Difference between revisions of "Richard Price" - New World Encyclopedia
Keisuke Noda (talk | contribs) (imported from wiki) |
Makoto Maeda (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
:''This is about the 18th-century philosopher; '''Richard Price''' is also the [[Richard Price (writer)|name of a novelist and screenwriter,]]'' an American historian at the [[College of William and Mary]], a British historian at the [[University of Maryland, College Park]], a political scientist at the [[University of British Columbia]], and a theoretical physicist at the [[University of Texas at Brownsville and Texas Southmost College|University of Texas at Brownsville]] | :''This is about the 18th-century philosopher; '''Richard Price''' is also the [[Richard Price (writer)|name of a novelist and screenwriter,]]'' an American historian at the [[College of William and Mary]], a British historian at the [[University of Maryland, College Park]], a political scientist at the [[University of British Columbia]], and a theoretical physicist at the [[University of Texas at Brownsville and Texas Southmost College|University of Texas at Brownsville]] | ||
[[Image:Richard Price.jpg|thumb|right|Richard Price]] | [[Image:Richard Price.jpg|thumb|right|Richard Price]] | ||
| − | '''Richard Price''' ([[ | + | '''Richard Price''' (February 23, 1723 - April 19, 1791), was a [[Wales|Welsh]] moral and political philosopher, a Dissenting minister and an expert on government finance and insurance whose writings influenced the philosophy and public life of Britain during the late eighteenth century. His ethical treatise, Review of the Principal Questions and Difficulties in Morals (1757) emphasized the role of reason in making moral judgments. He criticized empiricism as not being able to account for morality’s necessity for not providing an adequate explanation for moral agency. Price argued that reason contributed to all knowledge, and that it could intuitively discern certain simple and self-evident ideas, such as right and wrong. In determining moral action, Price removed emotions and feelings from the central position and kept them as accompaniments to rational intuition, arguing that acting according to instincts and feelings would be like following a blind guide in the dark. |
| + | |||
| + | Two pamphlets which he published in 1771, ''Appeal to the Public on the Subject of the National Debt'' and Observations on Reversionary Payments (1771), influenced [[William Pitt the Elder]] in re-establishing the sinking fund for the extinction of the national debt. He became famous for defending the independence of the American colonies in his pamphlet called Observations on the Nature of Civil Liberty, the Principles of Government, and the Justice and Policy of the War with America (1776). He also supported the French Revolution, and was criticized by Edmund Burke in his Reflections on the Revolution in France. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Life == | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Richard Price''' was born February 23, 1723, at Tynton, Glamorgan, Wales, the son of a dissenting minister. Educated privately and at a dissenting academy in London, he became chaplain and companion to a Mr Streatfield at Stoke Newington. Streatfield's death and that of an uncle in 1756 improved his circumstances, and on June 16, 1757 he married Sarah Blundell, originally of Belgrave in Leicestershire. A Dissenter like his father, he ministered to Presbyterians near London. In 1758 he published Review of the Principal Questions and Difficulties in Morals, arguing for ethical intuitionism and rationalism, foreshadowing the ethics of Kant. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In 1765 Price was admitted to the Royal Society for his work on probability, which he later used as the basis for a scientific system for life insurance and old age pensions (Observations on Reversionary Payments, 1771). In 1767 Price published a volume of sermons, through which he made the acquaintance of Lord Shelburne; this established his reputation and helped determine the direction of his career. In 1769 Price received the degree of Doctor of Divinity from the University of Glasgow. It was, however, as a writer on financial and political questions that Price became widely known. In 1769, in a letter to [[Benjamin Franklin]], he wrote some observations on the life expectancy, the increase of mankind, and the population of London, which were published in the ''Philosophical Transactions'' of that year; in May 1770 he presented a paper to the Royal Society on the proper method of calculating the values of contingent reversions. The publication of these papers helped draw attention to the inadequate calculations on which many insurance and benefit societies had recently been formed. In 1771 he published ''Appeal to the Public on the Subject of the National Debt'' (ed. 1772 and 1774). This pamphlet excited considerable controversy, and together with Observations on Reversionary Payments (1771), is supposed to have influenced [[William Pitt the Elder]] in re-establishing the sinking fund for the extinction of the national debt, created by [[Robert Walpole]] in 1716 and abolished in 1733. (The means proposed for the extinction of the debt were described by Lord Overstone as "a sort of hocus-pocus machinery," supposed to work "without loss to any one," and consequently unsound.) | ||
