Encyclopedia, Difference between revisions of "Kurt Lewin" - New World

From New World Encyclopedia
m
m ({{Contracted}})
Line 2: Line 2:
 
[[Category:Psychology]]
 
[[Category:Psychology]]
 
[[Category:Biography]]
 
[[Category:Biography]]
 
+
{{Contracted}}
 
{{epname}}
 
{{epname}}
  

Revision as of 19:48, 16 October 2006


Kurt Zadek Lewin (September 9,1890 - February 12,1947), a German-born psychologist, became one of the pioneers of social psychology. Often called "the father of social psychology," and one of the first researchers to study group dynamics and organizational development, he advocated Gestalt psychology.

Lewin became associated with the early Frankfurt School, originated by an influential group of largely Jewish Marxists at the Institute for Social Research in Germany. But when Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933 the Institute members had to disband, moving to England and America. Lewin became influential in the founding of sensitivity training through the Tavistock Clinic in London.

Lewin coined the notion of genidentity (1922), which has gained some importance in various theories of space-time and related fields. He also proposed Herbert Blumer's interactionist perspective of 1937 as an alternative to the nature versus nurture debate, in that he suggested that neither nature (inborn tendencies) nor nurture (how experiences in life shape individuals) alone can account for individuals' behavior and personalities, but rather that both nature and nurture interact to shape each person. Prominent psychologists mentored by Kurt Lewin included Leon Festinger (1919 - 1989), who became known for his cognitive dissonance theory (1956), and environmental psychologist Roger Barker.

Biography

Born in 1890 into a Jewish family in Mogilno, Poland (then in County of Mogilno, province of Posen, Germany), Lewin joined the German armed forces when World War I began. But due to a war wound, he completed his Ph.D., with Carl Stumpf (1848 - 1936) as the supervisor of his doctoral thesis.

Lewin emigrated to the United States in August 1933 and became a naturalized citizen in 1940. He died in Newtonville, Massachusetts of a heart-attack in 1947. He was buried in his home town.

Impact on organizational development

Action Research

Action research is research that each of us can do on our own practice, that “we” (any team or family or informal community of practice) can do to improve its practice, or that larger organizations or institutions can conduct on themselves, assisted or guided by professional researchers, with the aim of improving their strategies, practices, and knowledge of the environments within which they practice.

Kurt Lewin, then a professor at MIT, first coined the term “action research” in his 1946 paper “Action Research and Minority Problems”. In that paper, he described action research as “a comparative research on the conditions and effects of various forms of social action and research leading to social action” that uses “a spiral of steps, each of which is composed of a circle of planning, action, and fact-finding about the result of the action”.

Action research is not only a research that describes how humans and organizations behave in the outside world but also a change mechanism that helps human and organizations reflect on and change their own systems (Reason & Bradbury, 2001). After six decades of action research development, many methodologies have been evolved, ranging:

  1. from those that are more driven by the researcher’s agenda to those more driven by participants;
  2. from those that are motivated primarily by instrumental goal attainment to those motivated primarily by the aim of personal, organizational, or societal transformation; and
  3. from 1st-, to 2nd-, to 3rd-person research (i.e. my research on my own action, aimed primarily at personal change; our research on our group (family/team), aimed primarily at improving the group; and ‘scholarly’ research aimed primarily at theoretical generalization and/or large scale change).

Action research can change the entire sense of social science, transforming it from reflective knowledge about past social practices formulated by a priesthood of experts (research PhDs) to an active moment-to-moment theorizing, data collecting, and inquiring occurring in the midst of our ongoing lives. “Knowledge is always gained through action and for action. From this starting point, to question the validity of social knowledge is to question, not how to develop a reflective science about action, but how to develop genuinely well-informed action—how to conduct an action science” (Torbert 2001).

Four major action research theories are:

  • Chris Argyris’ Action Science
  • John Heron and Peter Reason’s Cooperative Inquiry
  • Paulo Freire’s Participatory Action Research (PAR)
  • William Torbert’s Developmental Action Inquiry

Argyris’ action science invites individuals to study themselves in action with others, and simultaneously attempts to contribute to and transform the practice of social science itself. Therefore, it is primarily a 1st-person approach, learned in 2nd-person settings, but with implications for 3rd-person social science theory and method that Argyris (1970, 1980) has strongly articulated.

Heron’s (1996)and Reason’s (1995) Cooperative Inquiry brings peers (e.g. doctors, social workers, young women managers, men) together in self-study groups. Thus, it is primarily a 2nd-person approach, though group participants are also encouraged to try 1st-person action research outside the groups, and Reason has played a central role in mounting a paradigm challenge to ‘naively objective’ modernist social science.

The Participatory Action Research approach of Freire (1970) and others, primarily in the southern hemisphere, concerns empowering the poorest and least educated members of society for literacy, for land reform analyses, and for community. Hence, this approach is primarily 3rd-person in the scope of its intended societal transformations.

The Developmental Action Inquiry approach of Torbert & Associates (2004) attempts to interweave individual, 1st-person self-study with face-to-face 2nd-person self-study by teams and with 3rd-person institution-wide self-study.

Since action research is as much about creating a better life within more effective and just social contexts as it is about discovering true facts and theories, it should not be surprising that it has flourished in Latin America, Northern Europe, India, and Australia as much or more than within university scholarship in the US.


Force field analysis

Force field analysis is one of the most influential developments in the field of social science. Force field analysis provides a framework for looking at the factors (forces) that influence a situation, originally social situations. It looks at forces that are either driving movement toward a goal (helping forces) or blocking movement toward a goal (hindering forces). The principle, developed by Kurt Lewin, is a significant contribution to the fields of social science, psychology, social psychology, organizational development, process management, and change management.

