Difference between revisions of "Image of Edessa" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
m
m
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:Abgarwithimageofedessa10thcentury.jpg|thumb|right|250Ppx|According to the legend, King Abgarus received the Image of Edessa, a likeness of Jesus.]]
+
[[Image:Abgarwithimageofedessa10thcentury.jpg|thumb|right|250px|King Abgarus receiving the Image of Edessa, which allegedly depicts Jesus.]]
According to [[Christian]] legend, the '''Image of Edessa''', (known to [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Orthodox]] Christians as the '''''Holy Mandylion''''', a Byzantine Greek word not applied in any other context), was a holy relic consisting of a square or rectangle of cloth upon which a miraculous image of the face of [[Jesus]] was imprinted &mdash; the first [[icon]] ("image").<ref>Since Jesus was living at the time, this image would seem to have no connection with his alleged burial cloth, the [[Shroud of Turin]], but see below.</ref> 
 
  
According to the legend, King [[Abgar V of Edessa|Abgar of Edessa]] wrote to Jesus, asking him to come cure him of an illness. Abgar received an answering letter from Jesus, declining the invitation, but promising a future visit by one of his disciples. Along with the letter went a likeness of Jesus. This legend was first recorded in the early fourth century by [[Eusebius of Caesarea]]<ref>Eusebius, ''[[Church History (Eusebius)|Historia Ecclesiae]]'' 1.13.5 and .22.</ref>, who said that he had transcribed and translated the actual letter in the Syriac chancery documents of the king of Edessa. Instead, the [[Seventy Disciples|apostle]] "[[Thaddeus of Edessa|Thaddaeus]]" is said to have come to Edessa, bearing the words of Jesus, by the virtues of which the king was miraculously healed.  
+
According to [[Christian]] legend, the '''Image of Edessa''', known to [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Orthodox]] Christians as the '''''Holy Mandylion''''',  was a holy relic consisting of a cloth upon which a miraculous image of the face of [[Jesus]] was allegedly imprinted &mdash; the so-called first [[icon]] ("image").<ref>Since Jesus was living at the time, this image would seem to have no connection with his alleged burial cloth, the [[Shroud of Turin]], but see below.</ref> 
 +
 
 +
According to legend, King [[Abgar V of Edessa|Abgar of Edessa]] wrote to Jesus, asking him to come cure him of an illness. Abgar received an answering letter from Jesus, declining the invitation, but promising a future visit by one of his disciples. Along with the letter went a likeness of Jesus. This legend was first recorded in the early fourth century by [[Eusebius of Caesarea]],<ref>Eusebius, ''[[Church History (Eusebius)|Historia Ecclesiae]]'' 1.13.5 and .22.</ref> who said that he had transcribed and translated the actual letter in the Syriac chancery documents of the king of Edessa. Instead, the [[Seventy Disciples|apostle]] "[[Thaddeus of Edessa|Thaddaeus]]" is said to have come to Edessa, bearing the words of Jesus, by the virtues of which the king was miraculously healed.  
  
 
The first record of the existence of a physical image was in the sixth century, in the ancient city of [[Edessa]] (now Urfa). The image was moved to [[Constantinople]] in the tenth Century. The cloth disappeared from Constantinople during the [[Fourth Crusade]] (Sack of Constantinople) in 1204, reappearing as a relic in King [[Louis IX of France]]'s [[Sainte Chapelle]] in [[Paris]]. It finally disappeared in the [[French Revolution]].
 
The first record of the existence of a physical image was in the sixth century, in the ancient city of [[Edessa]] (now Urfa). The image was moved to [[Constantinople]] in the tenth Century. The cloth disappeared from Constantinople during the [[Fourth Crusade]] (Sack of Constantinople) in 1204, reappearing as a relic in King [[Louis IX of France]]'s [[Sainte Chapelle]] in [[Paris]]. It finally disappeared in the [[French Revolution]].
 
The vicissitudes of the Edessa image between the first century and its location in his own time are not reported by Eusebius. The materials, according to the scholar [[Robert Eisenman]], "are very widespread in the Syriac sources with so many multiple developments and divergences that it is hard to believe they could all be based on Eusebius' poor efforts" (Eisenman 1997:862).
 
