi-volume Latin dictionary in the [[University Library of Graz]].]] | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
− | The | + | The first known bilingual dictionaries were created in Ancient Mesopotamia - specifically in Ebla (modern Syria) - with cuneiform tablets displaying Sumerian words and their Akkadian equivalents dating back to 2300B.C.E..<ref name = "imlqdg">[http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761573731/Dictionary.html#p3 Dictionary - MSN Encarta<!-- Bot generated title —>]</ref>. The first dictionary of the Chinese language, the ''[[Shuowen Jiezi]]'', was written around 100 C.E. (although other sources suggest that Chinese scholars may have created a monolingual dictionary as far back as 1109B.C.E.<ref>http://www.sentex.net/~ajy/facts/firsts.html quoting the Waterford Star (Waterford, Ontario, June 13, 1907, page 3)</ref>), while a [[Ancient Greek|Greek]] lexicon (specifically a list of words used by [[Homer]], and their meanings) was written by [[Apollonius the Sophist]] at around the same time<ref name = "imlqdg"/>. According to the [[Nihon Shoki|The Chronicles of Japan]], [[Japanese dictionaries#Early Japanese lexicography|Japanese dictionaries]] originated in 682 C.E., although the first dictionary dealt with the deciphering of [[Chinese language|Chinese]] characters. |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | The earliest European dictionaries were bilingual dictionaries. These were glossaries of French, Italian or Latin words, along with definitions of the foreign words in English. An early nonalphabetical list of 8000 English words was the ''Elementarie'' created by [[Richard Mulcaster]] in 1592.<ref>[http://www.bl.uk/learning/langlit/dic/mul/elementarie.html 1582 - Mulcaster's Elementarie], Learning Dictionaries and Meaning, [[The British Library]]</ref><ref>[http://angli02.kgw.tu-berlin.de/lexicography/b_history.html A Brief History of English Lexicography], Peter Erdmann and See-Young Cho, [[Technical University of Berlin|Technische Universität Berlin]], 1999.</ref> | |
+ | Daniel Webster also made a dictionary in the 1700's. It was one of America's first dictionaries. That is where the Webster part in dictionaries comes from. | ||
− | The | + | The first purely English alphabetical dictionary was ''[[Table Alphabeticall|A Table Alphabeticall]]'', written by [[English people|English]] schoolteacher [[Robert Cawdrey]] in 1604. It was eight years ahead of the first [[Italian language|Italian]] dictionary and thirty-five years ahead of the [[French language|French]]. Conversely, it is eight hundred years after the first [[Arabic]], and almost one-thousand years after the first [[Sanskrit]] in [[India]]. The only surviving copy is found at the [[Bodleian Library]] in [[Oxford]]. Yet this early effort, as well as the many imitators which followed it, was seen as unreliable and nowhere near definitive<ref>[[Philip Stanhope, 4th Earl of Chesterfield]] was still lamenting in 1754, 150 years after Cawdrey's publication, that it is "a sort of disgrace to our nation, that hitherto we have had no . . . standard of our language; our dictionaries at present being more properly what our neighbours the Dutch and the Germans call theirs, word-books, than dictionaries in the superior sense of that title." [(http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Papers/firstdict.html)]</ref>. It wasn't until [[Samuel Johnson]]'s ''[[A Dictionary of the English Language]]'' (1755) that a truly noteworthy, reliable English Dictionary was deemed to have been produced, and the fact that today many people still mistakenly believe Johnson to have written the first English Dictionary is a testament to this legacy<ref name = "wblqfm">[http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Papers/firstdict.html Lynch, "How Johnson's Dictionary Became the First Dictionary"<!-- Bot generated title —>]</ref>. By this stage, dictionaries had evolved to contain textual references for most words, and were arranged alphabetically, rather than by topic (a previously popular form of arrangement, which meant all animals would be grouped together etc.). Johnson's masterwork could be judged as the first to bring all these elements together, creating the first 'modern' dictionary<ref name = "wblqfm"/>. |
− | + | Johnson's Dictionary remained the English-language standard for over 150 years, until the [[Oxford University Press]] began writing and releasing the [[Oxford English Dictionary]] in short fascicles from 1884 onwards. It took nearly 50 years to finally complete the huge work, and they finally released the complete [[OED]] in 12 volumes in 1928. It remains the most comprehensive and trusted English language dictionary to this day, with revisions and updates added by a dedicated team every three months. | |
