Encyclopedia, Difference between revisions of "Raymond Dart" - New World

From New World Encyclopedia
m
Line 5: Line 5:
 
{{epname}}
 
{{epname}}
  
 +
'''Raymond Arthur Dart''' (born February 4, 1893 &ndash died November 22, 1988) was an Australian anatomist and [[anthropology|anthropologist]] best known for his discovery in 1924 of a fossil of Australopithecus at Taung, in Northwestern South Africa.
  
'''Raymond Dart''' ([[February 4]] [[1893]] – [[November 22]] [[1988]]) was an [[Australia]]n [[anatomist]] and [[anthropology|anthropologist]] best known for his discovery in [[1924]] of a fossil of [[Australopithecus]] at [[Taung]] in Northwestern [[South Africa]]. The son of a farmer and tradesman, he was married twice and had two children.
+
==Life==
  
He was born in [[Toowong, Queensland|Toowong]], Australia and studied at [[Ipswich Grammar School]], the [[University of Queensland]], [[University of Sydney]] and [[University College, London]], before taking a position as head of the newly established department of [[anatomy]] at the [[University of Witwatersrand]] in [[Johannesburg]], [[South Africa]] in [[1922]].  
+
Raymond Dart was born in Toowong, Brisbane, Australia into a family of farmers. He was the fifth of nine children. After getting a scholarship and attending the Ipswich Grammar School at the University of Queensland in Brisbane - where he showed his great intelligence by winning several prizes - he continued to study medicine at the [[University of Sydney]]. After graduation, and in the middle of the World War I, Dart decided to go to England to serve in medical corps. Then in 1920 he enrolled at the [[University of London]] to study anatomy.  
  
==Taung Child==
+
At the University of London Dart became an assistant of Grafton Elliot Smith, one of the world’s most famous neuroanatomists. Darn built a reputation being the Smith’s brightest students. In 1922 he, however, accepted a position as head of the newly established department of anatomy at the University of Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa. Dart worked hard to organize the department from scratches.
 +
 
 +
In 1924 Dart excavated fossil bones of what later will be known as the Taung baby. He named it Australopithecus africanus, or Southern ape from Africa, in an article in ''Nature'' which described his finds. The discovery was initially praised in scientific community as a missing link between apes and humans, but later it was rejected as an ape. In 1930 Dart traveled to London to defend his position, but found little understanding. The discovery of Piltdown man and, later Peking men shifted focus from Taung Child.
 +
 
 +
Dart returned to Witwaterrand and continued to focus on his work in anatomy department. He served there as a Dean from 1925 to 1943. In mid 1940s Dart started excavations again, at Makapansgat. He found numerous blackened bones that indicated the possibility the Australopithecus knowledge of fire-making. Dart named the species Australopithecus prometheus. Analyzing their jaw and skeleton, he claimed that they were fierce savage hunters, whose inheritance we all feel today in violent human behavior. Even though those claims were dismissed later by modern scientists, the myth of “killer ape” was perpetuated and popularized through books (e.g. African Genesis by R. Ardrey) and movies (e.g. 2001: Space Odyssey). In late 1940s scientists accepted the hominid nature of Australopithecus, such saving Dart’s name from oblivion.
 +
 
 +
Dart continued to teach at the University of Johannesburg until 1958. He married twice and had two children. He died 1988 at the age of 95.
 +
 
 +
==Work==
 +
 
 +
Besides his work in the Anatomy department at the University of Johannesburg, one of Dart’s main contribution to science was his discovery of Taung child.
 
[[Image:Taung child.jpg|thumb|right|The Taung Child skull at the Maropeng visitor's centre at the Cradle of Humankind.]]
 
[[Image:Taung child.jpg|thumb|right|The Taung Child skull at the Maropeng visitor's centre at the Cradle of Humankind.]]
  
