Difference between revisions of "Trade secret" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
(New page: {{expert-subject|law}} {{Intellectual property}} A '''trade secret''' is a formula, practice, process, design, instrument, pattern, o...)
 
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{expert-subject|law}}
+
{{Submitted}} [[category:image wanted]]{{approved}}{{copyedited}}
 
{{Intellectual property}}
 
{{Intellectual property}}
A '''trade secret''' is a [[formula]], [[Best practice|practice]], [[process]], [[design]], [[Legal instrument|instrument]], [[pattern]], or compilation of [[information]] which is not generally known or reasonably ascertainable, by which a [[business]] can obtain an economic advantage over competitors or customers. In some [[jurisdiction]]s, such secrets are referred to as "confidential information" or "classified information".
+
A '''trade secret''' is a [[formula]], [[Best practice|practice]], [[process]], [[design]], [[Legal instrument|instrument]], [[pattern]], or compilation of [[information]] which is not generally known or reasonably ascertainable to the public, by which a [[business]] can obtain an economic advantage over competitors or customers. Most trade secrets concern the production of goods, but a trade secret might also be a special mailing list of customers or suppliers, a method of bookkeeping, a distribution method, consumer profiles, or a special advertising and marketing strategy.<ref>World Intellectual Property Organization, [http://www.wipo.int/sme/en/ip_business/trade_secrets/trade_secrets.htm Trade Secrets.] Retrieved November 1, 2008.</ref> Two of the most famous trade secrets in the United States, for example, are the recipe for [[Coca Cola]] and [[Colonel Harland Sanders]]' handwritten Original Recipe(R) for [[Kentucky Fried Chicken]].
 +
{{toc}}
 +
Unlike a [[trademark]], which is publicly associated with a particular company, or a [[patent]], which is registered and legally protected for a specific period of time, a trade secret can only be protected as long as it remains secret. Trade secrets are protected without registration or procedural formalities. Companies use a variety of legal and commercial means to keep their special knowledge out of the hands of competitors, such as [[Non-disclosure agreement]]s (NDA) and [[non-compete clause]]s for employees, and confidentiality agreements for vendors or third parties in business negotiations. A wide range of internal security measures, including shredding of documents, [[encryption]] of computer files, permissions and security clearances, and [[disclaimers]] on faxes and emails, protects confidential information. In the [[United States]], under the [[Uniform Trade Secrets Act]] (UTSA), and the [[Economic Espionage Act of 1996]], companies can legally seek damages and injunctions when their trade secrets are misappropriated if they have taken reasonable measures to protect them. The sanctioned protection of information such as trade secrets from public disclosure is an important aspect of law that guards the overall economic vitality of a society. The [[World Intellectual Property Organization]] (WIPO), a specialized agency of the [[United Nations]] established in 1967, is dedicated to developing a balanced and accessible international system to protect intellectual property (IP) in the interest of developing the global economy.<ref>World Intellectual Property Organization, [http://www.wipo.int/about-wipo/en/what/  What is WIPO.] Retrieved November 1, 2008.</ref>
  
 
==Definition==
 
==Definition==
 +
Any confidential business information which gives a business a competitive edge may be considered a trade secret. The precise language by which a trade secret is defined varies by legal jurisdiction (as do the particular types of information that are subject to trade secret protection). However, there are three factors that, although subject to differing interpretations, are common to all such definitions: a trade secret is information that:
 +
* Is not generally known to the public
 +
* Confers some sort of economic benefit on its holder (where this benefit must derive ''specifically'' from its not being generally known, not just from the value of the information itself)
 +
* Is the subject of reasonable efforts to maintain its secrecy
  
The precise language by which a trade secret is defined varies by jurisdiction (as do the particular types of information that are subject to trade secret protection). However, there are three factors that, although subject to differing interpretations, are common to all such definitions: a trade secret is information that:
+
In some legal [[jurisdiction]]s, such secrets are referred to as "confidential information" or "classified information." Where trade secrets are legally recognized, the creator of knowledge regarded as a "trade secret" is ''entitled'' to regard such "special knowledge" as [[intellectual property]].
* is not generally known to the public;
 
* confers some sort of economic benefit on its holder (where this benefit must derive ''specifically'' from its not being generally known, not just from the value of the information itself);
 
* is the subject of reasonable efforts to maintain its secrecy.
 
