Difference between revisions of "Head Start" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
(Images OK)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
  
'''Head Start''' is a program of the [[United States Department of Health and Human Services]] that focuses on assisting children from low-income families. Created in 1965, Head Start is the longest-running program for stopping the cycle of poverty in the United States. It provides comprehensive education, health, nutrition, and parent involvement services to low-income children and their families. Established in the mid 1960s, Head Start is the only program to continue to this very day from the [[Economic Opportunity Act of 1964]]. Currently, Head Start is a program within the Administration on Children, Youth and Families in the HHS. Programs are administered locally by non-profit organizations and local education agencies such as school systems.
+
'''Head Start''' is a program of the [[United States Department of Health and Human Services]] that focuses on assisting children from low-income [[family|families]]. Created in 1965, Head Start is the longest-running program designed to stop the cycle of [[poverty]] in the United States. It provides comprehensive [[education]], [[health]], [[nutrition]], and [[parent]] involvement services to low-income children and their families. Established in the mid 1960s, Head Start is the only program to continue to this day from the [[Economic Opportunity Act of 1964]]. Currently, Head Start is a program within the Administration on Children, Youth and Families in the HHS. Programs are administered locally by [[non-profit organization]]s and local education agencies such as [[school]] systems.
  
 
== History ==
 
== History ==
Head Start was started as part of President [[Lyndon Johnson]]'s [[War on Poverty]]. A key part of the [[Great Society]] domestic agenda, the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 authorized programs to help meet the needs of disadvantaged preschool children. Some economists and advisors to President Johnson at the time believed that poverty was directly linked to a lack of adequate education. Children from poorer areas and families often struggled in school and were prone to high drop out rates, reducing there chances of finding employment that paid well. Hence, poorer children tended to remain poor as well develop families of there own that faced the same difficulties they did as children. The belief at the time was that boosting academic achievement would help break the cycle of and ultimately diminish poverty in general.<ref> Zigler, Edward and Susan Muenchow ''Head Start: The Inside Story of America's Most Successful Educational Experiment '' (Basic Books 1994) ISBN 0465028853 </ref>   
+
'''Head Start''' was started as part of President [[Lyndon Johnson]]'s [[War on Poverty]]. A key part of the [[Great Society]] domestic agenda, the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 authorized programs to help meet the needs of disadvantaged preschool children. Some [[economics|economists]] and advisers to President Johnson at the time believed that [[poverty]] was directly linked to a lack of adequate [[education]]. Children from poorer areas and families often struggled in [[school]] and were prone to high drop out rates, reducing there chances of finding employment that paid well. Hence, poorer children tended to remain poor as well develop families of there own that faced the same difficulties they did as children. The belief at the time was that boosting academic achievement would help break the cycle of and ultimately diminish poverty in general.<ref> Edward Zigler and Susan Muenchow ''Head Start: The Inside Story of America's Most Successful Educational Experiment'' (Basic Books 1994 ISBN 0465028853) </ref>   
  
A panel of child experts recognized two main areas that hindered the success of disadvantaged children in school: First, poorer children, upon entering compulsory schooling (usually at the [[Preschool education|kindergarten]] level since poorer families could not afford preschool) were at a lower intellectual level than other students. There were many theories for this. Poor children often came from parents who themselves were not highly educated and thus were not able to pass on academic knowledge to their children. They also had less access to educational and social stimuli than their middle and higher class peers. Second, poorer children did not have access to the level of health care that children from middle and higher class families did, and therefore were more likely to develop more medical conditions that went undiagnosed for long periods of time. Often, since these conditions went untreated for some time, developed into more serious problems that affected the child's academic performance and resulted into economic hardship for his or her families.<ref> "head start." Encyclopedia of Children's Health. Answers Corporation, 2006. Answers.com 10 Nov. [2007. http://www.answers.com/topic/head-start]</ref>   
+
A panel of child experts recognized two main areas that hindered the success of disadvantaged children in school: First, poorer children, upon entering compulsory schooling (usually at the [[kindergarten]] level since poorer families could not afford [[preschool]]) were at a lower intellectual level than other students. There were many theories for this. Poor children often came from parents who themselves were not highly educated and thus were not able to pass on academic knowledge to their children. They also had less access to educational and social stimuli than their middle and higher class peers. Second, poorer children did not have access to the level of [[health care]] that children from middle and higher class families did, and therefore were more likely to develop more medical conditions that went undiagnosed for long periods of time. Often, since these conditions went untreated for some time, developed into more serious problems that affected the child's academic performance and resulted into economic hardship for his or her families.<ref> [http://www.answers.com/topic/head-start head start] ''Encyclopedia of Children's Health''. Answers Corporation, 2006. Answers.com Retrieved November 10, 2007. </ref>   
  
