Encyclopedia, Difference between revisions of "Ruth Benedict" - New World

From New World Encyclopedia
Line 24: Line 24:
 
== Work ==
 
== Work ==
  
In her work, Benedict was greatly inspired by her mentor, Franz Boaz. Boaz, often considered the father of American anthropology, was the one who initiated the idea that no culture is inferior, including so called “primitive” cultures. Ruth Benedict was affected by the passionate egalitarianism of Boas and continued it in her research and writing. She believed that any culture, including a “primitive” one, should be viewed holistically, with all of its pieces combined in an integrated whole.  
+
In her work, Benedict was greatly inspired by her mentor, [[Franz Boas]]. Boaz, often considered the father of [[United States|American]] [[anthropology]], initiated the idea that no [[culture]] is inferior, including so called “[[primitive culture]]s." Ruth Benedict was affected by the passionate egalitarianism of Boas and continued it in her own research and writing. She believed that any culture, including a primitive one, should be viewed holistically, with all of its pieces combined in an integrated whole.  
  
In her dissertation from 1923, The Concept of the Guardian Spirit in North America, Benedict discusses the power of religious awe in Native American cultures. She was particularly interested in the methods by which different tribes sought visions and guidance. Benedict considered Boaz her own spirit guide, as she relied on his knowledge to inspire her in her own work.  
+
In her 1923 dissertation, ''The Concept of the Guardian Spirit in North America'', Benedict discussed the power of [[religion|religious]] awe in [[Native American]] cultures. She was particularly interested in the methods by which different [[tribe]]s sought visions and guidance. Benedict considered Boaz her own spirit guide, as she relied on his knowledge to inspire her in her own work.  
  
Benedict continued her research on American Indians through her field studies. In 1922 she did study on Serrano, in 1924 on Zuni, in 1925 on Cochiti, and in 1926 on Pima. Through her experience with all those tribes she discovered the differences in temperament and culture between the Pueblo and Plains Indian tribes. It led her to conclusion that personality and culture are interconnected, in isomorphic sense. This work led to publishing of her most acclaimed work Patterns of Culture, a bestseller that brought Benedict into the top of American anthropology.  
+
Benedict continued research on American Indians through a series of field studies, beginning with the Serrano in 1922, followed by the Zuni in 1924, the Cochiti in 1925, and in 1926 on the Pima. Through her experience with these various tribes she discovered differences in [[temperament]] and culture between the [[Pueblo]] and [[Plains Indian]] tribes, which led her to conclude that [[personality]] and culture are interconnected, in an isomorphic sense. This work led to the publishing of her most acclaimed work ''Patterns of Culture'' (Benedict, 1934), a bestseller that brought Benedict to the forefront of American anthropology.  
  
When war broke out, Benedict was asked by the U.S. government to write about European and Asian cultures, in order to gain deeper understanding of the enemy. Her work led to publishing of her Chrysanthemum and the Sword (1946), a soon-to-become bestseller about Japanese culture.  
+
When [[World War II|war]] broke out, Benedict was asked by the U.S. government to write about [[Europe]]an and [[Asia]]n cultures, in order to gain deeper understanding of the enemy. Her work led to the publishing of her ''The Chrysanthemum and the Sword'' (Benedict, 1946), her bestseller about [[Japan]]ese culture.  
 
   
 
   
Below is some important summary of her well-known work:
+
===Patterns of Culture===
 +
According to [[Margaret Mead]], the essential idea in ''Patterns of Culture'' (1934) is the view of "human cultures as 'personality writ large.'" Each culture, Benedict explained, chooses from "the great arc of human potentialities" only a few characteristics, which become the leading [[personality]] traits of the persons living in that [[culture]]. For example, she described the emphasis on "restraint" in [[Pueblo]] cultures of the American southwest, and the emphasis on "abandon" in the [[Native American]] cultures of the Great Plains. She used the [[Nietzsche]]an opposites of "Apollonian" and "Dionesian" as the stimulus for her thought about these Native American cultures. She described how in [[ancient Greece]], the worshippers of [[Apollo]] emphasized order and calm in their celebrations. In contrast, the worshippers of [[Dionysis]], the god of wine, emphasized wildness, abandon, letting go. And so it was among Native Americans. She described in detail the contrasts between [[ritual]]s, [[belief]]s, and personal preferences amongst people of diverse cultures to show how each culture had a "personality" that was encouraged in each individual.
  
