Difference between revisions of "Evil" - New World Encyclopedia
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
==Moral Evil in Various Areas of Human Life== | ==Moral Evil in Various Areas of Human Life== | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
===Evil from a psychiatric viewpoint=== | ===Evil from a psychiatric viewpoint=== | ||
| Line 48: | Line 44: | ||
* Is unable to think from other people's viewpoints. | * Is unable to think from other people's viewpoints. | ||
| − | Most evil people realize their evil deep within themselves but are unable to tolerate the pain of introspection or admit to themselves that they are evil. Thus, they constantly run away from their evil by putting themselves in a position of "moral superiority" and putting the locus of evil on others. Evil is an extreme form of | + | Most evil people realize their evil deep within themselves but are unable to tolerate the pain of introspection or admit to themselves that they are evil. Thus, they constantly run away from their evil by putting themselves in a position of "moral superiority" and putting the locus of evil on others. Evil is an extreme form of character disorder. |
Scott Peck makes great efforts to keep much of his discussion on a scientific basis. He says that evil arises out of "free choice." He describes it thus: Every person stands at a crossroads, with one path leading to God, and the other path leading to the devil. The path of God is the right path, and accepting this path is akin to submission to a higher power. However, if a person wants to convince himself and others that he has free choice, he would rather take a path which cannot be attributed to its being the ''right'' path. Thus, he chooses the path of evil. In this it is close to the original Judeo-Christian concept of "sin" as a consistent process that leads to failure to reach one's true goals. | Scott Peck makes great efforts to keep much of his discussion on a scientific basis. He says that evil arises out of "free choice." He describes it thus: Every person stands at a crossroads, with one path leading to God, and the other path leading to the devil. The path of God is the right path, and accepting this path is akin to submission to a higher power. However, if a person wants to convince himself and others that he has free choice, he would rather take a path which cannot be attributed to its being the ''right'' path. Thus, he chooses the path of evil. In this it is close to the original Judeo-Christian concept of "sin" as a consistent process that leads to failure to reach one's true goals. | ||
| Line 54: | Line 50: | ||
===Sociopaths=== | ===Sociopaths=== | ||
| − | A sociopath is a person with "antisocial" personality disorder. The basic characteristic of a sociopath is a disregard for the rights of others. It is typified by extreme self-serving behavior and a lack of [[conscience]] as well as an inability to [[empathy|empathize]] with others and to restrain him or herself from, or to feel remorse for, harm personally caused to others. Very often the sociopath may look very charming, friendly, and considerate, but these attitudes turn out to be superficial and even deceptice. They are used as a way of pulling and blinding others to the personal | + | A sociopath is a person with "antisocial" personality disorder, which is a bit more serious than M. Scott Peck's notion of evil above. The basic characteristic of a sociopath is a disregard for the rights of others. It is typified by extreme self-serving behavior and a lack of [[conscience]] as well as an inability to [[empathy|empathize]] with others and to restrain him or herself from, or to feel remorse for, harm personally caused to others. Very often the sociopath may look very charming, friendly, and considerate, but these attitudes turn out to be superficial and even deceptice. They are used as a way of pulling and blinding others to the personal sociopathic agenda behind the surface. Many sociopaths are engaged in alchohol or drug use as a way of heightening their antisocial personality. They want to heighten their antisocial personality because they usually have a low self-esteem, for which they try to compensate through the use of these substrances. |
Some [[sociology|sociologists]], [[psychiatry|psychiatrists]] and [[neuroscience|neuroscientists]] have attempted to construct scientific explanations for the development of antisocial personality disorder. Although any diagnosis of sociopathy is sometimes criticized as being, at the present time, no more scientific than calling a person "evil," nevertheless it seems that sociopathy has something to do with moral evil, as long is its basic characteristic is a disregard for the rights of other people. | Some [[sociology|sociologists]], [[psychiatry|psychiatrists]] and [[neuroscience|neuroscientists]] have attempted to construct scientific explanations for the development of antisocial personality disorder. Although any diagnosis of sociopathy is sometimes criticized as being, at the present time, no more scientific than calling a person "evil," nevertheless it seems that sociopathy has something to do with moral evil, as long is its basic characteristic is a disregard for the rights of other people. | ||
| Line 60: | Line 56: | ||
===Evil in business=== | ===Evil in business=== | ||
