Difference between revisions of "Charisma" - New World Encyclopedia
m (→External Links) |
m (→External Links) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{Claimed}}{{Started}}{{Contracted}} | {{Claimed}}{{Started}}{{Contracted}} | ||
| − | The term '''charisma''' originates from the [[Greek language|Greek]] word χάρισμα meaning "gift" or "divine favor" and most often refers to a rare trait found in certain human personalities which can include extreme charm, a "magnetic" quality of personality and/or appearance, and an innate and powerfully sophisticated personal communicability and persuasiveness. | + | The term '''charisma''' originates from the [[Greek language|Greek]] word χάρισμα meaning "gift" or "divine favor" and most often refers to a rare trait found in certain human personalities which can include extreme charm, a "magnetic" quality of personality and/or appearance, and an innate and powerfully sophisticated personal communicability and persuasiveness. Charisma is often used to describe a seemingly uncanny ability of one to charm or influence other people. It refers especially to a quality in certain people who easily draw the attention and admiration, or in negative cases hatred, of others due to an alluring quality of personality. Other similar terms or phrases related to charisma can include: [[grace]], exuberance, [[equanimity]], [[mystique]], positive energy, "right stuff," joie de vivre, [[charm]], personal magnetism, personal appeal, "electricity," and [[allure]]. Many of these qualities must be present within an individual in order for the person to be considered 'charismatic' by the public and their peers. |
==Characteristics== | ==Characteristics== | ||
| − | [[Image:Bloch-SermonOnTheMount.jpg|thumb|300px|right|[[Jesus]] is considered by many to be an example of a | + | [[Image:Bloch-SermonOnTheMount.jpg|thumb|300px|right|[[Jesus]] is considered by many to be an example of a charismatic authority.]] |
| − | + | Charismatic individuals generally project unusual confidence, serenity, assertiveness, authenticity, and focus, along with superb communication skills. To the early Greeks, charisma was said to be a "gift of grace," implying that this "divine quality" was an inborn trait. Today, many believe charisma can be taught or even learned, despite a persistent inability to accurately define or even fully understand the complex term. In many individuals, the use of charisma can lead to the development of a [[charismatic authority]] which may allow the individual to influence and lead others. | |
| − | Charismatic individuals generally project unusual confidence, serenity, assertiveness, authenticity, and focus, along with superb communication skills. To the early Greeks, charisma was said to be a "gift of grace," implying that this "divine quality" was an inborn trait. Today, many believe charisma can be taught or even learned, despite a persistent inability to accurately define or even fully understand the complex term. In many individuals, the use of charisma can lead to the development of a [[ | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
The study, recognition, and development of charisma in individuals is of particular interest to [[sociologist]]s, [[psychologist]]s, popular [[politician]]s, [[public speaker]]s, and [[entertainer]]s. In recent years the study of charisma has also reached areas of the business community, [[academics]] and other areas involving [[leadership]] studies or [[leadership development]]. | The study, recognition, and development of charisma in individuals is of particular interest to [[sociologist]]s, [[psychologist]]s, popular [[politician]]s, [[public speaker]]s, and [[entertainer]]s. In recent years the study of charisma has also reached areas of the business community, [[academics]] and other areas involving [[leadership]] studies or [[leadership development]]. | ||
| − | Charisma has also been defined as a | + | Charisma has also been defined as a "set of behaviors or traits"; for example, a modern psychological approach posits that charisma is basically aggregative, a conglomeration of distinct personality traits that meld well in certain individuals to form the broad quality known as [[charisma]]. Theatrically, charisma is prevalent [[Theatre|on-stage]] and in [[film]]s, and can be encapsulated in [[verbal]] and [[non-verbal communication]]. |
==Charismatic Authority== | ==Charismatic Authority== | ||
| − | + | [[Charismatic]] authority is defined as the 'power legitimized on the basis of a leader's exceptional personal qualities or the demonstration of extraordinary insight and accomplishment, which inspire loyalty and obedience from followers' <ref>Kendall, D., J. Murray, and R. Linden. ''Sociology in Our Time''. Wadsworth Publishing; Scarborough, Ont. 2000. ISBN 0495096563 </ref>. As such, it rests almost entirely on the [[leadership|leader]]; the absence of that leader for any reason can lead to the authority's power dissolving. However, due to its idiosyncratic nature and lack of formal [[organization]], charismatic authority depends strongly on the perceived [[legitimacy]] of the authority figure. For instance, a charismatic leader in a [[religion|religious]] context might promote an unchallenged [[belief]] that he or she has been touched by [[God]], in the sense of a [[guru]] or [[prophet]]. Should the strength of this belief fade, the power of the charismatic leader may also fade, which is one of the ways in which this form of authority shows itself to be unstable. | |