'''Patterns of Culture'''
+
Other [[anthropology|anthropologists]] of the "personality and culture" school followed through on these ideas, most notably Margaret Mead in her ''Coming of Age in Samoa'' and ''Sex and Temperament in Three Primitive Societies.'' Abram Kardiner was also affected by these ideas, and in time the concept of "modal personality" was born: the cluster of traits most commonly thought to be observed in people of any given culture.
The essential idea in ''Patterns of Culture'' is, according to Margaret Mead, "her view of human cultures as 'personality writ large.'" Each culture, Benedict explains, chooses from "the great arc of human potentialities" only a few characteristics, which become the leading personality traits of the persons living in that culture. For example, she described the emphasis on ''restraint'' in Pueblo cultures of the American southwest, and the emphasis on ''abandon'' in the Native American cultures of the Great Plains. She used the Nietzschean opposites of "Apollonian" and "Dionesian" as the stimulus for her thought about these Native American cultures. She describes how in ancient Greece, the worshippers of Apollo emphasized order and calm in their celebrations. In contrast, the worshippers of Dionysis, the god of wine, emphasized wildness, abandon, letting go. And so it was among Native Americans. She described in detail the contrasts between rituals, beliefs, personal preferences amongst people of diverse cultures to show how each culture had a "personality" that was encouraged in each individual.
 
  
Other anthropologists of the ''personality and culture'' school followed through on these ideas—notably Margaret Mead in her ''Coming of Age in Samoa'' and ''Sex and Temperament in Three Primitive Societies.'' Abram Kardiner was affected by these ideas, and in time the concept of "modal personality" was born: the cluster of traits most commonly thought to be observed in people of any given culture.
+
In ''Patterns of Culture'', Benedict expressed her belief in cultural relativism. She desired to show that each culture has its own [[moral]] imperatives that can be understood only if one studies that culture as a whole. It was wrong, she felt, to disparage the [[custom]]s or values of a culture different from one's own. Those customs had a meaning to the persons who lived them which should not be summed up or superficialized. We should not try to evaluate people by our standards alone. Morality, she felt, was relative.
  
Benedict, in ''Patterns of Culture,'' expresses her belief in cultural relativism. She desired to show that each culture has its own moral imperatives that can be understood only if one studies that culture as a whole. It was wrong, she felt, to disparage the customs or values of a culture different from one's own. Those customs had a meaning to the persons who lived them which should not be summed up or superficialized. We should not try to evaluate people by our standards alone. Morality, she felt, was ''relative''.  
+
===The Races of Mankind===
 +
''The Races of Mankind'' is a lesser-known work by Benedict, written in 1943. In this she wrote against the [[World War II|war]], trying to encourage all types of people to join together and not fight amongst themselves. "The peoples of the earth," Benedict pointed out, “are one family. We all have just so many teeth, so many molars, just so many little bones and muscles—so we can only have come from one set of ancestors no matter what our color, the shape of our head, the texture of our hair.... The races of mankind are what the Bible says they are—brothers. In their bodies is the record of their brotherhood."
  
'''The Races of Mankind'''
+
Furthermore, Benedict tried to give a scientific explanation for racial differences, in order to proclaim that all races are equal. Benedict wrote:
This is the lesser-known work of Benedict, which was written in 1943. In this she writes against the war, trying to encourage all types of people to join together and not fight amongst themselves. "The peoples of the earth," Benedict points out, “are one family. We all have just so many teeth, so many molars, just so many little bones and muscles—so we can only have come from one set of ancestors no matter what our color, the shape of our head, the texture of our hair…. The races of mankind are what the Bible says they are—brothers. In their bodies is the record of their brotherhood."
 
