Difference between revisions of "Skandha" - New World Encyclopedia
Chris Jensen (talk | contribs) |
Scott Dunbar (talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Contracted}} | {{Contracted}} | ||
− | In [[Buddhism|Buddhist]] | + | In [[Buddhism|Buddhist]] thought, the word '''skandha''' (Sanskrit: स्कान्धास) refers to the five "aggregate" elements that are said to comprise the psychophysical personality. These five aggregates are as follows: form (rūpa)<ref>In Rawson (1991: p.11), the first skandha is defined as: "name and form (Sanskrit ''nāma-rūpa'', Tibetan ''gzugs'')...". In the Pali literature, ''nāma-rūpa'' traditionally refers to the first four aggregates, as opposed to the fifth aggregate, consciousness.</ref>, feeling (vedanā)<ref>Generally, ''vedanā'' is considered to ''not'' include "emotions." For example, Bodhi (2000a), p. 80, writes: "The Pali word ''vedanā'' does not signify emotion (which appears to be a complex phenomenon involving a variety of concomitant mental factors), but the bare affective quality of an experience, which may be either pleasant, painful or neutral." Correspondingly, Trungpa (2001), p. 32, notes: "In this case 'feeling' is not quite our ordinary notion of feeling. It is not the feeling we take so seriously as, for instance, when we say, 'He hurt my feelings.' This kind of feeling that we take so seriously belongs to the fourth and fifth skandhas of concept and consciousness."</ref>, perception (samjñā)<ref>In some [[sutra]]s, it is explicitly tied to all types of sensory experience: "These six classes of perception — perception of form, perception of sound, perception of smell, perception of taste, perception of tactile sensation, perception of ideas: this is called perception." [http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn22/sn22.057.than.html Sattatthana Sutta] ''Samyutta Nikaya'' 22.57. Translated by Thanissaro Bhikkhu, 1997.</ref>, consciousness(Skt. ''visjñāna'', Pāli ''viññāṇa''), and reasoning (Skt. "vāsanā" or ''samskāra'').<ref>The [[Abhidhamma]] divides ''sankhāra'' into fifty mental factors consisting of all types of mental habits, thoughts, ideas, opinions, compulsions, and decisions triggered by an object(Bodhi, 2000a, p. 26).</ref> |
In the [[Theravada]] tradition, suffering (''dukkha'') arises when one identifies with or otherwise clings to an aggregate; hence, suffering is [[nirvana|extinguished]] by relinquishing attachments to aggregates. The [[Mahayana]] tradition, building upon this notion, suggests that [[nirvana|ultimate freedom]] is realized by [[Prajnaparamita|deeply penetrating]] the intrinsically [[Shunyata|empty nature]] of all aggregates. | In the [[Theravada]] tradition, suffering (''dukkha'') arises when one identifies with or otherwise clings to an aggregate; hence, suffering is [[nirvana|extinguished]] by relinquishing attachments to aggregates. The [[Mahayana]] tradition, building upon this notion, suggests that [[nirvana|ultimate freedom]] is realized by [[Prajnaparamita|deeply penetrating]] the intrinsically [[Shunyata|empty nature]] of all aggregates. | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Outside of Buddhist religious terminology, "skandha" can mean "mass, heap, bundle or tree trunk," though these "mundane" usages will not be explored below.<ref>Thanissaro (2002). Also see, for example, Thanissaro (2005) where ''khandha'' is translated as "mass" in the phrase ''dukkhakkhandha'' (which Thanissaro translates as "mass of stress") and Thanissaro (1998) where ''khandha'' is translated as "aggregate" but in terms of bundling the [[Noble Eightfold Path]] into the categories of virtue (''silakkhandha''), concentration (''samadhikkhandha'') and wisdom (''pannakkhandha'')</ref> | Outside of Buddhist religious terminology, "skandha" can mean "mass, heap, bundle or tree trunk," though these "mundane" usages will not be explored below.<ref>Thanissaro (2002). Also see, for example, Thanissaro (2005) where ''khandha'' is translated as "mass" in the phrase ''dukkhakkhandha'' (which Thanissaro translates as "mass of stress") and Thanissaro (1998) where ''khandha'' is translated as "aggregate" but in terms of bundling the [[Noble Eightfold Path]] into the categories of virtue (''silakkhandha''), concentration (''samadhikkhandha'') and wisdom (''pannakkhandha'')</ref> | ||
− | == | + | ==Enumeration and Relationship== |
+ | Contemporary writers (such as Trungpa Rinpoche and Red Pine) sometimes conceptualize the five aggregates as "one physical and four mental" aggregates. More traditional Buddhist literature (such as the [[Abhidhamma]]) speak of one physical aggregate (form), three mental factors (sensation, perception and mental formations) and consciousness. | ||
− | + | See [[#References in Buddhist literature|Table 1]] for examples of definitional references to the aggregates in the Buddhist canon. | |
− | # | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | ==Role in Buddhist Metaphysics and Soteriology== | |
+ | Bhikkhu Bodhi (2000b, p. 840) states that an examination of the aggregates has a "critical role" in understanding the Buddha's teachings, specifically in reference to the notions of: | ||
+ | #'''Understanding the Four Noble Truths:''' The five aggregates are the "ultimate referent" in the Buddha's elaboration on suffering (''dukkha'') in his First Noble Truth (see excerpted quote below). Thus, "since all four truths revolve around suffering, understanding the aggregates is essential for understanding the [[Four Noble Truths]] as a whole." | ||
+ | #'''Understanding the Cause of Future Suffering:''' The five aggregates are the substrata of human clinging and thus "contribute to the causal origination of future suffering." | ||
