Divine Principle

The Divine Principle or Exposition of the Divine Principle (in Korean, Wolli Kangron) is the main theological textbook of the Unification Church, held to have the status of scripture by believers. The term "Divine Principle" is also used by Unificationists to refer to a more metaphysical concept of divine truth, of which the DP text is only an imperfect human expression. The text follows the format of systematic theology, starting with God's purpose in creating human beings, the fall of man, and redemption—the process through history by which God is working to remove the ill effects of the fall and restore humanity back to the relationship and position that God originally intended.

History

The Divine Principle presents itself as a new revelation from God, given to the the Reverend Sun Myung Moon.

[The new] truth must appear as a revelation from God. With the fullness of time, God has sent one person to this earth to resolve the fundamental problems of human life and the universe. His name is Sun Myung Moon. For several decades he wandered through the spirit world so vast as to be beyond imagining... Through intimate spiritual communion with God and by meeting with Jesus and many saints in Paradise, he brought to light all the secrets of Heaven.

Reverend Moon's first encounter with Jesus reportedly took place on Easter Sunday, 1935. For the next decade or so, he wrote down notes in the margins of his Bible express variious insights and revelations. These notes reportedly formed the basis of the original concept of the work.

The earliest manuscript of the Principle was lost in North Korea during the Korean War. Upon arriving as a refugee in Pusan, Moon wrote a manuscript which is referred to as Wolli Wonbon (meaning "the original text of the Divine Principle"), dictating the last chapter to Won Pil Kim, his first disciple. He then guided Hyo Won Eu, the first president of the Unification Church of Korea, to prepare more systematic presentations of his teachings with biblical, historical, and scientific illustrations.

Moon gave Eu special instruction regarding the content of these texts and then checked them over meticulously. These efforts resulted in Wolli Hesol (Explanation of the Divine Principle), published in 1957 (but never translated into English), and Wolli Kangron (Exposition of the Divine Principle), published in 1966. Since then, Wolli Kangron has been the basic text of Moon's teachings.

According to its preface, Wolli Kangron expresses universal truth; it inherits and builds upon the core truths which God revealed through the Jewish and Christian scriptures and encompasses the wisdom from the Orient. However, it does not claim either to be a perfect expression of truth, or to be a complete rendering of the teachings of Reverend Moon:

The words proclaimed on these pages are only a portion of this truth. This volume is merely a compilation of what his disciples have hitherto heard and seen. We believe and hope that when the time is ripe, more profound portions of the truth will be published.

While no systematic treatise of Reverend Moon's subsequent teachings as emerged, many volumes of his speech, both formal and extemporaneous, have been publish. A recent compilation ---name here--- presents a topical sampling of Reverend Moon's sayings cover over 2,000 pages.

"Principle" is a direct translation of the Korean term wolli, and the word "Divine" was added to indicate that the material dealt with spiritual and religious principles. While some Unificationists speak of the "Divine Principles," plural forms are not normally used in Korean, and there is a sense that these principles fit together into a unitary whole. Unification Church members sometimes refer to the Divine Principle (or simply "The Principle") to mean not only the specific translation of Wolli Kangron, to signify an eternal truth already existed in the universe before the books were written. Indeed, sometimes "The Principle" is used to refer to the universal principles out there in the universe, apart from the books.

The first English translation by Mrs. Won Pok Choi of Wolli Kangron, named Divine Principle, was first published in English in 1973 and was subsequently revised in 1974. This book went through numerous printings and was widely distributed both among Unfiication Church members and the public at large. In 1996 the book was completely re-translated, primarily by Jin Goon Kim with the aid of Andrew Wilson, and re-titled Exposition of the Divine Principle.

Before the publication of the 1973 edition, various version of the Principle were published by the first three Unification Church missionaries to the US. Young Oon Kim (a female professor and the church's premier theologian) and David S.C. Kim (the first president of the Unification Theological Seminary) each wrote unofficial texts; these are now out of print.