| − | In business, evil refers to unfair business practices. The most widely agreed on unfair practices are [[sweatshop]]s and [[monopoly|monopolies]], but recently the term "evil" has been applied much more broadly, especially in the [[technology]] and [[intellectual property]] industries. One of the slogans of [[Google]] is "Don't Be Evil," in response to much-criticized technology companies such as [[Microsoft]] and [[AOL]], and the tagline of independent music recording company | + | In business, evil refers to unfair business practices. The most widely agreed on unfair practices are [[sweatshop]]s and [[monopoly|monopolies]], but recently the term "evil" has been applied much more broadly, especially in the [[technology]] and [[intellectual property]] industries. One of the slogans of [[Google]] is "Don't Be Evil," in response to much-criticized technology companies such as [[Microsoft]] and [[AOL]], and the tagline of independent music recording company Magnatune is "we are not evil," referring to the alleged evils of the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA). The economist [[David Korten]] has argued that industrial [[corporations]], set up as fictive individuals by law, are required to work only according to the criteria of making [[profit]]s for their shareholders, meaning they function as sociopathic organizations that inherently do evil in damaging the [[environmentalism|environment]], denying labor justice and exploiting the powerless. |
| + | |||
| + | ===Evil in a political context=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | In liberal-democratic societies, many associate evil in politics, as revolving around authoritarian and especially totalitarian regimes, and demagogue leaders, such as the [[Nazi]] regime of [[Adolf Hitler]] in Germany for its mass genocide of Jews in the [[Holocaust]], war crimes, as well as political and cultural persecution. In World War II and the post war years to present liberal-democratic societies view Hitler as a symbol of political and social evil in the modern world and is portrayed as such in most media presentations and representations of him. The [[Communism|Communist]] regime of the [[Soviet Union]] has also been considered to be evil by a number of western liberal democracies, especially under the rule of [[Joseph Stalin]] for its mass persecutions of political opponents, religious, and cultural minorities (e.g., the Cossacks). | ||
| + | |||
| + | The political writings of [[Niccolò Machiavelli]] (1469-1527) in ''The Prince'' often used by [[Hitler]] and [[Mussolini]], are considered to be a source of evil in politics, as they often speak of ignoring accepted morals for the pursuit of ultimate power, as "the ends justifies the means." Machiavelli favoured a prince creating a climate of fear in order to rule a population, rather than relying on popular support. Machiavelli supports the use of deception and manipulation as means to increase a prince's personal power. All these show little concern for traditional moral and ethical considerations in the thinking of Machiavelli. Thus when the term Machiavellian is used to describe politicians or political policy, it is often being used in a negative context, referring to Machiavelli's support of deception and manipulation to attain and preserve power. | ||
| + | |||
| + | On the other hand, [[authoritarian]], [[totalitarian]], and elements of [[religious fundamentalism]] regimes tend to hold a common view that liberal-democratic regimes are evil and blame liberal democracy for high crime rates, profiteering, corporate crime, materialist individualism replacing common bonds of similar people, destruction of culture and its replacement with sleaze. All of which, the regimes claim will result in the destruction of humanity if liberal democracy is not restrained. | ||
==The Criterion of Evil== | ==The Criterion of Evil== | ||
| Line 69: | Line 73: | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
| + | <references/> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| Line 103: | Line 108: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{credits|Evi|141682992|M._Scott_Peck|138033781}} |
Revision as of 18:55, 1 July 2007
Evil is understood to be of three kinds: 1) moral evil, 2) natural evil, and 3) metaphysical evil. Moral evil is evil human beings volitionally and intentionally originate, and its examples are their cruel, vicious, and unjust thoughts and actions. Natural evil is evil which occurs independently of human thoughts and actions but which causes pain and suffering, and it refers to earthquakes, volcanos, storms, droughts, disease bacilli, etc. "Metaphysical evil," a term coined by Gottfried Leibniz, refers to the finite and limited condition of the created world of time and space, thus being usually understood not to be evil in and by itself.
The monotheistic religions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam usually have a standatd of good and a standard of evil centering on a good God and tend to stress the seriousness of moral evil according to these standards, basically treating other kinds of evil only in the context of moral evil. By contrast, non-monotheistic religions are inclined to pay more attention to natural and metaphysical evil, saying that evil (i.e., natural and metaphysical evil) is ultimately unreal. Today, evil is much discussed in psychology, sociology, business, and politics, and evil in these areas tends to refer to moral evil.
The monotheistic traditions, however, sometimes treat moral evil as something not necessarily negative. There are two ways in which they treat it so: 1)
Etymology
The modern English word 'Evil' (Old English Yfel) and its current living cognates such as the German 'Übel' are widely considered to come from a Proto-Germanic reconstructed form *Ubilaz, comparable to the Hittite huwapp- ultimately from the Proto-Indo-European form *wap- and suffixed zero-grade form *up-elo-. Other later Germanic forms include Middle English evel, ifel, ufel Old Frisian evel (adjective & noun), Old Saxon ubil, Old High German ubil, and Gothic ubils. The root meaning is of obscure origin though shown to be akin to modern English 'over' (OE ofer) and 'up' (OE up, upp) with the basic idea of "transgressing".
