Difference between revisions of "Moral theology" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{claimed}}
+
{{Approved}}{{Images OK}}{{Submitted}}{{Paid}}{{Copyedited}}
  
Moral theology or Christian ethics is an [[Ethics]] developed from and within the contexts and history of [[Christianity]]. While Ethics as a [[philosophy|philosophical]] discipline relies upon the [[authority]] of [[reason]], moral theology or Christian ethics is established upon the authority of [[revelation]] as well as that of reason.  
+
'''Moral theology''' or '''Christian ethics''' is an [[Ethics]] developed from and within the contexts and history of [[Christianity]]. While Ethics as a [[philosophy|philosophical]] discipline relies upon the [[authority]] of [[reason]], moral theology or Christian ethics is established upon the authority of [[revelation]] as well as that of reason.
 +
 
 +
'''Catholic moral theology''' is a major category of [[doctrine]] in the [[Roman Catholic]] church, equivalent to a [[religious ethics]]. Moral theology encompasses Roman [[Catholic social teaching]], Catholic [[medical ethics]], [[sexual ethics]], and various doctrines on individual moral [[virtue]] and moral theory. It can be distinguished as dealing with "how one is to act," in contrast to dogmatic theology which proposes "what one is to believe." Sources of Catholic moral theology include both the [[Old Testament]] and the [[New Testament]], and philosophical ethics such as [[natural law]] that are seen as compatible with Catholic doctrine. Moral theology was mostly undifferentiated from theology in general during the patristic era, and is found in the [[homily|homilies]], letters and commentaries on Scripture of the early Church fathers. During the Middle Ages, moral theology developed in precision and scope through [[ethics in religion|scholasticism]].
 +
 
 +
Contemporary Catholic moral theology is developed by both church officials and moral theologians, who are scholars who may be less directly accountable to the [[Catholic church hierarchy]] (e.g., [[Charles Curran (theologian)|Charles Curran]], [[Richard A. McCormick]]). Moral theology tends to be advanced most authoritatively through official statements of doctrine, such as papal [[encyclical]]s and the major works of [[Vatican II]]. In addition, moral theologians publish their own works and write in a variety of journals devoted in whole or part to moral theology. These journals are helpful to make the theology of the church more clear and accessible to the laity. However, these journals do not add or remove anything from the Catholic teaching, but rather serve as a forum in which scholarly discussion of unsettled issues occurs.
 +
{{toc}}
 +
St. [[Thomas Aquinas]] is considered one of the greatest contributors to Catholic moral theology. His ''Summa Theologica'' gives an account of moral theology using the virtues as a framework, situated within a systematic theology of creation and return to God.
  
 
==Christian ethics or Moral theology ==
 
==Christian ethics or Moral theology ==
  
Christian ethics developed while early Christians were subjects of the [[Roman Empire]]. From the time Nero blamed Christians for setting Rome ablaze (64 AD) until Galarius (311 AD), persecutions against Christians erupted periodically. Consequently, early Christian ethics included discussions of how believers should relate to Roman authority and to the empire.   
+
Christian ethics developed while early Christians were subjects of the [[Roman Empire]]. From the time Nero blamed Christians for setting Rome ablaze (64 C.E.) until Galarius (311 C.E.), persecution against Christians erupted periodically. Consequently, early Christian ethics included discussions of how believers should relate to Roman authority and to the empire.   
  
Under the Emperor Constantine I (312-337), Christianity became the religion of the state. While some scholars debate whether Constantine's conversion to Christianity was authentic or simply matter of political expediency, Constantine's decree made the empire safe for Christian practice and belief. Consequently, issues of Christian doctrine, ethics and church practice were debated openly. By the time of Theodosius I (379-395), Christianity had become the normative religion of the empire. With Christianity now in power, ethical concerns broaden and included discussions of the proper role of the state.
+
Under the Emperor Constantine I (312-337), Christianity became the religion of the state. While some scholars debate whether Constantine's conversion to Christianity was authentic or simply a matter of political expediency, Constantine's decree made the empire safe for Christian practice and belief. Consequently, issues of Christian doctrine, ethics and church practice were debated openly. By the time of Theodosius I (379-395), Christianity had become the normative religion of the empire. With Christianity now in power, ethical concerns broaden and included discussions of the proper role of the state.
  
