Difference between revisions of "Formal system" - New World Encyclopedia
({{Contracted}}) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Contracted}} | {{Contracted}} | ||
| − | In | + | In [[logic]] and [[mathematics]], together with the allied branches of [[computer science]], [[information theory]], and [[statistics]], a '''formal system''' is an idealized and abstract language or [[formal grammar]] used for modeling purposes. '''Formalization''' is the act of creating a formal system, in an attempt to capture the essential features of a real-world or conceptual system in [[formal language]]. A [[model]] is a structure that can be used to provide an interpretation of the abstract or symbolic language that is embodied in the formal system. |
| − | In [[mathematics]], formal proofs are the product of formal systems, consisting of [[axiom]]s and rules of deduction. Theorems are then recognized as the possible 'last lines' of formal proofs. The point of view that this picture encompasses mathematics has been called [[formalist]]. | + | Formal systems have the virtue that absolutely certain proofs—or absolutely certain knowledge—can be found within them, and nowhere else. If the formal system is itself consistent, then it is possible to prove, within the given system, that a given conclusion follows from given premises. This means that, within that system, if the given premises are true, then the conclusion cannot be false. Thus we have absolutely certain knowledge that this conclusion is true if the premises are true. This is, of course, a highly restricted notion of certain (absolute) knowledge, but it is the only place or domain in which genuine or unassailable or unquestionable absolute knowledge exists, despite all claims to the contrary. |
| + | |||
| + | In [[mathematics]], formal proofs are the product of formal systems, consisting of [[axiom]]s and rules of deduction. Theorems are then recognized as the possible 'last lines' of formal proofs. The point of view that this picture encompasses in mathematics has been called [[formalist]]. That term has been used both approvingly and pejoratively. On the other hand, [[David Hilbert]] founded [[metamathematics]] as a discipline designed for discussing formal systems; it is not assumed that the [[metalanguage]] in which proofs are studied is itself less informal than the usual habits of mathematicians suggest. To contrast with the metalanguage, or language in which the formal system is itself stated, the language described by a formal grammar is often called an '''object language''' (i.e., the object of discussion - this distinction may have been introduced by [[Carnap]]). | ||
It has become common to speak of '''a formalism''', more-or-less synonymously with a formal system ''within standard mathematics'' invented for a particular purpose. This may not be much more than a '''notation''', such as [[Dirac]]'s [[bra-ket notation]]. | It has become common to speak of '''a formalism''', more-or-less synonymously with a formal system ''within standard mathematics'' invented for a particular purpose. This may not be much more than a '''notation''', such as [[Dirac]]'s [[bra-ket notation]]. | ||
| Line 12: | Line 14: | ||
# A set of [[rule of inference|inference rules]]. | # A set of [[rule of inference|inference rules]]. | ||
# A set of theorems. This set includes all the axioms, plus all ''wff''s which can be derived from previously-derived theorems by means of rules of inference. Unlike the grammar for ''wff''s, there is no guarantee that there will be a [[decidability|decision procedure]] for deciding whether a given ''wff'' is a theorem or not. | # A set of theorems. This set includes all the axioms, plus all ''wff''s which can be derived from previously-derived theorems by means of rules of inference. Unlike the grammar for ''wff''s, there is no guarantee that there will be a [[decidability|decision procedure]] for deciding whether a given ''wff'' is a theorem or not. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | *The ''Journal of Symbolic Logic'' has been a repository of literature on formal systems. | ||
| + | *Addison, John, Leon Henkin, and Alfred Tarski, eds., ''Proceedings of the International Symposium of the Theory of Models, Berkeley, 1963'', Amsterdam: Dordchrect, 1965. | ||
[[Category:Formal languages]] | [[Category:Formal languages]] | ||
Revision as of 17:15, 16 March 2007
In logic and mathematics, together with the allied branches of computer science, information theory, and statistics, a formal system is an idealized and abstract language or formal grammar used for modeling purposes. Formalization is the act of creating a formal system, in an attempt to capture the essential features of a real-world or conceptual system in formal language. A model is a structure that can be used to provide an interpretation of the abstract or symbolic language that is embodied in the formal system.
Formal systems have the virtue that absolutely certain proofs—or absolutely certain knowledge—can be found within them, and nowhere else. If the formal system is itself consistent, then it is possible to prove, within the given system, that a given conclusion follows from given premises. This means that, within that system, if the given premises are true, then the conclusion cannot be false. Thus we have absolutely certain knowledge that this conclusion is true if the premises are true. This is, of course, a highly restricted notion of certain (absolute) knowledge, but it is the only place or domain in which genuine or unassailable or unquestionable absolute knowledge exists, despite all claims to the contrary.
In mathematics, formal proofs are the product of formal systems, consisting of axioms and rules of deduction. Theorems are then recognized as the possible 'last lines' of formal proofs. The point of view that this picture encompasses in mathematics has been called formalist. That term has been used both approvingly and pejoratively. On the other hand, David Hilbert founded metamathematics as a discipline designed for discussing formal systems; it is not assumed that the metalanguage in which proofs are studied is itself less informal than the usual habits of mathematicians suggest. To contrast with the metalanguage, or language in which the formal system is itself stated, the language described by a formal grammar is often called an object language (i.e., the object of discussion - this distinction may have been introduced by Carnap).
It has become common to speak of a formalism, more-or-less synonymously with a formal system within standard mathematics invented for a particular purpose. This may not be much more than a notation, such as Dirac's bra-ket notation.
Mathematical formal systems consist of the following:
- A finite set of symbols which can be used for constructing formulae.
- A grammar, i.e. a way of constructing well-formed formulae out of the symbols, such that it is possible to find a decision procedure for deciding whether a formula is a well-formed formula (wff) or not.
- A set of axioms or axiom schemata: each axiom has to be a wff.
- A set of inference rules.
- A set of theorems. This set includes all the axioms, plus all wffs which can be derived from previously-derived theorems by means of rules of inference. Unlike the grammar for wffs, there is no guarantee that there will be a decision procedure for deciding whether a given wff is a theorem or not.
ReferencesISBN links support NWE through referral fees
- The Journal of Symbolic Logic has been a repository of literature on formal systems.
- Addison, John, Leon Henkin, and Alfred Tarski, eds., Proceedings of the International Symposium of the Theory of Models, Berkeley, 1963, Amsterdam: Dordchrect, 1965.
Credits
New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:
The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:
Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.