==Word order== | ==Word order== | ||
Today, dictionaries of most [[languages]] with [[alphabet]]ic and syllabic [[writing system]]s list words in [[Lexicographical order|lexicographic]] order, usually alphabetical or some analogous [[phonetic]] system. | Today, dictionaries of most [[languages]] with [[alphabet]]ic and syllabic [[writing system]]s list words in [[Lexicographical order|lexicographic]] order, usually alphabetical or some analogous [[phonetic]] system. | ||
− | In many languages, words are grouped together according to their | + | In many languages, words are grouped together according to their root word, with the roots being arranged alphabetically. If English dictionaries were arranged like this, the words "import," "export," "support," "report," "porter," "important" and "transportation" would theoretically be listed under the Latin ''"portare,"'' "to carry." This method has the advantage that all words of a common origin are listed together, but the [[disadvantage]] is that one has to know the roots of the word before one can look it up. Some [[Hebrew]], [[Sanskrit]], and [[Arabic]] dictionaries work this way. |
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | While most of Japanese and Korean dictionaries are arranged according to their phonetic writing ([[kana]] syllabic script for the Japanese, and [[hangul]] alphabet for the Korean), the main body of modern Chinese dictionaries mostly is ordered according to the [[latin alphabet]] with the [[pinyin]] spelling ; but most Chinese dictionaries have an appendix ordering entries accordance to the Chinese [[logographic]] writing system, in order to allow readers to find words written in [[logograms]] whose pronunciation is not known. Chinese characters may be sorted according to one of many [[schemes]] based on the component parts of the characters ([[Chinese radicals|radicals]], number of [[Stroke order|strokes]], overall shape). | |
==Coverage== | ==Coverage== | ||
− | Dictionaries vary | + | Dictionaries can vary widely in coverage, size, and scope. A [[maximizing dictionary]] lists as many words as possible from a particular speech community (e.g., the ''[[Oxford English Dictionary]]''), whereas a [[minimizing dictionary]] exclusively attempts to cover only a limited selection of words from a speech community (e.g., a dictionary of [[Basic English]] words). Take for instance, two dictionaries of [[Chinese characters]]: the pocket-sized minimizing dictionary ''[[Xinhua Zidian]]'' (2004, 700 pages) only includes 11,200 commonly used characters, while the multi-volume maximizing dictionary ''[[Hanyu Da Zidian]]'' (1995, 5800 pages) includes over 54,678 characters and [[Variant Chinese character|variants]]. |
==Special-purpose dictionaries== | ==Special-purpose dictionaries== | ||
− | There are many different types of dictionaries, including bilingual, multilingual, historical, biographical, and geographical dictionaries. | + | There are many different types of special-purpose dictionaries, including bilingual, multilingual, scientifical, historical, biographical, technical and geographical dictionaries. |
[[Image:Dictionary-selection.jpg|thumb|right|300px|A selection of special purpose dictionaries]] | [[Image:Dictionary-selection.jpg|thumb|right|300px|A selection of special purpose dictionaries]] | ||
− | == | + | ==Specialized dictionaries== |
− | + | [[Image:LA2-picture-dictionary.jpg|thumb|300px|Picture dictionaries explain concepts from [[tureen|soup-tureen]] in the 1904 ''Engelska bild-glosor med textöfningar …'' to [[supersonic transport]] in the 1998 ''Visual Encyclopedia''.]] | |
− | + | According to the ''Manual of Specialised Lexicography'' a [[specialized dictionary]] (also referred to as a technical dictionary) is a lexicon that focuses upon a specific subject field. Following the description in ''The Bilingual LSP Dictionary'' [[lexicographers]] categorize specialized dictionaries into three types. A [[multi-field dictionary]] broadly covers several semantic fields (e.g., a [[picture dictionary]]), a [[single-field dictionary]] narrowly covers one particular subject field (e.g., law), and a [[sub-field dictionary]] covers a singular field (e.g., constitutional law). For example, the 23-language [[Inter-Active Terminology for Europe]] is a multi-field dictionary, the [[American National Biography]] is a single-field, and the [[African American National Biography Project]] is a sub-field dictionary. In terms of the above coverage distinction between "minimizing dictionaries" and "maximizing dictionaries," multi-field dictionaries tend to minimize coverage across lexical fields (for instance, ''[[Oxford Dictionary of World Religions]]'') whereas single-field and sub-field dictionaries tend to maximize coverage within a limited subject field ''([[The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology]])''. See also [[LSP dictionary]]. | |