Saint [[Augustine of Hippo|Augustine]] adapted [[Plato]], and later, after the Islamic transmission of his works, [[Thomas Aquinas|Aquinas]] worked [[Aristotle|Aristotelian philosophy]] into a Christian framework.
+
Saint [[Augustine of Hippo|Augustine]] incorporated [[Plato]]'s philosophy, and later, after the [[Islam]]ic transmission of his works, [[Thomas Aquinas|Aquinas]] worked [[Aristotle|Aristotelian philosophy]] into a Christian framework.
  
Christian ethics in general has tended to stress the need for [[divine grace|grace]], [[mercy]], and [[forgiveness]] because of human weakness. With divine assistance, the Christian is called to become increasingly virtuous in both thought and deed. Conversely, the Christian is also called to abstain from vice. There are several different schema of vice and virtue. [[Thomas Aquinas|Aquinas]] adopted the four cardinal virtues of Plato, (justice, courage, temperance, prudence) and added to them the Christian virtues of faith, hope and love (from St.Paul, First Corinthians 13). Other schema include the [[Seven Deadly Sins]] and the [[Seven virtues]]. For more see [[Christian philosophy]].
+
Christian ethics in general have tended to stress the need for [[divine grace|grace]], [[mercy]], and [[forgiveness]] because of human weakness. With divine assistance, the Christian is called to become increasingly virtuous in both thought and deed. Conversely, the Christian is also called to abstain from vice. There are several different schema of vice and virtue. [[Thomas Aquinas|Aquinas]] adopted the four cardinal virtues of Plato, (justice, courage, temperance, prudence) and added to them the Christian virtues of faith, hope and love (from St.Paul, First Corinthians 13). Other schema include the [[Seven Deadly Sins]] and the [[Seven virtues]]. For more see [[Christian philosophy]].
  
 
==Early Church==
 
==Early Church==
[[Paul of Tarsus|Paul]] teaches (Rom., ii, 24 ff) that God has written his [[Natural law|moral law]] in the hearts of all men, even of those outside the influence of Christian [[revelation]]; this law manifests itself in the conscience of every man and is the norm according to which the whole human race will be judged on the day of reckoning. In consequence of their perverse inclinations, this law had become, to a great extent, obscured and distorted among the pagans; Christian understand their mission as, to restore it to its pristine integrity. 
+
[[Paul of Tarsus|Paul]] teaches (Rom., ii, 24 ff) that God has written his [[Natural law|moral law]] in the hearts of all men, even of those outside the influence of Christian [[revelation]]; this law manifests itself in the conscience of every man and is the norm according to which the whole human race will be judged on the day of reckoning.  
 
 
The [[New Testament]] generally asserts that all morality flows from the Great Commandment to love God with all one's heart, mind, strength, and soul, and to love one's neighbor as oneself.  In reaffirming this Great Commandment, Jesus Christ was reaffirming the teaching of the Torah. 
 
  
Ecclesiastical writers, as [[Justin Martyr]], [[Irenaeus]], [[Tertullian]], [[Clement of Alexandria]], [[Origen]], [[Ambrose]], [[Jerome]], and [[Augustine of Hippo]] all wrote on ethics from a distinctly Christian point of view. Interestingly, they made use of philosophical and ethical principles laid down by their Greek ([[Pagan]]) philosopher forbears.
+
The [[New Testament]] generally asserts that all morality flows from the Great Commandment to love God with all one's heart, mind, strength, and soul, and to love one's neighbor as oneself. In reaffirming this Great Commandment, Jesus Christ was reaffirming the teaching of the Torah.
  
