A Slavophile was a member of an intellectual movement in nineteenth century Imperial Russia that wanted the Russian Empire to be developed upon values and institutions derived from its early history. Slavophiles were especially opposed to Western European culture and its influences in Russia. From the time of Peter the Great and his "window on the West," Russia began a process of Westernization intended to bring the benefits of Western political and social institutions to Russia. This created an ongoing tension between those wished to integrate Russia into Western culture and those who saw the resisted Westernization in favor of Russia's own national traditions.
Even some of the Slavophiles wished to have for Russia the benefits of Western democracy, but they saw in Western culture a tendency toward individualism which they considered to be anathema to the Russian spirit. Many saw in the Russian peasant commune an idealistic model that could serve as the basis for Russian society.
As an intellectual movement, Slavophilism was developed in nineteenth century Russia. In a sense there was not one but many slavophile movements, or many branches of the same movement. Some were to the left of the political spectrum, noting that progressive ideas such as democracy were intrinsic to the Russian experience, as proved by what they considered to be the rough democracy of medieval Novgorod. Some were to the right of the spectrum and pointed to the centuries old tradition of the autocratic Tsar and the Russian Orthodox Church as expressing the essence of the Russian душа, or soul. The Slavophiles were determined to protect what they believed were unique Russian traditions and culture. In doing so they rejected the individualism of Western culture. The role of the Orthodox Church was considered even more significant than the role of the state. Socialism was opposed by Slavophiles as an alien thought, and Russian mysticism was preferred over Western rationalism. Rural life was praised by the movement, opposing industrialization as well as urban development, while protection of the мир (mir), or peasant commune (rural society) was seen as an important measure to prevent growth of the proletariat.
The movement originated in Moscow in the 1830s. Drawing on the works of Greek patristics, the poet Aleksey Khomyakov (1804-1860) and his devoutly Orthodox colleagues elaborated a traditionalistic doctrine that claimed Russia has its own distinct way, which doesn't have to imitate and mimic Western institutions. The Russian Slavophiles denounced Western culture and "westernizations" by Peter the Great and Catherine the Great, and some of them even adopted traditional pre-Petrine dress.
The doctrines of Aleksey Khomyakov, Ivan Kireevsky (1806-1856), Konstantin Aksakov (1817-1860) and other Slavophiles had a deep impact on Russian culture, including the Russian Revival school of architecture, The Mighty Five of Russian composers, the novelist Nikolai Gogol, the poet Fyodor Tyutchev, the lexicographer Vladimir Dahl, and others. Their struggle for purity of the Russian language had something in common with aesthetic views of Leo Tolstoy.
The term Соборность, or Sobornost', was coined by the early Slavophiles, Ivan Kireevsky and Aleksey Khomyakov, to designate cooperation within the Russian Община, or obshchina, the peasant commune. This term was used to underline the need for cooperation between people at the expense of individualism on the basis that the opposing groups focus on what is common between them. Slavophiles saw in the peasant commune a community united by a set of common convictions and Orthodox Christian values, as opposed to the cult of individualism in the West. Khomyakov believed the West was progressively losing its unity. According to Khomyakov this stemmed from the west embracing Aristotle and his defining individualism, although Kireevsky believed that Hegel and Aristotle represented the same ideal of reconciliation.
In the sphere of foreign relations, the Slavophilism manifested itself as a pan-Slavic movement for the unification of all Slavic people under leadership of the Russian tsar and for the liberation of the Balkan Slavs from the Ottoman yoke. The Russo-Turkish War, 1877-1878 is usually considered a high point of this militant Slavophilism, as expounded by the charismatic commander Mikhail Skobelev. The attitude towards other nations with Slavic origins varied, depending on the group involved. Classical Slavophiles believed that "Slavdom," that is the common identity to all people of Slavic origin alleged by Slavophile movement, was based on Orthodox religion.
