Difference between revisions of "William David Ross" - New World Encyclopedia
({{Contracted}}) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Contracted}} | {{Contracted}} | ||
| − | Sir '''William David Ross''' [[Order of the British Empire|KBE]] ( | + | Sir '''William David Ross''' [[Order of the British Empire|KBE]] (15 April, 1877– 5 May, 1971) was a Scottish philosopher, known for work in ethic and his work on Aristotle. He also published a book on Plato that understands and presents Plato from the point of view of an Aristotelian. His best known work is The Right and The Good (1930). His ethics is a form of deontology which sprang from a response to G.E. Moore’s Principia Ethica as well as a response to the limitations of—possibly even some perversities within—Immanuel Kant's deontological system. |
| + | |||
==Life== | ==Life== | ||
| − | William David Ross was born in | + | William David Ross was born in Thurso, Caithness, in the north of Scotland. He spent most of his first six years as a child in southern India. He was educated at the Royal High School, Edinburgh and the University of Edinburgh. In 1895, he gained a first class MA degree in classics. He completed his studies at Balliol College, Oxford, and gained a lectureship at Oriel College, Oxford, in 1900, followed by a fellowship in 1902. |
| + | |||
| + | Ross was Provost of Oriel College, Oxford (1929–1947), Vice-Chancellor of the University of Oxford from 1941 to 1944, and Pro-Vice-Chancellor (1944–1947). He was president of the Aristotelian Society from 1939 to 1940. He was knighted in 1928. | ||
| − | + | He married Edith Ogden in 1906 and they had four daughters (Margaret, Rosalind, Eleanor, Katharine). Edith died in 1953 and he died in Oxford in 1971. | |
| − | + | ==Ross's Ethics== | |
| + | The relationship of Ross's ideas with Moore's stems from Ross's agreement with Moore that any attempt to define ethical predicates wholly in terms of natural predicates commits the [[naturalistic fallacy]]. But, Ross argues, Moore's consequentialist ethics actually commits its own fallacy in positing good-maximization as the only content of the moral ought. | ||
| − | Ross | + | Instead, Ross argued, the maximization of good is only one of several ''[[prima facie]]'' (ostensive) obligations which play a role in determining the content of the moral ought in any given case. Ross gives a list of other such obligations, which he does not claim is all-inclusive. In any given situation, any number of prima facie obligations may apply, and in the case of ethical dilemmas, they may even contradict one another. Nonetheless, there can never be a true ethical dilemma, Ross would argue, because one of the prima facie obligations in a given situation is always the weightiest, and overrules all the others. This is thus the ''absolute obligation''. |
| − | + | Immanuel Kant's ethics, based on the categorical imperative, did not admit that one ethical duty could be overriden by another because, in Kant's view, ethical duties are ''categorical'', meaning without exceptions. Thus Kant argued that it is always wrong to tell a lie. That ethical stance or principle, however, could lead to perverse consequences, as in the case, for example, where you are hiding an innocent person in your house, and his enemy who is trying to hunt him down and kill him comes to your door and asks whether he is there. By Kant's ethics you could not tell the questioner a lie and say that the person being sought is not in your house. But Ross's ethics, based on prima facie duties, can create—even within the context of deontological ethics and without resorting to utilitarianism—a hierarchy of duties, so that the prima facie duty not to tell a lie is overridden by a higher duty, namely to protect the innocent person from his enemy who wants to kill him. | |
== Selected works == | == Selected works == | ||
Revision as of 17:41, 23 April 2007
Sir William David Ross KBE (15 April, 1877– 5 May, 1971) was a Scottish philosopher, known for work in ethic and his work on Aristotle. He also published a book on Plato that understands and presents Plato from the point of view of an Aristotelian. His best known work is The Right and The Good (1930). His ethics is a form of deontology which sprang from a response to G.E. Moore’s Principia Ethica as well as a response to the limitations of—possibly even some perversities within—Immanuel Kant's deontological system.
Life
William David Ross was born in Thurso, Caithness, in the north of Scotland. He spent most of his first six years as a child in southern India. He was educated at the Royal High School, Edinburgh and the University of Edinburgh. In 1895, he gained a first class MA degree in classics. He completed his studies at Balliol College, Oxford, and gained a lectureship at Oriel College, Oxford, in 1900, followed by a fellowship in 1902.
Ross was Provost of Oriel College, Oxford (1929–1947), Vice-Chancellor of the University of Oxford from 1941 to 1944, and Pro-Vice-Chancellor (1944–1947). He was president of the Aristotelian Society from 1939 to 1940. He was knighted in 1928.
He married Edith Ogden in 1906 and they had four daughters (Margaret, Rosalind, Eleanor, Katharine). Edith died in 1953 and he died in Oxford in 1971.
Ross's Ethics
The relationship of Ross's ideas with Moore's stems from Ross's agreement with Moore that any attempt to define ethical predicates wholly in terms of natural predicates commits the naturalistic fallacy. But, Ross argues, Moore's consequentialist ethics actually commits its own fallacy in positing good-maximization as the only content of the moral ought.
Instead, Ross argued, the maximization of good is only one of several prima facie (ostensive) obligations which play a role in determining the content of the moral ought in any given case. Ross gives a list of other such obligations, which he does not claim is all-inclusive. In any given situation, any number of prima facie obligations may apply, and in the case of ethical dilemmas, they may even contradict one another. Nonetheless, there can never be a true ethical dilemma, Ross would argue, because one of the prima facie obligations in a given situation is always the weightiest, and overrules all the others. This is thus the absolute obligation.
Immanuel Kant's ethics, based on the categorical imperative, did not admit that one ethical duty could be overriden by another because, in Kant's view, ethical duties are categorical, meaning without exceptions. Thus Kant argued that it is always wrong to tell a lie. That ethical stance or principle, however, could lead to perverse consequences, as in the case, for example, where you are hiding an innocent person in your house, and his enemy who is trying to hunt him down and kill him comes to your door and asks whether he is there. By Kant's ethics you could not tell the questioner a lie and say that the person being sought is not in your house. But Ross's ethics, based on prima facie duties, can create—even within the context of deontological ethics and without resorting to utilitarianism—a hierarchy of duties, so that the prima facie duty not to tell a lie is overridden by a higher duty, namely to protect the innocent person from his enemy who wants to kill him.
Selected works
- Aristotle (1923)
- The Right and the Good (1930)
- Foundations of Ethics (1939)
- Plato's Theory of Ideas (1951)
- Kant's Ethical Theory (1954)
See also
- List of Vice-Chancellors of the University of Oxford
External link
- Sir David Ross's Pluralistic Theory of Duty (The Beginnings) by Ken Cooley (including biographical details)
is:W.D. Ross
Credits
New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:
The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:
Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.