Based on these findings, the [[Office of Economic Opportunity]] launched Project Head Start as an eight-week summer program in 1965. The project aimed to attack the main two problems facing preschool age children from low-income families by providing a program that would meet emotional, social, health, nutritional, and psychological needs. It also targeted parents as well, encouraging them to become active in helping not just their own children, but others in similar situations as well.<ref> "head start." Encyclopedia of Children's Health. Answers Corporation, 2006. Answers.com 10 Nov. [2007. http://www.answers.com/topic/head-start]</ref>
+
Based on these findings, the [[Office of Economic Opportunity]] launched Project Head Start as an eight-week summer program in 1965. The project aimed to attack the main two problems facing preschool age children from low-income families by providing a program that would meet emotional, social, health, nutritional, and psychological needs. It also targeted parents as well, encouraging them to become active in helping not just their own children, but others in similar situations as well.<ref> [http://www.answers.com/topic/head-start Head Start] ''Encyclopedia of Children's Health''. Answers Corporation, 2006. Answers.com 1Retrieved November 10, 2007. </ref>
  
Although Head Start, along with Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 as a whole, was almost universally applauded as moves towards equality when they were created, there was a vocal opposition to such programs that gained momentum during the years that followed. Some of the detractors were motivated by political ideology, labeling Johnson's programs as being too liberal. Others, including some economists, felt that it was not the government's place to lend everyone such an extensive helping hand and that the efforts would not help curb poverty. President [[Richard Nixon]] was one such Head Start dissenter who felt that there was no data that could reliably prove that the program worked. However, Head Start was very popular and Nixon merely attempted to trim back some of the costs. One day was by having the program's administration transferred to the [[Office of Child Development]] in the [[Department of Health, Education, and Welfare]] (later the [[HHS|Department of Health and Human Services]]) in 1969.   
+
Although Head Start, along with the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 as a whole, was almost universally applauded as moves towards equality when they were created, there was a vocal opposition to such programs that gained momentum during the years that followed. Some of the detractors were motivated by political ideology, labeling Johnson's programs as being too liberal. Others, including some economists, felt that it was not the government's place to lend everyone such an extensive helping hand and that the efforts would not help curb poverty. President [[Richard Nixon]] was one such Head Start dissenter who felt that there were no data that could reliably prove that the program worked. However, Head Start was very popular and Nixon merely attempted to trim back some of the costs. One such change was having the program's administration transferred to the [[Office of Child Development]] in the [[Department of Health, Education, and Welfare]] (later the [[Department of Health and Human Services]] (DHHS)) in 1969.   
  
 
As of late 2005, more than 22 million pre-school aged children have participated in Head Start. The 6.8+ billion dollar budget for 2005 provided services to more than 905,000 children, 57 percent of whom were four years old or older, and 43 percent three years old or younger. Services were provided by 1,604 different programs operating more than 48,000 classrooms scattered across every state (and nearly every county) at an average cost of $7,222 per child. The paid staff of nearly 212,000 people is dwarfed by an army of volunteers six times as large.  
 
As of late 2005, more than 22 million pre-school aged children have participated in Head Start. The 6.8+ billion dollar budget for 2005 provided services to more than 905,000 children, 57 percent of whom were four years old or older, and 43 percent three years old or younger. Services were provided by 1,604 different programs operating more than 48,000 classrooms scattered across every state (and nearly every county) at an average cost of $7,222 per child. The paid staff of nearly 212,000 people is dwarfed by an army of volunteers six times as large.  
  
 +
==Program Description==
  
==Program Description==
+
Head Start programs are operated in all 50 states of the U.S. and the [[District of Columbia]]. While Head Start is a federally funded and controlled program, it is administered by local governments and non-for profits that awarded grants based upon applications. While each program is allowed some leeway in its operation, each one must meet the basic requirements set forth by the Department of Health and Human Resources. Each organization hosting a Head Start program is encouraged to seek additional funding and help from sources other than the federal government.
  