The Church fathers had little occasion to treat moral questions from a purely philosophical standpoint and independently of Christian Revelation; but in the explanation of Catholic doctrine their discussions naturally led to philosophical investigations.  
+
Ecclesiastical writers, as [[Justin Martyr]], [[Irenaeus]], [[Tertullian]], [[Clement of Alexandria]], [[Origen]], [[Ambrose]], [[Jerome]], and [[Augustine of Hippo]] all wrote on ethics from a distinctly Christian point of view. Interestingly, they made use of philosophical and ethical principles laid down by Greek ([[Pagan]]) philosophers.
  
This is particularly true of Augustine, who proceeded to develop thoroughly along philosophical lines and to establish firmly most of the truths of Christian morality.  The [[eternal law]] (''lex aeterna''), the original type and source of all temporal laws, the natural law, conscience, the ultimate end of man, the [[cardinal virtues]], [[sin]], [[marriage]], etc. were treated by him in the clearest and most penetrating manner. Hardly a single portion of ethics does he present to us but is enriched with his keen philosophical commentaries. Late ecclesiastical writers followed in his footsteps.
+
The Church fathers had little occasion to treat moral questions from a purely philosophical standpoint and independently of Christian Revelation; but, in the explanation of Catholic doctrine their discussions naturally led to philosophical investigations. This is particularly true of Augustine, who proceeded to develop his thought thoroughly along philosophical lines and sought to establish firmly most of the truths of Christian morality.  The [[eternal law]] ''(lex aeterna)'', the original type and source of all temporal laws, natural law, conscience, the ultimate end of man, [[cardinal virtues]], [[sin]], [[marriage]], etc., were treated by him in the clearest and most penetrating manner.
  
 
==Scholasticism==
 
==Scholasticism==
  
A sharper line of separation between philosophy and theology, and in particular between ethics and [[moral theology]], is first met with in the works of the great Schoolmen of the Middle Ages, especially of [[Albertus Magnus]] (1193–1280), [[Thomas Aquinas]] (1225–1274), [[Bonaventure]](1221-1274), and [[Duns Scotus]] (1274–1308). Philosophy and, by means of it, theology reaped abundant fruit from the works of Aristotle, which had until then been a sealed treasure to Western civilization, and had first been elucidated by the detailed and profound commentaries of Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas and pressed into the service of Christian philosophy.
+
A sharper line of separation between philosophy and theology, and in particular between ethics and [[moral theology]], was first met with in the works of the great Schoolmen of the Middle Ages, especially of [[Albertus Magnus]] (1193–1280), [[Thomas Aquinas]] (1225–1274), [[Bonaventure]](1221-1274), and [[Duns Scotus]] (1274–1308). Philosophy and, by means of it, theology drew heavily on the works of Aristotle, which had been preserved by Arabic scholars, and had been elucidated and incorporated into Christian philosophy by the detailed and profound commentaries of Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas.
  
The same is particularly true as regards ethics. Thomas, in his commentaries on the political and ethical writings of [[Aristotle]], in his ''Summa contra Gentiles'' and his ''Quaestiones disputatae'', treated with his wonted clearness and penetration nearly the whole range of ethics in a purely philosophical manner, so that even to the present day his words are an inexhaustible source from which ethics draws its supply. On the foundations laid by him the Catholic philosophers and theologians of succeeding ages have continued to build. In his ''Summa Theologiae'', Thomas locates ethics within the context of theology. The question of ''beatiudo'', perfect happiness in the possession of God, is posited as the goal of human life. Thomas also argues that the human being by reflection on human nature's inclinations discovers a law, that is the natural law, which is "man's participation in the divine law."[http://www.newadvent.org/summa/2.htm]  
+
The same is particularly true of ethics. Thomas Aquinas, in his commentaries on the political and ethical writings of [[Aristotle]], his ''Summa contra Gentiles'', and his ''Quaestiones disputatae'', treated nearly the whole range of ethics in a purely philosophical manner, so that even to the present day his words are an inexhaustible source from which ethics draws its supply. [[Catholic]] philosophers and theologians have continued to build upon the foundations laid by Aquinas. In his ''Summa Theologiae'', Thomas locates ethics within the context of theology. The question of ''beatiudo'', perfect happiness in the possession of God, is posited as the goal of human life. Thomas also argues that human beings, by reflecting on the inclinations of human nature, discover natural law, which is "man's participation in the divine law."<ref>[http://www.newadvent.org/summa/2.htmFirst Part of the Second Part (Prima Secundæ Partis)], The Summa Theologica of St. Thomas Aquinas, Catholic Encyclopedia. Retrieved December 21, 2007.</ref>
  
