The Creative Commons (CC) is a U.S. non-profit corporation founded by Lawrence Lessig in 2001, devoted to expanding the range of creative works available for others to legally build upon and share. The organization has released several copyright licenses, known as "Creative Commons licenses." These licenses allow the authors to share their works more freely than those protected by traditional copyright laws. Authors can choose from a range of limited rights in between traditional copyright (all rights reserved) and public domain (no right reserved).
Some projects using Creative Commons license are MIT OpenCourseWare (MIT OCW) and Public Library of Science.
Creative Commons licenses are currently available in 43 different jurisdictions worldwide, with more than nineteen others under development.
Creative Commons Japan Seminar, Tokyo
The Creative Commons licenses enable copyright holders to grant some or all of their rights to the public while retaining others through a variety of licensing and contract schemes including dedication to the public domain or open content licensing terms. The intention is to avoid the problems current copyright laws create for the sharing of information.
The project provides several free licenses that copyright owners can use when releasing their works on the Web. It also provides RDF/XML metadata that describes the license and the work, making it easier to automatically process and locate licensed works. Creative Commons also provides a "Founders' Copyright" contract, intended to re-create the effects of the original U.S. Copyright created by the founders of the U.S. Constitution.
All these efforts, and more, are done to counter the effects of what Creative Commons considers to be a dominant and increasingly restrictive permission culture. In the words of Lawrence Lessig, founder of Creative Commons and former Chairman of the Board, it is "a culture in which creators get to create only with the permission of the powerful, or of creators from the past." Lessig maintains that modern culture is dominated by traditional content distributors in order to maintain and strengthen their monopolies on cultural products such as popular music and popular cinema, and that Creative Commons can provide alternatives to these restrictions.
Golden Nica Award for Creative Commons
The Creative Commons licenses were pre-dated by the Open Publication License and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). The GFDL was intended mainly as a license for software documentation, but is also in active use by non-software projects such as Wikipedia. The Open Publication License is now largely defunct, and its creator suggests that new projects not use it. Both licenses contained optional parts that, in the opinions of critics, made them less "free." The GFDL differs from the CC licenses in its requirement that the licensed work be distributed in a form which is "transparent," that is, not in a proprietary and/or confidential format.
Headquartered in San Francisco, Creative Commons was officially launched in 2001. Lawrence Lessig, the founder and former chairman, started the organization as an additional method of achieving the goals of his Supreme Court case, Eldred v. Ashcroft. The initial set of Creative Commons licenses was published on December 16, 2002. The project itself was honored in 2004, with the Golden Nica Award at the Prix Ars Electronica, for the category "Net Vision."
The Creative Commons was first tested in court in early 2006, when podcaster Adam Curry sued a Dutch tabloid who published photos without permission from his Flickr page. The photos were licensed under the Creative Commons NonCommercial license. While the verdict was in favor of Curry, the tabloid avoided having to pay restitution to him as long as they did not repeat the offense. An analysis of the decision states, "The Dutch Court’s decision is especially noteworthy because it confirms that the conditions of a Creative Commons license automatically apply to the content licensed under it, and bind users of such content even without expressly agreeing to, or having knowledge of, the conditions of the license.
On December 15, 2006, Professor Lessig retired as chair and appointed Joi Ito as the new chair, in a ceremony which took place in Second Life.
The original, non-localized Creative Commons licenses were written with the U.S. legal system in mind, so the wording could be incompatible within different local legislations and render the licenses unenforceable in various jurisdictions. To address this issue, Creative Commons International has started to port the various licenses to accommodate local copyright and private law. As of February 2008, there are 43 jurisdiction-specific licenses, with 8 other jurisdictions in drafting process, and more countries joining the project.
Projects using Creative Commons licenses
Several million pages of web content use Creative Commons licenses. Common Content was set up by Jeff Kramer with cooperation from Creative Commons, and is currently maintained by volunteers.
This list provides a short sampling of CC-licensed projects which convey the breadth and scope of Creative Commons adoption among prominent institutions and publication modes.
The critical positions taken can be roughly divided up into complaints of a lack of:
- A political position—Where the object is to critically analyze the foundations of the Creative Commons movement and offer an eminent critique. One of the more notable concerns to be found in this vein of criticism is on the role the Creative Commons plays as an unconcerned corporate filter. As mentioned in Martin Hardie and "Creative License Fetishism," "When one examines closely just exactly what sort of 'freedom' is ultimately to be had within these licenses, one is quick to discover that they are primarily set up as tools meant to feed directly into corporate co-option." Matteo Pasquinelli (2008) describes two fronts of criticism: "Those who claim the institution of a real commonality against Creative Commons restrictions (non-commercial, share-alike, etc.) and those who point out Creative Commons complicity with global capitalism." Pasquinelli specifically criticizes CC for not establishing "productive commons."
- A common sense position—These usually fall into the category of "it is not needed" or "it takes away user rights" (Toth 2005 and Dvorak 2005).
- A pro-copyright position—These are usually marshaled by the content industry and argue either that Creative Commons is not useful, or that it undermines copyright (Nimmer 2005).
- Another criticism is that it worsens license proliferation, by providing multiple licenses that are incompatible. Most notably, "attribution-sharealike" and "attribution-noncommercial-sharealike" are incompatible, meaning that works under these licenses cannot be combined in a derivative work without obtaining permission from the license-holder.
Tools for finding CC-licensed content
Audio and music
- Electrobel Community—More than 10,000 electronic music songs released under one of the CC licences.