Head Start programs are operated in all 50 states of the U.S. and the [[District of Columbia]]. While Head Start is a federally funded and controlled program, it is administered by local governments and non-for profits that awarded grants based upon applications. While each program is allowed some leeway in its operation, each one must meet the basic requirements set forth by the Department of Health and Human Resources. Each organization hosting a Head Start program is encouraged to seek additional funding and help from sources other than the federal government.'''Community Partnership''' is a sister program involved in operation, governance and evaluation that helps keep the community being served involved with the program. Eligibility for Head Start services is largely income-based (100 percent of the federal poverty level), though each locally-operated program includes other eligibility criteria such as disabilities and services to other family members. As of late 2006, up to 10 percent of any funded program's enrollment can be from over-income families.  
+
Community Partnership is a sister program involved in operation, governance, and evaluation that helps keep the [[community]] being served involved with the program. Eligibility for Head Start services is largely income-based (100 percent of the federal poverty level), though each locally-operated program includes other eligibility criteria such as disabilities and services to other family members. As of late 2006, up to 10 percent of any funded program's enrollment can be from over-income families.  
 
    
 
    
 
There are five main sub-programs offered by the Head Start Organization:
 
There are five main sub-programs offered by the Head Start Organization:
  
*'''Early Head Start''' - promotes healthy prenatal outcomes, promotes healthy family functioning, and strengthens the development of infants and toddlers beginning as young as newborn infants. Within EHS are several initiatives, including '''Little Voices for Healthy Choices''', a program that focuses on the the nutrition and health of infants and toddlers.<ref>(2007) Early Head Start National Resource Center [[http://www.ehsnrc.org/"EHS Home Page"]] Retrieved November 11, 2007</ref>  
+
*'''Early Head Start''' - promotes healthy prenatal outcomes, promotes healthy family functioning, and strengthens the development of infants and toddlers beginning as young as newborn infants. Within EHS are several initiatives, including Little Voices for Healthy Choices, a program that focuses on the the nutrition and health of infants and toddlers.<ref>Early Head Start National Resource Center (2007) [http://www.ehsnrc.org/"EHS Home Page"] Retrieved November 11, 2007</ref>  
  
 
*'''Head Start'''- helps to create healthy development in low-income children. Programs offer a wide variety of services, that depend on a child's and each family's heritage and experience, to influence all aspects of a child's development and learning.  
 
*'''Head Start'''- helps to create healthy development in low-income children. Programs offer a wide variety of services, that depend on a child's and each family's heritage and experience, to influence all aspects of a child's development and learning.  
Line 32: Line 33:
 
*'''American Indian-Alaska Native Program Branch'''- provides American Indian and Alaska Native children and families with services such as: health care, educational, nutritional, socialization, as well as other services promoting school readiness.  Services are primarily for disadvantaged preschool children, and infants and toddlers.
 
*'''American Indian-Alaska Native Program Branch'''- provides American Indian and Alaska Native children and families with services such as: health care, educational, nutritional, socialization, as well as other services promoting school readiness.  Services are primarily for disadvantaged preschool children, and infants and toddlers.
  
*'''Family Partnership'''- focuses on the parents of Head Start children, getting them involved in their child's development, strengthening the parent-child relationship and even helping the parents develop their own skills to improve their lives. A new initiative lately has focused on fathers. Mothers have been for a long time viewed as sole care-takers and the more likely of the two parents to be involved in Head Start Programs, but the '''Male and Father-Involvement Initiative''' purposes to break this [[stereotype]] and cultivate strong male role-models in the lives of Head Start children.<ref>(2006) National Head Start Association [[http://www.nhsa.org/program/fathers/index.htm"Introduction to the Male and Father-Involvement Initiative"]] Retrieved November 11, 2007</ref>
+
*'''Family Partnership'''- focuses on the parents of Head Start children, getting them involved in their child's development, strengthening the parent-child relationship and even helping the parents develop their own skills to improve their lives. A new initiative lately has focused on fathers. Mothers have been for a long time viewed as sole care-takers and the more likely of the two parents to be involved in Head Start Programs, but the Male and Father-Involvement Initiative purposes to break this [[stereotype]] and cultivate strong male role-models in the lives of Head Start children.<ref>National Head Start Association (2006) [http://www.nhsa.org/program/fathers/index.htm Introduction to the Male and Father-Involvement Initiative] Retrieved November 11, 2007</ref>
  