  
Furthermore, Benedict tries to give scientific explanation for racial differences, but only to proclaim that all races are equal. Benedict says, “Whatever our physical traits, regardless of the shape or size of our head, we are equally intelligent… Environment has more to do with intelligence than birth does, including how much money is spent on schools. "Southern Whites," for example, scored below "Northern Negroes" in the IQ tests administered to the American Expeditionary Forces (AEF) in World War I. And the per capita expenditures on schools in the south were only "fractions" of those in northern states in 1917… The differences.... [arose] because of differences of income, education, cultural advantages, and other opportunities.''
+
:''Whatever our physical traits, regardless of the shape or size of our head, we are equally intelligent.... Environment has more to do with intelligence than birth does, including how much money is spent on schools. "Southern Whites," for example, scored below "Northern Negroes" in the IQ tests administered to the American Expeditionary Forces (AEF) in World War I. And the per capita expenditures on schools in the south were only "fractions" of those in northern states in 1917.... The differences.... [arose] because of differences of income, education, cultural advantages, and other opportunities.''
  
 
The ''Races of Mankind'' can be thus seen as one of the important scientific works targeting racial oppression and inequality.  
 
The ''Races of Mankind'' can be thus seen as one of the important scientific works targeting racial oppression and inequality.  
  
'''The Chrysanthemum and the Sword'''
+
===The Chrysanthemum and the Sword===
The ''Chrysanthemum and the Sword'' is the study of the society and culture of Japan, that Benedict published in 1946, incorporating results of her war-time research. This book is an example of “Anthropology at a Distance” a study of a culture through its literature, newspaper clippings, films and recordings, etc. Unable to visit Nazi Germany or Japan, anthropologists made use of the cultural materials studied at a distance. They were attempting to understand the cultural patterns that might be driving their aggression, and hoped to find possible weaknesses, or means of persuasion that had been missed. Benedict's war work included a major study, largely completed in 1944, aimed at understanding Japanese culture; for the Allies were in combat with Japanese armed forces in the Pacific Theatre of the Second World War. Benedict played a major role in grasping the place of the Emperor of Japan in Japanese popular culture, and formulating the recommendation to President Franklin D. Roosevelt that permitting continuation of the Emperor's reign had to be part of the eventual surrender offer.
+
The ''Chrysanthemum and the Sword'' is Benedict's (1946) study of the society and [[culture]] of [[Japan]], incorporating the results of her war-time research. This book is an example of “Anthropology at a Distance”: a study of a culture through its [[literature]], [[newspaper]] clippings, films, recordings, and so forth. Unable to visit [[Nazism|Nazi]] [[Germany]] or Japan during the [[World War II|Second World War]], [[anthropology|anthropologists]] made use of available cultural materials in an attempt to understand the cultural patterns that might be driving their [[aggression]], and hoped to find possible weaknesses, or means of [[persuasion]] that had been missed.
 +
 
 +
Americans found themselves unable to comprehend matters in Japanese culture. For instance, Americans considered it quite natural for American POWs to want their families to know they were alive, and to keep quiet when asked for military information. Japanese POWs, apparently, gave information freely and did not try to contact their families. Benedict's war work included a major study, largely completed in 1944, aimed at understanding Japanese culture. Benedict played a major role in grasping the place of the [[Emperor]] in Japanese culture, and formulating the recommendation to President [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] that permitted continuation of the Emperor's reign should to be part of the eventual surrender offer.
 +
 
 +
While ''The Chrysanthemum and the Sword'' has been criticized since Benedict had no direct experience in Japan, the Japanese ambassador to Pakistan noted in his public address:
 +
 
 +
:''The chrysanthemum has long been considered as a symbol of nobility, and the crest of the Imperial Household is a stylised representation of a chrysanthemum blossom. It has also been used as a symbol of the Japanese culture. In 1946, Ruth Benedict, a well-known American cultural anthropologist, published a book on Japan entitled "The Chrysanthemum and The Sword," which has been a must reading for many students of Japanese studies.'' Numata (200)
 +
 
 +
According to Margaret Mead (1974), other Japanese who have read this work, found it on the whole accurate but somewhat "moralistic." It is still generally regarded as a classic, despite the post-war changes in Japanese culture.
  
