History of logic
The history of logic documents the development of logic as it occurs in various rival cultures and traditions in history. While many cultures have employed intricate systems of reasoning, logic as an explicit analysis of the methods of reasoning received sustained development originally only in three traditions: China, India and Greece. Although exact dates are uncertain, especially in the case of India, it is possible that logic emerged in all three societies in the 4th century B.C.E. The formally sophisticated treatment of modern logic descends from the Greek tradition, but comes not wholly through Europe, but instead comes from the transmission of Aristotelian logic and commentary upon it by Islamic philosophers to Medieval European logicians.
Logic in China
- Main article: Logic in China
In China, a contemporary of Confucius, Mozi, "Master Mo", is credited with founding the Mohist school, whose canons dealt with issues relating to valid inference and the conditions of correct conclusions. In particular, one of the schools that grew out of Mohism, the Logicians, are credited by some scholars for their early investigation of formal logic. Unfortunately, due to the harsh rule of Legalism in the subsequent Qin Dynasty, this line of investigation disappeared in China until the introduction of Indian philosophy by Buddhists.
Logic in India
- Main article: Indian logic
Two of the six Indian schools of thought deal with logic: Nyaya and Vaisheshika. The Nyaya Sutras of Aksapada Gautama constitute the core texts of the Nyaya school, one of the six orthodox schools of Hindu philosophy. This realist, one might say materialist, school worked out a rigid five-member schema of inference involving an initial premise, a reason, an example, an application and a conclusion. The idealist Buddhist philosophy became the chief opponent to the Naiyayikas. Nagarjuna, the founder of the Madhyamika "Middle Way" developed an analysis known as the "catuskoti" or tetralemma. This four-cornered argumentation systematically examined and rejected the affirmation of a proposition, its denial, the joint affirmation and denial, and finally, the rejection of its affirmation and denial. But it was with Dignaga and his successor Dharmakirti that Buddhist logic reached its height. Their analysis centered on the definition of necessary logical entailment, "vyapti", also known as invariable concomitance or pervasion. To this end a doctrine known as "apoha" or differentiation was developed. This involved what might be called inclusion and exclusion of defining properties. The difficulties involved in this enterprise, in part, stimulated the neo-scholastic school of Navya-Nyaya, which introduced a formal analysis of inference in the 16th century.
Logic in Greece
In Greece, two main competing logical traditions emerged. Stoic logic traced its roots back to Euclid of Megara, a pupil of Socrates, and with its concentration on propositional logic was perhaps closer to modern logic. However, the tradition that survived to influence later cultures was the Peripatetic tradition which originated in Aristotle's collection of works known as the "Organon" or instrument, the first systematic Greek work on logic. Aristotle's examination of the syllogism bears interesting comparison with the Indian schema of inference and the less rigid Chinese discussion.
Through Latin in Western Europe, and disparate languages more to the East, such as Arabic, Armenian and Georgian, the Aristotelian tradition was considered to pre-eminently codify the laws of reasoning. It was only in the Nineteenth Century that this viewpoint changed; it has suggested that this change may have been facilitated by an acquaintance with the classical literature of India and deeper knowledge of China.
Logic in Islamic philosophy
- Main article: Logic in Islamic philosophy
For after Muhammed's death, Islamic law placed importance on formulating standards of argument, which gave rise to a novel approach to argumentation in Kalam, but this approach was displaced by ideas from Greek philosophy with the rise of the Mutazilite philosophers, who valued highly Aristotle's Organon. The work of Greek influenced Islamic philosophers were crucial in the reception of Greek logic in medieval Europe, and the commentaries on the Organon by Averroes played a central role in the subsequent flowering of medieval European logic.
Despite the logical sophistication of Al-Ghazali, the rise of the Asharite school slowly suffocated original work on logic in the Islamic world.
Medieval Logic
"Medieval Logic" (also known as "Scholastic Logic") generally means the form of Aristotelian logic developed in medieval Occident throughout the period c 1200-1600. The tradition was developed through textbooks such as that by Peter of Spain (fl. thirteenth century), whose exact identity is unknown, who was the author of a standard textbook on logic, the Tractatus which was well known in Europe for many centuries.