+ | #'''Understanding the Nature of Release (''[[nirvana]]''):''' The release of ''nirvana'' (Pali: ''nibbana'') can only be achieved once an individual ceases clinging to the five aggregates. | ||
− | + | Excerpts from the [[Pāli]] literature bear out Bhikkhu Bodhi's assessment of the importance of the doctrine of the ''skandhas''.<ref>In regards to how [[Theravada]] practitioners view the aggregates, [[Thanissaro Bhikkhu]] (2002) argues: | |
+ | :"The [Pāli] canon depicts the Buddha as saying that he taught only two topics: suffering and the end of suffering ([[SN]] 22.86[http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn22/sn22.086.than.html]). A survey of the Pali discourses shows him using the concept of the khandhas to answer the primary questions related to those topics: What is suffering? How is it caused? What can be done to bring those causes to an end?" | ||
+ | In other words, Theravada practitioners do not see the notion of the aggregates as providing an absolute truth about ultimate reality or as a map of the mind, but instead as providing a tool for understanding how our method of apprehending sensory experiences and the self can lead to either our own suffering or to our own liberation.</ref> | ||
+ | In the classic Theravada meditation reference, the ''Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta'' ("The Foundations of Mindfulness Discourse," MN 10), the Buddha provides four bases for establishing mindfulness: body (kaya), sensations (vedana), mind (citta) and mental objects (dhamma). When discussing mental objects as a basis for meditation, the Buddha identifies five objects, including the aggregates. Regarding meditation on the aggregates, the Buddha states: | ||
− | + | :"How, monks, does a monk live contemplating mental objects in the mental objects of the five aggregates of clinging? | |
− | |||
− | + | :"Herein, monks, a monk thinks, 'Thus is material form; thus is the arising of material form; and thus is the disappearance of material form. Thus is feeling; thus is the arising of feeling; and thus is the disappearance of feeling. Thus is perception; thus is the arising of perception; and thus is the disappearance of perception. Thus are formations; thus is the arising of formations; and thus is the disappearance of formations. Thus is consciousness; thus is the arising of consciousness; and thus is the disappearance of consciousness.'<ref>Bodhi (2000b, pp. 743, n. 58) points out that this formula for aggregate-contemplation can also be found in SN 12.21, 12.23, 22.78, 22.89 and 22.101, as well as MN 122.</ref> | |
− | + | :"...Or his mindfulness is established with the thought, 'Mental objects exist,' to the extent necessary just for knowledge and mindfulness, and he lives detached, and clings to nothing in the world. Thus also, monks, a monk lives contemplating mental objects in the mental objects of the five aggregates of clinging." (Nyanasatta, trans., 1994.) | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | Thus, through mindfulness contemplation, one sees an "aggregate as an aggregate" — sees it arising and dissipating. Such clear seeing creates a space between the aggregate and clinging, a space that will prevent or enervate the arising and propagation of clinging, thereby diminishing future suffering.<ref>That meditation creates a space between the aggregates (including clinging) is a readily accessible meditation experience. For a published (and reasonably authoritative) statement regarding this experience, see, for example, Trungpa (2001), pp. 85-86, where in response to a student's query he replies: "By meditating you are slowing down the process. When it has slowed down, the skandhas are no longer pushed against one another. There is space there, already there."</ref> | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | </ | ||
− | + | As clinging disappears, so too do notions of a separate "self." In the ''Mahasunnata Sutta'' ("The Greater Discourse on Emptiness," MN 122), after reiterating the aforementioned aggregate-contemplation instructions (for instance, "Thus is form; thus is the arising of form; and, thus is the disappearance of form"), the Buddha states: | |
− | + | :"When he [a monk] abides contemplating rise and fall in these five aggregates affected by clinging, the conceit 'I am' based on these five aggregates affected by clinging is abandoned in him...." (Nanamoli & Bodhi, 2001, p. 975.) | |
− | |||
− | In | + | In a complementary fashion, in the Buddha's second discourse, the ''Anattalakkhana Sutta'' ("The Characteristic of Nonself," SN 22:59), the Buddha instructs: |
+ | :"Monks, form is nonself. For if, monks, form were self, this form would not lead to affliction, and it would be possible to [manipulate] form [in the following manner]: 'Let my form be thus; let my form not be thus....' [Identical statements are made regarding feeling, perception, volitional formations and consciousness.] | ||
− | + | :"...Seeing thus [for instance, through contemplation], monks, the instructed noble disciple becomes disenchanted with form [and the other aggregates].... Being disenchanted, he becomes dispassionate. Through dispassion [his mind] is liberated." (Bodhi, 2005, pp. 341-2.) | |
+ | In this way, the Theravada understanding of the aggregates contributes to their overall cosmological scheme and to their particular understanding of enlightenment. | ||
==[[Theravada]] perspectives== | ==[[Theravada]] perspectives== | ||
+ | In the [[Pali canon]], the aggregates are causally related as follows:<ref>See, for instance, [[Samyutta Nikaya|SN]] 35.93, "The Dyad (2)" (Bodhi, 2000b, pp. 1172-3).</ref> | ||
+ | <table><tr><td> | ||