'''Taung Child''' refers to the fossil of a skull specimen of ''[[Australopithecus africanus]]''. It was discovered in [[1924]] by quarryman working for the Northern Lime Company in [[Taung]], [[South Africa]]. [[Raymond Dart]], an anatomist at the [[University of Witwatersrand]], received the artifact, recognized its importance and published his discovery in the journal ''[[Nature (journal)|Nature]]'' in [[1925]], describing it as a new species. Unfortunately, the [[United Kingdom|British]] establishment was at the time enamored with the hoax [[Piltdown man]], which had a large brain and [[ape]]-like teeth -- the exact opposite of the Taung Child -- and Raymond Dart's finding was not appreciated for decades.
+
Taung Child refers to the fossil of a skull specimen of ''[[Australopithecus africanus]]''. It was discovered in 1924 by quarryman working for the Northern Lime Company in Taung, South Africa. Dart immediately recognized its importance and published his discovery in the journal ''[[Nature (journal)|Nature]]'' in 1925, describing it as a new species. The scientific community was very interesting for this find at the beginning, Unfortunately, the British establishment later got tangled with the hoax [[Piltdown man]], which had a large brain and ape-like teeth - the exact opposite of the Taung Child - and Dart's finding was not appreciated for decades. Dart's discovery and Dart himself came under heavily criticism by the eminent anthropologists of the day, most notably Sir Arthur Keith who claimed the Taung Child to be nothing other than a juvenile gorilla.  Because the specimen was indeed a juvenile, there was a lot of room for interpretation, and because African origins for mankind and the development of [[bipedalism]] before a human-like brain were both inconsistent with the prevailing [[evolution|evolutionary]] notions of the time, Dart and his Child became the butt of many attacks.
 +
 
 +
Taung Child is believed to have been a three-year-old being at the time of its death 2.5 million years ago. It was a creature standing 3' 6" at approximately 75 pounds. It had a cranial capacity of 340cc, living mainly in a savanna habitat. Examinations of Taung Child compared to that of an equivalent 9-year-old child suggest that Australopithecus africanus had a growth rate more similar to modern apes than to modern ''[[Homo sapiens]]''. However intermediate species such as ''[[Homo ergaster]]/[[Homo erectus]]'' are thought to have gone through growths intermediate between modern humans and apes. The evidence has mostly been based on that of [[Turkana Boy]] discovered in 1984.
 +
 
 +
Based on the examination of bones, Dart concluded that Australopithecus africanus could walk upright, and possibly use tools. The controversy arose around the usage of tools, where some claimed that Australopithecus used bones of antelopes and wild boars as tools, while others argued that those bones were only remains of food Australopithecus ate. 
 +
 
 +
When in late 1940s Robert Broom and Wilfrid Le Gros Clark discovered further [[australopithecine]]s, support eventually vindicated Dart.  So much so that in 1947, Sir Arthur Keith said "...Dart was right, and I was wrong."
  
Taung Child is believed to have been a three-year-old being at the time of its death 2.5 million years ago. It was a creature standing 3' 6" at approximately 75 pounds. Taung Child had a [[cranial capacity]] of 340[[cc]], living mainly in a [[savanna]] habitat. Examinations of Taung Child compared to that of an equivalent 9-year-old child suggest that ''A. africanus'' had a growth rate to adolescence the same as in modern apes like [[chimpanzee]]s (genus ''Pan'') than compared with modern ''[[Homo sapiens]]''. However intermediate species such as ''[[Homo ergaster]]/[[Homo erectus]]'' are thought to have gone through growths intermediate between modern humans and apes. The evidence has mostly been based on that of [[Turkana Boy]] discovered in [[1984]].
+
In early 2006 it was announced [http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/01/12/humans.birds.ap/] that the Taung Child was likely killed by an eagle, or similar large predatory bird. This conclusion was reached by noting similarities in the damage to the skull and eye sockets of the Taung Child to the skulls of primates known to have been killed by modern eagles.
  
Its significance lies in the fact that this was the first of the fossils which had been found in the twenties and thirties to prove that the human race does indeed have a 'natural history' all of its own - just as [[Charles Darwin|Darwin]] had predicted. (Which is not quite the same as accepting [[Darwinism]] for an explanation of the relationship between the australopithecines and the hominids - which Darwin never offered -, but it does lay down the time-scales and the factual basis for a discussion about our own ancestors which includes 'proto-culture' as one of the variables in such a 'reconstruction' of our collective past.)
+
The skull is now (as of 2006) exhibited at the Maropeng visitor's center at the Cradle of Humankind in Gauteng, South Africa.  
  