 
The Eastern Orthodox Church have a feast of this icon  on August 16 (August 29 in N.S.), which commemorates its transition from Edessa to Constantinople.
 
  
 
== History of the legend==
 
== History of the legend==
 
The story of the Mandylion is the product of centuries of development. The first version is found in [[Eusebius of Caesarea|Eusebius]]' ''History of the Church'' (1.13.5-1.13.22). Eusebius claimed that he had transcribed and translated the actual letter in the Syriac chancery documents of the king of Edessa. This records a letter written by King [[Abgar of Edessa]] to Jesus, asking him to come cure him of an illness. Jesus replies by letter, saying that when he had completed his earthly mission and ascended to heaven, he would send a disciple to heal Abgar (and does so). At this stage, there is no mention of an image of Jesus.  
 
The story of the Mandylion is the product of centuries of development. The first version is found in [[Eusebius of Caesarea|Eusebius]]' ''History of the Church'' (1.13.5-1.13.22). Eusebius claimed that he had transcribed and translated the actual letter in the Syriac chancery documents of the king of Edessa. This records a letter written by King [[Abgar of Edessa]] to Jesus, asking him to come cure him of an illness. Jesus replies by letter, saying that when he had completed his earthly mission and ascended to heaven, he would send a disciple to heal Abgar (and does so). At this stage, there is no mention of an image of Jesus.  
  
In AD 384, [[Egeria (pilgrim)|Egeria]], a pilgrim from either Gaul or Spain, was given a personal tour by the Bishop of Edessa, who gave her many marvellous accounts of miracles that had saved Edessa from the Persians and put into her hands transcripts of the correspondence of Abgarus and Jesus, with embellishments. Part of her accounts of her travels, in letters to her sisterhood, survive. "She naïvely supposed that this version was more complete than the shorter letter which she had read in a translation at home, presumably one brought back to the Far West by an earlier pilgrim" (Palmer 1998). Her escorted tour, accompanied by a translator, was thorough; the bishop is quoted: "Now let us go to the gate where the messenger Ananias came in with the letter of which I have been telling you." (Palmer). There was however, no mention of any image reported by Egeria, who spent three days inspecting every corner of Edessa and the environs.
+
The vicissitudes of the Edessa image between the first century and its location in his own time are not reported by Eusebius. The materials, according to the scholar [[Robert Eisenman]], "are very widespread in the Syriac sources with so many multiple developments and divergences that it is hard to believe they could all be based on Eusebius' poor efforts" (Eisenman 1997:862).
 +
 
 +
In 384 C.E., [[Egeria (pilgrim)|Egeria]], a pilgrim from either Gaul or Spain, was given a personal tour by the Bishop of Edessa, who gave her many marvellous accounts of miracles that had saved Edessa from the Persians and put into her hands transcripts of the correspondence of Abgarus and Jesus, with embellishments. Part of her accounts of her travels, in letters to her sisterhood, survive. "She naïvely supposed that this version was more complete than the shorter letter which she had read in a translation at home, presumably one brought back to the Far West by an earlier pilgrim" (Palmer 1998). Her escorted tour, accompanied by a translator, was thorough; the bishop is quoted: "Now let us go to the gate where the messenger Ananias came in with the letter of which I have been telling you." (Palmer). There was however, no mention of any image reported by Egeria, who spent three days inspecting Edessa and the environs.
  
 
The next stage of development appears in the ''[[Doctrine of Addai]]'' [Thaddeus], c. 400, which introduces a court painter among a delegation sent by Abgar to Jesus, who paints a portrait of Jesus to take back to his master:  
 
The next stage of development appears in the ''[[Doctrine of Addai]]'' [Thaddeus], c. 400, which introduces a court painter among a delegation sent by Abgar to Jesus, who paints a portrait of Jesus to take back to his master:  
Line 20: Line 19:
 
Thus we can trace the development of the legend from a letter, but no image in Eusebius, to an image painted by a court painter in Addai; then to a miracle caused by the letter in Procopius, which becomes a miracle caused by a miraculously-created image supernaturally made when Jesus pressed a cloth to his wet face in Evagrius.  
 