In the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, thanks especially to the influence of the so-called Nominalists, a period of stagnation and decline set in, but the sixteenth century is marked by a revival. Ethical questions, also, though largely treated in connection with theology, are again made the subject of careful investigation. Examples include the theologians [[Francisco de Vitoria]], [[Dominicus Soto]], [[Luis de Molina]], [[Francisco Suarez]], [[Leonardus Lessius]], and [[Juan de Lugo]]. Among topics they discussed was the ethics of action in case of doubt, leading to the doctrine of [[probabilism]]. Since the sixteenth century special chairs of ethics (moral philosophy) have been erected in many Catholic universities. The larger, purely philosophical works on ethics, however do not appear until the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, as an example of which we may instance the production of Ign. Schwarz, "Instituitiones juris universalis naturae et gentium" (1743).
+
In the sixteenth century, philosophers made ethical questions the subjects of careful investigation. Examples include the theologians [[Francisco de Vitoria]], [[Dominicus Soto]], [[Luis de Molina]], [[Francisco Suarez]], [[Leonardus Lessius]], and [[Juan de Lugo]]. Among topics they discussed were the ethics of action in case of doubt, leading to the doctrine of [[probabilism]]. Since the sixteenth century, special chairs of ethics (moral philosophy) have been erected in many Catholic universities. The larger, purely philosophical works on ethics, however do not appear until the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, as an example of which we may instance the production of Ign. Schwarz, "Instituitiones juris universalis naturae et gentium" (1743).
  
 
==Protestant Ethics==
 
==Protestant Ethics==
  
Far different from Catholic ethical methods were those adopted for the most part by Protestants. With the rejection of the Church's teaching authority, each individual became on principle his own supreme teacher and arbiter in matters appertaining to faith and morals. The Reformers held fast to the Bible as the infallible source of revelation, but as to what belongs or does not belong to it, whether, and how far, it is inspired, and what is its meaning &mdash; all this was left to the final decision of the individual.  
+
Far different from Catholic ethical methods were those adopted for the most part by Protestants. With the rejection of the Church's teaching authority, each individual became on principle his own supreme teacher and arbiter in matters appertaining to faith and morals. The Reformers held fast to the Bible as the infallible source of revelation, but as to what belongs or does not belong to it, whether, and how far, it is inspired, and what is its meaning&mdash;all this was left to the final decision of the individual.
 +
 
 +
[[Philipp Melanchthon]], in his "Elementa philosophiae moralis," still clung to the Aristotelean philosophy; so, too, did [[Hugo Grotius]], in his work, "De jure belli et pacis." But [[Richard Cumberland (philosopher)|Cumberland]] and his follower, [[Samuel Pufendorf]], moreover, assumed, with [[Descartes]], that the ultimate ground for every distinction between good and evil lay in the free determination of God's will, a view which renders the philosophical treatment of ethics fundamentally impossible.  
  
