Difference between revisions of "Monad" - New World Encyclopedia
Keisuke Noda (talk | contribs) |
Rosie Tanabe (talk | contribs) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{Paid}}{{Approved}}{{Images OK}}{{Submitted}}{{Copyedited}} |
| − | '''Monad''' is an English term meaning "one," "single," or "unit," especially in technical contexts. | + | '''Monad''' is an English term meaning "one," "single," or "unit," especially in technical contexts. It comes from the Late [[Latin]] stem ''monad''-, derived from the Greek word ''monos'' or μονάς (from the word μόνος, which means "one," "single," or "unique"). |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | The term “monad” was used by the Pythagoreans as the name of the beginning number of a series, from which all following numbers derived. In [[Greek philosophy|ancient philosophy]], [[Epicurus]] described "monads" that were the smallest units of matter, much like Democritus's notion of an [[atom]]. For many Greek philosophers, including [[Pythagoras]], [[Parmenides]], [[Xenophanes]], [[Plato]], [[Aristotle]], and [[Plotinus]], Monad was a term for [[God]] or the first being, the totality of all beings, the source or the One. Gnostics used the term “monad” to refer to the most primal aspect of God. In ''De monade, numero et figura liber'' (“''On the Monad, Number, and Figure'',” 1591) [[Giordano Bruno]] described three fundamental types of monads: God, souls, and atoms. | ||
| + | {{toc}} | ||
The term "monad," however, is best known as a concept of [[Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz]]. Leibniz, in ''Monadologia'' (''Monadology'', 1714), proposed that the universe is made up of ''monads'', basic individual substances that encompass complete concepts and are immaterial, lacking spatial extension. Each monad is a unique, indestructible, dynamic, soul-like entity whose properties are a function of its perceptions and appetites. Monads have no true causal relation with other monads, but all are perfectly synchronized with each other by God in a pre-established harmony. Based upon the the principle of the "Identity of Indiscernibles" ("if and only if entities have the same properties in common, they are identical"), Leibniz explained the multiplicity of beings by ascribing the individuation of each being to the concept of monad. His concept of monad has a logical aspect as well. Mondad is the subject that all possible predicates are ascribable to. | The term "monad," however, is best known as a concept of [[Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz]]. Leibniz, in ''Monadologia'' (''Monadology'', 1714), proposed that the universe is made up of ''monads'', basic individual substances that encompass complete concepts and are immaterial, lacking spatial extension. Each monad is a unique, indestructible, dynamic, soul-like entity whose properties are a function of its perceptions and appetites. Monads have no true causal relation with other monads, but all are perfectly synchronized with each other by God in a pre-established harmony. Based upon the the principle of the "Identity of Indiscernibles" ("if and only if entities have the same properties in common, they are identical"), Leibniz explained the multiplicity of beings by ascribing the individuation of each being to the concept of monad. His concept of monad has a logical aspect as well. Mondad is the subject that all possible predicates are ascribable to. | ||
==Philosophy of Leibniz == | ==Philosophy of Leibniz == | ||
| − | Monadology as a philosophical system is usually associated with the mature metaphysics of [[Gottfried Leibniz]], outlined in his work, ''Monadology'' (1714). His fundamental thesis is that the basic individual substances that make up the universe are ''monads'', immaterial soul-like entities without spatial extension. | + | Monadology as a philosophical system is usually associated with the mature [[metaphysics]] of [[Gottfried Leibniz]], outlined in his work, ''Monadology'' (1714). His fundamental thesis is that the basic individual substances that make up the universe are ''monads'', immaterial soul-like entities without spatial extension. |
=== Substance as Monads=== | === Substance as Monads=== | ||
Around the end of the seventeenth century, Leibniz began to use the word "monad" (meaning “''that which is one, has no parts and is therefore indivisible''”) to refer to his concept of the fundamental units of existence. His theory was an alternative to the [[atomism|mechanistic theory of atoms]] that was becoming popular in natural philosophy at the time. While atoms were the smallest unit of extension out of which all larger extended things are built, monads had no spatial extension (Leibniz viewed spatial extension as an illusion). A monad was the reality represented by a complete concept, containing within itself all the predicates of the subject of which it was the concept; these predicates were related by sufficient reasons into a vast single network of explanation. A monad, having all these properties within itself, was self-sufficient and did not need to relate to or be influenced by any other monad. | Around the end of the seventeenth century, Leibniz began to use the word "monad" (meaning “''that which is one, has no parts and is therefore indivisible''”) to refer to his concept of the fundamental units of existence. His theory was an alternative to the [[atomism|mechanistic theory of atoms]] that was becoming popular in natural philosophy at the time. While atoms were the smallest unit of extension out of which all larger extended things are built, monads had no spatial extension (Leibniz viewed spatial extension as an illusion). A monad was the reality represented by a complete concept, containing within itself all the predicates of the subject of which it was the concept; these predicates were related by sufficient reasons into a vast single network of explanation. A monad, having all these properties within itself, was self-sufficient and did not need to relate to or be influenced by any other monad. | ||