− | == | + | ==Data dictionaries== |
− | [[ | + | Data sets and [[database]]s collected and utilized for [[statistics|statistical]] analyses are typically accompanied by, or able to be used to generate, a list of all [[variable]] names used within the data set, as well as matters such as their meaning, values, [[level of measurement]], length, decimal allowances, and type (numeric, string, etc.) |
− | |||
− | == | + | ==Glossaries== |
− | + | Another variant is the [[glossary]], an alphabetical list of defined terms in a specialised field, such as medicine or science. The simplest dictionary, a [[defining dictionary]], provides a [[core glossary]] of the simplest meanings of the simplest concepts. From these, other concepts can be explained and defined, in particular for those who are first learning a language. In English, the commercial defining dictionaries typically include only one or two meanings of under 2000 words. With these, the rest of English, and even the 4000 most common English [[idiom]]s and [[metaphor]]s, can be defined. | |
− | + | ==Pronunciation== | |
− | + | {{main|IPA chart for English|Pronunciation respelling for English}} | |
− | + | Dictionaries for languages for which the pronunciation of words is not apparent from their spelling, such as the English language, usually provide the pronunciation, often using the [[International Phonetic Alphabet]]. For example, the definition for the word ''dictionary'' might be followed by the (American English) phonemic spelling: {{IPA|/ˈdɪkʃəˌnɛri/}}. English dictionaries, however, often use other systems, such as the [[English Phonemic Representation]] system, in which the pronunciation of ''dictionary'' is given as [dĭk'shə-něr'ē]. Yet others use an ''ad hoc'' notation; for example, ''dictionary'' may become [DIK-shuh-ner-ee]. | |
− | |||
− | + | The online [[Turkish (language)|Turkish]]–English (and English–Turkish) dictionary [[Seslisozluk]] enables registered users to listen to the pronunciation of the words. | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
{{sectionstub}} | {{sectionstub}} | ||
==Variations between dictionaries== | ==Variations between dictionaries== | ||
===Prescription and description=== | ===Prescription and description=== | ||
− | Dictionary makers apply two basic philosophies to the defining of words: [[Prescription and description|''prescriptive'' or ''descriptive'']]. | + | Dictionary makers apply two basic philosophies to the defining of words: [[Prescription and description|''prescriptive'' or ''descriptive'']]. [[Noah Webster]], intent on forging a distinct identity for the American language, altered spellings and accentuated differences in meaning and pronunciation of some words. This is why [[American English]] now uses the spelling ''color'' while the rest of the English-speaking world prefers ''colour''. (Similarly, [[British English]] subsequently underwent a few spelling changes that did not affect American English; see further at [[American and British English spelling differences]].) Large 20th-century dictionaries such as the ''[[Oxford English Dictionary]]'' (OED) and [[Webster's Third New International Dictionary|Webster's Third]] are descriptive, and attempt to describe the actual use of words. |
[[Image:Dictionary through lens.JPG|thumb|left|250 px|A dictionary open at the word "Internet," viewed through a lens]] | [[Image:Dictionary through lens.JPG|thumb|left|250 px|A dictionary open at the word "Internet," viewed through a lens]] | ||
Line 75: | Line 62: | ||