 
== Effectiveness ==
 
== Effectiveness ==
Line 39: Line 40:
  
 
===Critical reviews===
 
===Critical reviews===
[[Steven D. Levitt]] and Stephen J. Dubner concluded that Head Start participation has no effect on test scores in early years of school, based on [[Regression analysis|regression analysis]] of data from the '''Early Childhood Longitudinal Study'''.<ref> (2007) Institute for Education Science, U.S. Department of Education [[http://nces.ed.gov/ecls/"Early Childhood Longitudinal Program"]] Retrieved November 10, 2007</ref> Levitt and Fryer come to the same conclusion in one 2004 paper they wrote.<ref> Roland G. Fryer Jr. and Steven D. Levitt [http://pricetheory.uchicago.edu/levitt/Papers/FryerLevittUnderstandingTheBlack2004.pdf "Understanding the Black-White Test Score Gap in the First Two Years of School"] ''The Review of Economics and Statistics'' Vol. 86, No.2. pp 447-464, 2004. Retrieved November 10, 2007 </ref>
+
[[Steven D. Levitt]] and Stephen J. Dubner concluded that Head Start participation has no effect on test scores in early years of [[school]], based on [[Regression analysis|regression analysis]] of data from the ''Early Childhood Longitudinal Study''.<ref> Institute for Education Science, U.S. Department of Education (2007) [http://nces.ed.gov/ecls/ Early Childhood Longitudinal Program] Retrieved November 10, 2007</ref> Levitt and Fryer come to the same conclusion in one 2004 paper they wrote.<ref> Roland G. Fryer Jr. and Steven D. Levitt [http://pricetheory.uchicago.edu/levitt/Papers/FryerLevittUnderstandingTheBlack2004.pdf "Understanding the Black-White Test Score Gap in the First Two Years of School"] ''The Review of Economics and Statistics'' Vol. 86, No.2. pp 447-464, 2004. Retrieved November 10, 2007 </ref>
  
 
Another issue has been that according to the most widely cited source supporting Head Start, children who finish the program and are placed into disadvantaged schools perform worse than their peers by 2nd grade. Only by continuing to isolate these children (such as dispersing and sending them to better performing school districts) can the gains be captured.<ref> Administrative History of the Office of Economic Opportunity, Vol. I, p.252, Box 1, LBJ Library.</ref>
 
Another issue has been that according to the most widely cited source supporting Head Start, children who finish the program and are placed into disadvantaged schools perform worse than their peers by 2nd grade. Only by continuing to isolate these children (such as dispersing and sending them to better performing school districts) can the gains be captured.<ref> Administrative History of the Office of Economic Opportunity, Vol. I, p.252, Box 1, LBJ Library.</ref>
  
 
===Mixed reviews===
 
===Mixed reviews===
A study conducted in 2004 concluded that early education does increase reading and mathematics skills at school entry,
+
A study conducted in 2004 concluded that early education does increase [[reading]] and [[mathematics]] skills at school entry, but it also boosts children's classroom behavioral problems and reduces their self-control. Further, for most children the positive effects of pre-kindergarten on skills largely dissipate by the spring of first grade, although the negative behavioral effects continue.<ref>David R. Francis, National Bureau of Economic Research (2004) [http://www.nber.org/digest/mar05/w10452.html Does Prekindergarten Improve School Preparation and Performance?] Retrieved November 10, 2007</ref> However, the study also found that, in contrast to the general population in pre-kindergarten, disadvantaged children and those attending schools with "low levels of academic instruction" get the largest and most lasting academic gains from early education.
but it also boosts children's classroom behavioral problems and reduces their self-control. Further, for most children the positive effects of pre-kindergarten on skills largely dissipate by the spring of first grade, although the negative behavioral effects continue.<ref>(2004) Francis, David R. National Buerua of Economic Research [[http://www.nber.org/digest/mar05/w10452.html"Does Prekindergarten Improve School Preparation and Performance?"]] Retrieved November 10, 2007</ref> However, the study also found that, in contrast to the general population in pre-kindergarten, disadvantaged children and those attending schools with "low levels of academic instruction" get the largest and most lasting academic gains from early education.
 