  
==Protection==
+
Other factors that define a trade secret are the extent to which it is known by employees and others involved in the same business; the measures which are taken to guard the secrecy of the information; the ease with which the same information could be independently acquired by someone else; and the amount of investment in developing the information.<ref>About.com, Trade Secret.</ref>
A company can protect its confidential information through non-compete and non-disclosure contracts with its employees (within the constraints of employment law, including only restraint that is reasonable in geographic and time scope). The law of protection of confidential information effectively allows a perpetual monopoly in secret information - it does not expire as would a [[patent]]. The lack of formal protection, however, means that a third party is not prevented from independently duplicating and using the secret information once it is discovered.  
+
Trade secrets are different from other business secrets such as the amount or terms of a secret bid for a contract, the salary of certain employees, or the plans for a new model. A trade secret is a process or device continually used in the operation of a business. Most trade secrets concern the production of goods, for example, a machine or formula for the manufacture of an article. However, a trade secret might be a code for determining discounts or rebates in a price list or catalog, a special mailing list of customers or suppliers, a method of [[bookkeeping]], a distribution method, consumer profiles, or a special [[advertising]] and [[marketing]] strategy.<ref>World Intellectual Property Organization, [http://www.wipo.int/sme/en/ip_business/trade_secrets/trade_secrets.htm Trade Secrets.] Retrieved November 1, 2008.</ref>
  
The sanctioned protection of such type of information from public disclosure is viewed as an important legal aspect by which a society protects its overall economic vitality.  
+
==Legal protection of trade secrets==
A company typically invests money, time and energy (work) into generating information regarding refinements of processes and operations. If competitors had access to the same knowledge, the first company's ability to survive or maintain its [[market dominance]] or market position and market share would be impaired.
+
The sanctioned protection of information such as trade secrets from public disclosure is an important aspect of [[law]] that guards the overall economic vitality of a society. Depending on the legal system, the protection of trade secrets forms part of the general concept of protection against unfair competition, or is based on specific provisions or laws protecting confidential information. A company typically invests money, time and labor in refining its processes, operations, and marketing strategies. Its ability to survive and maintain its [[market dominance]] or market share will be impaired if competitors gain access to the same knowledge, especially if they acquire that knowledge directly from the company in an illegal manner.  
Where trade secrets are recognized, the creator of knowledge regarded as a "trade secret" is ''entitled'' to regard such "special knowledge" as [[intellectual property]].
 
  
In the United States, trade secrets are not protected by law in the same manner as [[trademark]]s or [[patent]]s. Specifically, both trademarks and patents are protected under Federal statutes, the Lanham Act and Patent Act, respectively. Trade secrets arise out of state laws. Most states have adopted the [[Uniform Trade Secrets Act]] (UTSA). Only Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, North Carolina, and Texas have not adopted the UTSA. One of the most significant differences between patents and trademarks and trade secrets is that a trade secret is only protected when the secret is ''not'' disclosed.
+
A company can protect its confidential information through non-compete and non-disclosure contracts with its employees (within the constraints of employment law, and within reasonable limits on time and location), and by taking measures to keep the information secret. The protection of a trade secret is [[perpetual]] and does not expire after a specific length of time, as a [[patent]] does. The lack of formal protection, however, means that a third party is not prevented from independently duplicating and using the secret information once it is discovered.
 +
 
 +
In the [[United States]], trade secrets are not protected by law in the same manner as [[trademark]]s or [[patent]]s. Trademarks and patents are protected under Federal statutes, the Lanham Act (1947) and Patent Act (1790, 1793, 1836, 1952, 2007) respectively. Trade secrets are defined and protected by state laws. Most states have adopted the [[Uniform Trade Secrets Act]] (UTSA), a [[model law]] drafted by the [[National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws]] to better define rights and remedies of [[common law]] [[trade secret]]. It has been adopted by 46 states, the [[District of Columbia]] and the [[U.S. Virgin Islands]]. [[Massachusetts]], [[New Jersey]], [[New York]], and [[Texas]] have not adopted the UTSA. Some of these states continue to apply common law to trade secrets, and some have adopted separate state statutes. In 2007, the UTSA was introduced in both the New York and New Jersey legislatures.
 +
 
 +
In [[Commonwealth of Nations|Commonwealth]] [[common law]] jurisdictions, confidentiality and trade secrets are regarded as an [[Equity (law)|equitable]] right rather than a [[property]] right (with the exception of [[Hong Kong]] where a judgment of the High Court indicates that confidential information may be a property right). The [[Court of Appeal of England and Wales]] in the case of ''Saltman Engineering Co Ltd v. Campbell Engineering Ltd,'' (1948) 65 P.R.C. 203 held that the action for breach of confidence is based on a principle of preserving "good faith."
  