| − | + | Price then turned his attention to the question of the [[United States|American]] colonies. He had from the first been strongly opposed to the war, and in 1776 he published a pamphlet entitled ''Observations on Civil Liberty and the Justice and Policy of the War with America.'' Several thousand copies of this work were sold within a few days, and a cheap edition was soon issued. The pamphlet was extolled by one set of politicians and attacked by another; among its critics were [[William Markham|Dr Markham, archbishop of York]], [[John Wesley]], and [[Edmund Burke]]. Price rapidly became one of the best- known men in England. He was presented with the freedom of the city of London, and his pamphlet was said to have had considerable influence in determining the Americans to [[American Declaration of Independence|declare their independence]]. A second pamphlet on the war with America, the debts of [[Great Britain]], and related topics followed in the spring of 1777, and Price thus became identified with the cause of American independence. He was the intimate friend of Franklin; he corresponded with [[Anne Robert Jacques Turgot, Baron de Laune|Turgot]]; and in the winter of 1778 he was invited by Congress to go to America and assist in the financial administration of the states. He refused the offer, unwilling to leave his own country and his family connections. In 1781 he received the degree of Doctor of Divinity from [[Yale University|Yale College]]. | |
| − | + | One of Price's most intimate friends was [[Joseph Priestley]], in spite of their opposing views on morals and [[metaphysics]]. A correspondence between these two liberal [[theology|theologian]]s on the subjects of [[materialism]] and necessity was published in 1778. Price maintained, in opposition to Priestley, the free agency of man and the unity and immateriality of the human soul. Both Price and Priestley were what would now loosely be called "[[Unitarian]]s," though they occupied respectively the extreme right and the extreme left positions of that school. Price's opinions seem to have been rather [[Arianism|Arian]] than [[socinianism|Socinian]]. | |
| − | + | The pamphlets on the American War made Price famous. He preached to crowded congregations, and, when Lord Shelburne rose to power, not only was he offered the post of private secretary to the premier, but it is said that one of the paragraphs in the king's speech was suggested by him and even inserted in his words. In 1786 Mrs. Price died. They had had no children, Price’s own health was failing, and the remainder of his life appears to have been clouded by solitude and dejection. Only the progress of the [[French Revolution]] cheered him. On the April 19, 1791 he died, worn out with suffering and disease. | |
| − | + | ==Thought and Works== | |
| − | + | Much of Price's most important philosophical work was in the field of ethics. ''Review of the Principal Questions in Morals'' (1757, 3rd ed. revised 1787) contains his entire theory. The first of its ten chapters, though a small part of the whole, contains a complete demonstration of his ethical theory. The remaining chapters investigate details of minor importance, and are especially interesting as they show his relation to Butler and [[Immanuel Kant|Kant]] (ch. iii. and ch. vii.). The work is supposed to be a refutation of [[Francis Hutcheson]], but is more constructive than polemical. The theory he propounds is closely allied to that of Cudworth, but is interesting mainly in comparison with the subsequent theories of Kant. | |
| − | + | Price was also a friend of the mathematician and clergyman [[Thomas Bayes]]. He edited Bayes' most famous work "Essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances" which contains [[Bayes' Theorem]], one of the most fundamental theorems of probability theory. Price wrote an introduction to Bayes' paper which provides some of the philosophical basis for [[Bayesian Statistics]]. | |
| − | + | Besides the above-mentioned, Price wrote an ''Essay on the Population of England'' (2nd ed., 1780) which directly influenced [[Thomas Robert Malthus]]; two ''Fast-day Sermons'', published respectively in 1779 and 1781; and ''Observations on the importance of the American Revolution and the means of rendering it a benefit to the World'' (1784). A complete list of his works is given as an appendix to Dr Priestley's ''Funeral Sermon''. His views on the [[French Revolution]] are denounced by Burke in his ''Reflections on the Revolution in France''. References to Price's ethical system occur in [[James Mackintosh]]'s ''Progress of Ethical Philosophy'', [[Théodore Simon Jouffroy|Jouffroy]]'s ''Introduction to Ethics'', [[William Whewell]]'s ''History of Moral Philosophy in England''; [[Alexander Bain]]'s ''Mental and Moral Sciences.'' Price’s nephew, William Morgan, wrote a memoir about his life. | |
| − | + | == Price’s Theory of Ethics == | |