  
In their study, Currie and Thomas try to control for many family background factors. The analysis is based on within-family data, comparing children in Head Start with their siblings who were not in Head Start. Also, mothers who were themselves enrolled in Head Start were compared to their adult sisters who were not. Currie and Thomas analyzed groups separately by ethnicity: White, Black and Hispanic. White children, who were the most disadvantaged, showed larger and longer lasting improvements than African-American children.<ref> Currie, Janet and Duncan Thomas "Stalking the Wild Taboo: Does Head Start Make a Difference?" ''The American Economic Review''. Vol. 85, No. 3. pp. 341-364 1995. [http://lrainc.com/swtaboo/taboos/headst01.html] Retrieved November 10, 2007 </ref>
+
In their study, Currie and Thomas tried to control for many family background factors. The analysis is based on within-family data, comparing children in Head Start with their siblings who were not in Head Start. Also, mothers who were themselves enrolled in Head Start were compared to their adult sisters who were not. Currie and Thomas analyzed groups separately by ethnicity: White, Black and Hispanic. White children, who were the most disadvantaged, showed larger and longer lasting improvements than African-American children.<ref> Janet Currie and Duncan Thomas [http://lrainc.com/swtaboo/taboos/headst01.html Stalking the Wild Taboo: Does Head Start Make a Difference?] ''The American Economic Review''. Vol. 85, No. 3. pp. 341-364 1995. Retrieved November 10, 2007 </ref>
  
 
===Supportive reviews===
 
===Supportive reviews===
  
Many of the most ardent supporters of Head Start are those that actively participate in the program. While many studies may question how successful Head Start is, many with direct, personal experience claim that statistics and numbers do not reflect the actual success of the program. There is some statistical data to support these beliefs. In 2003, a report by '''Fight Crime:Invest in Kids''', an anti-crime organization, showed that children who participated in Head Start had higher IQs, SAT scores and graduation rates than those of similar background that were not active in Head Start.<ref> (2003) Fight Crime: Invest in Kids [[http://www.fightcrime.org/reports/HeadStartBrief.pdf"Head Start Improves Achievement and Reduces Crime"]] Retrieved November 11, 2007</ref>  
+
Many of the most ardent supporters of Head Start are those that actively participate in the program. While many studies may question how successful Head Start is, many with direct, personal experience claim that statistics and numbers do not reflect the actual success of the program. There are some statistical data to support these beliefs. In 2003, a report by Fight Crime:Invest in Kids, an anti-crime organization, showed that children who participated in Head Start scored higher on [[IQ test]]s, and had higher [[SAT]] scores and graduation rates than those of similar background that were not active in Head Start.<ref> Fight Crime: Invest in Kids (2003) [http://www.fightcrime.org/reports/HeadStartBrief.pdf Head Start Improves Achievement and Reduces Crime] Retrieved November 11, 2007</ref>  
  
 
====Congressional Impact Study====
 
====Congressional Impact Study====
  
Congress mandated an intensive study of the effectiveness of Head Start, the "Head Start Impact Study," which has issued a series of reports on the design and study of a target population of 5000 three and four year old children.<ref> (2007) ACF U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [[http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/opre/hs/impact_study/" Head Start Impact Study and Follow-up, 2000–2009"]] Retrieved November 10, 2007 </ref> The Head Start Impact Study First Year Findings were released in June of 2005. The study participants, beginning in fall 2002, were assigned to either the Head Start program or other parent-selected community resources. Thus, the study measured Head Start's effectiveness as compared to a variety of other forms of community support and educational intervention, as opposed to comparing Head Start to a non-intervention alternative.<ref> (2007) ACF U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [[http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/opre/hs/impact_study/" Head Start Impact Study and Follow-up, 2000–2009"]] Retrieved November 10, 2007 </ref>
+
Congress mandated an intensive study of the effectiveness of Head Start, the "Head Start Impact Study," which has issued a series of reports on the design and study of a target population of 5000 three and four year old children.<ref name=ACF> ACF U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2007) [http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/opre/hs/impact_study/ Head Start Impact Study and Follow-up, 2000–2009] Retrieved November 10, 2007 </ref> The Head Start Impact Study First Year Findings were released in June of 2005. The study participants, beginning in fall 2002, were assigned to either the Head Start program or other parent-selected community resources. Thus, the study measured Head Start's effectiveness as compared to a variety of other forms of community support and educational intervention, as opposed to comparing Head Start to a non-intervention alternative.<ref name=ACF/>
  