Thus we can trace the development of the legend from a letter, but no image in Eusebius, to an image painted by a court painter in Addai; then to a miracle caused by the letter in Procopius, which becomes a miracle caused by a miraculously-created image supernaturally made when Jesus pressed a cloth to his wet face in Evagrius.  
  
The later legend of the image recounts that because the successors of Abgar reverted to paganism, the bishop placed the miraculous image inside a wall, and setting a burning lamp before the image, he sealed them up behind a tile; that the image was later found again, after a vision, on the very night of the Persian invasion, and that not only had it miraculously reproduced itself on the tile, but the same lamp was still burning before it; further, that the bishop of Edessa used a fire into which oil flowing from the image was poured to destroy the Persians.
+
The later legend of the image recounts that since the successors of Abgar reverted to paganism, the bishop placed the miraculous image inside a wall, and setting a burning lamp before the image, he sealed them up behind a tile; that the image was later found again, after a vision, on the very night of the Persian invasion, and that not only had it miraculously reproduced itself on the tile, but the same lamp was still burning before it; further, that the bishop of Edessa used a fire into which oil flowing from the image was poured to destroy the Persians.
  
This long-developing legend of a miraculous first image of Jesus that appeared on a cloth he pressed to his wet face, was adopted by the Eastern Orthodox church not as legend, but as historical fact. Countless reproductions of what was considered to be the image were painted as icons; in the nineteenth century they were carried as [[khorugv]]s by the Russian armies. According to Robin Cormack, almost every Byzantine church contained a representation of the image by the beginning of the Iconoclastic period.<ref>Robin Cormack, ''Writing in Gold, Byzantine Society and its Icons'', 1985, George Philip, London, ISBN 054001085-5</ref> Because the miraculous image of the later legend was believed to be not made by humans but by God, it is called ''[[Acheiropoieta|acheiropoietos]]'' in Greek—"Not Made by Hands."  
+
This long-developing legend of a miraculous first image of Jesus that appeared on a cloth he pressed to his wet face, was adopted by the Eastern Orthodox church not as legend, but as historical fact. Countless reproductions of what was considered to be the image were painted as icons; in the nineteenth century they were carried as [[khorugv]]s (religious banner) by the Russian armies. According to Robin Cormack, almost every Byzantine church contained a representation of the image by the beginning of the Iconoclastic period.<ref>Robin Cormack, ''Writing in Gold, Byzantine Society and its Icons'', 1985, George Philip, London, ISBN 054001085-5</ref> Because the miraculous image of the later legend was believed to be not made by humans but by God, it is called ''[[Acheiropoieta|acheiropoietos]]'' in Greek—"Not Made by Hands."  
 
[[John of Damascus]] (died 749) mentions the image in his anti-iconoclastic work ''On Holy Images'',<ref>[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/damascus/icons.html On-line text].</ref> quoting a tradition that Abgarus had requested an image of Jesus and Jesus himself put a cloth to his face to produce the image. The cloth is described as being a "strip," or oblong cloth, rather than a square, as other accounts hold.
 
[[John of Damascus]] (died 749) mentions the image in his anti-iconoclastic work ''On Holy Images'',<ref>[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/damascus/icons.html On-line text].</ref> quoting a tradition that Abgarus had requested an image of Jesus and Jesus himself put a cloth to his face to produce the image. The cloth is described as being a "strip," or oblong cloth, rather than a square, as other accounts hold.
  
 
==History of the physical image==
 
==History of the physical image==
The image itself is said to have surfaced in 525, during a [[flood]] of the Daisan, a tributary stream of the [[Euphrates]] that passed by Edessa. This flood is mentioned in the writings of the court historian [[Procopius of Caesarea]]. In the course of the reconstruction work, a cloth bearing the facial features of a man was discovered hidden in the wall above one of the gates of Edessa.
+
The image itself is said to have surfaced in 525 C.E., during a [[flood]] of the Daisan, a tributary stream of the [[Euphrates]] that passed by Edessa. This flood is mentioned in the writings of the court historian [[Procopius of Caesarea]]. In the course of the reconstruction work, a cloth bearing the facial features of a man was discovered hidden in the wall above one of the gates of Edessa.
  