Because of the broad use of dictionaries, and their acceptance by many as language authorities, their treatment of the language does affect usage to some degree, even the most descriptive dictionaries providing conservative continuity. In the long run, however, usage primarily determines the meanings of words in English, and the language is being changed and created every day. As [[Jorge Luis Borges]] says in the prologue to "El otro, el mismo": "''It is often forgotten that (dictionaries) are artificial repositories, put together well after the languages they define. The roots of language are irrational and of a magical nature.''" | Because of the broad use of dictionaries, and their acceptance by many as language authorities, their treatment of the language does affect usage to some degree, even the most descriptive dictionaries providing conservative continuity. In the long run, however, usage primarily determines the meanings of words in English, and the language is being changed and created every day. As [[Jorge Luis Borges]] says in the prologue to "El otro, el mismo": "''It is often forgotten that (dictionaries) are artificial repositories, put together well after the languages they define. The roots of language are irrational and of a magical nature.''" | ||
− | == | + | ==Major English dictionaries== |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
+ | {{Multicol}} | ||
+ | * ''[[Penguin Group|The Penguin English Dictionary]]'' | ||
* ''[[Merriam-Webster]]'' Merriam-Webster Dictionary | * ''[[Merriam-Webster]]'' Merriam-Webster Dictionary | ||
+ | * ''[[Webster's Dictionary|Webster's Third New International Dictionary]]'' (descriptive) | ||
+ | * ''[[Random House Dictionary of the English Language]]'' | ||
+ | * ''[[The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language]]'' | ||
+ | * ''[[Webster's New World Dictionary]]'' | ||
* ''[[Oxford English Dictionary]]'' (descriptive) | * ''[[Oxford English Dictionary]]'' (descriptive) | ||
* ''[[Concise Oxford Dictionary]]'' | * ''[[Concise Oxford Dictionary]]'' | ||
Line 101: | Line 76: | ||
* ''[[New Oxford American Dictionary]]'' | * ''[[New Oxford American Dictionary]]'' | ||
* ''[[Canadian Oxford Dictionary]]'' | * ''[[Canadian Oxford Dictionary]]'' | ||
− | |||
* ''[[ITP Nelson Canadian Dictionary]]'' | * ''[[ITP Nelson Canadian Dictionary]]'' | ||
* ''[[Webster's New Universal Unabridged Dictionary]]'' | * ''[[Webster's New Universal Unabridged Dictionary]]'' | ||
+ | {{Multicol-break}} | ||
* [[Samuel Johnson]]'s ''[[A Dictionary of the English Language]]'' (prescriptive) | * [[Samuel Johnson]]'s ''[[A Dictionary of the English Language]]'' (prescriptive) | ||
* [[Noah Webster]]'s ''An American Dictionary of the English Language'' (prescriptive) | * [[Noah Webster]]'s ''An American Dictionary of the English Language'' (prescriptive) | ||
− | |||
* ''[[The Century Dictionary]]'' | * ''[[The Century Dictionary]]'' | ||
* ''[[Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable]]'' | * ''[[Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable]]'' | ||
* ''[[Macquarie Dictionary|Macquarie Dictionary, The]]'', a dictionary of [[Australian English]] | * ''[[Macquarie Dictionary|Macquarie Dictionary, The]]'', a dictionary of [[Australian English]] | ||
− | * ''[[Chambers Dictionary]]'' | + | * ''[[Chambers Dictionary|The Chambers Dictionary]]'' |
− | * [[HarperCollins|Collins]] [[COBUILD]] | + | * ''[[HarperCollins|Collins]]'' [[COBUILD]] |
* ''[[HarperCollins|Collins English Dictionary]]'' | * ''[[HarperCollins|Collins English Dictionary]]'' | ||
* ''[[Gage Canadian Dictionary]]'' | * ''[[Gage Canadian Dictionary]]'' | ||
* ''[[Longman|Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English]]'' | * ''[[Longman|Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English]]'' | ||
* ''[[Black's Law Dictionary]]'', a [[law dictionary]] | * ''[[Black's Law Dictionary]]'', a [[law dictionary]] | ||
− | + | {{Multicol-end}} | |
For languages other than modern English, see the article about that language. See also articles such as [[Japanese dictionaries]]. | For languages other than modern English, see the article about that language. See also articles such as [[Japanese dictionaries]]. | ||
− | == | + | === Others=== |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | {{Multicol}} | |
+ | * [[Academic Dictionary of Lithuanian]] | ||
+ | * [[Free On-line Dictionary of Computing]] | ||
+ | * [[Free On-line Dictionary of Philosophy]] | ||
+ | * [[Interglot]] | ||
+ | * [[Magyar szótár]] - A Dictionary of the Hungarian language | ||
+ | * [[LEO (website)]] | ||
+ | * [[Lingvo Online]] | ||
+ | * [[Lithuanian dictionaries]] | ||
+ | * [[Logos Dictionary]] | ||
+ | * [[Merriam-Webster]] | ||
+ | {{Multicol-break}} | ||
+ | * [[Online Etymology Dictionary]] | ||
+ | * [[Pseudodictionary]] | ||
+ | * [[Reference.com]] | ||
+ | * [[Dictionary of the Scots Language]] | ||
+ | * [[Susning.nu]] | ||
+ | * [[Urban Dictionary]] | ||
+ | * [[WWWJDIC]] | ||
+ | * [[Private Sözlük]] | ||
+ | * [[Seslisozluk]] | ||