A lecture manual by Reverend Young Whi Kim (then president of the Unification Church in Korea during the 1970s) was widely used in the U.S. during the early 1970s while Reverend Chung Hwan Kwak (then International Director of Education of the Unification Church) published a series of lectures manuals in the late 70s.

Structure

The book follows systematic theology in its structure: God's creation, the human fall, human redemption (called "restoration" in DP.")

The book has two parts, with a total of 13 chapters. The first part deals primarily with theological concepts, such as the nature of God and His creation, the human fall, the coming of the Messiah, and others. The second part deals with the historical process by which God continues to work to eliminate the ill effects of the human fall and restore humankind to the original "Ideal of Creation" that would have existed if the fall had not occurred.

• Introduction
• Part 1
  • Chapter 1: The Principle of Creation
  • Chapter 2: The Human Fall
  • Chapter 3: Eschatology and Human History
  • Chapter 4: The Messiah: His Advent and the Purpose of His Second Coming
  • Chapter 5: Resurrection
  • Chapter 6: Predestination
  • Chapter 7: Christology

• Part 2
  • Introduction to Restoration
  • Chapter 1: The Providence to Lay the Foundation for Restoration
  • Chapter 2: Moses and Jesus in the Providence of Restoration
  • Chapter 3: The Periods in Providential History and the Determination of Their Lengths
  • Chapter 4: The Parallels between the Two Ages in the Providence of Restoration
  • Chapter 5: The Period of Preparation for the Second Coming of the Messiah
  • Chapter 6: The Second Advent

Summary

Principles of creation

God is viewed as the creator, whose character is revealed in the Creation. God thus has "dual characteristics" corresponding to the attributes we see expressed in his creation: masculinity and femininity, internal character and external form, subject and object. God is referred to as "he" for simplicity and because "masculinity" is associated with God's role as "subject" in relation to huankind. God is omniscient and omnipotent, but is bound by his own principles and the logical consequences of human freedom. In order to experience a relationship of love, God created human beings as his children and gave them freedom to love him or not as they chose.

A fundamental teaching of the Principle is that God possesses both male and female attributes and that the most perfect substantial expression of God is to be found in a relationship between a fully perfected man and a fully perfected woman, living in accordance with the will of God. This love can then grow between parents and children. The family unit is a crucial foundation for the establishment of God's ideal for human beings.

The fall of humanity

Although the Divine Principle does not insist on a literal interpretation of Genesis in terms of when the first human beings might have existed, it portrays the Fall of Man as an actual historical event (rather than an allegory) involving an original human couple, who are called Adam and Eve. The elements in the story, however, such as the Tree of Life, the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, the forbidden fruit, the serpent, etc., are interpreted to be symbolic. They represent, respectively, ideal man, ideal woman, sexual love, and Satan. The essence of the fall is that Eve was seduced sexaully by an angelic being (Lucifer) and then seduced Adam. Although Adam and Eve were intended to be husabnd and wife, their love was consummated through sexual intercourse apart from the plan of God, and before Adam and Eve were spiritually mature.

They also regard Adam and Eve's son Cain killing his brother Abel as a literal event which contributed to humankind's fallen state. Unificationists teach that since the "fall of humanity," all of human history has been a constant struggle between the forces of God and Satan to correct this original sin (cf. Augustine and lust, concupiscence). This belief contributes to their strict moral code of "absolute love" and sexual purity, and the need for "indemnity."

Mission of the Messiah

Theology of redemption

The DP view of Jesus and his mission follows logical from its teaching about he Principles of Creation and the Fall of Man. The Messiah's role is essentially to fulfill the role of Adam, a doctrine also taught in the New Testament by Saint Paul, who refered to Jesus as the "second Adam." The Principle thus affirms that Jesus' original mission was restore Adam's position, to marry, establish a God-centered family, and expand this foundation to include a clan consisting his disicples and their families, then a tribe, nation, and eventually the entire world.