By 544, when Procopius recorded the recovery of Edessa from the Persians, he attributed the event to the ''letter'' sent from Jesus to Abgar. In a further elaboration, in 593 [[Evagrius]] attributed the same event to a "God-made image," a miraculous imprint of the face of Jesus upon a cloth. It was this last and latest stage of the legend that became accepted in Eastern Orthodoxy.
+
By 544 C.E., when Procopius recorded the recovery of Edessa from the Persians, he attributed the event to the ''letter'' sent from Jesus to Abgar. In a further elaboration, in 593 C.E., [[Evagrius]] attributed the same event to a "God-made image," a miraculous imprint of the face of Jesus upon a cloth. It was this last and latest stage of the legend that became accepted in Eastern Orthodoxy.
  
 
[[Evagrius Scholasticus]] mentions in his ''Ecclesiastical History'' the image of Edessa discovered in 544, that was "created by God, and not produced by the hands of man." This idea of an icon that was ''[[Acheiropoieta|Acheiropoietos]]'' (Αχειροποίητος, literally "not-made-by-hand") is a separate enrichment of the original legend: similar legends of supernatural origins have accrued to other Orthodox icons.
 
[[Evagrius Scholasticus]] mentions in his ''Ecclesiastical History'' the image of Edessa discovered in 544, that was "created by God, and not produced by the hands of man." This idea of an icon that was ''[[Acheiropoieta|Acheiropoietos]]'' (Αχειροποίητος, literally "not-made-by-hand") is a separate enrichment of the original legend: similar legends of supernatural origins have accrued to other Orthodox icons.
  
The ''Holy Mandylion'' disappeared again after the [[Sassanid Empire|Sassanian]]s conquered [[Edessa]] in 609. An Arab legend, related to historian Andrew Palmer when he visited [[Urfa]] (Edessa) in 1999, relates that the towel or burial cloth''(mendil)'' of [[Jesus Christ|Jesus]] was thrown into a well in what is today the city's Great Mosque. The Christian tradition is at variance with this, recounting how in 944 it was exchanged for a group of Muslim prisoners&mdash; at that time the Image of Edessa was taken to [[Constantinople]] where it was received amidst great celebration by emperor [[Romanus I]], who deposited it in the chapel of the [[Great Palace of Constantinople]]. It remained there until the Crusaders sacked the city in 1204 and carried off many of its treasures to western Europe - though the "Image of Edessa" is not mentioned in this context in any contemporary document. A small part of this relic, or one believed to be the same, was one of the large group sold by [[Baldwin II of Constantinople]] to [[Louis IX of France]] in 1241 and housed in the [[Sainte Chapelle]] in Paris (two documentary inventories: year 1534 (Gerard of St. Quentin de l´Isle/Paris) and year 1740) until it disappeared during the [[French Revolution]] (not to be confused with the Sainte Chapelle at [[Chambery]], home for a period of the Shroud of Turin).<ref>[http://www.artnet.com/library/05/0537/T053734.asp Grove Dictionary of Art], also [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=1474-6913(1931)3%3A3%3C238%3ASROTIO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-6 Steven Runciman, Some Remarks on the Image of Edessa, Cambridge Historical Journal 1931] and [http://www.shroud.com/pdfs/n56part5.pdf] for a list of the group of relics; see also: [http://histor.ws/grabtuch/bild/saintchapel.gif an image of the gothic reliquary dating from the 13th century], in: [http://histor.ws/grabtuch/geschichte02.htm]</ref>
+
The ''Holy Mandylion'' disappeared again after the [[Sassanid Empire|Sassanian]]s conquered [[Edessa]] in 609. An Arab legend, related to historian Andrew Palmer when he visited [[Urfa]] (Edessa) in 1999, relates that the towel or burial cloth ''(mendil)'' of [[Jesus Christ|Jesus]] was thrown into a well in what is today the city's Great Mosque. The Christian tradition is at variance with this, recounting how in 944 it was exchanged for a group of Muslim prisoners&mdash; at that time the Image of Edessa was taken to [[Constantinople]] where it was received amidst great celebration by emperor [[Romanus I]], who deposited it in the chapel of the [[Great Palace of Constantinople]]. It remained there until the Crusaders sacked the city in 1204 and carried off many of its treasures to western Europe - though the "Image of Edessa" is not mentioned in this context in any contemporary document. A small part of this relic, or one believed to be the same, was one of the large group sold by [[Baldwin II of Constantinople]] to [[Louis IX of France]] in 1241 and housed in the [[Sainte Chapelle]] in Paris (two documentary inventories: year 1534 (Gerard of St. Quentin de l´Isle/Paris) and year 1740) until it disappeared during the [[French Revolution]] (not to be confused with the Sainte Chapelle at [[Chambery]], home for a period of the Shroud of Turin).<ref>[http://www.artnet.com/library/05/0537/T053734.asp Grove Dictionary of Art], also [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=1474-6913(1931)3%3A3%3C238%3ASROTIO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-6 Steven Runciman, Some Remarks on the Image of Edessa, Cambridge Historical Journal 1931] and [http://www.shroud.com/pdfs/n56part5.pdf] for a list of the group of relics; see also: [http://histor.ws/grabtuch/bild/saintchapel.gif an image of the gothic reliquary dating from the 13th century], in: [http://histor.ws/grabtuch/geschichte02.htm]</ref>
  