+ | *'''Form''' (''rupa'') arises from experientially irreducible physical/physiological phenomena.<ref>In terms of how these phenomena are analysed in traditional Buddhist texts, see the description of the "Great Elements" in the [http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/mn/mn.140.than.html Dhatu-vibhanga Sutta].</ref> | ||
− | + | *Form – in terms of an external object (such as a sound) and its associated sense organ (such as the ear) – gives rise to '''consciousness''' (''viññāṇa'').<ref>In the Pali canon, the concurrence of an object, its sense organ and the related consciousness (''viññāṇa'') is called "contact" (''phassa''). In addition to referring to the five '''form'''-derived sense faculties (eye, ear, nose, tongue, body), their associated objects and consciousness, ''phassa'' also pertains to these aspects of '''mentality''' (''nama''): mind, mind objects and mind-consciousness. In the [[Abhidhamma]] (e.g., see Bodhi, 2000a, p. 78), ''phassa'' is a mental factor, the means by which consciousness "touches" an object.</ref><ref>Traditional Buddhist texts do not directly address Western philosophy's so-called [[Philosophy of Mind|mind-body problem]] since in Buddhism the exploration of the aggregates is not primarily to ascertain ultimate empirical reality but to obtain ultimate release from suffering.</ref> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | *From the contact of form and consciousness arise the three mental (''nāma'') aggregates of '''feeling''' (''vedanā''), '''perception''' (''saññā'') and '''mental formation''' (''sankhāra'').<ref>A mental aggregate arises either from conscious contact with form or from another mental aggregate (Bodhi, 2000a, pp. 78ff).</ref> | |
− | + | ||
+ | In this scheme, physical form, the mental aggregates,<ref>Form and the mental aggregates together are technically referred to as ''nāmarūpa'', which is variously defined as "name-and-form," "materiality-mentality" and "matter-mind." Bodhi (2000b), pp. 47-48, mentions that Ñāṇamoli translated ''nāmarūpa'' as "mentality-materiality," which Bodhi assesses to be "[i]n some respects ... doctrinally more accurate, but it is also unwieldy...." Bodhi goes on to note that, "in the Nikāyas, ''nāmarūpa'' does not include ''consciousness'' (viññāṇa)."</ref> and consciousness are mutually dependent.<ref>According to Bodhi (2000b), p. 48, based on suttas in SN 14, consciousness "can operate only in dependence on a physical body (''rūpa'') and in conjunction with its constellation of concomitants (''nāma''); conversely, only when consciousness is present can a compound of material elements function as a sentient body and the mental concomitants participate in cognition." Also, for example, see the Nagara Sutta ("The City," SN 12:65) [http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn12/sn12.065.than.html (Thanissaro, 1997a)], where the Buddha in part states: "[F]rom name-&-form as a requisite condition comes consciousness, from consciousness as a requisite condition comes name-&-form."</ref> | ||
− | + | *'''[[Twelve Nidanas]] / [[Pratitya-samutpada|Dependent Origination]]''': <br>The Twelve Nidanas describe twelve phenomenal links by which suffering is perpetuated between and within lives. It is through the five skandhas that clinging (''upadana'') occurs,<ref>For instance, see the ''Samadhi Sutta'' (SN 22:5).[http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn22/sn22.005.than.html]</ref> a pivotal link in this endless chain of suffering. To this end, Bodhi notes that "the teaching on the five aggregates concentrates on experience in its lived immediacy in the continuum from birth to death."<ref>Bodhi (2000b, pp. 839-840).</ref> | |
− | + | *'''Eighteen Dhatus'''<ref>The Pāli word ''dhātu'' is used in multiple contexts in the [[Pali canon|Pāli canon]]. For instance, Bodhi (2000b), pp. 527-8, identifies four different ways that ''dhātu'' is used including in terms of the "eighteen elements" and in terms of "the four primary elements" (''[[mahabhuta]]'').</ref>: <br>The eighteen dhatus are seen to function through the five aggregates. The eighteen dhatus can be arranged into six triads, where each triad is composed of a sense organ, a sense object and sense consciousness. In regards to the aggregates<ref>Bodhi (2000a), pp. 287-8.</ref>: | |
− | + | **The first five <u>sense organs</u> (eye, ear, nose, tongue, body) are derivates of '''form'''. The sixth sense organ (mind) is part of '''consciousness'''. | |
+ | **The first five <u>sense objects</u> (visible forms, sound, smell, taste, touch) are also derivatives of '''form'''. The sixth sense object (mental object) includes '''form''', '''sensation''', '''perception''' and '''mental formations'''. | ||
+ | **The <u>six sense consciousness</u> is the basis for '''consciousness'''. | ||
− | + | Other Buddhist literature has described the aggregates as arising in a linear or progressive fashion, from form to feeling to perception to mental formations to consciousness.<ref>Trungpa (2001), pp. 36-37.</ref> | |
− | In the [[Buddha]]'s first discourse, the ''Dhammacakkappavattana'' Sutta" ("The Setting in Motion the Wheel of Truth Discourse," [http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn56/sn56.011.piya.html Samyutta Nikaya 56:11]), he | + | In the [[Buddha]]'s first discourse, the ''Dhammacakkappavattana'' Sutta" ("The Setting in Motion the Wheel of Truth Discourse," [http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn56/sn56.011.piya.html Samyutta Nikaya 56:11]), he mentions the role of the skandhas as follows: |