 
== Comparison with trademarks ==
 
== Comparison with trademarks ==
To acquire rights in a trademark under U.S. law, one must simply use the mark "in commerce."<ref name="USPTO-FAQ"> United States Patent and Trademark Office, [http://www.uspto.gov/main/faq/index.html General Questions]</ref> It is possible to register a trademark in the U.S., both at the federal and state levels. (Registration of trademarks confers some advantages, including stronger protection in certain respects, but it is not required in order to get protection.)<ref name="USPTO-FAQ"/> Registration may be required in order to file a lawsuit for trademark infringement. Other nations have different trademark policies and this information may not apply to them. Assuming the mark in question meets certain other standards of protectibility, it is protected from infringement on the grounds that other uses might confuse consumers as to the origin or nature of the goods once the mark has been associated with a particular supplier. (Similar considerations apply to [[service mark]]s and [[trade dress]].) By definition, a trademark enjoys no protection (''qua'' trademark) until and unless it is "disclosed" to consumers, for only then are consumers able to associate it with a supplier or source in the requisite manner. (That a company plans to ''use'' a certain trademark might itself be protectible as a trade secret, however, until the mark is actually made public.)
+
A trademark, or “mark” is a distinctive [[sign (semiotics)|sign]] or indicator used by an individual, [[business organizations|business organization]] or other [[Juristic person|legal entity]] to identify that the goods or services with which that trademark appears originate from a unique source. A trademark is typically a name, word, phrase, [[logo]], [[symbol]], design, image, style of work uniform, or a combination of these elements and is considered a type of [[intellectual property]]. To acquire rights to a trademark under U.S. law, one must simply use the mark "in commerce."<ref> United States Patent and Trademark Office, [http://www.uspto.gov/main/faq/index.html General Questions.] Retrieved November 1, 2008.</ref> It is possible to legally register a trademark in the U.S., both at the federal and state levels. Registration of trademarks confers some advantages, but it is not required in order to get protection.<ref>Ibid.</ref> Registration may be required in order to file a lawsuit for trademark infringement. Other nations have different laws and policies regarding trademarks.  
 +
 
 +
A trademark is protected from infringement on the grounds that its use by another person or business might confuse consumers as to the origin or nature of the goods or services offered for sale. By definition, a trademark enjoys no protection (as a trademark) until it is made public and associated with a particular company. (A company’s plans to use a certain trademark might be protectible as a trade secret until the mark is actually made public.) A trade secret, on the other hand, can only be protected as long as it remains secret.
  
 
== Comparison with patents ==
 
== Comparison with patents ==
To acquire a patent, full information about the method or product has to be supplied to the patent office and upon publication or issuance, will then be available to all. After expiration of the patent, competitors can copy the method or product legally. The temporary [[monopoly]] on the subject matter of the patent is regarded as a ''[[quid pro quo]]'' for thus disclosing the information to the public.
+
To acquire a [[patent]], full information about the method or product has to be supplied to the patent office and upon publication or issuance, becomes available to all. Though the information is now available to the public, a temporary [[monopoly]] is granted to the patent holder on the use of the method or product. After the patent expires, competitors can legally copy the method or product.
 +
 
 +
To be patented, a product must be unique and not be a duplication of a previous [[invention]] or [[technique]]. A trade secret may not necessarily be a novel invention or technique; it can be a process that anyone with access to similar information could arrive at using common sense.  
  
 +
Protection of a trade secret can, in principle, extend indefinitely while patent protection lasts only for a specifically limited period of time. [[Coca-Cola]], the most famous trade secret example, has no patent for its formula and has been very effective in protecting it for much longer than the twenty years of protection that a patent would have provided. At least twice, Coca-Cola has refused to reveal its trade secret under judges' orders.<ref>Mark Pendergrast, ''For God, Country & Coca-Cola,'' 2nd ed. (Basic Books, 2000), 456.</ref>  Nevertheless, such protection is comparatively easy to lose. Another company might use [[reverse engineering]] or [[chemical analysis]] to discover how a product is made or a strategy is carried out, and there is no minimum time period of guaranteed protection for a trade secret, as there is with a patent.
 +
 
 
== Protecting trade secrets ==
 
== Protecting trade secrets ==
Trade secrets are by definition ''not'' disclosed to the world at large. Instead, owners of trade secrets seek to keep their special knowledge out of the hands of competitors through a variety of civil and commercial means, not the least of which is the use of [[non-disclosure agreement]]s (NDA) and [[non-compete clause]]s. In exchange for the opportunity to be employed by the holder of secrets, an employee will sign an agreement not to reveal his or her prospective employer's proprietary information. Often, the employee will also sign over rights to the ownership of own intellectual works produced during the course (or as a condition) of their employment. Violation of the agreement generally carries the possibility of stiff financial penalties. These penalties operate as a disincentive to revealing trade secrets. Similar agreements are often signed by other companies with whom the trade secret holder is engaged, e.g. with the trade secret holder's vendors, or third parties in licensing talks or involved in other business negotiations.
+
Owners of trade secrets use a variety of legal and commercial means to keep their special knowledge out of the hands of competitors. [[Non-disclosure agreement]]s (NDA) and [[non-compete clause]]s are widely used; as a condition of employment, new employees sign an agreement not to reveal the prospective employer's proprietary information. Often, an employee will also sign over rights to the ownership of intellectual works produced during the course (or as a condition) of his or her employment. Violation of the agreement typically carries stiff financial penalties. Similar confidentiality agreements are signed by other companies with whom the holder of a trade secret is engaged, such as vendors, or third parties in licensing talks or other business negotiations.
 +
 
 +
Companies implement a wide range of internal security measures to prevent their trade secrets from becoming public. Many firms and individuals who deal regularly with trade secret information routinely include a notice in their [[email]]s and [[fax]] cover sheets advising of the confidential nature of the contents. Documents are shredded rather than simply being thrown in a trash can or recycling bin. Computer files are [[encryption|encrypted]] and elaborate systems requiring permissions and passwords are put in place to protect sensitive information from [[computer hacker]]s or unscrupulous employees. These measures are particularly important if it becomes necessary to present a legal challenge in court.
  