In early 2006 it was announced [http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/01/12/humans.birds.ap/] that the Taung Child was likely killed by an [[eagle]] (or similar large predatory bird). This conclusion was reached by noting similarities in the damage to the skull and eye sockets of the Taung Child to the skulls of primates known to have been killed by modern eagles.
+
==Legacy==
  
The skull is now (as of 2006) exhibited at the [[Maropeng]] visitor's centre at the [[Cradle of Humankind]].
+
The significance of Dart’s work lies in the fact that Toung Child was the first of the fossils which had been found to prove that the human race does indeed have a 'natural history' all of its own - just as [[Charles Darwin|Darwin]] had predicted. This does not mean the same as accepting [[Darwinism]] for an explanation of the relationship between the australopithecines and the hominids - which Darwin never offered - but it does lay down the timeline and the factual basis for a discussion about our own ancestors which includes 'proto-culture' as one of the variables in such a 'reconstruction' of our collective past. Whether australopithecines are the direct ancestors of human line, or just our cousins on evolutionary scale, remains a mystery.  
  
 +
Phillip Tobias continued Dart’s work and has contributed to the study of [[Cradle of Humanity]]. The Institute for the Study of Man in Africa was founded at Witwatersrand in Dart’s honor.
  
==External links==
+
==Bibliography==
  
* [http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/fascinatingdeaths.shtml Downloadable 30 minute analysis by the BBC]
+
* Dart Raymond A. (1925): [http://www.nature.com/nature/ancestor/pdf/115195.pdf Australopithecus africanus: The man-ape of South Africa]. ''Nature'', 115, 195-9
  
 +
* Dart, Raymond A. & Craig, Dennis. (1959/1982). ''Adventures with the Missing Link''. Better Baby Press. ISBN 0936676299
  
In [[1924]], a [[limestone]] [[quarry]] owner at [[Taung]] shipped Dart a box of fossiliferous rock.  Digging around in it, Dart found an [[endocranial cast]], and then it's matching fossil skullpiece. (Source: Lucy)  Dart examined this [[Taung Child]] fossil, as it came to be known, and pronounced it to be a new species, ''[[Australopithecus africanus]]''.  Dart postulated his new find to be a missing link between [[ape]]s and humans because of its small [[brain]] size, but relatively human-like [[dentition]] and a probable upright [[posture]].
+
==References==
  
Dart's discovery and Dart himself were initially heavily criticized by the eminent anthropologists of the day, most notably [[Sir Arthur Keith]] who claimed the Taung Child to be nothing other than a juvenile [[gorilla]]. Because the specimen was indeed a juvenile, there was a lot of room for interpretation, and because African origins for mankind and the development of [[bipedalism]] before a human-like brain were both inconsistent with the prevailing [[evolution|evolutionary]] notions of the time, Dart and his Child became the butt of many attacks.
+
* Fagan, Brian. The Passion of Raymond Dart. ''Archaeology'', 42, 18.
  
Dart's closest ally was [[Robert Broom]] whose discoveries of further [[australopithecine]]s, as well as [[Wilfrid Le Gros Clark]]'s support eventually vindicated Dart.  So much so that in 1947, Sir Arthur Keith said "...Dart was right, and I was wrong."
+
* Johanson, Donald & Maitland, Edey. (1990). ''Lucy: The Beginnings of Humandkind''. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0671724991
  
Not all of Dart's ideas are accepted today, however. His assertion that [[gazelle]] long-bones found in association with ''Australopithecus africanus'' were used as [[tools]] is unproven and largely dismissed. Dart also originated the [[killer ape theory]]; although some other anthropologists, notably [[Robert Ardrey]], defended or further developed the theory, it is not generally accepted today.
+
* Tattersall, Ian. (1997). ''The fossil trail: How we know what we think we know about human evolution''. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0195109813
  