| − | Instead of cause and effect as the basic agency of change, Leibniz posited a theory of pre-established harmony | + | Instead of cause and effect as the basic agency of change, Leibniz posited a theory of pre-established harmony to explain the apparently inter-related behavior of things. A common analogy is that of two clocks situated on different sides of a room, both keeping accurate time. A person who does not understand clocks might suspect that one was the master clock and is causing the other clock to always follow it. Another person who knows about clocks would explain that the two clocks have no influence on each other, but instead that they share a common cause (the last person who turned them on and synchronized them) and have been independently keeping correct time. When two things are observed to behave in corresponding ways, it is often assumed (without any real evidence) that causation is occurring. According to Leibniz, every monad is like a clock, behaving independently of other monads. Nevertheless, all monads are perfectly synchronized with one another by God, according to His vast conception of the perfect universe. |
| − | Leibniz’ theory of pre-established harmony argued that monads do not affect one another, and that each monad expresses the entire universe. Leibniz stated that every monad mirrors the whole of the universe in that it expresses every other monad, but no monad has a window through which it can actually receive or supply causal influences | + | Leibniz’ theory of pre-established harmony argued that monads do not affect one another, and that each monad expresses the entire universe. Leibniz stated that every monad mirrors the whole of the universe in that it expresses every other monad, but no monad has a window through which it can actually receive or supply causal influences. Since a monad cannot be influenced, there is no way for a monad to be born or destroyed; all monads are thus eternal and immutable. |
| − | === | + | ===Leibniz and Descartes=== |
| − | Leibniz posited that human souls were a special kind of monad, termed a dominant, or rational, monad, which included consciousness and the ability to reflect, a capacity | + | Leibniz posited that human souls were a special kind of monad, termed a dominant, or rational, monad, which included consciousness and the ability to reflect, a capacity which [[Leibniz]] termed “apperception.” All other simple monads had two basic qualities, appetite and perception, while some monads also had memory. |
| − | Leibniz was one of the first philosophers to examine the importance of the "unconscious" mind. The concept of the human soul as a "mirror" of the whole universe entailed an infinite number and complexity of perceptions. An individual could not apperceive (be conscious of) all these little perceptions, as Leibniz called them, and even conscious perceptions were composites of vast numbers of individual perceptions. | + | Leibniz was one of the first philosophers to examine the importance of the "unconscious" mind. The concept of the human soul as a "mirror" of the whole universe entailed an infinite number and complexity of perceptions. An individual could not apperceive (be conscious of) all these little perceptions, as Leibniz called them, and even conscious perceptions were composites of vast numbers of individual perceptions. Leibniz used the analogy of the roar of waves on the beach; their seemingly singular sound was actually composed of vast numbers of small individual sounds. Leibniz considered that [[Descartes]] had made a major error in assuming that the human consciousness could actively perceive everything. |
| − | According to Leibniz, everything which is perceived as a unified being must be a single monad. Everything else is a composite of many monads. A coffee cup, for example, is actually composed of an infinite number of monads, all of them are acting together so that it is perceived as a single thing. The human soul, however, and the soul of every other living thing, is a single monad which "controls" a composite body. Leibniz posited substantial form, for living things, as the principle of the unity of certain living composites. In opposition to the | + | According to Leibniz, everything which is perceived as a unified being must be a single monad. Everything else is a composite of many monads. A coffee cup, for example, is actually composed of an infinite number of monads, all of them are acting together so that it is perceived as a single thing. The human soul, however, and the soul of every other living thing, is a single monad which "controls" a composite body. Leibniz posited substantial form, for living things, as the principle of the unity of certain living composites. In opposition to the [[empiricism|empiricist]]s of his time, Leibniz used the term "innate idea" to distinguish an idea which is intrinsic to the mind rather than arriving in some way from outside it. On a metaphysical level, since monads have no "windows," it is inherent that all ideas are innate. An idea in a peron’s monad/soul is just another property of that monad, which occurs according to an entirely internal explanation represented by the complete concept. At the phenomenal level, however, many ideas are represented as arriving through one's senses. |
