Difference between revisions of "Social structure" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
Line 3: Line 3:
 
[[Category:Sociology]]
 
[[Category:Sociology]]
  
'''Social structure'''  (also referred to as a '''social system''') is a [[system]] of [[social relation]]s. Social structure does not concern itself with [[person|people]] - individuals forming the [[society]] or their [[social organisation]]s, neither does it study who are the people/organisation forming it, or what is the ultimate goal of their relations. Social structure deals rather with the very [[structure]] of their relations—how are they organized in a [[pattern]]s of [[personal relationship|relationships]].
+
====Introduction====
  
The concept of social structure was pioneered by [[19th century]] German sociologist, [[Georg Simmel]], who studied structure as an [[abstract]] concept.
+
'''Social structure''' is a  [[system]] of [[social relation]]s. Social structure does not concern itself with [[person|people]] as individuals forming the society or their social organizations, neither does it study who are the people/organisation forming it, or what is the ultimate goal of their relations. Social structure deals rather with the very structure of their relations: how are they organized in a [[pattern]]s of [[personal relationship|relationships]]. The key to understanding social structure in a society is understanding its social institutions and their intertwining combinations. Social structure is the institutional framework that makes for order in daily, weekly, and yearly interaction between people. It is social institutions that promote the necessary order to make social structure possible.
  
Social structure presents an idea that society is grouped into structures with different functions, meanings or purposes. [[Family]], [[religion]], [[law]], [[Economics|economy]] and [[Social class|class]] are all social structures. This is related to the idea of "[[social stratification]]," which refers to the idea that society is separated into different strata, according to social distinctions such as a [[race]], class and [[gender]]. Social treatment of persons within various social structures can be understood as related to their placement within the various social strata.  
+
Social structure can be divided into [[Micro-sociology|micro-structure]] and [[Macro-sociology|macro-structure]]. '''Micro-structure''' is the pattern of relations between most basic elements of social life, that cannot be further divided and have no social structure of their own  ( i.e. pattern of relations between individuals in a group composed of individuals - where individuals have no social structure ). '''Macro-structure''' is thus a kind of  “second level” structure, a pattern of relations between objects that have their own structure ( e.g. a political social structure between political parties, as political parties have their own social structure).  
  
For example, some argue that men and women who have otherwise equal qualifications receive different treatment in the workplace because of their genderOthers note that individuals are sometimes viewed as having different essential qualities based on their race and ethnicity, regardless of their individual qualities.  When examined, these social distinctions are often considered [[stereotype]]s based on prejudiceHowever, these social distinctions often go unexamined because they appear to be the result of social structures rather than prejudice.  
+
Some believe that social structure is naturally developedIt may be caused by larger system needs, such as the need for [[labor (economics)|labor]], [[management]], [[professional]] and [[military]] classes, or by conflicts between groups, such as competition among [[political party|political parties]] or among [[elite]]s and [[masses]]. Others believe that this structuring is not a result of natural processes, but is socially constructedIt may be created by the power of elites who seek to retain their power, or by [[economic system]]s that place emphasis upon [[competition]] or [[cooperation]].
  
Some believe that social structure is naturally developed. It may be caused by larger system needs, such as the need for [[labour (economics)|labour]], [[management]], [[professional]] and [[military]] classes, or by conflicts between groups, such as competition among [[political party|political parties]] or among [[elite]]s and [[masses]]. Others believe that this structuring is not a result of natural processes, but is socially constructed.  It may be created by the power of elites who seek to retain their power, or by [[economic system]]s that place emphasis upon [[competition]] or [[cooperation]].
+
In any case, social system is the parent system of those lower systems. This is related to the notion of "social stratification," which refers to the idea that society is separated into different strata, according to social distinctions such as a race, class and gender. Social treatment of persons within various social structures can be understood as related to their placement within the various social strata.
  
Social structure can be divided into [[Microsociology|microstructure]] and [[Macrosociology|macrostructure]]. Microstructure is the pattern of relations between most basic elements of social life, that cannot be further divided and have no social structure of their own (for example, pattern of relations between individuals in a group composed of individuals - where individuals have no social structure, or a structure of organisations as a pattern of relations between [[social position]]s or [[social role]]s, where those positions and roles have no structure by themselves). Macrostructure is thus a kind of 'second level' structure, a pattern of relations between objects that have their own structure (for example, a political social structure between political parties, as political parties have their own social structure). Some special types of social structures that modern sociologist differentiate are ''[[relation structure]]s'' (in family or larger family-like clan structures), ''[[communication structure]]s'' (how information is passed in organisations) and ''[[sociometric structure]]s'' (structures of sympathy, antipathy and indifference in organisations - this was studied by [[Jacob Moreno]]).
+
====Culture Forms, Hierarchy of Values and Norms, are the Foundation of Social Structure====
  
