An ideal language (also philosophical or a priori language) is any constructed language that is built up out of first principles, such as a logical language. Such languages are in contrast to ordinary or spoken languages such as English, Italian, or Japanese (often called natural languages), which have within them a great deal of fuzziness, overlap, vagueness, ambiguity, multiple meanings, and indeterminacy of meaning for words and phrases, unclarity, inherent contradiction, and difference between intension and extension of terms—this is not necessarily a defect of natural languages, but may indeed constitute a strength of them. But it also means that those who want clarity and precision of language will be unsatisfied with natural or ordinary languages and those who construct an ideal language attempt to eliminate all such factors. An ideal language entails a stronger claim of absolute perfection or transcendent or even mystical truth rather than pragmatic principles. Philosophical languages were popular in Early Modern times, partly motivated by the goal of recovering what was thought to be the lost Adamic or Divine language.
In a philosophical language, words are constructed from a limited set of morphemes that are treated as "elemental" or fundamental. "Philosophical language" is more or less synonymous with "taxonomic language." Vocabularies of oligosynthetic languages are made of compound words, which are coined from a small (theoretically minimal) set of morphemes. Suzette Haden Elgin's Láadan is designed to lexicalize and grammaticalize the concepts and distinctions important to women, based on muted group theory. Sonja Elen Kisa's Toki Pona is based on minimalistic simplicity, incorporating elements of Taoism.
A priori languages are constructed languages where the vocabulary is invented directly, rather than being derived from other existing languages (as with Esperanto or Interlingua).
Philosphical languages are almost all a priori languages, but not all a priori languages are philosophical. For example, Tolkein's Quenya and Sindarin, and Okrand's Klingon, are both a priori but not philosophical—they are meant to seem like natural languages, even though they have no relation to any natural languages.
Work on philosophical languages was pioneered by Francis Lodwick (A Common Writing, 1647; The Groundwork or Foundation laid (or So Intended) for the Framing of a New Perfect Language and a Universal Common Writing, 1652), Sir Thomas Urquhart (Logopandecteision, 1652), George Dalgarno (Ars signorum, 1661), and John Wilkins (Essay towards a Real Character, and a Philosophical Language, 1668). Those were systems of hierarchical classification that were intended to result in both spoken and written expression.
Gottfried Leibniz created lingua generalis in 1678, aiming to create a lexicon of characters upon which the user might perform calculations that would yield true propositions automatically; as a side-effect he developed binary calculus.
These projects aimed not only to reduce or model grammar, but also to arrange all human knowledge into "characters" or hierarchies. This idea ultimately led to the Encyclopédie, in the Age of Enlightenment. Leibniz and the encyclopedists realized that it is impossible to organize human knowledge unequivocally as a tree, and so impossible to construct an a priori language based on such a classification of concepts. Under the entry Charactère, D'Alembert critically reviewed the projects of philosophical languages of the preceding century.
After the Encyclopédie, projects for a priori languages moved more and more to the lunatic fringe. Individual authors, typically unaware of the history of the idea, continued to propose taxonomic philosophical languages until the early twentieth century.
However, following the program of the logical positivists and the Vienna Circle, especially as embodied in Ludwig Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus and some of the work of Rudolf Carnap, especially his book Der logische Aufbau der Welt, some analytic philosophers attempted to construct ideal languages for science—the program or movement was usually known as constructivism. A leading figure here was Nelson Goodman in his book The Structure of Appearance. Washington University in St. Louis philosopher Richard Rudner, following Goodman, carried on the attempt.
- Carnap, Rudolf. Der logische Aufbau der Welt. Hamburg: Meiner, 1966.
- Eco, Umberto. The Search for the Perfect Language. trans. by James Fentress. Oxford, UK & Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1995. ISBN 0631174656
- Goodman, Nelson. The Structure of Appearance. 2nd. ed. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1966. ISBN 902770774X
- Libert, Alan. A Priori Artificial Languages. Munich: Lincom Europa, 2000. ISBN 3-89586-667-9
- Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung. trans. as Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus by D.F. Pears and Brian McGuinness. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1961.
All links retrieved February 24, 2018.
- Philosophy of language The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
- Leibniz's Philosophy of Mind Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
- Wittgenstein's Logical Atomism Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
- Types and Tokens Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
General Philosophy Sources
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- Paideia Project Online
- Project Gutenberg
New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:
The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:
Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.