The results of the first report showed consistent small to moderate advantages to children from participating in Head Start programs rather than other programs, with a few areas where no advantage was reported. The benefits improved with early participation and varied among racial and ethnic groups.<ref> (2007) ACF U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [[http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/opre/hs/impact_study/" Head Start Impact Study and Follow-up, 2000–2009"]] Retrieved November 10, 2007 </ref>
+
The results of the first report showed consistent small to moderate advantages to children from participating in Head Start programs rather than other programs, with a few areas where no advantage was reported. The benefits improved with early participation and varied among racial and ethnic groups.<ref name=ACF/>
  
 
==Footnotes==
 
==Footnotes==
 
<References/>
 
<References/>
 
 
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
  
 
*Andrew, John A. ''Lyndon Johnson and the Great Society '' (Ivan R. Dee 1999) ISBN 1566631858
 
*Andrew, John A. ''Lyndon Johnson and the Great Society '' (Ivan R. Dee 1999) ISBN 1566631858
*Books, Sue. ''Poverty and Schooling in the U.S.: Contexts and Consequences'' (Lawrence Erlbaum 2001) ISBN Lawrence Erlbaum
+
*Books, Sue. 2004.''Poverty and Schooling in the U.S.: Contexts and Consequences'' Lawrence Erlbaum. ISBN 978-0805851939
*Cravens, Hamilton. ''Before Head Start: The Iowa Station and America's Children'' (The University of North Carolina Press 2002) ISBN 0807854328
+
*Cravens, Hamilton. 2002. ''Before Head Start: The Iowa Station and America's Children''. The University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 0807854328
*Iceland, John. ''Poverty in America: A Handbook'' (University of California Press 2006) ISBN 0520248414
+
*Iceland, John. 2006. ''Poverty in America: A Handbook''. University of California Press. ISBN 0520248414
*Washington, Valo. ''Project Head Start: Models and Strategies for the Twenty-First Century'' (Garland Reference Library of Social Science, Vol 827) (Routledge 1994) ISBN 0815312075
+
*Washington, Valo. 1994. ''Project Head Start: Models and Strategies for the Twenty-First Century'' (Garland Reference Library of Social Science, Vol 827) Routledge. ISBN 0815312075
*Zigler, Edward. ''The Head Start Debates: Are We Failing the Children most at Risk?'' (Brookes Publishing 2004) ISBN 1557667543
+
*Zigler, Edward. 2004. ''The Head Start Debates: Are We Failing the Children most at Risk?''. Brookes Publishing. ISBN 1557667543
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==

Revision as of 17:33, 20 November 2007


Head Start is a program of the United States Department of Health and Human Services that focuses on assisting children from low-income families. Created in 1965, Head Start is the longest-running program designed to stop the cycle of poverty in the United States. It provides comprehensive education, health, nutrition, and parent involvement services to low-income children and their families. Established in the mid 1960s, Head Start is the only program to continue to this day from the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964. Currently, Head Start is a program within the Administration on Children, Youth and Families in the HHS. Programs are administered locally by non-profit organizations and local education agencies such as school systems.

History

Head Start was started as part of President Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty. A key part of the Great Society domestic agenda, the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 authorized programs to help meet the needs of disadvantaged preschool children. Some economists and advisers to President Johnson at the time believed that poverty was directly linked to a lack of adequate education. Children from poorer areas and families often struggled in school and were prone to high drop out rates, reducing there chances of finding employment that paid well. Hence, poorer children tended to remain poor as well develop families of there own that faced the same difficulties they did as children. The belief at the time was that boosting academic achievement would help break the cycle of and ultimately diminish poverty in general.[1]

A panel of child experts recognized two main areas that hindered the success of disadvantaged children in school: First, poorer children, upon entering compulsory schooling (usually at the kindergarten level since poorer families could not afford preschool) were at a lower intellectual level than other students. There were many theories for this. Poor children often came from parents who themselves were not highly educated and thus were not able to pass on academic knowledge to their children. They also had less access to educational and social stimuli than their middle and higher class peers. Second, poorer children did not have access to the level of health care that children from middle and higher class families did, and therefore were more likely to develop more medical conditions that went undiagnosed for long periods of time. Often, since these conditions went untreated for some time, developed into more serious problems that affected the child's academic performance and resulted into economic hardship for his or her families.[2]

Based on these findings, the Office of Economic Opportunity launched Project Head Start as an eight-week summer program in 1965. The project aimed to attack the main two problems facing preschool age children from low-income families by providing a program that would meet emotional, social, health, nutritional, and psychological needs. It also targeted parents as well, encouraging them to become active in helping not just their own children, but others in similar situations as well.[3]