[[Philipp Melanchthon]], in his "Elementa philosophiae moralis", still clung to the Aristotelean philosophy; so, too, did [[Hugo Grotius]], in his work, "De jure belli et pacis". But [[Richard Cumberland (philosopher)|Cumberland]] and his follower, [[Samuel Pufendorf]], moreover, assumed, with [[Descartes]], that the ultimate ground for every distinction between good and evil lay in the free determination of God's will, a view which renders the philosophical treatment of ethics fundamentally impossible.  
+
In the twentieth century, some Christian philosophers, notably [[Dietrich Bonhoeffer]] questioned the value of ethical reasoning in moral philosophy. In this school of thought, ethics, with its focus on distinguishing right from wrong, tends to produce behavior that is simply not wrong, whereas the Christian life should instead be marked by the highest form of right. Rather than ethical reasoning, they stress the importance of meditation on and relationship with God.
  
In the 20th century, some Christian philosophers, notably [[Dietrich Bonhoeffer]] questioned the value of ethical reasoning in moral philosophy.  In this school of thought, ethics, with its focus on distinguishing right from wrong, tends to produce behavior that is simply not wrong, whereas the Christian life should instead be marked by the highest form of right.  Rather than ethical reasoning, they stress the importance of meditation on and relationship with God.
+
==Notes==
 +
<references/>
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
*Böckle, Franz. Fundamental Moral Theology. New York: Pueblo Pub. Co, 1980. ISBN:0916134423 9780916134426
+
*Böckle, Franz. ''Fundamental Moral Theology.'' New York: Pueblo Pub. Co, 1980. ISBN 0916134423 ISBN 9780916134426
*Cessario, Romanus. Introduction to Moral Theology. Catholic moral thought. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 2001. ISBN:0813210690 9780813210698 0813210704 9780813210704
+
*Cessario, Romanus. ''Introduction to Moral Theology.'' Catholic moral thought. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 2001. ISBN 0813210690 ISBN 9780813210698 ISBN 0813210704 ISBN 9780813210704
*Curran, Charles E. Themes in Fundamental Moral Theology. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1977. ISBN:0268018332 : 9780268018337 0268018340 : 9780268018344
+
*Curran, Charles E. ''Themes in Fundamental Moral Theology.'' Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1977. ISBN 0268018332 ISBN 9780268018337 ISBN 0268018340 ISBN 9780268018344
*Curran, Charles E. Transition and Tradition in Moral Theology. Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press, 1979. ISBN:0268018375 9780268018375
+
*Curran, Charles E. ''Transition and Tradition in Moral Theology''. Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press, 1979. ISBN 0268018375 ISBN 9780268018375
*Gill, Robin. The Cambridge Companion to Christian Ethics. Cambridge companions to religion. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2001. ISBN:052177070X 9780521770705 0521779189 9780521779180
+
*Gill, Robin. ''The Cambridge Companion to Christian Ethics.'' Cambridge companions to religion. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2001. ISBN 052177070X ISBN 9780521770705 ISBN 0521779189 ISBN 9780521779180
*Lehmann, Paul Louis. Ethics in a Christian Context. New York: Harper & Row, 1963.  
+
*Lehmann, Paul Louis. ''Ethics in a Christian Context.'' New York: Harper & Row, 1963.  
*Ramsey, Paul. Basic Christian Ethics. New York: Scribner, 1950.
+
*Ramsey, Paul. ''Basic Christian Ethics.'' New York: Scribner, 1950.
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
*[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14601a.htm Moral theology], Catholic Encyclopedia. Retrieved December 13, 2007.
+
All links retrieved November 9, 2022.
*Georgia Harkness. [http://www.religion-online.org/showbook.asp?title=802 Christian Ethics]. Retrieved December 13, 2007.
+
*[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14601a.htm Moral theology] Catholic Encyclopedia.  
*[http://www.christianethicstoday.com/The Christian Ethics Today]. Retrieved December 13, 2007.
 
