Stephen Jay Gould

File:Stephen Jay Gould.png

Stephen Jay Gould

Stephen Jay Gould (September 10, 1941–May 20, 2002) was an American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and historian of science. He was also one of the most influential and widely read writers of popular science of his generation. He spent most of his career teaching at Harvard University and working at the American Museum of Natural History.

Early in his career he developed with Niles Eldredge the theory of punctuated equilibrium, where evolutionary change occurs relatively rapidly to comparatively longer periods of evolutionary stability (stasis). According to Gould, punctuated equilibrium revised a key pillar of neo-Darwinism (Gould 2002). Initially confronting significant opposition, the theory became accepted as part of evolutionary theory. Some evolutionary biologists have argued that the theory was an important insight, but merely modified neo-Darwinism in a manner which was fully compatible with what had been known before (Maynard Smith 1984).

Gould received many accolades for his scholarly work and popular expositions of natural history,. He was criticized by some in the biological community who felt his public presentations were, in various respects, out of step with mainstream evolutionary theory or even misrepresenting their work (Tooby and Cosmides 1997).

Personal life

Gould was born and raised in Queens, New York, NY. His father Leonard was a court stenographer, and his mother Eleanor an artist. When Gould was five years old, his father took him to the "Hall of Dinosaurs" in the American Museum of Natural History, where he first saw Tyrannosaurus rex. "I had no idea there were such things—I was awestruck," Gould once recalled. (Green 1986). He later claimed that it was in that moment that he decided he would become a paleontologist.

Raised in a nominally Jewish home, Gould did not formally practice organized religion and preferred to be called an agnostic. His father was a Marxist, but Gould is quoted as saying that his own political views were different from that of his father. Throughout his career and writings he spoke out against cultural oppression in all its forms, especially what he saw as pseudoscience in the service of racism and sexism. In the early 1970s, Gould joined a group called "Science for the People," a left-wing organization that emerged from the antiwar movement.

Gould was twice married; to Deborah Lee in 1965, which ended in divorce, and to artist Rhonda Roland Shearer in 1995. Gould had two children, Jesse and Ethan, by his first marriage, and two stepchildren, Jade and London.

In July 1982, Gould was diagnosed with abdominal mesothelioma. He later published a column in Discover magazine, titled "The Median Isn't the Message," in which he discusses his discovery that mesothelioma patients had only a median lifespan of eight months after diagnosis. He then describes the research he uncovered behind this number, and his relief upon the realization that statistics are not destiny. After his diagnosis and receiving an experimental treatment, Gould continued to live for nearly twenty years. His column became a source of comfort for many cancer patients.

It was during his bout with abdominal mesothelioma that Gould became a user of marijuana to alleviate the nausea associated with his cancer treatments. Although Gould maintained "I am something of a Puritan" with respect to any substances that would alter or dull his mental state—not drinking alcohol or using drugs in a recreational sense—he attributed value to the medicinal use of marijuana in helping him to face the painful side effects of his treatment and keep a more positive attitude (Grinspoon 1993). . Ultimately, he recognized an important role to the maintainence of spirit through adversity, and that use of marijuana had an important effect on this aspect of his treatments, though he disliked the mental blurring.

Stephen Jay Gould died May 20, 2002 from a metastatic adenocarcinoma of the lung (a form of lung cancer, which had spread to his brain). This cancer was completely unrelated to his abdominal mesothelioma, from which he had fully recovered almost twenty years earlier. He died in his home "in a bed set up in the library of his Soho loft, surrounded by his wife Rhonda, his mother Eleanor, and the many books he loved" (Krementz 2002).

Gould as a scientist

Gould began his higher education at Antioch College, a Liberal arts college in Ohio, graduating with a degree in geology in 1963. He spent a brief period of this time studying at the University of Leeds, England. After completing his graduate work at Columbia University in 1967 under the guidance of Norman Newell, he was immediately hired by Harvard University, where he worked until the end of his life (1967-2002). In 1973, Harvard promoted him to Professor of Geology and Curator of Invertebrate Paleontology at the institution's Museum of Comparative Zoology, and in 1982 was awarded the title of Alexander Agassiz Professor of Zoology. In 1983, Gould was awarded fellowship into the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), where he later served as president (2000). He also served as president of the Paleontological Society (1985-1986) and the Society for the Study of Evolution (1990-1991). In 1989, Gould was elected into the body of the National Academy of Sciences.