The tradition reached its high point in the fourteenth century, with the works of William of Ockham (c. 1287-1347) and Jean Buridan.
One feature of the Development of Aristotelian logic through what is known as Supposition Theory, a study of the semantics of the terms of the proposition.
The last great works in this tradition are the Logic of John Poinsot (1589-1644, known as John of St Thomas), and the Metaphysical Disputations of Francisco Suarez (1548-1617).
Traditional Logic
"Traditional Logic" generally means the textbook tradition that begins with Antoine Arnauld and Nicole's Logic, or the Art of Thinking, better known as the Port-Royal Logic. Published in 1662, it was the most influential work on logic in England until Mill's System of Logic in 1825 [N4]. The book presents a loosely Cartesian doctrine (that the proposition is a combining of ideas rather than terms, for example) within a framework that is broadly derived from Aristotelian and medieval term logic. Between 1664 and 1700 there were eight editions, and the book had considerable influence after that. It was frequently reprinted in English up to the end of the nineteenth century.
The account of propositions that Locke gives in the Essay is essentially that of Port-Royal. "Verbal propositions, which are words, [are] the signs of our ideas, put together or separated in affirmative or negative sentences. So that proposition consists in the putting together or separating these signs, according as the things which they stand for agree or disagree." (Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, IV. 5. 6)
Works in this tradition include Isaac Watts' Logick: Or, the Right Use of Reason (1725), Richard Whately's Logic (1826), and John Stuart Mill's A System of Logic (1843), which was one of the last great works in the tradition.
The advent of modern logic
Historically, Descartes, may have been the first philosopher to have had the idea of using algebra, especially its techniques for solving for unknown quantities in equations, as a vehicle for scientific exploration. The idea of a calculus of reasoning was also cultivated by Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Leibniz was the first to formulate the notion of a broadly applicable system of mathematical logic. However, the relevant documents were not published until 1901 or remain unpublished to the present day, and the current understanding of the power of Leibniz's discoveries did not emerge until the 1980s. See Lenzen's chapter in Gabbay and Woods (2004).
Gottlob Frege in his 1879 Begriffsschrift extended formal logic beyond propositional logic to include constructors such as "all", "some". He showed how to introduce variables and quantifiers to reveal the logical structure of sentences, which may have been obscured by their grammatical structure. For instance, "All humans are mortal" becomes "All things x are such that, if x is a human then x is mortal." Frege's peculiar two dimensional notation led to his work being ignored for many years.
In a masterly 1885 article read by Peano, Ernst Schröder, and others, Charles Peirce introduced the term "second-order logic" and provided us with much of our modern logical notation, including prefixed symbols for universal and existential quantification. Logicians in the late 19th and early 20th centuries were thus more familiar with the Peirce-Schröder system of logic, although Frege is generally recognized today as being the "Father of modern logic".
In 1889 Giuseppe Peano published the first version of the logical axiomatization of arithmetic. Five of the nine axioms he came up with are now known as the Peano axioms. One of these axioms was a formalized statement of the principle of mathematical induction.
See also
- Term Logic
- Ernst Schröder
- Charles Peirce
ReferencesISBN links support NWE through referral fees
- Alonzo Church, 1936-8. "A bibliography of symbolic logic". Journal of Symbolic Logic 1: 121-218; 3:178-212.
- Dov Gabbay and John Woods, eds, 2004. Handbook of the History of Logic. Vol. 1: Greek, Indian and Arabic logic; Vol. 3: The Rise of Modern Logic I: Leibniz to Frege. Elsevier, ISBN 0-444-51611-5.
- Ivor Grattan-Guinness, 2000. The Search for Mathematical Roots 1870-1940. Princeton Uni. Press.
- Kneale, William and Martha, 1962. The development of logic. Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-824773-7.
External links
- Annotated bibliography on the history of logic
- Overview of Indian and Greek Development of Logic and Language
pl:Historia logiki tr:Mantık tarihi zh:逻辑史
Credits
New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:
The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:
Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.