===Influence of Leibniz’s Monadism=== | ===Influence of Leibniz’s Monadism=== | ||
| − | Leibniz's approach to reality was very influential on | + | [[Leibniz]]'s approach to reality was very influential on eighteenth–century philosophy, suggesting ideas which revived an interest in rational [[metaphysics]] and laying the foundation for the idealism of [[Kant]] and [[Hegel]]. During the twentieth century, Leibniz was appreciateded by Anglo-American [[Analytic philosophy|analytic philosophers]] as a gifted logician who made significant contributions to the theory of identity and modal logic. Leibniz has been given less importance in [[Continental philosophy|continental European philosophy]], although the writings of [[Heidegger]] and, much later, [[Deleuze]], demonsrate the continuing fertility of his philosophical ideas. |
==Other Uses of the term “Monad” == | ==Other Uses of the term “Monad” == | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
*A ''monadic'' function or operator may be the same as a unary one, or one somehow having to do with either of the previous kinds of monad. Monadic predicate calculus is a form of logic based on unary operators. | *A ''monadic'' function or operator may be the same as a unary one, or one somehow having to do with either of the previous kinds of monad. Monadic predicate calculus is a form of logic based on unary operators. | ||
*A monad in music is a single note, as opposed to a dyad or trichord. | *A monad in music is a single note, as opposed to a dyad or trichord. | ||
| + | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| − | *Bruno, Giordano. ''De monade, numero et figura liber'' ( | + | *Bruno, Giordano. 1591. ''De monade, numero et figura liber'' (“On the Monad, Number, and Figure”). |
| − | *Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, and Nicholas Rescher. 1991. ''G.W. Leibniz's Monadology : an edition for students.'' Pittsburgh, | + | *Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, and Nicholas Rescher. 1991. ''G.W. Leibniz's Monadology : an edition for students.'' Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. ISBN 0822936704 ISBN 9780822936701 ISBN 0822954494 ISBN 9780822954491 |
*Savile, Anthony, and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. 2000. ''Routledge philosophy guidebook to Leibniz and the Monadology. Routledge philosophy guidebooks''. London: Routledge. ISBN 041516575X ISBN 9780415165754 ISBN 0415171148 ISBN 9780415171144 ISBN 0415165768 ISBN 9780415165761 ISBN 041517113X ISBN 9780415171137 | *Savile, Anthony, and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. 2000. ''Routledge philosophy guidebook to Leibniz and the Monadology. Routledge philosophy guidebooks''. London: Routledge. ISBN 041516575X ISBN 9780415165754 ISBN 0415171148 ISBN 9780415171144 ISBN 0415165768 ISBN 9780415165761 ISBN 041517113X ISBN 9780415171137 | ||
*Singer, Dorothea Waley, and Giordano Bruno. 1968. ''Giordano Bruno; his life and thought. With annotated translation of his work, On the infinite universe and worlds.'' New York: Greenwood Press. OCLC: 442921 | *Singer, Dorothea Waley, and Giordano Bruno. 1968. ''Giordano Bruno; his life and thought. With annotated translation of his work, On the infinite universe and worlds.'' New York: Greenwood Press. OCLC: 442921 | ||
| + | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
| − | + | All links retrieved November 9, 2022. | |
| − | *Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | + | *[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10447b.htm Monad] – ''The Catholic Encyclopedia'' |
| − | **[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/leibniz-causation/ Leibniz on Causation] | + | *Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entries: |
| − | **[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/leibniz-mind/ Leibniz's Philosophy of Mind] | + | **[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/leibniz-causation/ Leibniz on Causation] |
| − | **[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity-indiscernible/ The Identity of Indiscernibles] | + | **[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/leibniz-mind/ Leibniz's Philosophy of Mind] |
| + | **[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity-indiscernible/ The Identity of Indiscernibles] | ||
===General Philosophy Sources=== | ===General Philosophy Sources=== | ||
| − | *[http://plato.stanford.edu/ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy] | + | *[http://plato.stanford.edu/ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy] |
| − | *[http://www.iep.utm.edu/ The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy] | + | *[http://www.iep.utm.edu/ The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy] |
| − | + | *[http://www.bu.edu/wcp/PaidArch.html Paideia Project Online] | |
| − | + | *[http://www.gutenberg.org/ Project Gutenberg] | |
| − | *[http://www.bu.edu/wcp/PaidArch.html Paideia Project Online] | ||
| − | *[http://www.gutenberg.org/ Project Gutenberg] | ||
{{Credit|105163792}} | {{Credit|105163792}} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:53, 9 November 2022
Monad is an English term meaning "one," "single," or "unit," especially in technical contexts. It comes from the Late Latin stem monad-, derived from the Greek word monos or μονάς (from the word μόνος, which means "one," "single," or "unique").