Most of Gould's empirical research was on land snails. His early work was on the Bermudian genus Poecilozonites, while his later work concentrated on the West Indian genus Cerion.

In addition to his work on punctuated equilibrium and evolutionary developmental biology, Gould had championed biological constraints and other non-selectionist forces in evolution. Together with Richard Lewontin, they authored an influential 1979 paper critiquing the overuse of adaptation in biology (Gould and Lewontin 1979). Their paper introduced the architectural word "spandrel" in an evolutionary context, using it to mean a feature of an organism that exists as a necessary consequence of other features and not built directly, piece by piece, by natural selection. The relative frequency of spandrels, so defined, versus adaptive features in nature, remains a controversial topic in evolutionary biology.

Shortly before his death, Gould published a long treatise recapitulating his version of modern evolutionary theory, written primarily for the technical audience of evolutionary biologists: The Structure of Evolutionary Theory.

Gould as a public figure

Gould became widely known through his popular science essays in Natural History magazine and his best-selling books on evolution. Many of his magazine essays were reprinted in collected volumes, such as Ever Since Darwin and The Panda's Thumb, while his popular treatises included books such as The Mismeasure of Man, Wonderful Life and Full House.

Gould was a passionate advocate of evolutionary theory and wrote prolifically on the subject, trying to communicate his understanding of contemporary evolutionary theories to a wide audience. A recurring theme in his writings is the history and development of evolutionary, and pre-evolutionary thought, as well as paleontology or paleobiology (Shermer 2002). Ronald Numbers called him one of the two most influential historians of science of the 20th century, along with Thomas Kuhn (Shermer 2002). He was also an enthusiastic baseball fan and made frequent references to the sport in his essays, including enough essays to publish a posthumous anthology Triumph and Tragedy in Mudville.

Although a proud Darwinist, his emphasis was less gradualism than most neo-Darwinists. He also opposed many aspects of sociobiology and its intellectual descendant evolutionary psychology.

Gould devoted much time to arguing against creationism (and the related constructs Creation Science and Intelligent Design). It was not a reactionary position—Gould even supervised a graduate student who was a creationist and presented a sympathetic portrayal of the religious position in his recounting of the history of the Scopes trial. Gould provided expert testimony against the equal-time creationism law in McLean v. Arkansas. Gould used the term "Non-Overlapping Magisteria" (NOMA) to describe how, in his view, science and religion could not comment on each other's realm. Gould went on to develop this idea in some detail, particularly in the books Rocks of Ages (1999) and The Hedgehog, the Fox, and the Magister's Pox (2003). In a 1982 essay for Natural History Gould writes: "Our failure to discern a universal good does not record any lack of insight or ingenuity, but merely demonstrates that nature contains no moral messages framed in human terms. Morality is a subject for philosophers, theologians, students of the humanities, indeed for all thinking people. The answers will not be read passively from nature; they do not, and cannot, arise from the data of science. The factual state of the world does not teach us how we, with our powers for good and evil, should alter or preserve it in the most ethical manner (Gould 1982).

Gould become a noted public face of science, and often appeared on television. He once voiced a cartoon version of himself on an episode of The Simpsons, a popular animated television program.

Controversies

Gould was considered by many people to be one of the pre-eminent theoreticians in his field. His work and promotion of punctuated equilibrium, originally controversial, became a mainstay of evolutionary theory.