| − | + | In contrast to the current popular use of the term charismatic leader, German Sociologist [[Maximilian Weber]] saw charismatic authority not so much attributed to the character traits of the charismatic leader but as developing out of a relationship between the leader and his or her followers. Weber believed the validity of charisma to be founded on its [[recognition]] by certain followers. He believed this recognition to be based not on the grounds of legitimacy, but on a sense of duty belonging to certain followers who believe they are especially chosen to recognize and confirm the exceptional qualities of their leader. | |
| − | + | According to Weber, a charismatic leader is not solely of a positive force. Many sociologists argue that both [[Winston Churchill]] and [[Adolf Hitler]] could exemplify the characteristics of charismatic leaders. Furthermore, society often remains neutral towards both positive and negative forms of charismatic domination. French sociologist [[Pierre Bourdieu]] supported many of Weber’s claims, and further stressed a leader to have charisma only if other people ''accept'' that he or she may have it. He argued that charisma usually depends on an "inaugural act" such as a decisive battle or moving speech after which the charismatic person will be regarded as such. | |
| − | |||
| − | + | ===Routinization=== | |
| + | Charismatic authority almost always evolves in the context of traditional authority which provides comparative forms and boundaries. However, by its nature, charismatic authority tends to challenge conventionally accepted forms of authority and is therefore often considered [[revolutionary]]. However the constant challenge that charismatic authority presents to older forms of authority must eventually subside or be incorporated into a society through the process of routinization. | ||
| − | [[ | + | Routinization is the process by which charismatic authority is replaced by a rationally established authority. Such routinization can be seen in the example of the prophet [[Muhammad]], who maintained charismatic authority among his followers though He was eventually succeeded by the traditional authority and structure of [[Islam]]. |
| + | Politically, charismatic rule can be found in various [[Authoritarianism|authoritarian states]], [[Autocracy|autocracies]], [[dictatorship]]s and [[Theocracy|theocracies]]. In many circumstances when the leader of such a state dies or leaves office and a new charismatic leader does not appear, such a regime is more likely to fall afterward. As in the example of Islam, a religion which evolves its own [[priesthood]] and establishes a set of laws and rules is most likely to lose its charismatic character and eventually move toward a second type of authority upon the removal of that leader. | ||
| − | == | + | ==The Study of Charismatic Leadership== |
| − | + | The study of charismatic leadership has been undertaken by many professional scholars throughout history. In particular, the relationship between charismatic leadership and the onset of new religious movements has been closely monitored by scholars of a sociological, psychological and religious background. Some historical patterns have proved to emerge. | |
| − | + | [[Richard Wiseman]], Professor of the [[Public Understanding of Psychology]] at the [[University of Hertfordshire]], UK, maintains that a charismatic person has three attributes; a strong feeling of emotion, the ability to induce strong feelings in others, and an imperviousness to the influence of other charismatic people. <ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4579681.stm Charisma] — [[BBC]] News. </ref> | |
| − | + | In regards to religious charisma, [[George D. Chryssides]], the Head of Religious Studies at the University of Wolverhampton, asserts that not all new religious movements have charismatic leaders, and that there are differences in the hegemonic styles among those movements that do. <ref>Chryssides, George D. ''Unrecognized Charisma? A Study and Comparison of Four Charismatic Leaders. [[http://www.cesnur.org/2001/london2001/chryssides.htm 2001 International Conference : The Spiritual Supermarket: Religious Pluralism in the 21st Century]]. 19 April, 2001. London, England. </ref>However Eileen Barker, Professor of Sociology at the London School of Economics, has claimed that in many new religious movements there is often employed a founder or leader who wields charismatic authority and is believed to have some special powers or knowledge. Barker asserts that almost by definition, charismatic leaders are unpredictable, for they are not bound to tradition or rules. In many circumstances, Barker asserts a warning when a leader who lacks accountability requires from their following an unquestioned obedience, and subsequently encourages a growing dependency upon the movement for all material, spiritual and social resources. <ref> Barker, Eileen. ''New Religious Movements: A Practical Introduction''. Bernan Press, 1990. ISBN 0113409273 </ref>. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | [[Len Oakes]], | + | Australian psychologist [[Len Oakes]], who authored a dissertation regarding prophetic charisma, invited eleven charismatic leaders to complete a psychometric test, which he labeled the [[adjective checklist]]. Though Oakes found the group “quite ordinary”, the findings of his study led him to argue that the majority of charismatic leaders exhibit traits of [[narcissism]], display an extraordinary amount of energy, and an inner clarity unhindered by the anxieties and guilt that afflict most people. <ref>Oakes, Len: ''Prophetic Charisma: The Psychology of Revolutionary Religious Personalities''. Syracuse University Press, 1997. ISBN 0815603983. </ref> |