The term “monad” was used by the Pythagoreans as the name of the beginning number of a series, from which all following numbers derived. In ancient philosophy, Epicurus described "monads" that were the smallest units of matter, much like Democritus's notion of an atom. For many Greek philosophers, including Pythagoras, Parmenides, Xenophanes, Plato, Aristotle, and Plotinus, Monad was a term for God or the first being, the totality of all beings, the source or the One. Gnostics used the term “monad” to refer to the most primal aspect of God. In De monade, numero et figura liber (“On the Monad, Number, and Figure,” 1591) Giordano Bruno described three fundamental types of monads: God, souls, and atoms.
The term "monad," however, is best known as a concept of Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Leibniz, in Monadologia (Monadology, 1714), proposed that the universe is made up of monads, basic individual substances that encompass complete concepts and are immaterial, lacking spatial extension. Each monad is a unique, indestructible, dynamic, soul-like entity whose properties are a function of its perceptions and appetites. Monads have no true causal relation with other monads, but all are perfectly synchronized with each other by God in a pre-established harmony. Based upon the the principle of the "Identity of Indiscernibles" ("if and only if entities have the same properties in common, they are identical"), Leibniz explained the multiplicity of beings by ascribing the individuation of each being to the concept of monad. His concept of monad has a logical aspect as well. Mondad is the subject that all possible predicates are ascribable to.
Philosophy of Leibniz
Monadology as a philosophical system is usually associated with the mature metaphysics of Gottfried Leibniz, outlined in his work, Monadology (1714). His fundamental thesis is that the basic individual substances that make up the universe are monads, immaterial soul-like entities without spatial extension.
Substance as Monads
Around the end of the seventeenth century, Leibniz began to use the word "monad" (meaning “that which is one, has no parts and is therefore indivisible”) to refer to his concept of the fundamental units of existence. His theory was an alternative to the mechanistic theory of atoms that was becoming popular in natural philosophy at the time. While atoms were the smallest unit of extension out of which all larger extended things are built, monads had no spatial extension (Leibniz viewed spatial extension as an illusion). A monad was the reality represented by a complete concept, containing within itself all the predicates of the subject of which it was the concept; these predicates were related by sufficient reasons into a vast single network of explanation. A monad, having all these properties within itself, was self-sufficient and did not need to relate to or be influenced by any other monad.
Instead of cause and effect as the basic agency of change, Leibniz posited a theory of pre-established harmony to explain the apparently inter-related behavior of things. A common analogy is that of two clocks situated on different sides of a room, both keeping accurate time. A person who does not understand clocks might suspect that one was the master clock and is causing the other clock to always follow it. Another person who knows about clocks would explain that the two clocks have no influence on each other, but instead that they share a common cause (the last person who turned them on and synchronized them) and have been independently keeping correct time. When two things are observed to behave in corresponding ways, it is often assumed (without any real evidence) that causation is occurring. According to Leibniz, every monad is like a clock, behaving independently of other monads. Nevertheless, all monads are perfectly synchronized with one another by God, according to His vast conception of the perfect universe.
Leibniz’ theory of pre-established harmony argued that monads do not affect one another, and that each monad expresses the entire universe. Leibniz stated that every monad mirrors the whole of the universe in that it expresses every other monad, but no monad has a window through which it can actually receive or supply causal influences. Since a monad cannot be influenced, there is no way for a monad to be born or destroyed; all monads are thus eternal and immutable.