 
==Links with the Shroud of Turin==
 
==Links with the Shroud of Turin==
Line 63: Line 62:
  
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
<!--This article uses the Cite.php citation mechanism. If you would like more information on how to add references to this article, please see http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cite/Cite.php —>
 
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
  
==See also==
+
==References==
* [[Acheiropoieta]]: images 'Not made by Hands'
+
*Eisenman, Robert., 1997. ''James the Brother of Jesus''. (Viking Penguin).
* [[Shroud of Turin]]
+
*Palmer, Andrew.  1998.
* [[Relics attributed to Jesus]]
 
* [[Images of Jesus]]
 
* [[Veil of Veronica]], the other "true image" ''(vera icon)''
 
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
*[http://www.mpg.de/bilderBerichteDokumente/dokumentation/jahrbuch/2005/kunsthistorisches_institut/forschungsSchwerpunkt1/Web.jpeg Image: Mandylion of Genoa]
+
*[http://www.mpg.de/bilderBerichteDokumente/dokumentation/jahrbuch/2005/kunsthistorisches_institut/forschungsSchwerpunkt1/Web.jpeg Image: Mandylion of Genoa] Retrieved January 17, 2009.
*[http://www.urfa.org/urfa/ Old and new Images from Edessa]
+
*[http://www.urfa.org/urfa/ Old and new Images from Edessa] Retrieved January 17, 2009.
*[http://www.isidore-of-seville.com/goudenhoorn/61andrew.html Andrew Palmer's essay on Edessa in ''Golden Horn: a Journal of Byzantium''] summer, 1998
+
*[http://www.isidore-of-seville.com/goudenhoorn/61andrew.html Andrew Palmer's essay on Edessa in ''Golden Horn: a Journal of Byzantium''] Retrieved January 17, 2009.
*[http://www.icon-art.info/topic.php?lng=en&top_id=122 Icons of the Mandylion (mostly Russian)]
+
*[http://www.icon-art.info/topic.php?lng=en&top_id=122 Icons of the Mandylion (mostly Russian)] Retrieved January 17, 2009.
*[http://www.shroudofturin4journalists.com/history.htm Is the Shroud of Turin the Image of Edessa?]
+
*[http://www.shroudofturin4journalists.com/history.htm Is the Shroud of Turin the Image of Edessa?] Retrieved January 17, 2009.
*[http://www.mystae.com/restricted/reflections/messiah/edessa.html "The Image of Edessa":"Not-Made-by-Human-Hand"] Ancient and modern references.
+
*[http://www.mystae.com/restricted/reflections/messiah/edessa.html "The Image of Edessa":"Not-Made-by-Human-Hand".] Retrieved January 17, 2009.
*[http://www.shroud.com/pdfs/guscin3.pdf Eyewitness report: The sermon of Gregory Referendarius in 944]  
+
*[http://www.shroud.com/pdfs/guscin3.pdf Eyewitness report: The sermon of Gregory Referendarius in 944.] Retrieved January 17, 2009.
*[http://www.shroudstory.com/scavone/scavone.doc Documentary proofs, make out a list of sixteen documents in the period 944 to 1247]
+
*[http://www.shroudstory.com/scavone/scavone.doc Documentary proofs, make out a list of sixteen documents in the period 944 to 1247.] Retrieved January 17, 2009.
 +
*[http://www.comparative-religion.com/christianity/apocrypha/new-testament-apocrypha/1/1.php  Eusebius of Caesarea,  ''Epistle of Jesus Christ to Abgarus King of Edessa''  in ''Historia Ecclesiae.'']  Retrieved January 17, 2009.
  