Divine Principle teadches that Jesus' death by no means a preordained necessity, but a secondary course made necessary by disbelief and rejection. Like traditional Christianity, however, DP teaches that Jesus death serves as a redemption of humanity's sins. DP teaches that Jesus resurrection was spiritual, not physical. It further teaches that the Trinty represents a spiritual manifestation of the original Trinity of God, Adam, and Eve, with Jesus in the position of father, and the Holy Spirit in the position of mother. Christians are thus the children of Jesus and the Holy Spirit, through whom spiritual rebirth is given. If Jesus had lived, the Holy Spirit would have incarnated in his wife, similar to the incarnation of the spirit of Christ/Adam incarnated in Adam.

The role of Elijah

DP's understanding of the mission of Elijah is a key to understanding its conception of the mission of the Messiah. Elijah had the role of harbinger or forerunner. He was to reveal to Israel and the world the identity of the Messiah, and the person fulfilling this role was slated to work with the Messiah to usher in the kingdom of Heaven. In particular, John the Baptist was to play the role of Elijah in relation to his kinsman Jesus.

The prophecies concerning John's ministry ("in the spirit and power of Elijah" and "make ready for the Lord a people prepared"—Luke 1) are cited by the church in support of this view. DP strongly criticizes John for failing to provide active support for Jesus and asserts this as the primary reason why the Jewish could not recognize Jesus as the Messiah.

The Principle of Indemnity

Indemnity is generally defined as "a restitution for something that was lost due to the fall. Unificationists see an aspect of the universe in terms of debt and payment, like a merchant marketplace. If someone in the past has made a social ethical mistake, according to the Unificationist "absolute love" moral code, God remembers that mistake as a debt that must be paid (indemnified) by someone in the present or future. Misfortune will continue to happen to the family, nation or all of world history until the debt is paid with some kind of suffering or right moral action by a representative agent or agents.

Indemnity can also be a positive thing. By willingly enduring mistreatment (the principle of Indemnity), one can receive God's blessing. The principle seemed, to Unificationists, to be bearing fruit in the 1980s, after Moon served 13 months of an 18-month sentence for tax evasion and conspiracy to obstruct justice. Christian ministers, particularly from the black community, rallied around Moon.

The History of Restoration

Foundation of restoration

History is viewed as God’s work to bring about the realization of his original ideal. DP outlines a basic principle by which this work was to be accomplished and then applies it systematically to Old Testament history, concentrating espeically on the Book of Genesis and continuing on through the history of Israel until the coming of Jesus, and then through Christian civilization in the New Testament Age.

The process of restoration began immediately in Adam's family. Cain and Abel's relationship was meant to restore the position of Lucifer and Adam. Just as Lucifer had to humble himself from the position of Archangel and approach God through Adam (but failed to do so), Cain had to experience the humiliation of having his offering rejected by God, while Abel's was accepted. The next step was for Abel to win Cain's heart and bring him, too, to God. This would have accomplished the "foundation for the Messiah" allowing the Messiah to be born as Abel descendant, probably in the very next generation. The murder of Abel by Cain, however, prevented this.

The next attempt at restoration came ten biblical generations later in the family of Noah. A righteous man in a wikced generation, Noah resored Adam's position by his course of faithfully building the ark and saving his family from the flood. His sons Shem and Ham then had to restore the positions of Cain and Abel. Unfortunately, Ham failed to inherit Abel's position when he responded shamefully to Noah's nakedness and spread this attitude to his brothers. Thus, the providence of restoration in Noah's family, too, ended in failure.

The foundation for restoration was finally accomplished through the work of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob together with their wives. Because more details are given in the Bible, the DP analysis of these events cannot be fully summarized here. The basic outline is that Abraham stood in Adam's position but failed to set up a successful foundation of faith during his first symbolic offering.If he had succeeded in this offering Abrham's sons Ishmael and Isaace would have stood in the position of Cain and Abel. Because of his failure in this offering, this providence failed. However, when Abraham was willing to offer Isaac as a sacrifice to God, he restored the foundation of faith and Isaac inherited the position of Adam from Abraham. Isaac then had two sons, Esau and Jacob, and these two together succeeded in restoring the position of Cain and Abel. This occurred after Esau lost both his birthright and Isaac's blessing to Jacob. Like Cain, he desired to kill his blessed young brother, but eventually overcame his rage when Jacob returned for 21 years in exile and won his heart through acts of humility and generosity. This successfully established the foundation for the Messiah and is the reason why God sent the Messiah to the Jews as Jacob's descendents.