:"The Noble Truth of Suffering (''dukkha''), monks, is this: Birth is suffering, aging is suffering, sickness is suffering, death is suffering, association with the unpleasant is suffering, dissociation from the pleasant is suffering, not to receive what one desires is suffering — in brief the '''five aggregates''' subject to grasping are suffering."<ref> Translated from the Pali by Piyadassi Thera, 1999 [http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn56/sn56.011.piya.html]. Boldface added.</ref> | :"The Noble Truth of Suffering (''dukkha''), monks, is this: Birth is suffering, aging is suffering, sickness is suffering, death is suffering, association with the unpleasant is suffering, dissociation from the pleasant is suffering, not to receive what one desires is suffering — in brief the '''five aggregates''' subject to grasping are suffering."<ref> Translated from the Pali by Piyadassi Thera, 1999 [http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn56/sn56.011.piya.html]. Boldface added.</ref> | ||
Line 71: | Line 64: | ||
:"Prior to the Buddha, the Pali word khandha had very ordinary meanings: A khandha could be a pile, a bundle, a heap, a mass. It could also be the trunk of a tree. In his first sermon, though, the Buddha gave it a new, psychological meaning, introducing the term 'clinging-khandhas' to summarize his analysis of the truth of stress and suffering. Throughout the remainder of his teaching career, he referred to these psychological khandhas time and again."[http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/khandha.html] | :"Prior to the Buddha, the Pali word khandha had very ordinary meanings: A khandha could be a pile, a bundle, a heap, a mass. It could also be the trunk of a tree. In his first sermon, though, the Buddha gave it a new, psychological meaning, introducing the term 'clinging-khandhas' to summarize his analysis of the truth of stress and suffering. Throughout the remainder of his teaching career, he referred to these psychological khandhas time and again."[http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/khandha.html] | ||
− | + | The Buddha taught that self-identifing with an aggregate would, by necessity, lead to clinging (''upadana'')<ref>Note that, in Buddhism, one ''clings'' to (guards) something they have (or mistakenly believe they have), whereas one ''craves'' (searches) for that which they lack. (See the articles on [[upadana]] and [[tanha]] for references.) Thus, the notion of the "''clinging'' aggregates" refers to things with which we identify or which we think we can possess. When, instead, one ''desires'' such things, it is technically ''craving'', not clinging.</ref> to that element; and, given that all aggregates are impermanent (''anicca''), it is invariable that this attachment would eventually yield agitation (''paritassati''), loss, grief, stress or suffering. Therefore, to be free of suffering required the wisdom to experience the aggregates clearly, without clinging or craving ([[tanha]]), and without associating them with any notion of self (''anatta''). | |
+ | For example, if one believes "this body is mine" or "I exist within this body," then as their body ages, becomes ill and approaches death, such a person will likely experience longing for youth or health or eternal life, will likely dread of aging, sickness and death, and will likely spend much time and energy lost in fears, fantasies and ultimately futile activities. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the Nikayas, such is likened to shooting oneself with a second arrow, where the first arrow is a physical phenomenon (such as, in this case, a bodily manifestation associated with aging or illness or dying) and the second is the mental anguish of the undisciplined mind associated with the physical phenomenon (see the Sallatha Sutta<ref>On-line translations of the Sallatha Sutta ("The Arrow" or "The Dart," SN 36.6) include [http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn36/sn36.006.than.html Thanissaro (1997c)] and [http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn36/sn36.006.nypo.html Nyanaponika (1998)].</ref>). | ||
+ | |||
+ | On the other hand, one with a disciplined mind who is able to see this body as a set of aggregates will be free of such fear, frustration and time-consuming escapism. But how does one become aware of and then release one's own identification with (/ clinging to) the aggregates? Below is an excerpt from the classic ''Satipatthana Sutta'' that shows how traditional mindfulness practices can awaken understanding, release and wisdom. | ||
− | |||
The Samyutta Nikaya contains a book entitled the "Khandhavagga" ("The Book of Aggregates"), which compiles over a hundred suttas related to the five aggregates. Typical of the materials in this collection is the ''Upadaparitassana Sutta'' ("Agitation through Clinging Discourse," SN 22:7), which states in part: | The Samyutta Nikaya contains a book entitled the "Khandhavagga" ("The Book of Aggregates"), which compiles over a hundred suttas related to the five aggregates. Typical of the materials in this collection is the ''Upadaparitassana Sutta'' ("Agitation through Clinging Discourse," SN 22:7), which states in part: | ||
:"...[T]he instructed noble disciple ... does not regard form [or other aggregates] as self, or self as possessing form, or form as in self, or self as in form. That form of his changes and alters. Despite the change and alteration of form, his consciousness does not become preoccupied with the change of form.... [T]hrough non-clinging he does not become agitated."<ref>Trans. by Bodhi, 2000b, pp. 865-866.</ref> | :"...[T]he instructed noble disciple ... does not regard form [or other aggregates] as self, or self as possessing form, or form as in self, or self as in form. That form of his changes and alters. Despite the change and alteration of form, his consciousness does not become preoccupied with the change of form.... [T]hrough non-clinging he does not become agitated."<ref>Trans. by Bodhi, 2000b, pp. 865-866.</ref> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