==References==
 
*Eusebius of Caesarea. [http://www.comparative-religion.com/christianity/apocrypha/new-testament-apocrypha/1/1.php      ''Epistle of Jesus Christ to Abgarus King of Edessa''] ''Historia Ecclesiae''
 
*Eisenman, Robert., 1997. ''James the Brother of Jesus''. (Viking Penguin). In part a deconstruction of the legends surrounding Agbar/Abgar.
 
  
 
[[Category:Relics attributed to Jesus]]
 
[[Category:Relics attributed to Jesus]]

Revision as of 04:44, 17 January 2009

King Abgarus receiving the Image of Edessa, which allegedly depicts Jesus.

According to Christian legend, the Image of Edessa, known to Orthodox Christians as the Holy Mandylion, was a holy relic consisting of a cloth upon which a miraculous image of the face of Jesus was allegedly imprinted — the so-called first icon ("image").[1]

According to legend, King Abgar of Edessa wrote to Jesus, asking him to come cure him of an illness. Abgar received an answering letter from Jesus, declining the invitation, but promising a future visit by one of his disciples. Along with the letter went a likeness of Jesus. This legend was first recorded in the early fourth century by Eusebius of Caesarea,[2] who said that he had transcribed and translated the actual letter in the Syriac chancery documents of the king of Edessa. Instead, the apostle "Thaddaeus" is said to have come to Edessa, bearing the words of Jesus, by the virtues of which the king was miraculously healed.

The first record of the existence of a physical image was in the sixth century, in the ancient city of Edessa (now Urfa). The image was moved to Constantinople in the tenth Century. The cloth disappeared from Constantinople during the Fourth Crusade (Sack of Constantinople) in 1204, reappearing as a relic in King Louis IX of France's Sainte Chapelle in Paris. It finally disappeared in the French Revolution.

History of the legend

The story of the Mandylion is the product of centuries of development. The first version is found in Eusebius' History of the Church (1.13.5-1.13.22). Eusebius claimed that he had transcribed and translated the actual letter in the Syriac chancery documents of the king of Edessa. This records a letter written by King Abgar of Edessa to Jesus, asking him to come cure him of an illness. Jesus replies by letter, saying that when he had completed his earthly mission and ascended to heaven, he would send a disciple to heal Abgar (and does so). At this stage, there is no mention of an image of Jesus.

The vicissitudes of the Edessa image between the first century and its location in his own time are not reported by Eusebius. The materials, according to the scholar Robert Eisenman, "are very widespread in the Syriac sources with so many multiple developments and divergences that it is hard to believe they could all be based on Eusebius' poor efforts" (Eisenman 1997:862).

In 384 C.E., Egeria, a pilgrim from either Gaul or Spain, was given a personal tour by the Bishop of Edessa, who gave her many marvellous accounts of miracles that had saved Edessa from the Persians and put into her hands transcripts of the correspondence of Abgarus and Jesus, with embellishments. Part of her accounts of her travels, in letters to her sisterhood, survive. "She naïvely supposed that this version was more complete than the shorter letter which she had read in a translation at home, presumably one brought back to the Far West by an earlier pilgrim" (Palmer 1998). Her escorted tour, accompanied by a translator, was thorough; the bishop is quoted: "Now let us go to the gate where the messenger Ananias came in with the letter of which I have been telling you." (Palmer). There was however, no mention of any image reported by Egeria, who spent three days inspecting Edessa and the environs.