Although Head Start, along with the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 as a whole, was almost universally applauded as moves towards equality when they were created, there was a vocal opposition to such programs that gained momentum during the years that followed. Some of the detractors were motivated by political ideology, labeling Johnson's programs as being too liberal. Others, including some economists, felt that it was not the government's place to lend everyone such an extensive helping hand and that the efforts would not help curb poverty. President Richard Nixon was one such Head Start dissenter who felt that there were no data that could reliably prove that the program worked. However, Head Start was very popular and Nixon merely attempted to trim back some of the costs. One such change was having the program's administration transferred to the Office of Child Development in the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (later the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)) in 1969.

As of late 2005, more than 22 million pre-school aged children have participated in Head Start. The 6.8+ billion dollar budget for 2005 provided services to more than 905,000 children, 57 percent of whom were four years old or older, and 43 percent three years old or younger. Services were provided by 1,604 different programs operating more than 48,000 classrooms scattered across every state (and nearly every county) at an average cost of $7,222 per child. The paid staff of nearly 212,000 people is dwarfed by an army of volunteers six times as large.

Program Description

Head Start programs are operated in all 50 states of the U.S. and the District of Columbia. While Head Start is a federally funded and controlled program, it is administered by local governments and non-for profits that awarded grants based upon applications. While each program is allowed some leeway in its operation, each one must meet the basic requirements set forth by the Department of Health and Human Resources. Each organization hosting a Head Start program is encouraged to seek additional funding and help from sources other than the federal government.

Community Partnership is a sister program involved in operation, governance, and evaluation that helps keep the community being served involved with the program. Eligibility for Head Start services is largely income-based (100 percent of the federal poverty level), though each locally-operated program includes other eligibility criteria such as disabilities and services to other family members. As of late 2006, up to 10 percent of any funded program's enrollment can be from over-income families.

There are five main sub-programs offered by the Head Start Organization:

  • Early Head Start - promotes healthy prenatal outcomes, promotes healthy family functioning, and strengthens the development of infants and toddlers beginning as young as newborn infants. Within EHS are several initiatives, including Little Voices for Healthy Choices, a program that focuses on the the nutrition and health of infants and toddlers.[4]
  • Head Start- helps to create healthy development in low-income children. Programs offer a wide variety of services, that depend on a child's and each family's heritage and experience, to influence all aspects of a child's development and learning.
  • Migrant and Seasonal Program Branch- provides the children of migrant and seasonal farm workers who meet income and other eligibility guidelines with Head Start services.
  • American Indian-Alaska Native Program Branch- provides American Indian and Alaska Native children and families with services such as: health care, educational, nutritional, socialization, as well as other services promoting school readiness. Services are primarily for disadvantaged preschool children, and infants and toddlers.
  • Family Partnership- focuses on the parents of Head Start children, getting them involved in their child's development, strengthening the parent-child relationship and even helping the parents develop their own skills to improve their lives. A new initiative lately has focused on fathers. Mothers have been for a long time viewed as sole care-takers and the more likely of the two parents to be involved in Head Start Programs, but the Male and Father-Involvement Initiative purposes to break this stereotype and cultivate strong male role-models in the lives of Head Start children.[5]

Effectiveness

The long term effectiveness of Head Start is controversial. Set out below are a number of critical and positive reports or statements on Head Start. In light of the controversy, Congress commissioned an Impact Statement, which is discussed below.

Critical reviews

Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner concluded that Head Start participation has no effect on test scores in early years of school, based on regression analysis of data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study.[6] Levitt and Fryer come to the same conclusion in one 2004 paper they wrote.[7]

Another issue has been that according to the most widely cited source supporting Head Start, children who finish the program and are placed into disadvantaged schools perform worse than their peers by 2nd grade. Only by continuing to isolate these children (such as dispersing and sending them to better performing school districts) can the gains be captured.[8]

Mixed reviews

A study conducted in 2004 concluded that early education does increase reading and mathematics skills at school entry, but it also boosts children's classroom behavioral problems and reduces their self-control. Further, for most children the positive effects of pre-kindergarten on skills largely dissipate by the spring of first grade, although the negative behavioral effects continue.[9] However, the study also found that, in contrast to the general population in pre-kindergarten, disadvantaged children and those attending schools with "low levels of academic instruction" get the largest and most lasting academic gains from early education.