==References== | ==References== | ||
| Line 48: | Line 39: | ||
==External Links== | ==External Links== | ||
| − | *[http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/pto-20050502-000001.html The X-Factors of Success] | + | *[http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/pto-20050502-000001.html The X-Factors of Success] Psychology Today |
| − | *[http://whyfiles.org/205charisma/ The Character of Charisma] | + | *[http://whyfiles.org/205charisma/ The Character of Charisma] Whyfiles.org |
| − | + | *[http://www.frugalmarketing.com/dtb/charisma.shtml Why Charisma Matters] Tony Alessandra, Ph.D. | |
| − | + | *[http://www.vocalist.org.uk/charisma.html Charisma] Vocalist.org | |
| − | *[http://www.frugalmarketing.com/dtb/charisma.shtml Why Charisma Matters] | + | *[http://hirr.hartsem.edu/ency/charisma.htm ''Charisma''] The Encyclopedia of Religion & Society |
| − | *[http://www.vocalist.org.uk/charisma.html Charisma] | ||
| − | |||
| − | *[http://hirr.hartsem.edu/ency/charisma.htm ''Charisma''] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
*[http://atheism.about.com/od/religiousauthority/a/types_2.htm Charismatic Authority: Emotional Bonds Between Leaders and Followers] | *[http://atheism.about.com/od/religiousauthority/a/types_2.htm Charismatic Authority: Emotional Bonds Between Leaders and Followers] | ||
| − | |||
{{Credit2|Charisma|71513894|Charismatic_authority|76642132|}} | {{Credit2|Charisma|71513894|Charismatic_authority|76642132|}} | ||
Revision as of 22:59, 10 April 2007
The term charisma originates from the Greek word χάρισμα meaning "gift" or "divine favor" and most often refers to a rare trait found in certain human personalities which can include extreme charm, a "magnetic" quality of personality and/or appearance, and an innate and powerfully sophisticated personal communicability and persuasiveness. Charisma is often used to describe a seemingly uncanny ability of one to charm or influence other people. It refers especially to a quality in certain people who easily draw the attention and admiration, or in negative cases hatred, of others due to an alluring quality of personality. Other similar terms or phrases related to charisma can include: grace, exuberance, equanimity, mystique, positive energy, "right stuff," joie de vivre, charm, personal magnetism, personal appeal, "electricity," and allure. Many of these qualities must be present within an individual in order for the person to be considered 'charismatic' by the public and their peers.
Characteristics
Charismatic individuals generally project unusual confidence, serenity, assertiveness, authenticity, and focus, along with superb communication skills. To the early Greeks, charisma was said to be a "gift of grace," implying that this "divine quality" was an inborn trait. Today, many believe charisma can be taught or even learned, despite a persistent inability to accurately define or even fully understand the complex term. In many individuals, the use of charisma can lead to the development of a charismatic authority which may allow the individual to influence and lead others.
The study, recognition, and development of charisma in individuals is of particular interest to sociologists, psychologists, popular politicians, public speakers, and entertainers. In recent years the study of charisma has also reached areas of the business community, academics and other areas involving leadership studies or leadership development.
Charisma has also been defined as a "set of behaviors or traits"; for example, a modern psychological approach posits that charisma is basically aggregative, a conglomeration of distinct personality traits that meld well in certain individuals to form the broad quality known as charisma. Theatrically, charisma is prevalent on-stage and in films, and can be encapsulated in verbal and non-verbal communication.
Charismatic Authority
Charismatic authority is defined as the 'power legitimized on the basis of a leader's exceptional personal qualities or the demonstration of extraordinary insight and accomplishment, which inspire loyalty and obedience from followers' [1]. As such, it rests almost entirely on the leader; the absence of that leader for any reason can lead to the authority's power dissolving. However, due to its idiosyncratic nature and lack of formal organization, charismatic authority depends strongly on the perceived legitimacy of the authority figure. For instance, a charismatic leader in a religious context might promote an unchallenged belief that he or she has been touched by God, in the sense of a guru or prophet. Should the strength of this belief fade, the power of the charismatic leader may also fade, which is one of the ways in which this form of authority shows itself to be unstable.