However, he is not without his detractors. His criticism of the modern evolutionary synthesis (neo-Darwinism) and its extraopolation of natural selection on the microevolutionary level to macroevolutionary events confronted, and still confronts, orthodox Darwinian positions. A good number of evolutionary biologists have disagreed with the way in which Gould publicly presented his views. John Maynard Smith, for example, thought that Gould trivialized the role of adaptation, and overestimated the possible role of mutations of large effect (Maynard Smith 1981a, 1981b) In a review of Daniel Dennett's book Darwin's Dangerous Idea, Maynard Smith wrote that Gould "is giving non-biologists a largely false picture of the state of evolutionary theory" Maynard Smith 1995). But Maynard Smith has not been consistently negative, writing in a review of The Panda's Thumb that often "he infuriates me, but I hope he will go right on writing essays like these" (Maynard Smith 1981b). Maynard Smith was also among those who welcomed Gould's reinvigoration of evolutionary paleontology (Maynard Smith 1984).

One reason for such criticism is that Gould, although a strong evolutionist, offers a perspective that appears to be a revolutionary way of understanding evolution, which relegates natural selection to a less important position than the orthodox view. Indeed, Gould criticizes a "Darwinian fundamentalism" that holds that "natural selection regulates everything of any importance in evolution" (Gould 1997a, 1997b). Even Darwin, Gould contends, criticized those who contented that natural selection caused all evolutionary change. As such, Gould's writings have been used in the criticism of evolutionary theory, including by creationists (Wright 1999). However, Gould remained a strong believer in both evolution by common descent and in natural selection as the causal agent of evolution, although he viewed natural selection acting not only on the level of the individual, but with higher groupings as well (species, etc.), and that factors other than natural selection may play a major role in macroevolutionary changes.

Gould also had a long-running feud with E. O. Wilson, Richard Dawkins, and other evolutionary biologists over sociobiology and its descendant evolutionary psychology, which Gould strongly opposed, but others strongly advocated. Gould and Dawkins also disagreed over the importance of gene selection in evolution. Dawkins argued that all evolution is ultimately caused by gene competition, while Gould advocated the importance of higher-level selection, including, but certainly not limited to, species selection. Strong criticism of Gould can be found in Dawkins' The Blind Watchmaker and Dennett's Darwin's Dangerous Idea. Dennett's criticism has tended to be harsher, while Dawkins praises Gould in evolutionary topics other than those of contention. Pinker accuses Gould, Richard Lewontin, and other opponents of evolutionary psychology of being "radical scientists," whose stance on human nature is influenced by politics rather than science (Pinker 2002). Gould countered that sociobiologists and evolutionary psychologists are often heavily influenced, perhaps unconsciously, by their own prejudices and interests (Gould 1997b).

Gould's interpretation of the Cambrian Burgess Shale fossils in his book Wonderful Life was criticized by Simon Conway Morris, one of the key researchers on the Burgess Shale, in his 1998 book The Crucible Of Creation. Gould and Conway Morris debated the issue in a piece titled "Showdown on the Burgess Shale" (Conway Morris and Gould 1998). Gould had emphasized the "weirdness" of the Burgess Shale fauna, and the role of unpredictable, contingent phenomena in determining which members of this fauna survived and flourished. Conway Morris stressed the phylogenetic linkages between the Burgess Shale forms and modern taxa, particularly, the importance of convergent evolution in producing general predictable responses to similar environmental circumstances. Paleontologist Richard Fortey has noted that prior to the release of Wonderful Life Conway Morris shared many of Gould's sentiments and views. It was only after publication of Wonderful Life that Conway Morris revised his interpretation and adopted a more deterministic stance towards the history of life (Fortey 1998).

As the author of The Mismeasure of Man (1981), a history and inquiry of psychometrics and intelligence testing, Gould investigated many of the techniques of nineteenth century craniometry, as well as modern-day psychological testing. Gould concluded they developed unnecessarily from an unfounded faith in biological determinism. The Mismeasure of Man generated considerable controversy, and has been subject to both widespread praise (by skeptics) and extensive criticism (by psychologists)—including claims by some scientists that Gould had misrepresented their work (Jensen 1982).