Many of the suttas in the Khandhavagga express the aggregates in the context of the following sequence: | Many of the suttas in the Khandhavagga express the aggregates in the context of the following sequence: | ||
Line 87: | Line 82: | ||
#An instructed noble disciple (sutavā ariyasāvaka) does ''not'' regard form as self, etc., and thus, when form changes, dukkha does not arise.<ref>Note that, in each of the suttas where the above formula is used, subsequent verses replace "form" with each of the other aggregates: sensation, perception, mental formations and consciousness.</ref> | #An instructed noble disciple (sutavā ariyasāvaka) does ''not'' regard form as self, etc., and thus, when form changes, dukkha does not arise.<ref>Note that, in each of the suttas where the above formula is used, subsequent verses replace "form" with each of the other aggregates: sensation, perception, mental formations and consciousness.</ref> | ||
− | + | ==Mahayana perspectives== | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | == | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | The classic "Prajnaparamita Hridaya Sutra" ("[[Heart Sutra]]") begins: | + | [[Mahayana]] Buddhism emphasizes the intrinsic emptiness of all things including Skandhas. The classic "Prajnaparamita Hridaya Sutra" ("[[Heart Sutra]]") begins: |
:''The [[Bodhisattva]] [[Avalokitesvara|Avalokita]],'' | :''The [[Bodhisattva]] [[Avalokitesvara|Avalokita]],'' | ||
:''while moving in the deep course of [[Prajnaparamita|Perfect Understanding]],'' | :''while moving in the deep course of [[Prajnaparamita|Perfect Understanding]],'' | ||
Line 132: | Line 91: | ||
:''After this penetration, he overcame all pain.''<ref>Nhat Hanh (1988), p. 1. See also Red Pine (2004), p. 2, and Suzuki (1960), p. 26.</ref><ref>Suzuki (1960), p. 29, notes that the last sentence of this first stanza ("After this penetration, he overcame all pain") is unique to Hsuan-chuang's translation and is omitted in other versions of the Heart Sutra.</ref> | :''After this penetration, he overcame all pain.''<ref>Nhat Hanh (1988), p. 1. See also Red Pine (2004), p. 2, and Suzuki (1960), p. 26.</ref><ref>Suzuki (1960), p. 29, notes that the last sentence of this first stanza ("After this penetration, he overcame all pain") is unique to Hsuan-chuang's translation and is omitted in other versions of the Heart Sutra.</ref> | ||
− | From its very first verse, the Heart Sutra introduces an alternative to the practice and worldview of the Theravada school with respect to the aggregates | + | From its very first verse, the Heart Sutra introduces an alternative to the practice and worldview of the Theravada school with respect to the aggregates. First, whereas Theravada meditation practices relating to the aggregates generally use change-penetrating (''vipassana'') meditation, here the non-dualistic [[prajnaparamita]] practice is invoked. Second, in Theravada texts, when "emptiness of self" is mentioned, the English word "self" is a translation of the Pali word ''"atta"'' (Sanskrit, ''"[[atman]]"''); in the Heart Sutra, the English word "self" is a translation of the Sanskrit word ''"sva-[[bhava]]"''.<ref>''"Svabhava"'' has also been translated as "self-nature" (Suzuki, 1960, p. 26), "separate self" (Nhat Hanh, 1988, p. 16) and "self-existence" (Red Pine, 2004, p. 67).</ref> According to Red Pine, "the 'self' (''sva'') ... was more generalized in its application than 'ego' (''[[atman (Buddhism)|atman]]'') and referred not only to ''beings'' but to ''any inherent substance'' that could be identified as existing in time or space as a permanent or independent entity."<ref>Red Pine (2004), p. 68.</ref> (Italics added.) |
− | |||
− | |||
In other words, whereas the ''Sutta Pitaka'' typically instructs one to apprehend the aggregates ''without clinging or self-identification'', [[Prajnaparamita]] leads one to apprehend the aggregates as having ''no intrinsic reality''.<ref>While Red Pine (2004) contextualizes the Prajnaparamita texts as a historical ''reaction'' to some early Buddhist Abhidhammas, some interpretations of the Theravada Abhidhamma are actually ''consistent'' with the prajnaparamita notion of "emptiness."</ref> | In other words, whereas the ''Sutta Pitaka'' typically instructs one to apprehend the aggregates ''without clinging or self-identification'', [[Prajnaparamita]] leads one to apprehend the aggregates as having ''no intrinsic reality''.<ref>While Red Pine (2004) contextualizes the Prajnaparamita texts as a historical ''reaction'' to some early Buddhist Abhidhammas, some interpretations of the Theravada Abhidhamma are actually ''consistent'' with the prajnaparamita notion of "emptiness."</ref> | ||
Line 143: | Line 100: | ||
:''The same is true with feelings, perceptions, mental formations and consciousness."''<ref>Nhat Hanh (1988), p.1. Again, also see Red Pine (2004), p. 2, and Suzuki (1960), p. 26.</ref> | :''The same is true with feelings, perceptions, mental formations and consciousness."''<ref>Nhat Hanh (1988), p.1. Again, also see Red Pine (2004), p. 2, and Suzuki (1960), p. 26.</ref> | ||
− | + | Red Pine interprets this statement as follows: | |
− | |||
− | |||