The Kinds of Evil
Evil as a Religious Concept
Judaism
Christianity
Islam
Zoroastrianism
Hinduism
Buddhism
Confucianism
Moral Evil in Various Areas of Human Life
Evil from a psychiatric viewpoint
M. Scott Peck (1936-2005) discusses evil in his book People of the Lie: The Hope For Healing Human Evil.[1] Most of his conclusions about the psychiatric condition he designates evil are derived from his close study of one patient he names Charlene. Although Charlene is not dangerous, she is ultimately unable to have empathy for others in any way. According to Peck, people like her see others as play things or tools to be manipulated for their uses or entertainment. He claims that these people are rarely seen by psychiatrists and have never been treated successfully.
He gives some identifying characteristics for evil persons. An evil person:
- Projects his or her evils and sins onto others and tries to remove them from others;
- Maintains a high level of respectability and lies incessantly in order to do so;
- Is consistent in his or her sins. Evil persons are characterized not so much by the magnitude of their sins, but by their consistency;
- Is unable to think from other people's viewpoints.
Most evil people realize their evil deep within themselves but are unable to tolerate the pain of introspection or admit to themselves that they are evil. Thus, they constantly run away from their evil by putting themselves in a position of "moral superiority" and putting the locus of evil on others. Evil is an extreme form of character disorder.
Scott Peck makes great efforts to keep much of his discussion on a scientific basis. He says that evil arises out of "free choice." He describes it thus: Every person stands at a crossroads, with one path leading to God, and the other path leading to the devil. The path of God is the right path, and accepting this path is akin to submission to a higher power. However, if a person wants to convince himself and others that he has free choice, he would rather take a path which cannot be attributed to its being the right path. Thus, he chooses the path of evil. In this it is close to the original Judeo-Christian concept of "sin" as a consistent process that leads to failure to reach one's true goals.
Sociopaths
A sociopath is a person with "antisocial" personality disorder, which is a bit more serious than M. Scott Peck's notion of evil above. The basic characteristic of a sociopath is a disregard for the rights of others. It is typified by extreme self-serving behavior and a lack of conscience as well as an inability to empathize with others and to restrain him or herself from, or to feel remorse for, harm personally caused to others. Very often the sociopath may look very charming, friendly, and considerate, but these attitudes turn out to be superficial and even deceptice. They are used as a way of pulling and blinding others to the personal sociopathic agenda behind the surface. Many sociopaths are engaged in alchohol or drug use as a way of heightening their antisocial personality. They want to heighten their antisocial personality because they usually have a low self-esteem, for which they try to compensate through the use of these substrances.
Some sociologists, psychiatrists and neuroscientists have attempted to construct scientific explanations for the development of antisocial personality disorder. Although any diagnosis of sociopathy is sometimes criticized as being, at the present time, no more scientific than calling a person "evil," nevertheless it seems that sociopathy has something to do with moral evil, as long is its basic characteristic is a disregard for the rights of other people.
Evil in business
In business, evil refers to unfair business practices. The most widely agreed on unfair practices are sweatshops and monopolies, but recently the term "evil" has been applied much more broadly, especially in the technology and intellectual property industries. One of the slogans of Google is "Don't Be Evil," in response to much-criticized technology companies such as Microsoft and AOL, and the tagline of independent music recording company Magnatune is "we are not evil," referring to the alleged evils of the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA). The economist David Korten has argued that industrial corporations, set up as fictive individuals by law, are required to work only according to the criteria of making profits for their shareholders, meaning they function as sociopathic organizations that inherently do evil in damaging the environment, denying labor justice and exploiting the powerless.
Evil in a political context
In liberal-democratic societies, many associate evil in politics, as revolving around authoritarian and especially totalitarian regimes, and demagogue leaders, such as the Nazi regime of Adolf Hitler in Germany for its mass genocide of Jews in the Holocaust, war crimes, as well as political and cultural persecution. In World War II and the post war years to present liberal-democratic societies view Hitler as a symbol of political and social evil in the modern world and is portrayed as such in most media presentations and representations of him. The Communist regime of the Soviet Union has also been considered to be evil by a number of western liberal democracies, especially under the rule of Joseph Stalin for its mass persecutions of political opponents, religious, and cultural minorities (e.g., the Cossacks).
