Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft

From New World Encyclopedia
Revision as of 01:51, 4 September 2006 by Christopher Laws (talk | contribs)


Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft are sociological categories introduced by the German sociologist Ferdinand Tönnies for two types of human association. Tönnies believed there existed two forms of human will: essential and arbitrary. Essential will is the instinctive driving force of humanity and arbitrary will is deliberative and goal oriented. Groups forming around essential will are known as Gemeinschaft while those forming around arbitrary will are known as Gesellschaft. His concepts of both Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft, strictly separated from each other conceptually, are fully discussed in his work Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft (1887).

Tönnies Concept

Gemeinschaft

Gemeinschaft (often translated as community) is an association in which individuals are oriented to the large association as much if not more than to their own self interest. Furthermore, individuals in Gemeinschaft are regulated by common mores, or beliefs about the appropriate behavior and responsibility of members of the association to each other and to the association at large; associations marked by "unity of will" (Tönnies, 22). Tönnies saw the family as the most perfect expression of Gemeinschaft. He expected, however, that Gemeinschaft could be based on shared place and shared belief as well as kinship, and he included globally dispersed religious communities as possible examples of Gemeinschaft.

Gemeinschaften are broadly characterized by a moderate division of labour, strong personal relationships, strong families, and relatively simple social institutions. In such societies there is seldom a need to enforce social control externally, due to a collective sense of loyalty individuals feel for society. Historically, Gemeinschaft societies were racially and ethnically homogeneous.

Order is supposed to exist from the natural law resulting from the commonly held mores of the members of the Gemeinschaft.

Gesellschaft

Gesellschaft (often translated as society or civil society or 'association'), in contrast to Gemeinschaft, describes associations in which, for the individual, the larger association never takes on more importance than individual self interest, and lacks the same level of shared mores. Gesellschaft is maintained through individuals acting in their own self interest. A modern business is a good example of Gesellschaft. The workers, managers, and owners may have very little in terms of shared orientations or beliefs, they may not care deeply for the product they are making, but it is in all their self interest to come to work to make money, and thus the business continues.

Unlike Gemeinschaften, Gesellschaften emphasize secondary relationships rather than familial or community ties, and there is generally less individual loyalty to society. Social cohesion in Gesellschaften typically derives from a more elaborate division of labor. Such societies are considered more susceptible to class conflict as well as racial and ethnic conflicts.

Order in Gesellschaften is maintained by commonly held fear of reprisal from the laws accepted in the community.

In business usage, Gesellschaft is the German term for "company", as in Aktiengesellschaft or Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung (GmbH).

Progression from Gemeinschaft to Gesellschaft

As men develop personal goals and strive to better their social status, the common mores begin to change and groups grow to oppose one another. Laws change in order to reflect this competition and members of societies become entrenched in a social contract to which they are all beholden in the name of efficiency for advanced economic interests. The focus of the mental energies of the members of this society shifts from the invisible (gods, spirits, etc) to the visible (material goods, money, etc).

Durkheim's use of Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft

French sociologist Emile Durkheim adopted the concepts of gemeinschaft and gesellschaft in his work The Division of Labor. Durkheim used the terms mechanical and organic societies. Mechanical societies were characterized by a common consciousness of its members while organic societies are marked by specialization and individual consciousness.

Mechanical Society

Durkheim wrote that people in primitive societies were bound together by common held beliefs, namely religion. Individuals held tightly to tradition and felt great loyalty to their community. Each action taken by individuals was for the good of the community, and these individuals felt morally obligated to take such actions. People did not act because of the orders of some authority, but out of solidarity [1]

Organic Society

As populations and cities grow, organic societies develop. Performing all the tasks of everyday life becomes impossible and thus the division of labor is born. This specialization reduces the collective conscious of the members of society. Members of organic societies are more dependent on each other than in mechanical societies as not everyone is proficient in all routines required of life. Organic societies give their members freedom to choose their own ideology and career as their is definitive belief system to adhere to. [2]

Application to Society

Since, for Tönnies, Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft are normal types, or examples of pure sociology, he did not expect them to be found in a pure form in actual society. Tönnies' expectation is accurate. Even in societies famous for guaranteeing the freedoms of its citizens, such as the United States with its Bill of Rights or France during the French Revolution, there still exists some semblance of public consciousness. This consciousness can be seen in public outrage to various actions or speeches in America such as the backlash against Enron for supposedly bilking its employees out of their retirement savings. At the same time, no perfect Gemeinschaft exists. Even in the most primitive of villages in the third world today there exists some division of labor as well as political discord.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees


Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.