:"That form is empty was one of the Buddha's earliest and most frequent pronouncements. But in the light of Prajnaparamita, form is not simply empty, it is so completely empty, it is emptiness itself, which turns out to be the same as form itself.... All separations are delusions. But if each of the skandhas is one with emptiness, and emptiness is one with each of the skandhas, then everything occupies the same indivisible space, which is emptiness.... Everything is empty, and empty is everything.<ref>Red Pine (2004), pp. 75, 77.</ref> | :"That form is empty was one of the Buddha's earliest and most frequent pronouncements. But in the light of Prajnaparamita, form is not simply empty, it is so completely empty, it is emptiness itself, which turns out to be the same as form itself.... All separations are delusions. But if each of the skandhas is one with emptiness, and emptiness is one with each of the skandhas, then everything occupies the same indivisible space, which is emptiness.... Everything is empty, and empty is everything.<ref>Red Pine (2004), pp. 75, 77.</ref> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
==[[Vajrayana]] perspectives== | ==[[Vajrayana]] perspectives== | ||
Line 166: | Line 115: | ||
===Bardo deity manifestations=== | ===Bardo deity manifestations=== | ||
− | One of the major developments of the Tibetan Buddhist tradition was a profound exploration of the metaphysical and cosmological nature of reincarnation (''[[samsara]]''). One element of these discoveries was the description of various deities and interim states (''[[bardo]]s'') that exist between incarnations, all of which came to be depicted in their unique iconographic tradition. Intriguingly, some Tibetan Lamas postulate a connection between this iconography and their particular perspective on the aggregates. | + | One of the major developments of the Tibetan Buddhist tradition was a profound exploration of the metaphysical and cosmological nature of reincarnation (''[[samsara]]''). One element of these discoveries was the description of various deities and interim states (''[[bardo]]s'') that exist between incarnations, all of which came to be depicted in their unique iconographic tradition. Intriguingly, some Tibetan Lamas postulate a connection between this iconography and their particular perspective on the aggregates. For example, Trungpa Rinpoche writes (2001, p. 38): |
− | |||
− | Trungpa Rinpoche writes (2001, p. 38): | ||
:"[S]ome of the details of [[Vajrayana|tantric]] iconography are developed from abhidharma [that is, in this context, detailed analysis of the aggregates]. Different colors and feelings of this particular consciousness, that particular emotion, are manifested in a particular deity wearing such-and-such a costume, of certain particular colors, holding certain particular scepters in his hand. Those details are very closely connected with the individualities of particular psychological processes." | :"[S]ome of the details of [[Vajrayana|tantric]] iconography are developed from abhidharma [that is, in this context, detailed analysis of the aggregates]. Different colors and feelings of this particular consciousness, that particular emotion, are manifested in a particular deity wearing such-and-such a costume, of certain particular colors, holding certain particular scepters in his hand. Those details are very closely connected with the individualities of particular psychological processes." | ||
Line 177: | Line 124: | ||
* "The red light of the skandha of '''perception''' in its basic purity, the wisdom of discrimination, brilliant red, adorned with discs of light, luminous and clear, sharp and bright, will come from the heart of [[Amitabha|Amitābha]] and his consort and pierce your heart so that your eyes cannot bear to look at it. Do not be afraid of it." (p. 70) | * "The red light of the skandha of '''perception''' in its basic purity, the wisdom of discrimination, brilliant red, adorned with discs of light, luminous and clear, sharp and bright, will come from the heart of [[Amitabha|Amitābha]] and his consort and pierce your heart so that your eyes cannot bear to look at it. Do not be afraid of it." (p. 70) | ||
* "The green light of the skandha of '''concept''' [samskara] in its basic purity, the action-accomplishing wisdom, brilliant green, luminous and clear, sharp and terrifying, adorned with discs of light, will come from the heart of [[Five Dhyani Buddhas|Amoghasiddhi]] and his consort and pierce your heart so that your eyes cannot bear to look at it. Do not be afraid of it. It is the spontaneous play of your own mind, so rest in the supreme state free from activity and care, in which there is no near or far, love or hate." (p. 73) | * "The green light of the skandha of '''concept''' [samskara] in its basic purity, the action-accomplishing wisdom, brilliant green, luminous and clear, sharp and terrifying, adorned with discs of light, will come from the heart of [[Five Dhyani Buddhas|Amoghasiddhi]] and his consort and pierce your heart so that your eyes cannot bear to look at it. Do not be afraid of it. It is the spontaneous play of your own mind, so rest in the supreme state free from activity and care, in which there is no near or far, love or hate." (p. 73) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
==References in Buddhist literature== | ==References in Buddhist literature== |
Revision as of 02:47, 15 February 2007
In Buddhist thought, the word skandha (Sanskrit: स्कान्धास) refers to the five "aggregate" elements that are said to comprise the psychophysical personality. These five aggregates are as follows: form (rūpa)[1], feeling (vedanā)[2], perception (samjñā)[3], consciousness(Skt. visjñāna, Pāli viññāṇa), and reasoning (Skt. "vāsanā" or samskāra).[4]
In the Theravada tradition, suffering (dukkha) arises when one identifies with or otherwise clings to an aggregate; hence, suffering is extinguished by relinquishing attachments to aggregates. The Mahayana tradition, building upon this notion, suggests that ultimate freedom is realized by deeply penetrating the intrinsically empty nature of all aggregates.