 
== Legacy ==
 
== Legacy ==

Revision as of 23:55, 25 April 2006

Ruth Fulton Benedict (June 5, 1887 &ndahs; September 17, 1948) was an American cultural anthropologist, who advocated cross-cultural and racial equality.

File:Ruth0003.JPG
Ruth Benedict

Life

Ruth Benedict (née Fulton) was born on June 5, 1887, in New York City, although Margaret Mead stated that her actual birthplace was Shenango Valley in Upstate New York (Mead, 1974). Her father, Frederick S. Fulton, a successful surgeon, suddenly died when Ruth was two years old, an event that had a tremendous impact on her whole family. Ruth’s mother, Beatrice Shattuck, a schoolteacher, could not forget her husband, and spent the rest of her life grieving for him. Ruth and her sister, Margery, had little contact with the outside world, and Ruth was often isolated, playing in her own fantasy world. She developed depression, which lasted well into her adulthood. Additionally, when Ruth was eight years old it was discovered that she was partially deaf.

By the end of the century, Ruth’s mother moved to Buffalo, and Ruth was enrolled in St. Margaret's Academy, where she started to write poetry under the name Anne Singleton. After completing high school, Ruth entered Vassar College. There she remained focused on realizing her personal goals, and graduated in 1909 with a major in English literature. Her sister, Margery, who graduated together with Ruth, was married the same year, and Ruth decided to travel to Europe. On her return she settled in Buffalo, and started to work for the Charity Organization of Buffalo. However, she could not find satisfaction there, and eventually moved to join her sister in Los Angeles, where she became a teacher.

Life in Los Angeles was not fulfilling for Ruth either. She was searching for something more. When she met Stanley Benedict, a young biochemist, she thought that her quest was over. She married him in 1914, and moved with him to New York City. The couple could not have children, and that strained their relationship. Spending hours in the house alone was frustrating for Ruth, as her restless mind was seeking for intellectual satisfaction. In 1919, Ruth enrolled in The New School for Social Research in downtown Manhattan, where she became inspired by lectures on anthropology by Alexander Goldenweiser and Elsie Clews Parsons.

In 1921, Ruth entered graduate school at Columbia University, where she started her coursework under the guidance of Franz Boas. At 34 years of age she was not eligible for any financial help, and was forced to live a very modest life, living in a small rented house. However, that did not discourage her. She soon became an excellent student, and Franz Boas, who hired her as his assistant, became more like a father than a simple mentor to her. She received her Ph.D. in 1923, based on her dissertation, entitled "The Concept of the Guardian Spirit in North America," in which she discussed cultural aspects of individual religious experiences, and which was the beginning of her work on Native American cultures.

In 1924, Benedict began teaching at Barnard College and Columbia, where she remained as a lecturer until 1932. During this time she developed a close relationship with Margaret Mead, which began when Margaret took her anthropology class. Their relationship, both as intellectual collaborators and friends, sometimes lovers, survived both their marriages and other affairs, and influenced their theories regarding the role of culture in sexual development and the normalcy of heterosexuality. Although Ruth continued to live with her husband all these years, Stanley Benedict never approved of her career. The couple finally separated in 1930.