+ | {{Multicol-end}} | ||
− | |||
− | == | + | ==Notes== |
− | < | + | <references/> |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | ==References== | + | == References == |
− | + | *''Manual of Specialised Lexicography'', Henning Bergenholtz/Sven Tarp (eds.), Benjamins Publishing, 1995 | |
− | * | + | *''Diction and Stylistics of the 21st century'', Darwin, Charles Schickelgruber Maxis (ed.), Jackson Publishing, 2001 |
− | * | + | *''The Bilingual LSP Dictionary'', Sandro Nielsen, Gunter Narr Verlag 1994 |
− | * | + | *''Dictionaries, The Art and Craft of Lexicography'', Sidney I. Landau, Simon & Schuster, 1998, hardcover, ISBN 0-684-18096-0 |
− | * | + | *''The Professor and the Madman, A Tale of Murder, Insanity, and the Making of the Oxford English Dictionary'', Simon Winchester, HarperPerennial, New York, 1998, trade paperback, ISBN 0-06-017596-6. (published in the UK as ''The Surgeon of Crowthorne'') |
− | * | + | *{{cite web |url=http://angli02.kgw.tu-berlin.de/lexicography/data/b_history.html |title=A Brief History of English Lexicography |accessdate=2007-01-22 |coauthors=Prof. Dr. Peter Erdmann and Dr. See-Young Cho}} |
− | |||
+ | ==External links== | ||
+ | * {{dmoz|/Reference/Dictionaries/}} | ||
+ | * [http://emeld.org/school/classroom/text/lexicon-size.html How many words do you need?] (E-MELD) | ||
− | {{ | + | {{Credits|Dictionary|216312199|}} |
Revision as of 13:39, 3 June 2008
A dictionary is a book of alphabetically listed words in a specific language, with definitions, etymologies, pronunciations, and other information;[1] or a book of alphabetically listed words in one language with their equivalents in another, also known as a lexicon.[1]
IIn many languages, words can appear in many different forms, but only the undeclined or unconjugated form appears as the headword in most dictionaries. Dictionaries are most commonly found in the form of a book, but some newer dictionaries, like StarDict and the New Oxford American Dictionary on Mac OS X, are dictionary software running on PDAs or computers. There are also many online dictionaries accessible via the Internet.
History
The first known bilingual dictionaries were created in Ancient Mesopotamia - specifically in Ebla (modern Syria) - with cuneiform tablets displaying Sumerian words and their Akkadian equivalents dating back to 2300B.C.E.[2]. The first dictionary of the Chinese language, the Shuowen Jiezi, was written around 100 C.E. (although other sources suggest that Chinese scholars may have created a monolingual dictionary as far back as 1109B.C.E.[3]), while a Greek lexicon (specifically a list of words used by Homer, and their meanings) was written by Apollonius the Sophist at around the same time[2]. According to the The Chronicles of Japan, Japanese dictionaries originated in 682 C.E., although the first dictionary dealt with the deciphering of Chinese characters.
The earliest European dictionaries were bilingual dictionaries. These were glossaries of French, Italian or Latin words, along with definitions of the foreign words in English. An early nonalphabetical list of 8000 English words was the Elementarie created by Richard Mulcaster in 1592.[4][5] Daniel Webster also made a dictionary in the 1700's. It was one of America's first dictionaries. That is where the Webster part in dictionaries comes from.
The first purely English alphabetical dictionary was A Table Alphabeticall, written by English schoolteacher Robert Cawdrey in 1604. It was eight years ahead of the first Italian dictionary and thirty-five years ahead of the French. Conversely, it is eight hundred years after the first Arabic, and almost one-thousand years after the first Sanskrit in India. The only surviving copy is found at the Bodleian Library in Oxford. Yet this early effort, as well as the many imitators which followed it, was seen as unreliable and nowhere near definitive[6]. It wasn't until Samuel Johnson's A Dictionary of the English Language (1755) that a truly noteworthy, reliable English Dictionary was deemed to have been produced, and the fact that today many people still mistakenly believe Johnson to have written the first English Dictionary is a testament to this legacy[7]. By this stage, dictionaries had evolved to contain textual references for most words, and were arranged alphabetically, rather than by topic (a previously popular form of arrangement, which meant all animals would be grouped together etc.). Johnson's masterwork could be judged as the first to bring all these elements together, creating the first 'modern' dictionary[7].