Trade secret protection ''can'', in principle, extend indefinitely and in this may offer an advantage over patent protection, which lasts only for a specifically limited period of time. [[Coca-Cola]], the most famous trade secret example, has no patent for its formula and has been very effective in protecting it for many more years than the twenty years of protection that a patent would have provided.  In fact, Coca-Cola refused to reveal its trade secret under at least two judges' orders.<ref>''For God, Country & Coca-Cola'', by Mark Pendergrast, 2nd Ed., Basic Books 2000, p. 456</ref> However, the "down side" of such protection is that it is comparatively easy to lose (for example, to [[reverse engineering]], which a patent will withstand but a trade secret will not) and comes equipped with no ''minimum'' guaranteed period of years.
+
[[Colonel Harland Sanders]]' handwritten Original Recipe(R) for [[Kentucky Fried Chicken]] (KFC) ranks among America's most valuable trade secrets. For 68 years it was kept locked in a safe at KFC corporate headquarters. In 2008, while security was being upgraded, the recipe was transported to an undisclosed location in a locked briefcase handcuffed to a national corporate security expert, who rode in an armored car escorted by the Louisville Metro Police Department. Only two KFC executives know the recipe of 11 herbs and spices. A third executive knows the combination to the safe where the handwritten recipe is kept. These three executives are not allowed to travel together on the same plane or in the same car, and less than a handful of KFC employees knows their identities. Multiple suppliers, bound by strict secrecy agreements, are involved in the process of producing and blending the herbs, and none of the individual suppliers know the entire formula. KFC does not publicly identify the suppliers involved in producing and blending the recipe.<ref>Restaurant News Resource, [http://www.restaurantnewsresource.com/article34462-KFC_to_Showcase_Historic_Safe___Move_Colonel_Sanders__Famed_Secret_Recipe_Via_High_Security_Motorcade.html KFC to Showcase Historic Safe & Move Colonel Sanders' Famed Secret Recipe Via High-Security Motorcade] (September 9, 2008). Retrieved November 1, 2008.</ref>
  
 
== Discovering trade secrets ==
 
== Discovering trade secrets ==
Companies often try to discover one another's trade secrets through lawful methods of [[reverse engineering]] on one hand, and potentially unlawful methods including [[industrial espionage]] on the other. Acts of industrial espionage are generally illegal in their own right under the relevant governing laws. The importance of that illegality to trade secret law is as follows: if a trade secret is acquired by improper means (a somewhat wider concept than "illegal means" but inclusive of such means), the secret is generally deemed to have been ''misappropriated''. Thus if a trade secret has been acquired via industrial espionage, its acquirer will probably be subject to legal liability for acquiring it improperly. (The holder of the trade secret is nevertheless obliged to protect against such espionage to some degree in order to safeguard the secret. As noted above, under most trade secret regimes, a trade secret is not deemed to exist unless its purported holder takes reasonable steps to maintain its secrecy.)
+
Companies often try to discover one another's trade secrets through lawful methods such as [[reverse engineering]], and through potentially unlawful methods including [[industrial espionage]]. Acts of industrial espionage are illegal in their own right, and this illegality is important to the protection of trade secrets. If a trade secret is acquired by improper means, the secret can be deemed to have been ''misappropriated,'' and its acquirer will be liable in a court of law. In such a case, the holder of the trade secret must have taken reasonable steps to maintain its secrecy.
 
 
== Legal development to protecting trade secrets ==
 
A relatively recent development in the United States is the adoption of the UTSA, the ''[[Uniform Trade Secrets Act]]'', which has been adopted by approximately 45 states as the basis for trade secret law.  Another significant development in U.S. law is the [[Economic Espionage Act of 1996]] ({{usc|18|1831|1839}}), which makes the theft or misappropriation of a trade secret a federal crime. This law contains two provisions criminalizing two sorts of activity. The first, {{uscsub|18|1831|a}}, criminalizes the theft of trade secrets to benefit foreign powers. The second, {{usc|18|1832}}, criminalizes their theft for commercial or economic purposes. (The statutory penalties are different for the two offenses.)
 