Benedict continued to work as an anthropologist, writing papers and books, and conducting field research. She was appointed the executive director of the Department of Anthropology at Columbia in 1937, and founded the Institute for Intercultural Studies in 1941. There she started her studies on European and Asian cultures, which were sponsored by the Office of War Information. She wrote her best selling book The Chrysanthemum and the Sword in 1946, based on the data collected during this period. In 1947, Benedict served and president of the American Anthropological Association and received the Annual Achievement Award of the American Association of University Women. She obtained funding for a major project, Columbia University Research in Contemporary Cultures, which allowed her to travel to Europe to see first hand how accurate her cultural assessments had been in Czechoslovakia, Poland, Holland, and Belgium. Benedict died of a coronary thrombosis in 1948.

Work

In her work, Benedict was greatly inspired by her mentor, Franz Boas. Boaz, often considered the father of American anthropology, initiated the idea that no culture is inferior, including so called “primitive cultures." Ruth Benedict was affected by the passionate egalitarianism of Boas and continued it in her own research and writing. She believed that any culture, including a primitive one, should be viewed holistically, with all of its pieces combined in an integrated whole.

In her 1923 dissertation, The Concept of the Guardian Spirit in North America, Benedict discussed the power of religious awe in Native American cultures. She was particularly interested in the methods by which different tribes sought visions and guidance. Benedict considered Boaz her own spirit guide, as she relied on his knowledge to inspire her in her own work.

Benedict continued research on American Indians through a series of field studies, beginning with the Serrano in 1922, followed by the Zuni in 1924, the Cochiti in 1925, and in 1926 on the Pima. Through her experience with these various tribes she discovered differences in temperament and culture between the Pueblo and Plains Indian tribes, which led her to conclude that personality and culture are interconnected, in an isomorphic sense. This work led to the publishing of her most acclaimed work Patterns of Culture (Benedict, 1934), a bestseller that brought Benedict to the forefront of American anthropology.

When war broke out, Benedict was asked by the U.S. government to write about European and Asian cultures, in order to gain deeper understanding of the enemy. Her work led to the publishing of her The Chrysanthemum and the Sword (Benedict, 1946), her bestseller about Japanese culture.

Patterns of Culture

According to Margaret Mead, the essential idea in Patterns of Culture (1934) is the view of "human cultures as 'personality writ large.'" Each culture, Benedict explained, chooses from "the great arc of human potentialities" only a few characteristics, which become the leading personality traits of the persons living in that culture. For example, she described the emphasis on "restraint" in Pueblo cultures of the American southwest, and the emphasis on "abandon" in the Native American cultures of the Great Plains. She used the Nietzschean opposites of "Apollonian" and "Dionesian" as the stimulus for her thought about these Native American cultures. She described how in ancient Greece, the worshippers of Apollo emphasized order and calm in their celebrations. In contrast, the worshippers of Dionysis, the god of wine, emphasized wildness, abandon, letting go. And so it was among Native Americans. She described in detail the contrasts between rituals, beliefs, and personal preferences amongst people of diverse cultures to show how each culture had a "personality" that was encouraged in each individual.

Other anthropologists of the "personality and culture" school followed through on these ideas, most notably Margaret Mead in her Coming of Age in Samoa and Sex and Temperament in Three Primitive Societies. Abram Kardiner was also affected by these ideas, and in time the concept of "modal personality" was born: the cluster of traits most commonly thought to be observed in people of any given culture.

In Patterns of Culture, Benedict expressed her belief in cultural relativism. She desired to show that each culture has its own moral imperatives that can be understood only if one studies that culture as a whole. It was wrong, she felt, to disparage the customs or values of a culture different from one's own. Those customs had a meaning to the persons who lived them which should not be summed up or superficialized. We should not try to evaluate people by our standards alone. Morality, she felt, was relative.

The Races of Mankind

The Races of Mankind is a lesser-known work by Benedict, written in 1943. In this she wrote against the war, trying to encourage all types of people to join together and not fight amongst themselves. "The peoples of the earth," Benedict pointed out, “are one family. We all have just so many teeth, so many molars, just so many little bones and muscles—so we can only have come from one set of ancestors no matter what our color, the shape of our head, the texture of our hair.... The races of mankind are what the Bible says they are—brothers. In their bodies is the record of their brotherhood."