| − | == | + | Price did not like the moral sense theory, especially as advanced by Hume, which favored subjectivism and allowed instinct and feeling to determine human conduct. Price argued that reason contributed to all human knowledge. Reason, not emotion, was authoritative in moral concerns, and it could discern objective moral distinctions. Locke believed that all simple ideas were derived from sensation and reflection; Price held that certain simple and self-evident ideas, such as ideas of right and wrong, were immediately perceived by the understanding. Reason, a distinct intellectual operation, considers the relations among ideas which we already possess. The understanding, however, intuits self-evident ideas which cannot be broken down into mere elements derived from sense-experience. Our “common sense” tells us that the understanding has original and self-evident ideas, which are so basic and simple that they cannot be analyzed further. |
| + | |||
| + | Price’s rejection of the moral sense theory did not imply a total rejection of an emotional element in morality. Price removed emotions and feelings from the central position and kept them as accompaniments to rational intuition. Price argued that acting according to instincts and feelings would be like following a blind guide in the dark. Instinct “drives” and “precipitates” action, but reason commands and controls it. Price conceived of happiness as the destiny envisaged for man by divine Providence, and of virtuous action as producing happiness. Virtue would ultimately produce perfect happiness. True virtue meant doing right actions simply because they are right, and not in expectation of some other reward. Therefore, true happiness depended on “rectitude.” Price proposed an ethics of integrity which emphasized the duty of each individual to diligently seek out moral truth and then act upon it. Price believed that the moral duty of the individual, to seek out moral truth and determine his actions by it, grounded the values of political liberty, independence and democracy. | ||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | *Price, Richard; Peach, Bernard W. (Editor). The Correspondence of Richard Price: February 1786-February 1791. Duke Univ Pr (Tx), 1994. ISBN-10: 0822313278 ISBN-13: 978-0822313274 | ||
| + | *Laboucheix, Henri. Richard Price as Moral Philosopher and Political Theorist (Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century,). Voltaire Foundation, 1982. ISBN-10: 0729402851 ISBN-13: 978-0729402859 | ||
| + | *Price, Richard. A free discussion of the doctrines of materialism and philosophical necessity in correspondence with Joseph Priestley, 1778 (British philosophers and theologians of the 17th & 18th centuries). Garland Pub, 1978. ISBN-10: 0824017986 ISBN-13: 978-0824017989 | ||
| + | *Price, Richard; Thomas, D. O. (Editor) Price: Political Writings (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought). Cambridge University Press, 1992. ISBN-10: 0521409691 ISBN-13: 978-0521409698 | ||
| − | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*[[Liberalism]] | *[[Liberalism]] | ||
| − | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
| Line 33: | Line 46: | ||
*[http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/DServe/dserve.exe?dsqIni=Dserve.ini&dsqApp=Archive&dsqCmd=Show.tcl&dsqSearch=RefNo=='EC/1765/21'&dsqDb=Catalog Royal Society certificate of election] | *[http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/DServe/dserve.exe?dsqIni=Dserve.ini&dsqApp=Archive&dsqCmd=Show.tcl&dsqSearch=RefNo=='EC/1765/21'&dsqDb=Catalog Royal Society certificate of election] | ||
| − | |||
*{{1911}} | *{{1911}} | ||
| Line 46: | Line 58: | ||
[[Category:Welsh philosophers|Price, Richard]] | [[Category:Welsh philosophers|Price, Richard]] | ||
[[Category:Natives of Glamorgan|Price, Richard]] | [[Category:Natives of Glamorgan|Price, Richard]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
{{Credit|76431579}} | {{Credit|76431579}} | ||
Revision as of 15:05, 20 January 2007
- This is about the 18th-century philosopher; Richard Price is also the name of a novelist and screenwriter, an American historian at the College of William and Mary, a British historian at the University of Maryland, College Park, a political scientist at the University of British Columbia, and a theoretical physicist at the University of Texas at Brownsville
Richard Price (February 23, 1723 - April 19, 1791), was a Welsh moral and political philosopher, a Dissenting minister and an expert on government finance and insurance whose writings influenced the philosophy and public life of Britain during the late eighteenth century. His ethical treatise, Review of the Principal Questions and Difficulties in Morals (1757) emphasized the role of reason in making moral judgments. He criticized empiricism as not being able to account for morality’s necessity for not providing an adequate explanation for moral agency. Price argued that reason contributed to all knowledge, and that it could intuitively discern certain simple and self-evident ideas, such as right and wrong. In determining moral action, Price removed emotions and feelings from the central position and kept them as accompaniments to rational intuition, arguing that acting according to instincts and feelings would be like following a blind guide in the dark.