 
 
In [[Commonwealth of Nations|Commonwealth]] [[common law]] jurisdictions, confidentiality and trade secrets are regarded as an [[Equity (law)|equitable]] right rather than a [[property]] right (with the exception of [[Hong Kong]] where a judgment of the High Court indicates that confidential information may be a property right). The [[Court of Appeal of England and Wales]] in the case of ''Saltman Engineering Co Ltd v. Campbell Engineering Ltd'', (1948) 65 P.R.C. 203 held that the action for breach of confidence is based on a principle of preserving "good faith".
 
 
 
The test for a cause of action for breach of confidence in the common law world is set out in the case of ''Coco v. A.N. Clark (Engineers) Ltd'', (1969) R.P.C. 41 at 47:
 
  
* the information itself must have the necessary quality of confidence about it;
+
The [[Economic Espionage Act of 1996]] ({{usc|18|1831|1839}}), made the theft or misappropriation of a trade secret a federal crime in the United States. This law contains two provisions, criminalizing the theft of trade secrets to benefit foreign powers {{uscsub|18|1831|a}}, and criminalizing their theft for commercial or economic purposes {{usc|18|1832}}. The statutory penalties are different for the two offenses.
* that information must have been imparted in circumstances imparting an obligation of confidence;
 
* there must be an unauthorized use of that information to the detriment of the party communicating it.
 
  
The "quality of confidence" highlights that trade secrets are a legal concept.  With sufficient effort or through illegal acts (such as break and enter), competitors can usually obtain trade secrets.  However, so long as the owner of the trade secret can prove that reasonable efforts have been made to keep the information confidential, the information remains a trade secret and generally remains legally protected.  Conversely, trade secret owners who cannot evidence reasonable efforts at protecting confidential information, risk losing the trade secret, even if the information is obtained by competitors illegally.  It is for this reason that trade secret owners shred documents and do not simply recycle them.{{Fact|date=August 2007}}
+
[[Misappropriation]] is defined as acquiring the secret through improper means or from another person knowing that they acquired the secret by improper means; or as disclosing or using the secret without consent when the circumstances create a duty not to disclose or use it. Misappropriation also occurs when a secret is acquired by accident or mistake (for example, through a misdirected [[email]] or [[facsimile]] transmission), if before using or disclosing the trade secret the person acquiring it learns that it is a trade secret.  
  
A successful plaintiff is entitled to various forms of [[judicial relief]], including:
+
The UTSA imposes civil rather than criminal [[liability]] for misappropriation of trade secrets and creates a private [[cause of action]] for the victim. A successful [[plaintiff]] is entitled to various forms of [[judicial relief]], including [[injunction]]s, [[damages]], including "exemplary" (punitive) damages, and, in cases of bad faith or willful and malicious misappropriation, reasonable [[attorney's fees]]. The act also permits courts to grant [[protective order]]s to maintain the secrecy of a trade secret during a court case and to prevent disclosure by witnesses.
  
* an [[injunction]]
+
If the trade secret consists of a patentable device or process, the court will ordinarily prevent the further use of it, and require an accounting of any profits derived from it by someone who misappropriated the trade secret. If, on the other hand, the trade secret consists of improvements or information that could be arrived at by any skilled professional, liability may be limited to damages, and it may not be appropriate to issue an injunction against the future use of the trade secret.<ref>About.com, [http://inventors.about.com/od/tradesecrets/a/trade_secret.htm Trade Secret,] by Mary Bellis. Retrieved November 1, 2008.</ref>
* an [[account of profits]] or an award of [[damages]]
 
* a [[Declaration (law)|declaration]]
 
  
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
{{reflist}}
+
<references/>
  
==See also==
+
==References==
* [[:wikt:Transwiki:Glossary of legal terms in technology|Glossary of legal terms in technology]]
+
*Buchanan Ingersoll Professional Corporation. ''Trade Secret Law.'' White paper series. Pittsburgh, PA: Buchanan Ingersoll Professional Corporation. 1995.
 +
*Elias, Stephen, and Lisa Goldoftas. ''Patent, Copyright & Trademark: A Desk Reference to Intellectual Property Law.'' Berkeley: Nolo Press. 1996. ISBN 0873372360.
 +
*Goldscheider, Robert. ''Licensing Best Practices the LESI Guide to Strategic Issues and Contemporary Realities.'' Intellectual property—general, law, accounting & finance, management, licensing, special topics series. New York: Wiley. 2002. ISBN 0471423181.
 +
*Lockerby, Michael J. ''The Trade Secret Handbook Protecting Your Franchise System's Competitive Advantage.'' Chicago, IL: American Bar Association. 2000. ISBN 0585354138.
 +
*Pendergrast, Mark. ''For God, Country, and Coca-Cola: The Unauthorized History of the Great American Soft Drink and the Company That Makes It.'' New York: Scribner's, 1993. ISBN 0684193477.
  