Dart continued in his position as director of the School of Anatomy at [[University of Witwatersrand]], [[Johannesburg]], until [[1958]]. There he worked with [[Phillip Tobias]] who continues his work to this day, and has contributed to the study of [[Cradle of Humanity]]. In [[1959]], an autobiographical account of his discovery was published called ''Adventures with the Missing Link.''. The [[Institute for the Study of Man in Africa]] was founded at Witwatersrand in his honor.
+
* Wheelhouse, Frances. (2001). ''Dart: Scientist and man of grit''. Hornsby, Australia: Transpareon Press. ISBN 0908021216
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
*[http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/information/biography/abcde/dart_raymond.html Raymond Dart]
 
*[http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/rdart.html Raymond Dart]
 
  
 +
*[http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/information/biography/abcde/dart_raymond.html Raymond Dart biography 1]
  
==Bibliography==
+
*[http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/rdart.html Raymond Dart biography 2]
* Dart R.A. (1925): [http://www.nature.com/nature/ancestor/pdf/115195.pdf Australopithecus africanus: the man-ape of South Africa]. ''Nature'', 115:195-9 (the original paper communicating the Taung finding, in PDF format).
+
 
* Dart, Raymond and Craig, Dennis. ''Adventures with the Missing Link''. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1959 (autobiography).
+
* [http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/fascinatingdeaths.shtml Downloadable 30 minute analysis by the BBC]
* Fagan, Brian. ''The Passion of Raymond Dart.'' Archaeology v. 42 (May-June 1989): p. 18.
 
* Johanson, Donald & Maitland Edey. ''Lucy: The Beginnings of Humandkind''. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1990 ISBN 0671250361
 
  
  
 
{{Credit2|Raymond_Dart|56444986|Taung_Child|53915186|}}
 
{{Credit2|Raymond_Dart|56444986|Taung_Child|53915186|}}

Revision as of 17:57, 22 June 2006


Raymond Arthur Dart (born February 4, 1893 &ndash died November 22, 1988) was an Australian anatomist and anthropologist best known for his discovery in 1924 of a fossil of Australopithecus at Taung, in Northwestern South Africa.

Life

Raymond Dart was born in Toowong, Brisbane, Australia into a family of farmers. He was the fifth of nine children. After getting a scholarship and attending the Ipswich Grammar School at the University of Queensland in Brisbane - where he showed his great intelligence by winning several prizes - he continued to study medicine at the University of Sydney. After graduation, and in the middle of the World War I, Dart decided to go to England to serve in medical corps. Then in 1920 he enrolled at the University of London to study anatomy.

At the University of London Dart became an assistant of Grafton Elliot Smith, one of the world’s most famous neuroanatomists. Darn built a reputation being the Smith’s brightest students. In 1922 he, however, accepted a position as head of the newly established department of anatomy at the University of Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa. Dart worked hard to organize the department from scratches.

In 1924 Dart excavated fossil bones of what later will be known as the Taung baby. He named it Australopithecus africanus, or Southern ape from Africa, in an article in Nature which described his finds. The discovery was initially praised in scientific community as a missing link between apes and humans, but later it was rejected as an ape. In 1930 Dart traveled to London to defend his position, but found little understanding. The discovery of Piltdown man and, later Peking men shifted focus from Taung Child.

Dart returned to Witwaterrand and continued to focus on his work in anatomy department. He served there as a Dean from 1925 to 1943. In mid 1940s Dart started excavations again, at Makapansgat. He found numerous blackened bones that indicated the possibility the Australopithecus knowledge of fire-making. Dart named the species Australopithecus prometheus. Analyzing their jaw and skeleton, he claimed that they were fierce savage hunters, whose inheritance we all feel today in violent human behavior. Even though those claims were dismissed later by modern scientists, the myth of “killer ape” was perpetuated and popularized through books (e.g. African Genesis by R. Ardrey) and movies (e.g. 2001: Space Odyssey). In late 1940s scientists accepted the hominid nature of Australopithecus, such saving Dart’s name from oblivion.