Johnson's Dictionary remained the English-language standard for over 150 years, until the Oxford University Press began writing and releasing the Oxford English Dictionary in short fascicles from 1884 onwards. It took nearly 50 years to finally complete the huge work, and they finally released the complete OED in 12 volumes in 1928. It remains the most comprehensive and trusted English language dictionary to this day, with revisions and updates added by a dedicated team every three months.
Word order
Today, dictionaries of most languages with alphabetic and syllabic writing systems list words in lexicographic order, usually alphabetical or some analogous phonetic system.
In many languages, words are grouped together according to their root word, with the roots being arranged alphabetically. If English dictionaries were arranged like this, the words "import," "export," "support," "report," "porter," "important" and "transportation" would theoretically be listed under the Latin "portare," "to carry." This method has the advantage that all words of a common origin are listed together, but the disadvantage is that one has to know the roots of the word before one can look it up. Some Hebrew, Sanskrit, and Arabic dictionaries work this way.
While most of Japanese and Korean dictionaries are arranged according to their phonetic writing (kana syllabic script for the Japanese, and hangul alphabet for the Korean), the main body of modern Chinese dictionaries mostly is ordered according to the latin alphabet with the pinyin spelling ; but most Chinese dictionaries have an appendix ordering entries accordance to the Chinese logographic writing system, in order to allow readers to find words written in logograms whose pronunciation is not known. Chinese characters may be sorted according to one of many schemes based on the component parts of the characters (radicals, number of strokes, overall shape).
Coverage
Dictionaries can vary widely in coverage, size, and scope. A maximizing dictionary lists as many words as possible from a particular speech community (e.g., the Oxford English Dictionary), whereas a minimizing dictionary exclusively attempts to cover only a limited selection of words from a speech community (e.g., a dictionary of Basic English words). Take for instance, two dictionaries of Chinese characters: the pocket-sized minimizing dictionary Xinhua Zidian (2004, 700 pages) only includes 11,200 commonly used characters, while the multi-volume maximizing dictionary Hanyu Da Zidian (1995, 5800 pages) includes over 54,678 characters and variants.
Special-purpose dictionaries
There are many different types of special-purpose dictionaries, including bilingual, multilingual, scientifical, historical, biographical, technical and geographical dictionaries.
Specialized dictionaries
According to the Manual of Specialised Lexicography a specialized dictionary (also referred to as a technical dictionary) is a lexicon that focuses upon a specific subject field. Following the description in The Bilingual LSP Dictionary lexicographers categorize specialized dictionaries into three types. A multi-field dictionary broadly covers several semantic fields (e.g., a picture dictionary), a single-field dictionary narrowly covers one particular subject field (e.g., law), and a sub-field dictionary covers a singular field (e.g., constitutional law). For example, the 23-language Inter-Active Terminology for Europe is a multi-field dictionary, the American National Biography is a single-field, and the African American National Biography Project is a sub-field dictionary. In terms of the above coverage distinction between "minimizing dictionaries" and "maximizing dictionaries," multi-field dictionaries tend to minimize coverage across lexical fields (for instance, Oxford Dictionary of World Religions) whereas single-field and sub-field dictionaries tend to maximize coverage within a limited subject field (The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology). See also LSP dictionary.
Data dictionaries
Data sets and databases collected and utilized for statistical analyses are typically accompanied by, or able to be used to generate, a list of all variable names used within the data set, as well as matters such as their meaning, values, level of measurement, length, decimal allowances, and type (numeric, string, etc.)
Glossaries
Another variant is the glossary, an alphabetical list of defined terms in a specialised field, such as medicine or science. The simplest dictionary, a defining dictionary, provides a core glossary of the simplest meanings of the simplest concepts. From these, other concepts can be explained and defined, in particular for those who are first learning a language. In English, the commercial defining dictionaries typically include only one or two meanings of under 2000 words. With these, the rest of English, and even the 4000 most common English idioms and metaphors, can be defined.
Pronunciation
Dictionaries for languages for which the pronunciation of words is not apparent from their spelling, such as the English language, usually provide the pronunciation, often using the International Phonetic Alphabet. For example, the definition for the word dictionary might be followed by the (American English) phonemic spelling: /ˈdɪkʃəˌnɛri/. English dictionaries, however, often use other systems, such as the English Phonemic Representation system, in which the pronunciation of dictionary is given as [dĭk'shə-něr'ē]. Yet others use an ad hoc notation; for example, dictionary may become [DIK-shuh-ner-ee].