Two pamphlets which he published in 1771, Appeal to the Public on the Subject of the National Debt and Observations on Reversionary Payments (1771), influenced William Pitt the Elder in re-establishing the sinking fund for the extinction of the national debt. He became famous for defending the independence of the American colonies in his pamphlet called Observations on the Nature of Civil Liberty, the Principles of Government, and the Justice and Policy of the War with America (1776). He also supported the French Revolution, and was criticized by Edmund Burke in his Reflections on the Revolution in France.
Life
Richard Price was born February 23, 1723, at Tynton, Glamorgan, Wales, the son of a dissenting minister. Educated privately and at a dissenting academy in London, he became chaplain and companion to a Mr Streatfield at Stoke Newington. Streatfield's death and that of an uncle in 1756 improved his circumstances, and on June 16, 1757 he married Sarah Blundell, originally of Belgrave in Leicestershire. A Dissenter like his father, he ministered to Presbyterians near London. In 1758 he published Review of the Principal Questions and Difficulties in Morals, arguing for ethical intuitionism and rationalism, foreshadowing the ethics of Kant.
In 1765 Price was admitted to the Royal Society for his work on probability, which he later used as the basis for a scientific system for life insurance and old age pensions (Observations on Reversionary Payments, 1771). In 1767 Price published a volume of sermons, through which he made the acquaintance of Lord Shelburne; this established his reputation and helped determine the direction of his career. In 1769 Price received the degree of Doctor of Divinity from the University of Glasgow. It was, however, as a writer on financial and political questions that Price became widely known. In 1769, in a letter to Benjamin Franklin, he wrote some observations on the life expectancy, the increase of mankind, and the population of London, which were published in the Philosophical Transactions of that year; in May 1770 he presented a paper to the Royal Society on the proper method of calculating the values of contingent reversions. The publication of these papers helped draw attention to the inadequate calculations on which many insurance and benefit societies had recently been formed. In 1771 he published Appeal to the Public on the Subject of the National Debt (ed. 1772 and 1774). This pamphlet excited considerable controversy, and together with Observations on Reversionary Payments (1771), is supposed to have influenced William Pitt the Elder in re-establishing the sinking fund for the extinction of the national debt, created by Robert Walpole in 1716 and abolished in 1733. (The means proposed for the extinction of the debt were described by Lord Overstone as "a sort of hocus-pocus machinery," supposed to work "without loss to any one," and consequently unsound.)
Price then turned his attention to the question of the American colonies. He had from the first been strongly opposed to the war, and in 1776 he published a pamphlet entitled Observations on Civil Liberty and the Justice and Policy of the War with America. Several thousand copies of this work were sold within a few days, and a cheap edition was soon issued. The pamphlet was extolled by one set of politicians and attacked by another; among its critics were Dr Markham, archbishop of York, John Wesley, and Edmund Burke. Price rapidly became one of the best- known men in England. He was presented with the freedom of the city of London, and his pamphlet was said to have had considerable influence in determining the Americans to declare their independence. A second pamphlet on the war with America, the debts of Great Britain, and related topics followed in the spring of 1777, and Price thus became identified with the cause of American independence. He was the intimate friend of Franklin; he corresponded with Turgot; and in the winter of 1778 he was invited by Congress to go to America and assist in the financial administration of the states. He refused the offer, unwilling to leave his own country and his family connections. In 1781 he received the degree of Doctor of Divinity from Yale College.
One of Price's most intimate friends was Joseph Priestley, in spite of their opposing views on morals and metaphysics. A correspondence between these two liberal theologians on the subjects of materialism and necessity was published in 1778. Price maintained, in opposition to Priestley, the free agency of man and the unity and immateriality of the human soul. Both Price and Priestley were what would now loosely be called "Unitarians," though they occupied respectively the extreme right and the extreme left positions of that school. Price's opinions seem to have been rather Arian than Socinian.
The pamphlets on the American War made Price famous. He preached to crowded congregations, and, when Lord Shelburne rose to power, not only was he offered the post of private secretary to the premier, but it is said that one of the paragraphs in the king's speech was suggested by him and even inserted in his words. In 1786 Mrs. Price died. They had had no children, Price’s own health was failing, and the remainder of his life appears to have been clouded by solitude and dejection. Only the progress of the French Revolution cheered him. On the April 19, 1791 he died, worn out with suffering and disease.