Gould's books

• For technical audiences
  • Ontogeny and Phylogeny (Harvard University Press, 1977), ISBN 0-674-63940-5
  • The Structure of Evolutionary Theory (Harvard University Press, 2002), ISBN 0-674-00613-5

• For general audiences
  • The Mismeasure of Man (W.W. Norton, 1981; revised 1996), ISBN 0-393-03972-2
  • Time's Arrow, Time's Cycle (Harvard University Press, 1987), ISBN 0-674-89198-8
  • Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History (W.W. Norton, 1989), ISBN 0-393-02705-8
  • Full House: The Spread of Excellence From Plato to Darwin (Harmony Books, 1996), ISBN 0-517-70394-7 (Released outside North America as Life's Grandeur: The Spread of Excellence From Plato to Darwin (Jonathan Cape Ltd, 1996), ISBN 0-099-89360-6)
  • Questioning the Millennium: A Rationalist's Guide to a Precisely Arbitrary Countdown (Harmony, 1997); also published in a substantially extended second edition (Harmony, 1999), ISBN 0-609-60541-0
  • Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life (Ballantine Books, 1999), ISBN 0-345-43009-3
  • The Hedgehog, the Fox, and the Magister's Pox: Mending the Gap Between Science and the Humanities (Harmony, 2003), ISBN 0-609-60140-7

• Collected essays from Natural History magazine
  • Ever Since Darwin: Reflections in Natural History (Norton, 1977), ISBN 0-393-06425-5
  • The Panda's Thumb: More Reflections in Natural History (Norton, 1980), ISBN 0-393-01380-4
  • Hen's Teeth and Horse's Toes: Further Reflections in Natural History (Norton, 1983), ISBN 0-393-01716-8
  • The Flamingo's Smile (Norton, 1985), ISBN 0-393-02228-5
  • Bully for Brontosaurus (Norton, 1991), ISBN 0-393-02961-1
  • Eight Little Piggies (Norton, 1994), ISBN 0-393-03416-X
  • Dinosaur in a Haystack (Harmony, 1995), ISBN 0-517-70393-9
  • Leonardo's Mountain of Clams and the Diet of Worms (Harmony, 1998), ISBN 0-609-60141-5
  • The Lying Stones of Marrakech: Penultimate Reflections in Natural History (Harmony, 2000), ISBN 0-609-60142-3
  • I Have Landed: The End of a Beginning in Natural History (Harmony, 2001), ISBN 0-609-60143-1

• Other essay collections
  • An Urchin in the Storm (Norton, 1987), ISBN 0-393-02492-X
  • Triumph and Tragedy in Mudville: A Lifelong Passion for Baseball (Norton, 2003), ISBN 0-393-05755-0
  • Paul McGarr, ed., The Richness of Life: A Stephen Jay Gould Reader (Jonathan Cape]], 2006), ISBN 0-224-07607-8