The political writings of Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527) in The Prince often used by Hitler and Mussolini, are considered to be a source of evil in politics, as they often speak of ignoring accepted morals for the pursuit of ultimate power, as "the ends justifies the means." Machiavelli favoured a prince creating a climate of fear in order to rule a population, rather than relying on popular support. Machiavelli supports the use of deception and manipulation as means to increase a prince's personal power. All these show little concern for traditional moral and ethical considerations in the thinking of Machiavelli. Thus when the term Machiavellian is used to describe politicians or political policy, it is often being used in a negative context, referring to Machiavelli's support of deception and manipulation to attain and preserve power.
On the other hand, authoritarian, totalitarian, and elements of religious fundamentalism regimes tend to hold a common view that liberal-democratic regimes are evil and blame liberal democracy for high crime rates, profiteering, corporate crime, materialist individualism replacing common bonds of similar people, destruction of culture and its replacement with sleaze. All of which, the regimes claim will result in the destruction of humanity if liberal democracy is not restrained.
The Criterion of Evil
The Virulence of Evil
The Source of Evil
Notes
- ↑ (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1983).
ReferencesISBN links support NWE through referral fees
- Cenkner, William. 1998. Evil and the Response of World Religion. Continuum International. ISBN 1557787530
- Kelly, Joseph F. 2003. The Problem of Evil in the Western Tradition: From the Book of Job to Modern Genetics. Liturgical Press. ISBN 0-8146-5104-6
- Marc-Alain Ouaknin, Marc-Alain, Levenson, Claude B., Le Gall, Dom Robert, Chebel, Malek, Ouaknin Marc-Alain. 2005. The Great Religions: Essential Questions. Assouline. ISBN 2843236118
- Smith, Huston. 1997. Good and Evil in the World's Religions. Chautauqua audio cassette program, 97-139. Chautauqua Institution. OCLC 39783291
- Rosenberg, Shalom. 1989. Good and Evil in Jewish Thought. Tel Aviv: MOD Books. ISBN 9650504486
- Kushner, Harold S. 2000. When Bad Things Happen to Good People. London: Pan. ISBN 0330268279
- Shermer, M. 2004. The Science of Good & Evil. New York: Time Books. ISBN 0-8050-7520-8
- Ferré, Nels F. S. 1971. Evil and the Christian Faith. Essay index reprint series. Books for Libraries Press. ISBN 0836923936
- McCloskey, H. J. 1974. God and Evil. The Hague: Nijhoff. ISBN 9024716047
- Wilson, William McF., and Julian N. Hartt. "Farrer's Theodicy." In David Hein and Edward Hugh Henderson (eds), Captured by the Crucified: The Practical Theology of Austin Farrer. New York and London: T & T Clark / Continuum, 2004. ISBN 0-567-02510-1
- Peterson, Michael L. 1998. God and Evil: An Introduction to the Issues. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press. ISBN 0813328497
- Rosenberg, Marshall B. 2003. Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life: Create Your Life, Your Relationships, and Your World in Harmony with Your Values. Puddledancer Press ISBN 1892005034
- Rosenberg, Marshall B. 2005. Speak Peace in a World of Conflict : What You Say Next Will Change Your World. PuddleDancer Press. ISBN 1892005174
- Ellis, Albert, and Robert Allan Harper. 1975. A New Guide to Rational Living. Prentice-Hall. ISBN 013614909X
- Wolman, Benjamin B. 1971. The Psychoanalytic Interpretation of History. Basic Books. ISBN 0465065937
- Plantinga, Alvin. 1997. God, Freedom, and Evil. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company ISBN 0802817319
- Peck, M. Scott. 1983. People of the Lie: The Hope for Healing Human Evil. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 0671454927
- Oppenheimer, Paul (1996). Evil and the Demonic: A New Theory of Monstrous Behavior. New York: New York University Press. ISBN 0-8147-6193-3.
- Nelson, Marie Coleman, and Michael Eigen. 1984. Evil:Self and Culture. Human Sciences Press. ISBN 0898851432
External links
- Robinson, B.A. 2005. http://www.religioustolerance.org/reac_ter3.htm Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance. Theodicy: Why Doesn't God Prevent Evil. Retrieved March 13, 2007.
- http://www.chabad.org/search/keyword.asp?kid=1229 Chabad-Lubavitch Media Center. (2001-2007) Chabad.org. Retrieved March 13, 2007.
- Valea, Ernest. 2007. http://www.comparativereligion.com/evil.html The Problem of Evil in World Religions. Retrieved March 13, 2007.
- Faulkner, Joyce. 2003. http://www.curledup.com/religion.htm Curled up With a Good Book. Review of When Religion Becomes Evil. Retrieved March 13, 2007.
- Eby, Lloyd. http://www.tparents.org/Library/Unification/Talks/Eby/Eby-Theodicy-c.htm Unification Sermon The Problem of Evil and the Goodness of God (Part 3). Retrieved March 13, 2007.
Credits
New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:
The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:
Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.