  
 
[[Category:Philosophy and religion]]
 
[[Category:Philosophy and religion]]
 
[[Category:Christianity]]
 
[[Category:Christianity]]
  
{{credits|Ethics_in_religion|171117784}}
+
{{credits|Ethics_in_religion|171117784|Catholic_moral_theology|173090415}}

Latest revision as of 21:19, 9 November 2022


Moral theology or Christian ethics is an Ethics developed from and within the contexts and history of Christianity. While Ethics as a philosophical discipline relies upon the authority of reason, moral theology or Christian ethics is established upon the authority of revelation as well as that of reason.

Catholic moral theology is a major category of doctrine in the Roman Catholic church, equivalent to a religious ethics. Moral theology encompasses Roman Catholic social teaching, Catholic medical ethics, sexual ethics, and various doctrines on individual moral virtue and moral theory. It can be distinguished as dealing with "how one is to act," in contrast to dogmatic theology which proposes "what one is to believe." Sources of Catholic moral theology include both the Old Testament and the New Testament, and philosophical ethics such as natural law that are seen as compatible with Catholic doctrine. Moral theology was mostly undifferentiated from theology in general during the patristic era, and is found in the homilies, letters and commentaries on Scripture of the early Church fathers. During the Middle Ages, moral theology developed in precision and scope through scholasticism.

Contemporary Catholic moral theology is developed by both church officials and moral theologians, who are scholars who may be less directly accountable to the Catholic church hierarchy (e.g., Charles Curran, Richard A. McCormick). Moral theology tends to be advanced most authoritatively through official statements of doctrine, such as papal encyclicals and the major works of Vatican II. In addition, moral theologians publish their own works and write in a variety of journals devoted in whole or part to moral theology. These journals are helpful to make the theology of the church more clear and accessible to the laity. However, these journals do not add or remove anything from the Catholic teaching, but rather serve as a forum in which scholarly discussion of unsettled issues occurs.

St. Thomas Aquinas is considered one of the greatest contributors to Catholic moral theology. His Summa Theologica gives an account of moral theology using the virtues as a framework, situated within a systematic theology of creation and return to God.

Christian ethics or Moral theology

Christian ethics developed while early Christians were subjects of the Roman Empire. From the time Nero blamed Christians for setting Rome ablaze (64 C.E.) until Galarius (311 C.E.), persecution against Christians erupted periodically. Consequently, early Christian ethics included discussions of how believers should relate to Roman authority and to the empire.

Under the Emperor Constantine I (312-337), Christianity became the religion of the state. While some scholars debate whether Constantine's conversion to Christianity was authentic or simply a matter of political expediency, Constantine's decree made the empire safe for Christian practice and belief. Consequently, issues of Christian doctrine, ethics and church practice were debated openly. By the time of Theodosius I (379-395), Christianity had become the normative religion of the empire. With Christianity now in power, ethical concerns broaden and included discussions of the proper role of the state.

Saint Augustine incorporated Plato's philosophy, and later, after the Islamic transmission of his works, Aquinas worked Aristotelian philosophy into a Christian framework.

Christian ethics in general have tended to stress the need for grace, mercy, and forgiveness because of human weakness. With divine assistance, the Christian is called to become increasingly virtuous in both thought and deed. Conversely, the Christian is also called to abstain from vice. There are several different schema of vice and virtue. Aquinas adopted the four cardinal virtues of Plato, (justice, courage, temperance, prudence) and added to them the Christian virtues of faith, hope and love (from St.Paul, First Corinthians 13). Other schema include the Seven Deadly Sins and the Seven virtues. For more see Christian philosophy.

Early Church

Paul teaches (Rom., ii, 24 ff) that God has written his moral law in the hearts of all men, even of those outside the influence of Christian revelation; this law manifests itself in the conscience of every man and is the norm according to which the whole human race will be judged on the day of reckoning.

The New Testament generally asserts that all morality flows from the Great Commandment to love God with all one's heart, mind, strength, and soul, and to love one's neighbor as oneself. In reaffirming this Great Commandment, Jesus Christ was reaffirming the teaching of the Torah.