Leibniz and Descartes
Leibniz posited that human souls were a special kind of monad, termed a dominant, or rational, monad, which included consciousness and the ability to reflect, a capacity which Leibniz termed “apperception.” All other simple monads had two basic qualities, appetite and perception, while some monads also had memory.
Leibniz was one of the first philosophers to examine the importance of the "unconscious" mind. The concept of the human soul as a "mirror" of the whole universe entailed an infinite number and complexity of perceptions. An individual could not apperceive (be conscious of) all these little perceptions, as Leibniz called them, and even conscious perceptions were composites of vast numbers of individual perceptions. Leibniz used the analogy of the roar of waves on the beach; their seemingly singular sound was actually composed of vast numbers of small individual sounds. Leibniz considered that Descartes had made a major error in assuming that the human consciousness could actively perceive everything.
According to Leibniz, everything which is perceived as a unified being must be a single monad. Everything else is a composite of many monads. A coffee cup, for example, is actually composed of an infinite number of monads, all of them are acting together so that it is perceived as a single thing. The human soul, however, and the soul of every other living thing, is a single monad which "controls" a composite body. Leibniz posited substantial form, for living things, as the principle of the unity of certain living composites. In opposition to the empiricists of his time, Leibniz used the term "innate idea" to distinguish an idea which is intrinsic to the mind rather than arriving in some way from outside it. On a metaphysical level, since monads have no "windows," it is inherent that all ideas are innate. An idea in a peron’s monad/soul is just another property of that monad, which occurs according to an entirely internal explanation represented by the complete concept. At the phenomenal level, however, many ideas are represented as arriving through one's senses.
Influence of Leibniz’s Monadism
Leibniz's approach to reality was very influential on eighteenth–century philosophy, suggesting ideas which revived an interest in rational metaphysics and laying the foundation for the idealism of Kant and Hegel. During the twentieth century, Leibniz was appreciateded by Anglo-American analytic philosophers as a gifted logician who made significant contributions to the theory of identity and modal logic. Leibniz has been given less importance in continental European philosophy, although the writings of Heidegger and, much later, Deleuze, demonsrate the continuing fertility of his philosophical ideas.
Other Uses of the term “Monad”
- In Monism, the metaphysical and theological view that all is of one essence, this essence is sometimes called the monad.
- In Hermetica, a category of popular Late Antique literature purporting to contain secret wisdom, The Cup or Monad is one of the texts making up the Corpus Hermetica.
- In ancient philosophy, Epicurus described "monads" that were the smallest units of matter, much like Democritus's notion of an atom. For many others, including Pythagoras, Parmenides, Xenophanes, Plato, Aristotle, and Plotinus, Monad was a term for God or the first being, the totality of all beings, the source or the One.
- In Gnosticism, monad refers to the most primal aspect of God.
- In early biology, the indivisible life essence, either the cell or nucleus, was called “monad.”
- In category theory, a monad is a type of functor.
- Monads are type constructors that are used in functional programming languages to capture various notions of sequential computation.
- A monadic function or operator may be the same as a unary one, or one somehow having to do with either of the previous kinds of monad. Monadic predicate calculus is a form of logic based on unary operators.
- A monad in music is a single note, as opposed to a dyad or trichord.
ReferencesISBN links support NWE through referral fees
- Bruno, Giordano. 1591. De monade, numero et figura liber (“On the Monad, Number, and Figure”).
- Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, and Nicholas Rescher. 1991. G.W. Leibniz's Monadology : an edition for students. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. ISBN 0822936704 ISBN 9780822936701 ISBN 0822954494 ISBN 9780822954491
- Savile, Anthony, and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. 2000. Routledge philosophy guidebook to Leibniz and the Monadology. Routledge philosophy guidebooks. London: Routledge. ISBN 041516575X ISBN 9780415165754 ISBN 0415171148 ISBN 9780415171144 ISBN 0415165768 ISBN 9780415165761 ISBN 041517113X ISBN 9780415171137
- Singer, Dorothea Waley, and Giordano Bruno. 1968. Giordano Bruno; his life and thought. With annotated translation of his work, On the infinite universe and worlds. New York: Greenwood Press. OCLC: 442921
External links
All links retrieved November 9, 2022.
- Monad – The Catholic Encyclopedia
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entries:
General Philosophy Sources
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- Paideia Project Online
- Project Gutenberg
Credits
New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:
The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:
Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.