Outside of Buddhist religious terminology, "skandha" can mean "mass, heap, bundle or tree trunk," though these "mundane" usages will not be explored below.[5]
Enumeration and Relationship
Contemporary writers (such as Trungpa Rinpoche and Red Pine) sometimes conceptualize the five aggregates as "one physical and four mental" aggregates. More traditional Buddhist literature (such as the Abhidhamma) speak of one physical aggregate (form), three mental factors (sensation, perception and mental formations) and consciousness.
See Table 1 for examples of definitional references to the aggregates in the Buddhist canon.
Role in Buddhist Metaphysics and Soteriology
Bhikkhu Bodhi (2000b, p. 840) states that an examination of the aggregates has a "critical role" in understanding the Buddha's teachings, specifically in reference to the notions of:
- Understanding the Four Noble Truths: The five aggregates are the "ultimate referent" in the Buddha's elaboration on suffering (dukkha) in his First Noble Truth (see excerpted quote below). Thus, "since all four truths revolve around suffering, understanding the aggregates is essential for understanding the Four Noble Truths as a whole."
- Understanding the Cause of Future Suffering: The five aggregates are the substrata of human clinging and thus "contribute to the causal origination of future suffering."
- Understanding the Nature of Release (nirvana): The release of nirvana (Pali: nibbana) can only be achieved once an individual ceases clinging to the five aggregates.
Excerpts from the Pāli literature bear out Bhikkhu Bodhi's assessment of the importance of the doctrine of the skandhas.[6] In the classic Theravada meditation reference, the Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta ("The Foundations of Mindfulness Discourse," MN 10), the Buddha provides four bases for establishing mindfulness: body (kaya), sensations (vedana), mind (citta) and mental objects (dhamma). When discussing mental objects as a basis for meditation, the Buddha identifies five objects, including the aggregates. Regarding meditation on the aggregates, the Buddha states:
- "How, monks, does a monk live contemplating mental objects in the mental objects of the five aggregates of clinging?
- "Herein, monks, a monk thinks, 'Thus is material form; thus is the arising of material form; and thus is the disappearance of material form. Thus is feeling; thus is the arising of feeling; and thus is the disappearance of feeling. Thus is perception; thus is the arising of perception; and thus is the disappearance of perception. Thus are formations; thus is the arising of formations; and thus is the disappearance of formations. Thus is consciousness; thus is the arising of consciousness; and thus is the disappearance of consciousness.'[7]
- "...Or his mindfulness is established with the thought, 'Mental objects exist,' to the extent necessary just for knowledge and mindfulness, and he lives detached, and clings to nothing in the world. Thus also, monks, a monk lives contemplating mental objects in the mental objects of the five aggregates of clinging." (Nyanasatta, trans., 1994.)
Thus, through mindfulness contemplation, one sees an "aggregate as an aggregate" — sees it arising and dissipating. Such clear seeing creates a space between the aggregate and clinging, a space that will prevent or enervate the arising and propagation of clinging, thereby diminishing future suffering.[8]
As clinging disappears, so too do notions of a separate "self." In the Mahasunnata Sutta ("The Greater Discourse on Emptiness," MN 122), after reiterating the aforementioned aggregate-contemplation instructions (for instance, "Thus is form; thus is the arising of form; and, thus is the disappearance of form"), the Buddha states:
- "When he [a monk] abides contemplating rise and fall in these five aggregates affected by clinging, the conceit 'I am' based on these five aggregates affected by clinging is abandoned in him...." (Nanamoli & Bodhi, 2001, p. 975.)
In a complementary fashion, in the Buddha's second discourse, the Anattalakkhana Sutta ("The Characteristic of Nonself," SN 22:59), the Buddha instructs:
- "Monks, form is nonself. For if, monks, form were self, this form would not lead to affliction, and it would be possible to [manipulate] form [in the following manner]: 'Let my form be thus; let my form not be thus....' [Identical statements are made regarding feeling, perception, volitional formations and consciousness.]
- "...Seeing thus [for instance, through contemplation], monks, the instructed noble disciple becomes disenchanted with form [and the other aggregates].... Being disenchanted, he becomes dispassionate. Through dispassion [his mind] is liberated." (Bodhi, 2005, pp. 341-2.)
In this way, the Theravada understanding of the aggregates contributes to their overall cosmological scheme and to their particular understanding of enlightenment.