Sociologists also distinguish between:
+
Social structure, as mentioned above, alleges that society is grouped into structures with different functions, meanings or purposes. In a broader sense, known as social system, can be viewed as a ( social ) structure composed of the economic system, law system, political system, '''cultural system''' -    some sort  of shared reality: language, norms and values, etc. Structure arises out of the face-to-face interactions of people who are operating from, both, a shared sense of reality - culture and socialization - as well as an individual and group oriented strata  which are open to particular definitions and interpretations.
* [[normative structure]] - pattern of relations in given structure (organisation) between [[norm (sociology)|norm]]s and modes of operations of people of varying [[social position]]s
 
* [[ideal structure]] - pattern of relations between beliefs and views of people of varying social positions
 
* [[interest structure]] - pattern of relations between goals and desires of people of varying social positions
 
* [[interaction structure]] - forms of communications of people of varying social positions
 
  
Structures are important, as the actions of people and organisations are guided partially by the ''[[structural determination]]''. Organisation structure determines its flexibity, capacity to change and many other factors, and is an important part of the [[management]].
+
Among the '''several elements of social and cultural structures''', two are of  great importance: '''The first''' consists of culturally defined goals, purposes and interests, held out as legitimate objectives for all or for diversely located members of society. They are simply the things “worth striving for.”  Although some, not all, of these cultural goals are directly related to the biological drives of man, they are not determined by them.  '''The second''' element of the cultural structure defines, regulates and controls the acceptable modes of reaching out for these goals. Every social group invariably “squares” its cultural objectives with regulations, rooted in the mores or institutions, of allowable procedures for moving toward these objectives. So, norms - or [[normative structure]], as patterns of relations in given structure (organization) between [[norm (sociology)|norm]]s and modes of operations of people of varying [[social position]]s - became the rallying cry of  any society .  
 +
 
 +
Generally, no society lacks norms governing conduct. But societies do differ in the degree to which the folkways, mores and institutional controls are effectively integrated with the goals which stand high in the hierarchy of cultural values. The problem is that these regulatory norms are not necessarily identical with technical or efficiency norms. Many procedures which from the standpoint of the individuals would be most efficient in securing desired values - the exercise of force, fraud, power - are ruled out of the institutional area of permitted conduct. The pattern of relations between goals and desires of people of varying social positions is called  [[interest structure]]. In most cases, high rates of departure from institutional requirements are seen as the result of culturally induced, deep motivations which cannot be satisfied among those social strata with limited access to opportunity. The culture and the social structure operate at cross-purposes. In this context, the sole significant question becomes: Which of the available procedures is most efficient in netting  the culturally approved value? The technically most effective procedure, whether culturally legitimate or not, becomes typically preferred to institutionally prescribed conduct especially in  a societal culture where there is heavy emphasis on  wealth as a basic symbol of success without a corresponding emphasis upon the legitimate means to achieve it.
 +
 +
The pressure of such a social order is upon outdoing one's competitors. So long as the sentiments supporting this competitive system are distributed throughout the entire range of activities and are not confined to the final result of '''success''', the choice of means will remain largely within the realm of social control.  When, however, the cultural emphasis shifts from the satisfaction deriving from competition itself to almost exclusive concern with the outcome, the resultant stress makes for the breakdown of the regulatory structure.
 +
 
 +
====Conclusion====
 +
 
 +
Social structure is the way in which society is organized into predictable relationships, patterns of social interaction ( the way in which people respond to each other ). These patterns are to some extent independent of the particular individual, they exert a force which shapes behavior and identity of the society. Culture forms the foundation of social structure and the society uses norms  as the modes of operations among the society’s elements.  Sometimes, however, the shortcuts using institutionally  inhibited conducts  to achieve the  culturally approved values ( e.g. wealth )  brings the  necessary  strain in, both, social and regulatory structures.
  
Social structure in the broader sense, known as social system can be viewed as a structure composed of the [[economic system]], [[law system]], [[political system]], [[cultural system]], etc. Thus social system is the parent system of those lower systems.
 
