Difference between revisions of "Action (philosophy)" - New World Encyclopedia
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{merge|action (philosophy)}} | {{merge|action (philosophy)}} | ||
{{Contracted}} | {{Contracted}} | ||
− | '''[[Philosophy]] of action''' is chiefly concerned with human action, intending to distinguish between activity and passivity, voluntary, intentional, culpable and involuntary actions, and related questions. Though these issues have been discussed in nearly every era of philosophy, the topic of action began to receive special attention in the 1960's, and is becoming one of the major sub-disciplines in contemporary philosophy. | + | '''[[Philosophy]] of action''' is chiefly concerned with human action, intending to distinguish between activity and passivity, voluntary, intentional, culpable and involuntary actions, and related questions. Though these issues have been discussed in nearly every era of philosophy, the topic of action began to receive special attention in the 1960's, and is becoming one of the major sub-disciplines in contemporary philosophy. This article is primarily concerned with the more recent developments. |
+ | ==Action in the History of Philosophy== | ||
− | + | Since action has ties to central human concerns such as responsibility and autonomy, it has been discussed in nearly every philosophical tradition. Furthermore, most metaphysical, epistemological and ethical views carry implications for our understanding of action (and vice-versa). A survey of philosophical discussions of action would therefore amount to a survey of nearly all of philosophy. A brief note must therefore suffice. | |
− | |||
− | + | Action has been of concern to [[Western world|Western]] philosophers at least since [[Aristotle]], who wrote about the subject in his [[Nicomachean Ethics]]. It is the theme of the [[Hindu]] epic [[Bhagavad Gita]], in which the [[Sanskrit]] word [[karma]] epitomizes personal action. It has nearly always been bound up with [[Ethics]], the study of what actions one ''ought'' to perform. | |
− | |||
− | + | Many branches of [[Buddhism]] reject the notion of agency in varying degrees. In these schools of thought there is action, but no [[agent]]. [[Taoism]] has famously championed "inaction" as an ideal. | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | ==Action vs. Mere Behavior== | |
+ | |||
+ | In §621 of the ''Philosophical Investigations'', Wittgenstein posed a question: "What is left over if I subtract the fact that my arm goes up from the fact that I raise my arm?" | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==The Metaphysics of Action== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Causalism vs. Non-causalism=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===The Individuation of Actions=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Action an Determinism=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==The Epistemology of Action== | ||
+ | |||
+ | In her short but extremely influential work ''Intention'', G. E. M. Anscombe claimed that we have knowledge of our own actions "without observation." | ||
== Philosophers concerned with action == | == Philosophers concerned with action == | ||
Line 28: | Line 37: | ||
* [[Harry Frankfurt]] | * [[Harry Frankfurt]] | ||
* [[David Hume]] | * [[David Hume]] | ||
+ | * [[Aristotle]] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
Line 51: | Line 52: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
== See also == | == See also == |
Revision as of 20:29, 5 June 2006
{{#invoke:Message box|ambox}}
Philosophy of action is chiefly concerned with human action, intending to distinguish between activity and passivity, voluntary, intentional, culpable and involuntary actions, and related questions. Though these issues have been discussed in nearly every era of philosophy, the topic of action began to receive special attention in the 1960's, and is becoming one of the major sub-disciplines in contemporary philosophy. This article is primarily concerned with the more recent developments.
Action in the History of Philosophy
Since action has ties to central human concerns such as responsibility and autonomy, it has been discussed in nearly every philosophical tradition. Furthermore, most metaphysical, epistemological and ethical views carry implications for our understanding of action (and vice-versa). A survey of philosophical discussions of action would therefore amount to a survey of nearly all of philosophy. A brief note must therefore suffice.
Action has been of concern to Western philosophers at least since Aristotle, who wrote about the subject in his Nicomachean Ethics. It is the theme of the Hindu epic Bhagavad Gita, in which the Sanskrit word karma epitomizes personal action. It has nearly always been bound up with Ethics, the study of what actions one ought to perform.
Many branches of Buddhism reject the notion of agency in varying degrees. In these schools of thought there is action, but no agent. Taoism has famously championed "inaction" as an ideal.
Action vs. Mere Behavior
In §621 of the Philosophical Investigations, Wittgenstein posed a question: "What is left over if I subtract the fact that my arm goes up from the fact that I raise my arm?"
The Metaphysics of Action
Causalism vs. Non-causalism
The Individuation of Actions
Action an Determinism
The Epistemology of Action
In her short but extremely influential work Intention, G. E. M. Anscombe claimed that we have knowledge of our own actions "without observation."
Philosophers concerned with action
- G. E. M. Anscombe
- Michael Bratman
- John Broome
- August Cieszkowski
- Donald Davidson
- Harry Frankfurt
- David Hume
- Aristotle
ReferencesISBN links support NWE through referral fees
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Action, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/action/
- Mele, Alfred (ed.): The Philosophy of Action, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997
See also
- social action
External links
Credits
New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:
The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:
Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.