Ecclesiastical writers, as Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Tertullian, Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Ambrose, Jerome, and Augustine of Hippo all wrote on ethics from a distinctly Christian point of view. Interestingly, they made use of philosophical and ethical principles laid down by Greek (Pagan) philosophers.

The Church fathers had little occasion to treat moral questions from a purely philosophical standpoint and independently of Christian Revelation; but, in the explanation of Catholic doctrine their discussions naturally led to philosophical investigations. This is particularly true of Augustine, who proceeded to develop his thought thoroughly along philosophical lines and sought to establish firmly most of the truths of Christian morality. The eternal law (lex aeterna), the original type and source of all temporal laws, natural law, conscience, the ultimate end of man, cardinal virtues, sin, marriage, etc., were treated by him in the clearest and most penetrating manner.

Scholasticism

A sharper line of separation between philosophy and theology, and in particular between ethics and moral theology, was first met with in the works of the great Schoolmen of the Middle Ages, especially of Albertus Magnus (1193–1280), Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274), Bonaventure(1221-1274), and Duns Scotus (1274–1308). Philosophy and, by means of it, theology drew heavily on the works of Aristotle, which had been preserved by Arabic scholars, and had been elucidated and incorporated into Christian philosophy by the detailed and profound commentaries of Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas.

The same is particularly true of ethics. Thomas Aquinas, in his commentaries on the political and ethical writings of Aristotle, his Summa contra Gentiles, and his Quaestiones disputatae, treated nearly the whole range of ethics in a purely philosophical manner, so that even to the present day his words are an inexhaustible source from which ethics draws its supply. Catholic philosophers and theologians have continued to build upon the foundations laid by Aquinas. In his Summa Theologiae, Thomas locates ethics within the context of theology. The question of beatiudo, perfect happiness in the possession of God, is posited as the goal of human life. Thomas also argues that human beings, by reflecting on the inclinations of human nature, discover natural law, which is "man's participation in the divine law."[1]

In the sixteenth century, philosophers made ethical questions the subjects of careful investigation. Examples include the theologians Francisco de Vitoria, Dominicus Soto, Luis de Molina, Francisco Suarez, Leonardus Lessius, and Juan de Lugo. Among topics they discussed were the ethics of action in case of doubt, leading to the doctrine of probabilism. Since the sixteenth century, special chairs of ethics (moral philosophy) have been erected in many Catholic universities. The larger, purely philosophical works on ethics, however do not appear until the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, as an example of which we may instance the production of Ign. Schwarz, "Instituitiones juris universalis naturae et gentium" (1743).

Protestant Ethics

Far different from Catholic ethical methods were those adopted for the most part by Protestants. With the rejection of the Church's teaching authority, each individual became on principle his own supreme teacher and arbiter in matters appertaining to faith and morals. The Reformers held fast to the Bible as the infallible source of revelation, but as to what belongs or does not belong to it, whether, and how far, it is inspired, and what is its meaning—all this was left to the final decision of the individual.

Philipp Melanchthon, in his "Elementa philosophiae moralis," still clung to the Aristotelean philosophy; so, too, did Hugo Grotius, in his work, "De jure belli et pacis." But Cumberland and his follower, Samuel Pufendorf, moreover, assumed, with Descartes, that the ultimate ground for every distinction between good and evil lay in the free determination of God's will, a view which renders the philosophical treatment of ethics fundamentally impossible.

In the twentieth century, some Christian philosophers, notably Dietrich Bonhoeffer questioned the value of ethical reasoning in moral philosophy. In this school of thought, ethics, with its focus on distinguishing right from wrong, tends to produce behavior that is simply not wrong, whereas the Christian life should instead be marked by the highest form of right. Rather than ethical reasoning, they stress the importance of meditation on and relationship with God.

Notes

  1. Part of the Second Part (Prima Secundæ Partis), The Summa Theologica of St. Thomas Aquinas, Catholic Encyclopedia. Retrieved December 21, 2007.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

External links

All links retrieved November 9, 2022.

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.