References

ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

• Brown, A. 1999. The Darwin Wars. New York: Simon & Schuster.
• Carroll, J. 2003. Modern Darwinism and the Pseudo-Revolutions of Stephen Jay Gould. In J. Carroll, ed., On the Origin of Species New York: Broadview Press, 2003.
• Conway Morris, S. 1998. The Crucible of Creation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Conway Morris, S., and S. J. Gould. 1998. Showdown on the Burgess Shale. Nat. Hist. 107(10):48-55.
• Eldredge, N., and S. J. Gould. 1972. Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. In T. J. M. Schopf, ed., Models in Paleobiology. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper and Company.
• Gould, S. J. 1980a. Is a new and general theory of evolution emerging? Paleobiology 6:119-130.
• Gould, S. J. 1980b. Sociobiology and the theory of natural selection. In G. W. Barlow and J. Silverberg, eds., Sociobiology: Beyond Nature/Nurture? Boulder CO: Westview Press.
• Gould, S. J. 1981. Museum debate (Letter to the Editor). Nature 289, p. 742.
• Gould, S. J. 1982. Darwinism and the expansion of evolutionary theory. Science 216:380–387.
• Gould, S. J. 1987. The limits of adaptation: Is language a spandrel of the human brain? Paper presented to the Cognitive Science Seminar, Centre for Cognitive Science, MIT.
• Gould, S. J. 1988. Ten thousand acts of kindness. Natural history, December.
• Gould, S. J. 1989. Through a lens, darkly: Do species change by random molecular shifts or natural selection? Natural history, September.
• Gould, S. J. 1989. The creation myths of Cooperstown. Natural History, November.
• Gould, S. J. 1992. The confusion over evolution. New York Review of Books, Nov. 19, pp. 39-54.
• Gould, S. J. 1997a. Darwinian Fundamentalism. New York Review of Books, June 12, pp. 34-37.
• Gould, S. J. 1997b. Evolution: The Pleasures of Pluralism. New York Review of Books, June 26, pp. 47-52.
• Gould, S. J. 1997c. The Exaptive Excellence of Spandrels as a Term and Prototype. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:10750-55.
• Gould, S. J. 2002. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
• Gould, S. J., and N. Eldredge. 1977. Puntuated equilibria: The tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology 3:115-151.
• Gould, S. J., and N. Eldredge. 1986. Punctuated equilibria at the thrid stage. Systematic Zoology 35(1):143-148.
• Gould, S. J., and R. Lewontin. 1979. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossion paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc R Soc Lond B 205(1161):581–598.
• Jensen, A. 1982. The debunking of scientific fossils and straw persons. Contemporary Education Review 1(2):121-135.
• Maynard Smith, J. 1981a. Did Darwin get it right? The London Review of Books. 3(11):10-11.
• Maynard Smith, J. 1981b. Review of Stephen Jay Gould's The Panda's Thumb. The London Review of Books. Sept. pp. 17-30.
• Maynard Smith, J. 1984. Paleontology at the high table. Nature 309:401-402.
• Maynard Smith, J. 1992. Taking a Chance on Evolution. NYRB (May 14): 34-36.
• Maynard Smith, J. 1995. Genes, Memes, & Minds. The New York Review of Books 42 (Nov.): 46-48.

• Mayr, E. (1992) "Speciational Evolution or Punctuated Equilibria" from Albert Somit and Steven Peterson The Dynamics of Evolution. New York: Cornell University Press. pp. 21-53.
• Morris, R. (2001) The Evolutionists. New York: Henry Holt & Company.
• Pinker, S. (2002) The Blank Slate. New York: Penguin.
• Rose, S. (2002) Obituaries: Stephen Jay Gould The Guardian. (May 22): 20.
• Rushton, J. P. (1996). Race, intelligence, and the brain. Personality and Individual Differences 23 (1): 169–180.
• Shermer, M. (2002) "This View of Science" Social Studies of Science 32/4(August) 489–525.
• Tooby, J. and L. Cosmides (1997) Letter to the Editor of The New York Review of Books
• Wright, R. (1999) "The Accidental Creationist" The New Yorker (Dec. 13): 56-65.

Michelle Green (1986) "Stephen Jay Gould: driven by a hunger to learn and to write" People Weekly June 2.</ref>

Gould. 1982. "Nonmoral Nature" Natural History 91 (February): 19-26; and reprinted in Hen's Teeth and Horse's Toes. New York: W.W. Norton, 1983, pp. 42-43.</ref>

did not use drugs in a recreational sense and did not even drink alcohol because he did

Lester Grinspoon, Marihuana, The Forbidden Medicine, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993, pp. 39-41

Jill Krementz (2002) "Jill Krementz Photo Journal" New York Social Diary June 2.

M. B. Shermer 2002 This view of science: Stephen Jay Gould as historian of science and scientific historian, popular scientists and scientific popularizer. 'Social Studies of Science 32(4) http://www.stephenjaygould.org/library/shermer_sjgould.pdf

Richard Fortey (1998) "Shock Lobsters" London Review of Books Vol. 20, October 1.

Simon Conway Morris and Stephen Jay Gould  1998

published in Nat. Hist. 107 (10): 48-55.

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

• Stephen Jay Gould  ^history

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

• History of "Stephen Jay Gould"

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.