 
== External links ==
 
== External links ==
*[http://www.ipwatchdog.com/tradesecret.html Trade Secret Law] by Eugene R. Quinn, Jr. (IPWatchdog).
+
All links retrieved May 1, 2023.
*[http://www.myersbigel.com/ts_articles/trade_secret3.htm International Aspects of Trade Secrets Law] by Karen A. Magri.
 
  
[[Category:Intellectual property law]]
+
*[http://rhesq.com/CI/National%20Law%20Journal.pdf  Industry Spying Still Flourishes; Criminalizing Trade Secret Theft Hasn't Led to Mass Prosecutions], ''National Law Journal'' (March 29, 2000)
[[Category:Secrecy]]
 
  
[[de:Betriebs- und Geschäftsgeheimnis]]
+
[[Category:Politics and social sciences]]
[[id:Rahasia dagang]]
+
[[Category:Law]]
[[he:סוד מסחרי]]
+
[[Category:Industry and business]]
[[hu:Üzleti titok]]
+
{{credits|Trade_secret&oldid=248437196|Uniform_Trade_Secrets_Act|232857663|Economic_Espionage_Act_of_1996|243207844|}}
[[pt:Segredo comercial]]
 
[[ru:Коммерческая тайна]]
 
[[simple:Trade secret]]
 
[[sk:Obchodné tajomstvo]]
 
[[th:ความลับทางการค้า]]
 
[[uk:Комерційна таємниця]]
 
[[zh:商业秘密]]
 

Latest revision as of 04:53, 1 May 2023

Scales of justice
Intellectual property law
 
Rights
Authors' rights · Intellectual property · Copyright
Database right · Indigenous intellectual property
Industrial design rights · Geographical indication
Patent · Related rights · Trademark
Trade secret · Utility model
Related topics
Fair use · Public domain
Trade name

A trade secret is a formula, practice, process, design, instrument, pattern, or compilation of information which is not generally known or reasonably ascertainable to the public, by which a business can obtain an economic advantage over competitors or customers. Most trade secrets concern the production of goods, but a trade secret might also be a special mailing list of customers or suppliers, a method of bookkeeping, a distribution method, consumer profiles, or a special advertising and marketing strategy.[1] Two of the most famous trade secrets in the United States, for example, are the recipe for Coca Cola and Colonel Harland Sanders' handwritten Original Recipe(R) for Kentucky Fried Chicken.

Unlike a trademark, which is publicly associated with a particular company, or a patent, which is registered and legally protected for a specific period of time, a trade secret can only be protected as long as it remains secret. Trade secrets are protected without registration or procedural formalities. Companies use a variety of legal and commercial means to keep their special knowledge out of the hands of competitors, such as Non-disclosure agreements (NDA) and non-compete clauses for employees, and confidentiality agreements for vendors or third parties in business negotiations. A wide range of internal security measures, including shredding of documents, encryption of computer files, permissions and security clearances, and disclaimers on faxes and emails, protects confidential information. In the United States, under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA), and the Economic Espionage Act of 1996, companies can legally seek damages and injunctions when their trade secrets are misappropriated if they have taken reasonable measures to protect them. The sanctioned protection of information such as trade secrets from public disclosure is an important aspect of law that guards the overall economic vitality of a society. The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), a specialized agency of the United Nations established in 1967, is dedicated to developing a balanced and accessible international system to protect intellectual property (IP) in the interest of developing the global economy.[2]

Definition

Any confidential business information which gives a business a competitive edge may be considered a trade secret. The precise language by which a trade secret is defined varies by legal jurisdiction (as do the particular types of information that are subject to trade secret protection). However, there are three factors that, although subject to differing interpretations, are common to all such definitions: a trade secret is information that:

  • Is not generally known to the public
  • Confers some sort of economic benefit on its holder (where this benefit must derive specifically from its not being generally known, not just from the value of the information itself)
  • Is the subject of reasonable efforts to maintain its secrecy

In some legal jurisdictions, such secrets are referred to as "confidential information" or "classified information." Where trade secrets are legally recognized, the creator of knowledge regarded as a "trade secret" is entitled to regard such "special knowledge" as intellectual property.

Other factors that define a trade secret are the extent to which it is known by employees and others involved in the same business; the measures which are taken to guard the secrecy of the information; the ease with which the same information could be independently acquired by someone else; and the amount of investment in developing the information.[3] Trade secrets are different from other business secrets such as the amount or terms of a secret bid for a contract, the salary of certain employees, or the plans for a new model. A trade secret is a process or device continually used in the operation of a business. Most trade secrets concern the production of goods, for example, a machine or formula for the manufacture of an article. However, a trade secret might be a code for determining discounts or rebates in a price list or catalog, a special mailing list of customers or suppliers, a method of bookkeeping, a distribution method, consumer profiles, or a special advertising and marketing strategy.[4]

Legal protection of trade secrets

The sanctioned protection of information such as trade secrets from public disclosure is an important aspect of law that guards the overall economic vitality of a society. Depending on the legal system, the protection of trade secrets forms part of the general concept of protection against unfair competition, or is based on specific provisions or laws protecting confidential information. A company typically invests money, time and labor in refining its processes, operations, and marketing strategies. Its ability to survive and maintain its market dominance or market share will be impaired if competitors gain access to the same knowledge, especially if they acquire that knowledge directly from the company in an illegal manner.