The Russian Empire ruled over millions of Ukrainians, Poles and Belarussians, that had their own national identities, traditions and religions. Towards Ukrainians and Belarussians, the Slavophiles developed the view that they are part of the same "Great Russian" nation, Belarussian translates to "White Russian" and Ukrainians were "Little Russians." Slavophile thinkers such as Mikhail Katkov believed that both nations should be ruled under Russian leadership and are an essential part of Russian state. At the same time they denied the separate cultural identity of Ukrainian and Belarussian people, believing their national as well as language and literary aspirations are result of "Polish intrigue" that aims at separating them from Russians. Other Slavophiles like Ivan Aksakov recognized the right of Ukrainians to use Ukrainian language, however seeing it as completely unnecessary and harmful. Aksakov however did see some use of "Malorussian" language as practical, it would be beneficial in struggle against "Polish civilizational element in the western provinces"
Besides Ukrainians and Belarussians, the Russian Empire also included Poles, whose country was gone after being partitioned by three neighboring states, including Russia, which after decisions of Congress of Vienna expanded into more Polish inhabited territories. Poles proved to be a problem for the ideology of Slavophilism
The very name Slavophiles indicated that the characteristics of the Slavs were based from their ethnicity, but at the same time Slavophiles believed that Orthodoxy equaled Slavdom. This belief was opposed by very existence of Poles within Russian Empire, who while having Slavic origins were also deeply Roman Catholic, the catholic faith forming one of core values of Polish national identity
Also while Slavophiles praised the leadership of Russia over other nations of Slavic origins, the Poles very identity was based on West European culture and values and resistance to Russia was seen by them as resistance to something representing alien way of life. As a result Slavophiles were particularly hostile to Polish nation often emotionally attacking it in their writings
When the Polish uprising of 1861 started, Slavophiles used anti-Polish sentiment to create feelings of national unity in Russian people, and the idea of cultural union of all Slavs was abandoned.
With that Poland became firmly established to Slavophiles as symbol of Catholicism and Western Europe, that they detested, and as Poles were never assimilated within the Russian Empire, constantly resisting Russian occupation of their country, in the end Slavophiles came to belief that annexation of Poland was a mistake due to fact that Polish nation couldn't be russified.
"After the struggle with Poles, Slavophiles expressed their belief, that notwithstanding the goal of conquering Constantinopol, the future conflict would be made between "Teutonic race"(Germans), and "Slavs," Chief and the movement turned into Germanophobia
It should be noted that most Slavophiles were liberals and ardently supported the emancipation of serfs, which was finally realized in emancipation reform of 1861. Press censorship, serfdom, and capital punishment were viewed as baneful Western influences. Their political ideal was a parliamentary monarchy, as represented by the medieval Zemsky Sobors.
New Slavophile thinkers appeared in 1870s and 1880s represented by scholars like Nikolay Danilevsky and K. Leontiev. Danilevsky promoted autocracy and imperialistic expansion as part of Russian national interest. Leontiev believed in a police state ideology aimed at preventing European influences from reaching Russia.  This new generation adopted the term pochvennichestvo.
Pochvennichestvo (from the Russian word for soil) was a late nineteenth century Russian nativist movement tied in closely with its contemporary ideology, the Slavophile movement. Both were for the complete emancipation of serfdom, and both campaigns stressed a strong desire to return to the idealized past of Russia's history, and both were driven towards anti-Europeanization. In addition, they also chose a complete rejection of the Nihilist and radical movements of the time. The primary focus was instead to change Russian society through the humbling of the self, and social reform through the Russian Orthodox church, rather than the radical implementations of the intelligentsia.
The major difference between the Slavophiles and the Pochvennichestvo was that the Slavophile group detested the reforms of Peter the Great while the latter recognized the benefits introduced by the notorious ruler, while still maintaining a strong patriotic mentality for the Russian people. Another major difference was that some of the movement's supporters adopted a strong [[antisemitism}anti-semitic]] stance.
The concept had its roots in the works of the German philosopher Johann Gottfried Herder which focused primarily on emphasizing the differences amongst people and regional cultures. In addition it rejected the universalism of the Enlightenment period. The most prominent Russian intellectuals who founded this ideology were Nikolay Strakhov, Nikolay Danilevsky and Konstantin Leontyev. The ideology was later adopted by Alexander III and Nicholas II. After the Russian Revolution of 1917, it was further developed by émigré religious philosophers like Ivan Ilyin (1883-1954).
All links Retrieved July 7, 2008.
New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:
Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.