Thought and Works
Much of Price's most important philosophical work was in the field of ethics. Review of the Principal Questions in Morals (1757, 3rd ed. revised 1787) contains his entire theory. The first of its ten chapters, though a small part of the whole, contains a complete demonstration of his ethical theory. The remaining chapters investigate details of minor importance, and are especially interesting as they show his relation to Butler and Kant (ch. iii. and ch. vii.). The work is supposed to be a refutation of Francis Hutcheson, but is more constructive than polemical. The theory he propounds is closely allied to that of Cudworth, but is interesting mainly in comparison with the subsequent theories of Kant.
Price was also a friend of the mathematician and clergyman Thomas Bayes. He edited Bayes' most famous work "Essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances" which contains Bayes' Theorem, one of the most fundamental theorems of probability theory. Price wrote an introduction to Bayes' paper which provides some of the philosophical basis for Bayesian Statistics.
Besides the above-mentioned, Price wrote an Essay on the Population of England (2nd ed., 1780) which directly influenced Thomas Robert Malthus; two Fast-day Sermons, published respectively in 1779 and 1781; and Observations on the importance of the American Revolution and the means of rendering it a benefit to the World (1784). A complete list of his works is given as an appendix to Dr Priestley's Funeral Sermon. His views on the French Revolution are denounced by Burke in his Reflections on the Revolution in France. References to Price's ethical system occur in James Mackintosh's Progress of Ethical Philosophy, Jouffroy's Introduction to Ethics, William Whewell's History of Moral Philosophy in England; Alexander Bain's Mental and Moral Sciences. Price’s nephew, William Morgan, wrote a memoir about his life.
Price’s Theory of Ethics
Price did not like the moral sense theory, especially as advanced by Hume, which favored subjectivism and allowed instinct and feeling to determine human conduct. Price argued that reason contributed to all human knowledge. Reason, not emotion, was authoritative in moral concerns, and it could discern objective moral distinctions. Locke believed that all simple ideas were derived from sensation and reflection; Price held that certain simple and self-evident ideas, such as ideas of right and wrong, were immediately perceived by the understanding. Reason, a distinct intellectual operation, considers the relations among ideas which we already possess. The understanding, however, intuits self-evident ideas which cannot be broken down into mere elements derived from sense-experience. Our “common sense” tells us that the understanding has original and self-evident ideas, which are so basic and simple that they cannot be analyzed further.
Price’s rejection of the moral sense theory did not imply a total rejection of an emotional element in morality. Price removed emotions and feelings from the central position and kept them as accompaniments to rational intuition. Price argued that acting according to instincts and feelings would be like following a blind guide in the dark. Instinct “drives” and “precipitates” action, but reason commands and controls it. Price conceived of happiness as the destiny envisaged for man by divine Providence, and of virtuous action as producing happiness. Virtue would ultimately produce perfect happiness. True virtue meant doing right actions simply because they are right, and not in expectation of some other reward. Therefore, true happiness depended on “rectitude.” Price proposed an ethics of integrity which emphasized the duty of each individual to diligently seek out moral truth and then act upon it. Price believed that the moral duty of the individual, to seek out moral truth and determine his actions by it, grounded the values of political liberty, independence and democracy.
ReferencesISBN links support NWE through referral fees
- Price, Richard; Peach, Bernard W. (Editor). The Correspondence of Richard Price: February 1786-February 1791. Duke Univ Pr (Tx), 1994. ISBN-10: 0822313278 ISBN-13: 978-0822313274
- Laboucheix, Henri. Richard Price as Moral Philosopher and Political Theorist (Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century,). Voltaire Foundation, 1982. ISBN-10: 0729402851 ISBN-13: 978-0729402859
- Price, Richard. A free discussion of the doctrines of materialism and philosophical necessity in correspondence with Joseph Priestley, 1778 (British philosophers and theologians of the 17th & 18th centuries). Garland Pub, 1978. ISBN-10: 0824017986 ISBN-13: 978-0824017989
- Price, Richard; Thomas, D. O. (Editor) Price: Political Writings (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought). Cambridge University Press, 1992. ISBN-10: 0521409691 ISBN-13: 978-0521409698
See also
External links
- This article incorporates text from the Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition, a publication now in the public domain.
Credits
New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:
The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:
Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.