A company can protect its confidential information through non-compete and non-disclosure contracts with its employees (within the constraints of employment law, and within reasonable limits on time and location), and by taking measures to keep the information secret. The protection of a trade secret is perpetual and does not expire after a specific length of time, as a patent does. The lack of formal protection, however, means that a third party is not prevented from independently duplicating and using the secret information once it is discovered.

In the United States, trade secrets are not protected by law in the same manner as trademarks or patents. Trademarks and patents are protected under Federal statutes, the Lanham Act (1947) and Patent Act (1790, 1793, 1836, 1952, 2007) respectively. Trade secrets are defined and protected by state laws. Most states have adopted the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA), a model law drafted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws to better define rights and remedies of common law trade secret. It has been adopted by 46 states, the District of Columbia and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and Texas have not adopted the UTSA. Some of these states continue to apply common law to trade secrets, and some have adopted separate state statutes. In 2007, the UTSA was introduced in both the New York and New Jersey legislatures.

In Commonwealth common law jurisdictions, confidentiality and trade secrets are regarded as an equitable right rather than a property right (with the exception of Hong Kong where a judgment of the High Court indicates that confidential information may be a property right). The Court of Appeal of England and Wales in the case of Saltman Engineering Co Ltd v. Campbell Engineering Ltd, (1948) 65 P.R.C. 203 held that the action for breach of confidence is based on a principle of preserving "good faith."

Comparison with trademarks

A trademark, or “mark” is a distinctive sign or indicator used by an individual, business organization or other legal entity to identify that the goods or services with which that trademark appears originate from a unique source. A trademark is typically a name, word, phrase, logo, symbol, design, image, style of work uniform, or a combination of these elements and is considered a type of intellectual property. To acquire rights to a trademark under U.S. law, one must simply use the mark "in commerce."[5] It is possible to legally register a trademark in the U.S., both at the federal and state levels. Registration of trademarks confers some advantages, but it is not required in order to get protection.[6] Registration may be required in order to file a lawsuit for trademark infringement. Other nations have different laws and policies regarding trademarks.

A trademark is protected from infringement on the grounds that its use by another person or business might confuse consumers as to the origin or nature of the goods or services offered for sale. By definition, a trademark enjoys no protection (as a trademark) until it is made public and associated with a particular company. (A company’s plans to use a certain trademark might be protectible as a trade secret until the mark is actually made public.) A trade secret, on the other hand, can only be protected as long as it remains secret.

Comparison with patents

To acquire a patent, full information about the method or product has to be supplied to the patent office and upon publication or issuance, becomes available to all. Though the information is now available to the public, a temporary monopoly is granted to the patent holder on the use of the method or product. After the patent expires, competitors can legally copy the method or product.

To be patented, a product must be unique and not be a duplication of a previous invention or technique. A trade secret may not necessarily be a novel invention or technique; it can be a process that anyone with access to similar information could arrive at using common sense.

Protection of a trade secret can, in principle, extend indefinitely while patent protection lasts only for a specifically limited period of time. Coca-Cola, the most famous trade secret example, has no patent for its formula and has been very effective in protecting it for much longer than the twenty years of protection that a patent would have provided. At least twice, Coca-Cola has refused to reveal its trade secret under judges' orders.[7] Nevertheless, such protection is comparatively easy to lose. Another company might use reverse engineering or chemical analysis to discover how a product is made or a strategy is carried out, and there is no minimum time period of guaranteed protection for a trade secret, as there is with a patent.

Protecting trade secrets

Owners of trade secrets use a variety of legal and commercial means to keep their special knowledge out of the hands of competitors. Non-disclosure agreements (NDA) and non-compete clauses are widely used; as a condition of employment, new employees sign an agreement not to reveal the prospective employer's proprietary information. Often, an employee will also sign over rights to the ownership of intellectual works produced during the course (or as a condition) of his or her employment. Violation of the agreement typically carries stiff financial penalties. Similar confidentiality agreements are signed by other companies with whom the holder of a trade secret is engaged, such as vendors, or third parties in licensing talks or other business negotiations.

Companies implement a wide range of internal security measures to prevent their trade secrets from becoming public. Many firms and individuals who deal regularly with trade secret information routinely include a notice in their emails and fax cover sheets advising of the confidential nature of the contents. Documents are shredded rather than simply being thrown in a trash can or recycling bin. Computer files are encrypted and elaborate systems requiring permissions and passwords are put in place to protect sensitive information from computer hackers or unscrupulous employees. These measures are particularly important if it becomes necessary to present a legal challenge in court.