The online Turkish–English (and English–Turkish) dictionary Seslisozluk enables registered users to listen to the pronunciation of the words.
Variations between dictionaries
Prescription and description
Dictionary makers apply two basic philosophies to the defining of words: prescriptive or descriptive. Noah Webster, intent on forging a distinct identity for the American language, altered spellings and accentuated differences in meaning and pronunciation of some words. This is why American English now uses the spelling color while the rest of the English-speaking world prefers colour. (Similarly, British English subsequently underwent a few spelling changes that did not affect American English; see further at American and British English spelling differences.) Large 20th-century dictionaries such as the Oxford English Dictionary (OED) and Webster's Third are descriptive, and attempt to describe the actual use of words.
While descriptivists argue that prescriptivism is an unnatural attempt to dictate usage or curtail change, prescriptivists argue that to indiscriminately document "improper" or "inferior" usages sanctions those usages by default and causes language to "deteriorate." Although the debate can become very heated, only a small number of controversial words are usually affected. But the softening of usage notations, from the previous edition, for two words, ain't and regardless, out of over 450,000 in Webster's Third in 1961, was enough to provoke outrage among many with prescriptivist leanings, who branded the dictionary as "permissive."
The prescriptive/descriptive issue has been given so much consideration in modern times that most dictionaries of English apply the descriptive method to definitions, while additionally informing readers of attitudes which may influence their choices on words often considered vulgar, offensive, erroneous, or easily confused. Merriam-Webster is subtle, only adding italicized notations such as, sometimes offensive or nonstand (nonstandard.) American Heritage goes further, discussing issues separately in numerous "usage notes." Encarta provides similar notes, but is more prescriptive, offering warnings and admonitions against the use of certain words considered by many to be offensive or illiterate, such as, "an offensive term for..." or "a taboo term meaning..."
Because of the broad use of dictionaries, and their acceptance by many as language authorities, their treatment of the language does affect usage to some degree, even the most descriptive dictionaries providing conservative continuity. In the long run, however, usage primarily determines the meanings of words in English, and the language is being changed and created every day. As Jorge Luis Borges says in the prologue to "El otro, el mismo": "It is often forgotten that (dictionaries) are artificial repositories, put together well after the languages they define. The roots of language are irrational and of a magical nature."
Major English dictionaries
|
|
For languages other than modern English, see the article about that language. See also articles such as Japanese dictionaries.
Others
|
|
Notes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Webster's New World College Dictionary, Fourth Edition, 2002
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Dictionary - MSN Encarta
- ↑ http://www.sentex.net/~ajy/facts/firsts.html quoting the Waterford Star (Waterford, Ontario, June 13, 1907, page 3)
- ↑ 1582 - Mulcaster's Elementarie, Learning Dictionaries and Meaning, The British Library
- ↑ A Brief History of English Lexicography, Peter Erdmann and See-Young Cho, Technische Universität Berlin, 1999.
- ↑ Philip Stanhope, 4th Earl of Chesterfield was still lamenting in 1754, 150 years after Cawdrey's publication, that it is "a sort of disgrace to our nation, that hitherto we have had no . . . standard of our language; our dictionaries at present being more properly what our neighbours the Dutch and the Germans call theirs, word-books, than dictionaries in the superior sense of that title." [(http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Papers/firstdict.html)]
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Lynch, "How Johnson's Dictionary Became the First Dictionary"
ReferencesISBN links support NWE through referral fees
- Manual of Specialised Lexicography, Henning Bergenholtz/Sven Tarp (eds.), Benjamins Publishing, 1995
- Diction and Stylistics of the 21st century, Darwin, Charles Schickelgruber Maxis (ed.), Jackson Publishing, 2001
- The Bilingual LSP Dictionary, Sandro Nielsen, Gunter Narr Verlag 1994
- Dictionaries, The Art and Craft of Lexicography, Sidney I. Landau, Simon & Schuster, 1998, hardcover, ISBN 0-684-18096-0
- The Professor and the Madman, A Tale of Murder, Insanity, and the Making of the Oxford English Dictionary, Simon Winchester, HarperPerennial, New York, 1998, trade paperback, ISBN 0-06-017596-6. (published in the UK as The Surgeon of Crowthorne)
- A Brief History of English Lexicography. Retrieved 2007-01-22.
External links
- {{{2}}} at the Open Directory Project
- How many words do you need? (E-MELD)
Credits
New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:
The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:
Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.