Jesus

Unificationists view Jesus as the Messiah on the national level. Unificationists believe that Jesus fulfilled the condition of faith that Adam lacked, but that he did not gain a sufficient following during his lifetime to fulfill the condition of substance needed to achieve his ultimate God-given mission of building the Kingdom of Heaven on Earth. Unificationists believe that, through his death on the cross, Jesus created a condition such that all who believe in him can achieve spiritual salvation and thus be united with him both on earth and beyond. They also view that someone in the position of Adam, or the Messiah, must come again to fulfill the condition of substance. This would be the second coming. The Messiah does not, in Unificationist theology, have any superhuman powers that are not available to anyone with faith. The Messiah can make errors of judgment. Unificationists specifically do not believe that Jesus, or anyone in the position of the Messiah, is God.

Rev. Moon

The majority of Unficationists view Moon as the actual historical Messiah or "Christ of the Second Advent" (See Divine Principle quotes below) and rightful spiritual and political leader of all mankind. He regards his own mission as that of “True Parents,” the parents that Adam and Eve should have become and the true monarch of the literal theocratic "Kingdom of Heaven" on Earth that Jesus should have established.

Second Coming of Christ

Virtually all Unification Church members consider Father Moon to be the new Messiah. The Unificationist view of the messiah is of a man (or ideally, a married couple) representing God as "True Parent(s)."

In 2002, the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification published a message which it says describes a conference at which all the historical founders of all other religions have recently, in heaven, proclaimed Moon's messiahship (see Clouds of Witnesses).

Many other Christians strongly reject such a proclamation, citing the Gospel of John (14:6) in which Jesus of Nazareth states with finality that "I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." (King James Version)

Political statements in the Divine Principle

The Divine Principle asserts that existing modern democracies have been a necessary, but temporary, stage in history and politics:

"How can democracy accomplish its purpose?...We need to understand that democracy was born to undermine satanic monopolies of power for the purpose of God's final providence to restore, by the will of the people, a heavenly sovereignty under the leadership of the returning Christ."
- Divine Principle Section 7.2.6 Democracy and Socialism

"...Thus, in the ideal world, people of God led by Christ will form organizations analogous to today's political parties..."
- Divine Principle, Section 3.2 The Significance of the Separation of Powers

"If we are to realize the ideal world of one global family which can honor Christ at the Second Advent as our True Parent, surely our languages must be unified...then he will certainly use the Korean language, which will then become the mother tongue for all humanity."
- Divine Principle, Section 5

See also

• Unification theology
• Unification Thought
• Unification Church
• Sun Myung Moon
• Western world values
• religious pluralism

Other theology and philosophy

Theology, fall of man, theory of education

Other Unification Church texts

Heavenly Scripture

The Cheongseonggyeong (Heavenly Scripture) is a recent compilation of the speeches Rev.Moon selected as representing his core thought and legacy. Each day, wherever Rev.Moon is, this is read aloud at hundokhoe, the gatherings for reading and learning from 5:00am to 6:30am Cheongseonggyeong is being translated into English and other languages.

Speeches

Many of Rev.Moon's sermons, speeches, and directives have been collected and archived by the Unification Church. In earlier years they were printed out and given to members. Since the 1990s they have also been posted on the Internet. In the 1960s and 1970s the speeches were given the general title "Master Speaks," which was later dropped. Except for speeches prepared in advance for official events, the English versions of Rev.Moon's speeches are transcribed from consecutive or simultaneous translation, often in summary form, and distributed without verification of the accuracy of the translation.

External links

• The Divine Principle in Plain Language
• Exposition of the Divine Principle

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

• Divine Principle  ^history

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

• History of "Divine Principle"

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.