The next stage of development appears in the Doctrine of Addai [Thaddeus], c. 400, which introduces a court painter among a delegation sent by Abgar to Jesus, who paints a portrait of Jesus to take back to his master:

"When Hannan, the keeper of the archives, saw that Jesus spoke thus to him, by virtue of being the king's painter, he took and painted a likeness of Jesus with choice paints, and brought with him to Abgar the king, his master. And when Abgar the king saw the likeness, he received it with great joy, and placed it with great honor in one of his palatial houses." (Doctrine of Addai 13)

Thus we can trace the development of the legend from a letter, but no image in Eusebius, to an image painted by a court painter in Addai; then to a miracle caused by the letter in Procopius, which becomes a miracle caused by a miraculously-created image supernaturally made when Jesus pressed a cloth to his wet face in Evagrius.

The later legend of the image recounts that since the successors of Abgar reverted to paganism, the bishop placed the miraculous image inside a wall, and setting a burning lamp before the image, he sealed them up behind a tile; that the image was later found again, after a vision, on the very night of the Persian invasion, and that not only had it miraculously reproduced itself on the tile, but the same lamp was still burning before it; further, that the bishop of Edessa used a fire into which oil flowing from the image was poured to destroy the Persians.

This long-developing legend of a miraculous first image of Jesus that appeared on a cloth he pressed to his wet face, was adopted by the Eastern Orthodox church not as legend, but as historical fact. Countless reproductions of what was considered to be the image were painted as icons; in the nineteenth century they were carried as khorugvs (religious banner) by the Russian armies. According to Robin Cormack, almost every Byzantine church contained a representation of the image by the beginning of the Iconoclastic period.[3] Because the miraculous image of the later legend was believed to be not made by humans but by God, it is called acheiropoietos in Greek—"Not Made by Hands." John of Damascus (died 749) mentions the image in his anti-iconoclastic work On Holy Images,[4] quoting a tradition that Abgarus had requested an image of Jesus and Jesus himself put a cloth to his face to produce the image. The cloth is described as being a "strip," or oblong cloth, rather than a square, as other accounts hold.

History of the physical image

The image itself is said to have surfaced in 525 C.E., during a flood of the Daisan, a tributary stream of the Euphrates that passed by Edessa. This flood is mentioned in the writings of the court historian Procopius of Caesarea. In the course of the reconstruction work, a cloth bearing the facial features of a man was discovered hidden in the wall above one of the gates of Edessa.

By 544 C.E., when Procopius recorded the recovery of Edessa from the Persians, he attributed the event to the letter sent from Jesus to Abgar. In a further elaboration, in 593 C.E., Evagrius attributed the same event to a "God-made image," a miraculous imprint of the face of Jesus upon a cloth. It was this last and latest stage of the legend that became accepted in Eastern Orthodoxy.

Evagrius Scholasticus mentions in his Ecclesiastical History the image of Edessa discovered in 544, that was "created by God, and not produced by the hands of man." This idea of an icon that was Acheiropoietos (Αχειροποίητος, literally "not-made-by-hand") is a separate enrichment of the original legend: similar legends of supernatural origins have accrued to other Orthodox icons.

The Holy Mandylion disappeared again after the Sassanians conquered Edessa in 609. An Arab legend, related to historian Andrew Palmer when he visited Urfa (Edessa) in 1999, relates that the towel or burial cloth (mendil) of Jesus was thrown into a well in what is today the city's Great Mosque. The Christian tradition is at variance with this, recounting how in 944 it was exchanged for a group of Muslim prisoners— at that time the Image of Edessa was taken to Constantinople where it was received amidst great celebration by emperor Romanus I, who deposited it in the chapel of the Great Palace of Constantinople. It remained there until the Crusaders sacked the city in 1204 and carried off many of its treasures to western Europe - though the "Image of Edessa" is not mentioned in this context in any contemporary document. A small part of this relic, or one believed to be the same, was one of the large group sold by Baldwin II of Constantinople to Louis IX of France in 1241 and housed in the Sainte Chapelle in Paris (two documentary inventories: year 1534 (Gerard of St. Quentin de l´Isle/Paris) and year 1740) until it disappeared during the French Revolution (not to be confused with the Sainte Chapelle at Chambery, home for a period of the Shroud of Turin).[5]

Links with the Shroud of Turin

Journalist Ian Wilson has put forward a theory[6] that the object venerated as the Mandylion from the sixth to the thirteenth centuries was in fact the Shroud of Turin, folded in four, and enclosed in an oblong frame so that only the face was visible.