Furthermore, Benedict tried to give a scientific explanation for racial differences, in order to proclaim that all races are equal. Benedict wrote:

Whatever our physical traits, regardless of the shape or size of our head, we are equally intelligent.... Environment has more to do with intelligence than birth does, including how much money is spent on schools. "Southern Whites," for example, scored below "Northern Negroes" in the IQ tests administered to the American Expeditionary Forces (AEF) in World War I. And the per capita expenditures on schools in the south were only "fractions" of those in northern states in 1917.... The differences.... [arose] because of differences of income, education, cultural advantages, and other opportunities.

The Races of Mankind can be thus seen as one of the important scientific works targeting racial oppression and inequality.

The Chrysanthemum and the Sword

The Chrysanthemum and the Sword is Benedict's (1946) study of the society and culture of Japan, incorporating the results of her war-time research. This book is an example of “Anthropology at a Distance”: a study of a culture through its literature, newspaper clippings, films, recordings, and so forth. Unable to visit Nazi Germany or Japan during the Second World War, anthropologists made use of available cultural materials in an attempt to understand the cultural patterns that might be driving their aggression, and hoped to find possible weaknesses, or means of persuasion that had been missed.

Americans found themselves unable to comprehend matters in Japanese culture. For instance, Americans considered it quite natural for American POWs to want their families to know they were alive, and to keep quiet when asked for military information. Japanese POWs, apparently, gave information freely and did not try to contact their families. Benedict's war work included a major study, largely completed in 1944, aimed at understanding Japanese culture. Benedict played a major role in grasping the place of the Emperor in Japanese culture, and formulating the recommendation to President Franklin D. Roosevelt that permitted continuation of the Emperor's reign should to be part of the eventual surrender offer.

While The Chrysanthemum and the Sword has been criticized since Benedict had no direct experience in Japan, the Japanese ambassador to Pakistan noted in his public address:

The chrysanthemum has long been considered as a symbol of nobility, and the crest of the Imperial Household is a stylised representation of a chrysanthemum blossom. It has also been used as a symbol of the Japanese culture. In 1946, Ruth Benedict, a well-known American cultural anthropologist, published a book on Japan entitled "The Chrysanthemum and The Sword," which has been a must reading for many students of Japanese studies. Numata (200)

According to Margaret Mead (1974), other Japanese who have read this work, found it on the whole accurate but somewhat "moralistic." It is still generally regarded as a classic, despite the post-war changes in Japanese culture.

Legacy

Whatever ethical imperatives have since been described by anthropologists as universal, not culture-bound, Benedict's work as a pioneer in describing whole cultures, and as an advocate of cross-cultural equality, has lived.

Benedict's Patterns of Culture (1934) was translated into fourteen languages and was published in many editions as standard reading for anthropology courses in American universities for years.

Benedict was among the leading social anthropologists who were recruited by the U.S. Government for war-related research and consultation after U.S. entry into World War II.

Benedict’s The Races of Mankind (1943), which she wrote with her colleague at the Columbia University Department of Anthropology, Gene Weltfish, can be seen as an important scientific attempt to battle against racist beliefs.


Publications

  • Benedict, Ruth. 1922. The Concept of the Guardian Spirit in North America. (Ph.D. diss., Columbia University.) Memoirs of the American Anthropological Association, 29, 1-7 .
  • Benedict, Ruth. 1982. Race: Science and Politics. New York: Greenwood-Heinemann Publishing. (original work published in 1940) ISBN 031323597X
  • Benedict, Ruth. 1989. Patterns of Culture. Mariner Books (original work published in 1934) ISBN 0395500885
  • Benedict, Ruth. 1989. The Chrysanthemum and the Sword: Patterns of Japanese Culture. Mariner Books (original work published in 1946) ISBN 0395500753
  • Benedict, Ruth & G. Weltfish. 1943. The Races of Mankind. Public Affairs Pamphlet, No. 85, Public Affairs Committee, Inc., New York

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.