In contrast to the current popular use of the term charismatic leader, German Sociologist Maximilian Weber saw charismatic authority not so much attributed to the character traits of the charismatic leader but as developing out of a relationship between the leader and his or her followers. Weber believed the validity of charisma to be founded on its recognition by certain followers. He believed this recognition to be based not on the grounds of legitimacy, but on a sense of duty belonging to certain followers who believe they are especially chosen to recognize and confirm the exceptional qualities of their leader.
According to Weber, a charismatic leader is not solely of a positive force. Many sociologists argue that both Winston Churchill and Adolf Hitler could exemplify the characteristics of charismatic leaders. Furthermore, society often remains neutral towards both positive and negative forms of charismatic domination. French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu supported many of Weber’s claims, and further stressed a leader to have charisma only if other people accept that he or she may have it. He argued that charisma usually depends on an "inaugural act" such as a decisive battle or moving speech after which the charismatic person will be regarded as such.
Routinization
Charismatic authority almost always evolves in the context of traditional authority which provides comparative forms and boundaries. However, by its nature, charismatic authority tends to challenge conventionally accepted forms of authority and is therefore often considered revolutionary. However the constant challenge that charismatic authority presents to older forms of authority must eventually subside or be incorporated into a society through the process of routinization.
Routinization is the process by which charismatic authority is replaced by a rationally established authority. Such routinization can be seen in the example of the prophet Muhammad, who maintained charismatic authority among his followers though He was eventually succeeded by the traditional authority and structure of Islam. Politically, charismatic rule can be found in various authoritarian states, autocracies, dictatorships and theocracies. In many circumstances when the leader of such a state dies or leaves office and a new charismatic leader does not appear, such a regime is more likely to fall afterward. As in the example of Islam, a religion which evolves its own priesthood and establishes a set of laws and rules is most likely to lose its charismatic character and eventually move toward a second type of authority upon the removal of that leader.
The Study of Charismatic Leadership
The study of charismatic leadership has been undertaken by many professional scholars throughout history. In particular, the relationship between charismatic leadership and the onset of new religious movements has been closely monitored by scholars of a sociological, psychological and religious background. Some historical patterns have proved to emerge.
Richard Wiseman, Professor of the Public Understanding of Psychology at the University of Hertfordshire, UK, maintains that a charismatic person has three attributes; a strong feeling of emotion, the ability to induce strong feelings in others, and an imperviousness to the influence of other charismatic people. [2]
In regards to religious charisma, George D. Chryssides, the Head of Religious Studies at the University of Wolverhampton, asserts that not all new religious movements have charismatic leaders, and that there are differences in the hegemonic styles among those movements that do. [3]However Eileen Barker, Professor of Sociology at the London School of Economics, has claimed that in many new religious movements there is often employed a founder or leader who wields charismatic authority and is believed to have some special powers or knowledge. Barker asserts that almost by definition, charismatic leaders are unpredictable, for they are not bound to tradition or rules. In many circumstances, Barker asserts a warning when a leader who lacks accountability requires from their following an unquestioned obedience, and subsequently encourages a growing dependency upon the movement for all material, spiritual and social resources. [4].
Australian psychologist Len Oakes, who authored a dissertation regarding prophetic charisma, invited eleven charismatic leaders to complete a psychometric test, which he labeled the adjective checklist. Though Oakes found the group “quite ordinary”, the findings of his study led him to argue that the majority of charismatic leaders exhibit traits of narcissism, display an extraordinary amount of energy, and an inner clarity unhindered by the anxieties and guilt that afflict most people. [5]
ReferencesISBN links support NWE through referral fees
- ↑ Kendall, D., J. Murray, and R. Linden. Sociology in Our Time. Wadsworth Publishing; Scarborough, Ont. 2000. ISBN 0495096563
- ↑ Charisma — BBC News.
- ↑ Chryssides, George D. Unrecognized Charisma? A Study and Comparison of Four Charismatic Leaders. [2001 International Conference : The Spiritual Supermarket: Religious Pluralism in the 21st Century]. 19 April, 2001. London, England.
- ↑ Barker, Eileen. New Religious Movements: A Practical Introduction. Bernan Press, 1990. ISBN 0113409273
- ↑ Oakes, Len: Prophetic Charisma: The Psychology of Revolutionary Religious Personalities. Syracuse University Press, 1997. ISBN 0815603983.
External Links
- The X-Factors of Success Psychology Today
- The Character of Charisma Whyfiles.org
- Why Charisma Matters Tony Alessandra, Ph.D.
- Charisma Vocalist.org
- Charisma The Encyclopedia of Religion & Society
- Charismatic Authority: Emotional Bonds Between Leaders and Followers
Credits
New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:
The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:
Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.