For support, he refers to documents in the Vatican Library and the University of Leiden, Netherlands, which seem to suggest the presence of another image at Edessa. A tenth century codex, Codex Vossianus Latinus Q 69[7] found by Gino Zaninotto in the Vatican Library contains an eighth-century account saying that an imprint of Christ's whole body was left on a canvas kept in a church in Edessa: it quotes a man called Smera in Constantinople: "King Abgar received a cloth on which one can see not only a face but the whole body" (in Latin: [non tantum] faciei figuram sed totius corporis figuram cernere poteris).[8]

This image is apparently not the same as the Mandylion whose widely-disseminated and familiar iconic image is of a face alone. Byzantine reports however mention "one original and two copies."

Surviving images

Two images survive today which are associated with the Mandylion.

Holy Face of Genoa

The Holy Face of Genoa.

This image is kept in the modest Church of St Bartholomew of The Armenians, Genoa, where it was donated to the city’s 14th century Doge Leonardo Montaldo by the Byzantine Emperor John V Palaeologus.

It has been the subject of a detailed 1969 study by Colette Dufour Bozzo, who dated the outer frame to the late 14th century[9], while the inner frame and the image itself are believed by some to have originated earlier. Bozzo found that the image was imprinted on a cloth that had been pasted onto a wooden board.[10][11]

The similarity of the image with the Veil of Veronica suggests a link between the two traditions.

Holy Face of San Silvestro

The Image from the Matilda chapel in the Vatican.

This image was kept in Rome’s church of S. Silvestro up to 1870 and is now kept in the Matilda chapel in the Vatican. It is housed in a Baroque frame donated by one Sister Dionora Chiarucci in 1623 [12]. The earliest evidence of its existence is 1517, when the nuns were forbidden to exhibit it to avoid competition with the Veronica.

Like the Genoa image, it is painted on board and therefore is likely to be a copy.

It was exhibited at Germany’s Expo 2000 in the pavilion of the Holy See.

Notes

  1. Since Jesus was living at the time, this image would seem to have no connection with his alleged burial cloth, the Shroud of Turin, but see below.
  2. Eusebius, Historia Ecclesiae 1.13.5 and .22.
  3. Robin Cormack, Writing in Gold, Byzantine Society and its Icons, 1985, George Philip, London, ISBN 054001085-5
  4. On-line text.
  5. Grove Dictionary of Art, also Steven Runciman, Some Remarks on the Image of Edessa, Cambridge Historical Journal 1931 and [1] for a list of the group of relics; see also: an image of the gothic reliquary dating from the 13th century, in: [2]
  6. Wilson, Holy Faces, Secret Places: The Quest for Jesus' True Likeness' (London:Doubleday) 1991.
  7. From the library of Gerhard Johann Vossius.
  8. Codex Vossianus Latinus, Q69, and Vatican Library, Codex 5696, fol.35, which was published in Pietro Savio, Ricerche storiche sulla Santa Sindone Turin 1957.
  9. Ian Wilson, Holy Faces, Secret Places, page 162
  10. Wilson, ibid, page 88
  11. Das Mandylion von Genua und sein paläologischer Rahmen - The Mandylion of Genoa (in German) See also: Annalen van de stad Genua uit de 14de eeuw beschrijven dat het de echte Edessa-mandylion betreft (in Dutch)
  12. Ian Wilson, Holy Faces, Secret Places, page 193

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Eisenman, Robert., 1997. James the Brother of Jesus. (Viking Penguin).
  • Palmer, Andrew. 1998.

External links

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.