  
  
  
 
{{Credit1|Social_structure|38136387|}}
 
{{Credit1|Social_structure|38136387|}}

Revision as of 18:58, 26 February 2006


Introduction

Social structure is a system of social relations. Social structure does not concern itself with people as individuals forming the society or their social organizations, neither does it study who are the people/organisation forming it, or what is the ultimate goal of their relations. Social structure deals rather with the very structure of their relations: how are they organized in a patterns of relationships. The key to understanding social structure in a society is understanding its social institutions and their intertwining combinations. Social structure is the institutional framework that makes for order in daily, weekly, and yearly interaction between people. It is social institutions that promote the necessary order to make social structure possible.

Social structure can be divided into micro-structure and macro-structure. Micro-structure is the pattern of relations between most basic elements of social life, that cannot be further divided and have no social structure of their own ( i.e. pattern of relations between individuals in a group composed of individuals - where individuals have no social structure ). Macro-structure is thus a kind of “second level” structure, a pattern of relations between objects that have their own structure ( e.g. a political social structure between political parties, as political parties have their own social structure).

Some believe that social structure is naturally developed. It may be caused by larger system needs, such as the need for labor, management, professional and military classes, or by conflicts between groups, such as competition among political parties or among elites and masses. Others believe that this structuring is not a result of natural processes, but is socially constructed. It may be created by the power of elites who seek to retain their power, or by economic systems that place emphasis upon competition or cooperation.

In any case, social system is the parent system of those lower systems. This is related to the notion of "social stratification," which refers to the idea that society is separated into different strata, according to social distinctions such as a race, class and gender. Social treatment of persons within various social structures can be understood as related to their placement within the various social strata.

Culture Forms, Hierarchy of Values and Norms, are the Foundation of Social Structure

Social structure, as mentioned above, alleges that society is grouped into structures with different functions, meanings or purposes. In a broader sense, known as social system, can be viewed as a ( social ) structure composed of the economic system, law system, political system, cultural system - some sort of shared reality: language, norms and values, etc. Structure arises out of the face-to-face interactions of people who are operating from, both, a shared sense of reality - culture and socialization - as well as an individual and group oriented strata which are open to particular definitions and interpretations.

Among the several elements of social and cultural structures, two are of great importance: The first consists of culturally defined goals, purposes and interests, held out as legitimate objectives for all or for diversely located members of society. They are simply the things “worth striving for.” Although some, not all, of these cultural goals are directly related to the biological drives of man, they are not determined by them. The second element of the cultural structure defines, regulates and controls the acceptable modes of reaching out for these goals. Every social group invariably “squares” its cultural objectives with regulations, rooted in the mores or institutions, of allowable procedures for moving toward these objectives. So, norms - or normative structure, as patterns of relations in given structure (organization) between norms and modes of operations of people of varying social positions - became the rallying cry of any society .

Generally, no society lacks norms governing conduct. But societies do differ in the degree to which the folkways, mores and institutional controls are effectively integrated with the goals which stand high in the hierarchy of cultural values. The problem is that these regulatory norms are not necessarily identical with technical or efficiency norms. Many procedures which from the standpoint of the individuals would be most efficient in securing desired values - the exercise of force, fraud, power - are ruled out of the institutional area of permitted conduct. The pattern of relations between goals and desires of people of varying social positions is called interest structure. In most cases, high rates of departure from institutional requirements are seen as the result of culturally induced, deep motivations which cannot be satisfied among those social strata with limited access to opportunity. The culture and the social structure operate at cross-purposes. In this context, the sole significant question becomes: Which of the available procedures is most efficient in netting the culturally approved value? The technically most effective procedure, whether culturally legitimate or not, becomes typically preferred to institutionally prescribed conduct especially in a societal culture where there is heavy emphasis on wealth as a basic symbol of success without a corresponding emphasis upon the legitimate means to achieve it.

The pressure of such a social order is upon outdoing one's competitors. So long as the sentiments supporting this competitive system are distributed throughout the entire range of activities and are not confined to the final result of success, the choice of means will remain largely within the realm of social control. When, however, the cultural emphasis shifts from the satisfaction deriving from competition itself to almost exclusive concern with the outcome, the resultant stress makes for the breakdown of the regulatory structure.

Conclusion

Social structure is the way in which society is organized into predictable relationships, patterns of social interaction ( the way in which people respond to each other ). These patterns are to some extent independent of the particular individual, they exert a force which shapes behavior and identity of the society. Culture forms the foundation of social structure and the society uses norms as the modes of operations among the society’s elements. Sometimes, however, the shortcuts using institutionally inhibited conducts to achieve the culturally approved values ( e.g. wealth ) brings the necessary strain in, both, social and regulatory structures.


Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.