Lewin, a social psychologist, believed the "field" to be a Gestalt psychological environment existing in an individual's (or in the collective group) mind at a certain point in time that can be mathematically described in a topological constellation of constructs. The "field" is very dynamic, changing with time and experience. When fully constructed, an individual's "field" (Lewin used the term "life space") describes that person's motives, values, needs, moods, goals, anxieties, and ideals.

Lewin believed that changes of an individual's "life space" depend upon that individual's internalization of external stimuli (from the physical and social world) into the "life space." Although Lewin did not use the word "experiential," (see experiential learning) he nonetheless believed that interaction (experience) of the "life space" with "external stimuli" (at what he calls the "boundary zone") were important for development (or regression). For Lewin, development (or regression) of an individual occurs when their "life space" has a "boundary zone" experience with external stimuli. Note, it is not merely the experience that causes change in the "life space," but the acceptance (internalization) of external stimuli.

Lewin took these same principles and applied them to the analysis of group conflict, learning, adolescence, hatred, morale, German society, etc. This approach allowed him to break down common misconceptions of these social phenomena, and to determine their basic elemental constructs. He used theory, mathematics, and common sense to define a force field, and hence to determine the causes of human and group behavior.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Cartwright, D. (1951). Forward to the 1951 Edition. Field Theory in Social Science and Selected Theoretical Papers-Kurt Lewin. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1997. Originally published by Harper & Row.
  • Lewin K. (1943). Defining the "Field at a Given Time." Psychological Review. 50: 292-310. Republished in Resolving Social Conflicts & Field Theory in Social Science, Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1997.


Bibliography

  • Marrow, Alfred J. The Practical Theorist: The Life and Work of Kurt Lewin (1969, 1984) ISBN 0-934698-22-8 (Marrow studied as one of Lewin's students)
  • White, Ralph K., and Ronald O. Lippitt, Autocracy and Democracy (1960, 1972) ISBN 0-8371-5710-2 (White and Lippitt carried out the research described here under Lewin as their thesis-advisor; Marrow's book also briefly describes the same work in chapter 12.)

References

  • General sources for action research
    • Reason & Bradbury, Handbook of Action Research. London: Sage, 2001.
    • Sherman & Torbert, Transforming Social Inquiry, Transforming Social Action: New paradigms for crossing the theory/practice divide in universities and communities. Boston, Kluwer, 2000.
    • Woodman & Pasmore, Research in Organizational Change & Development series. Greenwich CT: Jai Press
    • Addison-Wesley Series in Organization Development
  • Scholarly Journals
    • Action Research
    • Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
    • Journal of Organizational Change Management
    • Management Learning
  • Philosophical sources of action research
    • Abram, D. 1996. The Spell of the Sensuous. New York: Vintage.
    • Argyris, C. Putnam, R. & Smith, D. 1985. Action Science: Concepts, methods and skills for research and intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    • Gadamer, H. 1982. Truth and Method. New York: Crossroad.
    • Habermas, J. 1984/1987. The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol.s I & II. Boston:Beacon.
    • Hallward, P. 2003. Badiou: A subject to truth. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    • Malin, S. 2001. Nature Loves to Hide: Quantum physics and the nature of reality, a Western perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Polanyi, M. 1958. Personal Knowledge. New York: Harper.
    • Senge, P. 1990. The Fifth Discipline. New York: Doubleday Currency.
    • Torbert, W. 1991. The Power of Balance: Transforming Self, Society, and Scientific Inquiry
    • Varela, F., Thompson, E. & Rosch E. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
    • Wilber, K. 1998. The Marriage of Sense and Soul: Integrating science and religion. New York: Random House
  • Exemplars and methodological discussions of action research
    • Argyris, C. 1970. Intervention Theory and Method. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
    • Argyris, C. 1980. Inner Contradictions of Rigorous Research. San Diego CA: Academic Press.
    • Argyris, C. 1994. Knowledge for Action. San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass.
    • Cameron, K. & Quinn, R. 1999. Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
    • Flyvbjerg, B. 2001. Making Social Science Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press.
    • Freire, P. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Herder & Herder.
    • Garreau, J. 2005. Radical Evolution: The promise and peril of enhancing our minds, our bodies – and what it means to be human. New York: Doubleday.
    • Heron, J. 1996. Cooperative Inquiry: Research into the human condition. London: Sage.
    • Ogilvy, J. 2000. Creating Better Futures: Scenario planning as a tool for a better tomorrow. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.
    • Reason, P. & Rowan, J. 1981. Human Inquiry: A Sourcebook of New Paradigm Research. London: Wiley.
    • Reason, P. 1995. Participation in Human Inquiry. London: Sage.
    • Schein, E. 1999. Process Consultation Revisited. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
    • Senge, P., Scharmer, C., Jaworski, J., & Flowers, B. 2004. Presence: Human purpose and the field of the future. Cambridge MA: Society for Organizational Learning.
    • Torbert, W. & Associates 2004. Action Inquiry: The Secret of Timely and Transforming Leadership.
  • 1st-Person Research/Practice Exemplars
    • Bateson, M. 1984. With a Daughter’s Eye: A Memoir of Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson. New York: Plume/Penguin.
    • Raine, N. 1998. After Silence: Rape and My Journey Back. New York: Crown.
    • Harrison, R. 1995. Consultant's Journey. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.


  • CARN Collaborative Action Research Network
  • Action Research Resources from the Southern Cross University
  • Action Research by Martin Ryder at the University of Colorado at Denver (School of Education)
  • Teacher action research from Edchange.
  • PARnet.org One of the oldest websites dedicated to the action research community sponsored by the Cornell Participatory Action Research Network. Includes the PARchives, a field repository and bibliographic database.



Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.