In their study, Currie and Thomas tried to control for many family background factors. The analysis is based on within-family data, comparing children in Head Start with their siblings who were not in Head Start. Also, mothers who were themselves enrolled in Head Start were compared to their adult sisters who were not. Currie and Thomas analyzed groups separately by ethnicity: White, Black and Hispanic. White children, who were the most disadvantaged, showed larger and longer lasting improvements than African-American children.[10]

Supportive reviews

Many of the most ardent supporters of Head Start are those that actively participate in the program. While many studies may question how successful Head Start is, many with direct, personal experience claim that statistics and numbers do not reflect the actual success of the program. There are some statistical data to support these beliefs. In 2003, a report by Fight Crime:Invest in Kids, an anti-crime organization, showed that children who participated in Head Start scored higher on IQ tests, and had higher SAT scores and graduation rates than those of similar background that were not active in Head Start.[11]

Congressional Impact Study

Congress mandated an intensive study of the effectiveness of Head Start, the "Head Start Impact Study," which has issued a series of reports on the design and study of a target population of 5000 three and four year old children.[12] The Head Start Impact Study First Year Findings were released in June of 2005. The study participants, beginning in fall 2002, were assigned to either the Head Start program or other parent-selected community resources. Thus, the study measured Head Start's effectiveness as compared to a variety of other forms of community support and educational intervention, as opposed to comparing Head Start to a non-intervention alternative.[12]

The results of the first report showed consistent small to moderate advantages to children from participating in Head Start programs rather than other programs, with a few areas where no advantage was reported. The benefits improved with early participation and varied among racial and ethnic groups.[12]

Footnotes

  1. Edward Zigler and Susan Muenchow Head Start: The Inside Story of America's Most Successful Educational Experiment (Basic Books 1994 ISBN 0465028853)
  2. head start Encyclopedia of Children's Health. Answers Corporation, 2006. Answers.com Retrieved November 10, 2007.
  3. Head Start Encyclopedia of Children's Health. Answers Corporation, 2006. Answers.com 1Retrieved November 10, 2007.
  4. Early Head Start National Resource Center (2007) "EHS Home Page" Retrieved November 11, 2007
  5. National Head Start Association (2006) Introduction to the Male and Father-Involvement Initiative Retrieved November 11, 2007
  6. Institute for Education Science, U.S. Department of Education (2007) Early Childhood Longitudinal Program Retrieved November 10, 2007
  7. Roland G. Fryer Jr. and Steven D. Levitt "Understanding the Black-White Test Score Gap in the First Two Years of School" The Review of Economics and Statistics Vol. 86, No.2. pp 447-464, 2004. Retrieved November 10, 2007
  8. Administrative History of the Office of Economic Opportunity, Vol. I, p.252, Box 1, LBJ Library.
  9. David R. Francis, National Bureau of Economic Research (2004) Does Prekindergarten Improve School Preparation and Performance? Retrieved November 10, 2007
  10. Janet Currie and Duncan Thomas Stalking the Wild Taboo: Does Head Start Make a Difference? The American Economic Review. Vol. 85, No. 3. pp. 341-364 1995. Retrieved November 10, 2007
  11. Fight Crime: Invest in Kids (2003) Head Start Improves Achievement and Reduces Crime Retrieved November 11, 2007
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 ACF U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2007) Head Start Impact Study and Follow-up, 2000–2009 Retrieved November 10, 2007

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Andrew, John A. Lyndon Johnson and the Great Society (Ivan R. Dee 1999) ISBN 1566631858
  • Books, Sue. 2004.Poverty and Schooling in the U.S.: Contexts and Consequences Lawrence Erlbaum. ISBN 978-0805851939
  • Cravens, Hamilton. 2002. Before Head Start: The Iowa Station and America's Children. The University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 0807854328
  • Iceland, John. 2006. Poverty in America: A Handbook. University of California Press. ISBN 0520248414
  • Washington, Valo. 1994. Project Head Start: Models and Strategies for the Twenty-First Century (Garland Reference Library of Social Science, Vol 827) Routledge. ISBN 0815312075
  • Zigler, Edward. 2004. The Head Start Debates: Are We Failing the Children most at Risk?. Brookes Publishing. ISBN 1557667543

External links

All links Retrieved November 19, 2007.

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.