Theravada perspectives
In the Pali canon, the aggregates are causally related as follows:[9]
In this scheme, physical form, the mental aggregates,[14] and consciousness are mutually dependent.[15]
Other Buddhist literature has described the aggregates as arising in a linear or progressive fashion, from form to feeling to perception to mental formations to consciousness.[20] In the Buddha's first discourse, the Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta" ("The Setting in Motion the Wheel of Truth Discourse," Samyutta Nikaya 56:11), he mentions the role of the skandhas as follows:
According to Thanissaro (2002):
The Buddha taught that self-identifing with an aggregate would, by necessity, lead to clinging (upadana)[22] to that element; and, given that all aggregates are impermanent (anicca), it is invariable that this attachment would eventually yield agitation (paritassati), loss, grief, stress or suffering. Therefore, to be free of suffering required the wisdom to experience the aggregates clearly, without clinging or craving (tanha), and without associating them with any notion of self (anatta). For example, if one believes "this body is mine" or "I exist within this body," then as their body ages, becomes ill and approaches death, such a person will likely experience longing for youth or health or eternal life, will likely dread of aging, sickness and death, and will likely spend much time and energy lost in fears, fantasies and ultimately futile activities. In the Nikayas, such is likened to shooting oneself with a second arrow, where the first arrow is a physical phenomenon (such as, in this case, a bodily manifestation associated with aging or illness or dying) and the second is the mental anguish of the undisciplined mind associated with the physical phenomenon (see the Sallatha Sutta[23]). On the other hand, one with a disciplined mind who is able to see this body as a set of aggregates will be free of such fear, frustration and time-consuming escapism. But how does one become aware of and then release one's own identification with (/ clinging to) the aggregates? Below is an excerpt from the classic Satipatthana Sutta that shows how traditional mindfulness practices can awaken understanding, release and wisdom. The Samyutta Nikaya contains a book entitled the "Khandhavagga" ("The Book of Aggregates"), which compiles over a hundred suttas related to the five aggregates. Typical of the materials in this collection is the Upadaparitassana Sutta ("Agitation through Clinging Discourse," SN 22:7), which states in part:
Many of the suttas in the Khandhavagga express the aggregates in the context of the following sequence:
Mahayana perspectivesMahayana Buddhism emphasizes the intrinsic emptiness of all things including Skandhas. The classic "Prajnaparamita Hridaya Sutra" ("Heart Sutra") begins:
From its very first verse, the Heart Sutra introduces an alternative to the practice and worldview of the Theravada school with respect to the aggregates. First, whereas Theravada meditation practices relating to the aggregates generally use change-penetrating (vipassana) meditation, here the non-dualistic prajnaparamita practice is invoked. Second, in Theravada texts, when "emptiness of self" is mentioned, the English word "self" is a translation of the Pali word "atta" (Sanskrit, "atman"); in the Heart Sutra, the English word "self" is a translation of the Sanskrit word "sva-bhava".[28] According to Red Pine, "the 'self' (sva) ... was more generalized in its application than 'ego' (atman) and referred not only to beings but to any inherent substance that could be identified as existing in time or space as a permanent or independent entity."[29] (Italics added.) In other words, whereas the Sutta Pitaka typically instructs one to apprehend the aggregates without clinging or self-identification, Prajnaparamita leads one to apprehend the aggregates as having no intrinsic reality.[30] In the Heart Sutra's second verse, after rising from his meditation on the aggregates, Avalokiteshvara (the bodhisattva of compassion) declares:
Red Pine interprets this statement as follows:
Vajrayana perspectivesThe Vajrayana tradition further develops the Buddhist understanding of the skandhas in terms of mahamudra epistemology and tantric reifications. The truth of our insubstantialityReferring to mahamudra teachings, Chogyam Trungpa identifies the form aggregate as the "solidification" of ignorance (Pali, avijja; Skt., avidya), allowing one to have the illusion of "possessing" ever dynamic and spacious wisdom (Pali, vijja; Skt. vidya), and thus being the basis for the creation of a dualistic relationship between "self" and "other."[33] According to Trungpa Rinpoche (1976, pp. 20-22), the five skandhas are "a set of Buddhist concepts which describe experience as a five-step process" and that "the whole development of the five skandhas...is an attempt on our part to shield ourselves from the truth of our insubstantiality," while "the practice of meditation is to see the transparency of this shield." (ibid, p.23) In this way, the illusory (or at least impermanent) nature of the all bodily experiences, and the means of penetrating these illusions (tantric meditation) are emphasized. Bardo deity manifestationsOne of the major developments of the Tibetan Buddhist tradition was a profound exploration of the metaphysical and cosmological nature of reincarnation (samsara). One element of these discoveries was the description of various deities and interim states (bardos) that exist between incarnations, all of which came to be depicted in their unique iconographic tradition. Intriguingly, some Tibetan Lamas postulate a connection between this iconography and their particular perspective on the aggregates. For example, Trungpa Rinpoche writes (2001, p. 38):
Perhaps it is in this sense that the Tibetan Book of the Dead (Fremantle & Trungpa, 2003) makes the following associations between the aggregates and tantric deities during the bardo after death:
References in Buddhist literatureThe table below briefly cites Buddhist primary sources that characterize different aspects of the aggregates. This table is by no means exhaustive.
References
|