- iRATE radio
- Adrenalinic Sound—Italy
- Starfrosch Community MP3 Blog with a huge Creative Commons Section
- Jamendo—An archive of music albums under Creative Commons licenses
- Phlow—Magazine that picks Creative Commons music and music from the Netlabel Community on a daily basis
- CC:Mixter—A Creative Commons Remix community site.
- Date a Conocer—A Spanish archive of music under Creative Commons licenses.
Photos and images
- Everystockphoto.com—Search engine and member bookmarking for Creative Commons Photos
- Open Clip Art Library
- ccpics.com—Collection of Creative Commons Photos
- ↑ Creative Commons, International. Retrieved May 13, 2008.
- ↑ Creative Commons, Founder's Copyright. Retrieved April 4, 2006.
- ↑ Lawrence Lessig, Free Culture (New York: Penguin Press, 2004). Retrieved May 31, 2008.
- ↑ Monika Ermert, Germany debuts Creative Commons, Register 2004.
- ↑ Creative Commons, Creative Commons Unveils Machine-Readable Copyright Licenses. Retrieved February 9, 2007.
- ↑ www.groklaw.net, Creative Commons License Upheld by Dutch Court. Retrieved September 2, 2006.
- Ardito, Stephanie C. "Public-Domain Advocacy Flourishes." Information Today 20, no. 7 (2003): 17,19.
- Asschenfeldt, Christiane. "Copyright and Licensing Issues—The International Commons." In CERN Workshop Series on Innovations in Scholarly Communication: Implementing the Benefits of OAI (OAI3), 12 February-14 February 2004 at CERN, Geneva, Switzerland. Geneva: CERN, 2004. Retrieved May 31, 2008.
- Brown, Glenn Otis. "Academic Digital Rights: A Walk on the Creative Commons." Syllabus Magazine (April 2003).Retrieved May 31, 2008.
- —. "Out of the Way: How the Next Copyright Revolution Can Help the Next Scientific Revolution." PLoS Biology 1, no. 1 (2003): 30-31. Retrieved May 31, 2008.
- Chillingworth, Mark. "Creative Commons Attracts BBC's Attention." Information World Review. June 2004. Retrieved May 31, 2008.
- Conhaim, Wallys W. "Creative Commons Nurtures the Public Domain." Information Today 19, no. 7 (2002): 52, 54.
- Cover Pages. "Delivering Classics Resources with TEI-XML, Open Source, and Creative Commons Licenses." April 2004. Retrieved May 31, 2008.
- Denison, D.C. "For Creators, An Argument for Alienable Rights." Boston Globe. December 22, 2002, E2.
- Ermert, Monika. "Germany Debuts Creative Commons." The Register. June 2004. Retrieved May 31, 2008.
- Fitzgerald, Brian, and Ian Oi. "Free Culture: Cultivating the Creative Commons." 2004.
- Johnstone, Sally M. "Sharing Educational Materials Without Losing Rights." Change 35, no. 6 (2003): 49-51.
- Lessig, Lawrence. "The Creative Commons" (1994) vol.55 Florida Law Review 763.
- Pasquinelli, Matteo. "The ideology of Free Culture and the Grammar of Sabotage." Rotterdam: NAi Publishers, 2008. Retrieved May 31, 2008.
- Plotkin, Hal. "All Hail Creative Commons: Stanford Professor and Author Lawrence Lessig Plans a Legal Insurrection." SFGate.com. February 2002. Retrieved May 31, 2008.
- Schloman, Barbara F. "Creative Commons: An Opportunity to Extend the Public Domain." Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. October 2003. Retrieved May 31, 2008.
- Stix, Gary. "Some Rights Reserved." Scientific American 288, no. 3 (2003): 46. Retrieved May 31, 2008.
- Weitzman, Jonathan B., and Lawrence Lessig. "Open Access and Creative Common Sense." Open Access Now. May 2004. Retrieved May 31, 2008.
All links retrieved July 4, 2013.
- John C. Dvorak. "Creative Commons Humbug", July 18, 2005., PC Magazine. A critical article
- Berry, D. M. & Moss, G. (2005). On the “Creative Commons”: a critique of the commons without commonality. Free Software Magazine. No. 5.
- Daniel E. Atkins, John Seely Brown, and Allen L. Hammond. A Review of the Open Educational Resources (OER) Movement: Achievements, Challenges, and New Opportunities, Report to The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. February 2007.
- Fitzgerald, Michael (2005), Copyleft hits a Snag. Technology Review. Wednesday, December 21, 2005.
- Hill, Benjamin Mako. (2005). Towards a Standard of Freedom: Creative Commons and the Free Software Movement. Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:39:49 -0400.
- Mia Garlick A Review of Creative Commons and Science Commons, EDUCAUSE Review, vol. 40, no. 5 (September/October 2005): 78–79.
- Möller, Erik (2006). The Case for Free Use: Reasons Not to Use a Creative Commons NC License. Open Source, Jahrbuch 2006.
- Nimmer, Raymond (2005). Open source license proliferation, a broader view, Nov 12 2005.
- Orlowski, Andrew (2005). On Creativity, Computers and Copyright. The Register. Thursday 21st July 2005 01:43 GMT
- Tóth, Péter Benjamin. (2005). Creative Humbug: Personal feelings about the Creative Commons licenses, INDICARE 24/06/05 [10:12 UTC].
New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:
Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.
- Portions of this article are taken from the Creative Commons website, published under the Creative Commons Attribution License v1.0.