Dart continued to teach at the University of Johannesburg until 1958. He married twice and had two children. He died 1988 at the age of 95.

Work

Besides his work in the Anatomy department at the University of Johannesburg, one of Dart’s main contribution to science was his discovery of Taung child.

The Taung Child skull at the Maropeng visitor's centre at the Cradle of Humankind.

Taung Child refers to the fossil of a skull specimen of Australopithecus africanus. It was discovered in 1924 by quarryman working for the Northern Lime Company in Taung, South Africa. Dart immediately recognized its importance and published his discovery in the journal Nature in 1925, describing it as a new species. The scientific community was very interesting for this find at the beginning, Unfortunately, the British establishment later got tangled with the hoax Piltdown man, which had a large brain and ape-like teeth - the exact opposite of the Taung Child - and Dart's finding was not appreciated for decades. Dart's discovery and Dart himself came under heavily criticism by the eminent anthropologists of the day, most notably Sir Arthur Keith who claimed the Taung Child to be nothing other than a juvenile gorilla. Because the specimen was indeed a juvenile, there was a lot of room for interpretation, and because African origins for mankind and the development of bipedalism before a human-like brain were both inconsistent with the prevailing evolutionary notions of the time, Dart and his Child became the butt of many attacks.

Taung Child is believed to have been a three-year-old being at the time of its death 2.5 million years ago. It was a creature standing 3' 6" at approximately 75 pounds. It had a cranial capacity of 340cc, living mainly in a savanna habitat. Examinations of Taung Child compared to that of an equivalent 9-year-old child suggest that Australopithecus africanus had a growth rate more similar to modern apes than to modern Homo sapiens. However intermediate species such as Homo ergaster/Homo erectus are thought to have gone through growths intermediate between modern humans and apes. The evidence has mostly been based on that of Turkana Boy discovered in 1984.

Based on the examination of bones, Dart concluded that Australopithecus africanus could walk upright, and possibly use tools. The controversy arose around the usage of tools, where some claimed that Australopithecus used bones of antelopes and wild boars as tools, while others argued that those bones were only remains of food Australopithecus ate.

When in late 1940s Robert Broom and Wilfrid Le Gros Clark discovered further australopithecines, support eventually vindicated Dart. So much so that in 1947, Sir Arthur Keith said "...Dart was right, and I was wrong."

In early 2006 it was announced [1] that the Taung Child was likely killed by an eagle, or similar large predatory bird. This conclusion was reached by noting similarities in the damage to the skull and eye sockets of the Taung Child to the skulls of primates known to have been killed by modern eagles.

The skull is now (as of 2006) exhibited at the Maropeng visitor's center at the Cradle of Humankind in Gauteng, South Africa.

Legacy

The significance of Dart’s work lies in the fact that Toung Child was the first of the fossils which had been found to prove that the human race does indeed have a 'natural history' all of its own - just as Darwin had predicted. This does not mean the same as accepting Darwinism for an explanation of the relationship between the australopithecines and the hominids - which Darwin never offered - but it does lay down the timeline and the factual basis for a discussion about our own ancestors which includes 'proto-culture' as one of the variables in such a 'reconstruction' of our collective past. Whether australopithecines are the direct ancestors of human line, or just our cousins on evolutionary scale, remains a mystery.

Phillip Tobias continued Dart’s work and has contributed to the study of Cradle of Humanity. The Institute for the Study of Man in Africa was founded at Witwatersrand in Dart’s honor.

Bibliography

  • Dart, Raymond A. & Craig, Dennis. (1959/1982). Adventures with the Missing Link. Better Baby Press. ISBN 0936676299

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Fagan, Brian. The Passion of Raymond Dart. Archaeology, 42, 18.
  • Johanson, Donald & Maitland, Edey. (1990). Lucy: The Beginnings of Humandkind. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0671724991
  • Tattersall, Ian. (1997). The fossil trail: How we know what we think we know about human evolution. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0195109813
  • Wheelhouse, Frances. (2001). Dart: Scientist and man of grit. Hornsby, Australia: Transpareon Press. ISBN 0908021216

External links


Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.