Colonel Harland Sanders' handwritten Original Recipe(R) for Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) ranks among America's most valuable trade secrets. For 68 years it was kept locked in a safe at KFC corporate headquarters. In 2008, while security was being upgraded, the recipe was transported to an undisclosed location in a locked briefcase handcuffed to a national corporate security expert, who rode in an armored car escorted by the Louisville Metro Police Department. Only two KFC executives know the recipe of 11 herbs and spices. A third executive knows the combination to the safe where the handwritten recipe is kept. These three executives are not allowed to travel together on the same plane or in the same car, and less than a handful of KFC employees knows their identities. Multiple suppliers, bound by strict secrecy agreements, are involved in the process of producing and blending the herbs, and none of the individual suppliers know the entire formula. KFC does not publicly identify the suppliers involved in producing and blending the recipe.[8]

Discovering trade secrets

Companies often try to discover one another's trade secrets through lawful methods such as reverse engineering, and through potentially unlawful methods including industrial espionage. Acts of industrial espionage are illegal in their own right, and this illegality is important to the protection of trade secrets. If a trade secret is acquired by improper means, the secret can be deemed to have been misappropriated, and its acquirer will be liable in a court of law. In such a case, the holder of the trade secret must have taken reasonable steps to maintain its secrecy.

The Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (18 U.S.C. § 1831), made the theft or misappropriation of a trade secret a federal crime in the United States. This law contains two provisions, criminalizing the theft of trade secrets to benefit foreign powers 18 U.S.C. § 1831(a), and criminalizing their theft for commercial or economic purposes 18 U.S.C. § 1832. The statutory penalties are different for the two offenses.

Misappropriation is defined as acquiring the secret through improper means or from another person knowing that they acquired the secret by improper means; or as disclosing or using the secret without consent when the circumstances create a duty not to disclose or use it. Misappropriation also occurs when a secret is acquired by accident or mistake (for example, through a misdirected email or facsimile transmission), if before using or disclosing the trade secret the person acquiring it learns that it is a trade secret.

The UTSA imposes civil rather than criminal liability for misappropriation of trade secrets and creates a private cause of action for the victim. A successful plaintiff is entitled to various forms of judicial relief, including injunctions, damages, including "exemplary" (punitive) damages, and, in cases of bad faith or willful and malicious misappropriation, reasonable attorney's fees. The act also permits courts to grant protective orders to maintain the secrecy of a trade secret during a court case and to prevent disclosure by witnesses.

If the trade secret consists of a patentable device or process, the court will ordinarily prevent the further use of it, and require an accounting of any profits derived from it by someone who misappropriated the trade secret. If, on the other hand, the trade secret consists of improvements or information that could be arrived at by any skilled professional, liability may be limited to damages, and it may not be appropriate to issue an injunction against the future use of the trade secret.[9]

Notes

  1. World Intellectual Property Organization, Trade Secrets. Retrieved November 1, 2008.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization, What is WIPO. Retrieved November 1, 2008.
  3. About.com, Trade Secret.
  4. World Intellectual Property Organization, Trade Secrets. Retrieved November 1, 2008.
  5. United States Patent and Trademark Office, General Questions. Retrieved November 1, 2008.
  6. Ibid.
  7. Mark Pendergrast, For God, Country & Coca-Cola, 2nd ed. (Basic Books, 2000), 456.
  8. Restaurant News Resource, KFC to Showcase Historic Safe & Move Colonel Sanders' Famed Secret Recipe Via High-Security Motorcade (September 9, 2008). Retrieved November 1, 2008.
  9. About.com, Trade Secret, by Mary Bellis. Retrieved November 1, 2008.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Buchanan Ingersoll Professional Corporation. Trade Secret Law. White paper series. Pittsburgh, PA: Buchanan Ingersoll Professional Corporation. 1995.
  • Elias, Stephen, and Lisa Goldoftas. Patent, Copyright & Trademark: A Desk Reference to Intellectual Property Law. Berkeley: Nolo Press. 1996. ISBN 0873372360.
  • Goldscheider, Robert. Licensing Best Practices the LESI Guide to Strategic Issues and Contemporary Realities. Intellectual property—general, law, accounting & finance, management, licensing, special topics series. New York: Wiley. 2002. ISBN 0471423181.
  • Lockerby, Michael J. The Trade Secret Handbook Protecting Your Franchise System's Competitive Advantage. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association. 2000. ISBN 0585354138.
  • Pendergrast, Mark. For God, Country, and Coca-Cola: The Unauthorized History of the Great American Soft Drink and the Company That Makes It. New York: Scribner's, 1993. ISBN 0684193477.

External links

All links retrieved May 1, 2023.

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.