Difference between revisions of "Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
(copied from Wikipedia)
 
m ({{Contracted}})
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[Category:Politics and social sciences]]
 
[[Category:Politics and social sciences]]
 
[[Category:Sociology]]
 
[[Category:Sociology]]
 
+
{{Contracted}}
 
'''Gemeinschaft''' and '''Gesellschaft''' are [[sociology|sociological]] categories introduced by the [[Germany|German]] sociologist [[Ferdinand Tönnies]] for two [[normal type]]s of human association. (A ''normal type'' as coined by Tönnies is a purely conceptual tool to be built up logically, whereas an ''[[ideal type]]'', as coined by [[Max Weber]], is a concept formed by accentuating main elements of a historic/social change.) Tönnies' concepts of both ''Gemeinschaft'' and ''Gesellschaft'', strictly separated from each other conceptually, are fully discussed in his work ''Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft'' ([[1887]]), seven more German editions). Only the second edition of [[1912]] turned out to be a success, and the [[juxtaposition]] of these two terms belonged to the general stock of concepts German pre-[[1933]] intellectuals were quite familiar with and quite often misunderstood.
 
'''Gemeinschaft''' and '''Gesellschaft''' are [[sociology|sociological]] categories introduced by the [[Germany|German]] sociologist [[Ferdinand Tönnies]] for two [[normal type]]s of human association. (A ''normal type'' as coined by Tönnies is a purely conceptual tool to be built up logically, whereas an ''[[ideal type]]'', as coined by [[Max Weber]], is a concept formed by accentuating main elements of a historic/social change.) Tönnies' concepts of both ''Gemeinschaft'' and ''Gesellschaft'', strictly separated from each other conceptually, are fully discussed in his work ''Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft'' ([[1887]]), seven more German editions). Only the second edition of [[1912]] turned out to be a success, and the [[juxtaposition]] of these two terms belonged to the general stock of concepts German pre-[[1933]] intellectuals were quite familiar with and quite often misunderstood.
  

Revision as of 14:15, 7 August 2006


Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft are sociological categories introduced by the German sociologist Ferdinand Tönnies for two normal types of human association. (A normal type as coined by Tönnies is a purely conceptual tool to be built up logically, whereas an ideal type, as coined by Max Weber, is a concept formed by accentuating main elements of a historic/social change.) Tönnies' concepts of both Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft, strictly separated from each other conceptually, are fully discussed in his work Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft (1887), seven more German editions). Only the second edition of 1912 turned out to be a success, and the juxtaposition of these two terms belonged to the general stock of concepts German pre-1933 intellectuals were quite familiar with and quite often misunderstood.

Gemeinschaft

Gemeinschaft (often translated as community) is an association in which individuals are oriented to the large association as much if not more than to their own self interest. Furthermore, individuals in Gemeinschaft are regulated by common mores, or beliefs about the appropriate behavior and responsibility of members of the association, to each other and to the association at large; associations marked by "unity of will" (Tönnies, 22). Tönnies saw the family as the most perfect expression of Gemeinschaft; however, he expected that Gemeinschaft could be based on shared place and shared belief as well as kinship, and he included globally dispersed religious communities as possible examples of Gemeinschaft.

Gemeinschafts are broadly characterized by a moderate division of labour, strong personal relationships, strong families, and relatively simple social institutions. In such societies there is seldom a need to enforce social control externally, due to a collective sense of loyalty individuals feel for society. Historically, Gemeinschaft societies were racially and ethnically homogeneous.

Gesellschaft

Gesellschaft (often translated as society or civil society or 'association'), in contrast, describes associations in which, for the individual, the larger association never takes on more importance than individual self interest, and lack the same level of shared mores. Gesellschaft is maintained through individuals acting in their own self interest. A modern business is a good example of Gesellschaft, the workers, managers, and owners may have very little in terms of shared orientations or beliefs, they may not care deeply for the product they are making, but it is in all their self interest to come to work to make money, and thus the business continues.

Unlike Gemeinschaften, Gesellschaften emphasize secondary relationships rather than familial or community ties, and there is generally less individual loyalty to society. Social cohesion in Gesellschafts typically derives from a more elaborate division of labor. Such societies are considered more susceptible to class conflict as well as racial and ethnic conflicts.

Since, for Tönnies, Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft are normal types, he considered them a matter of Pure Sociology, whereas in Applied Sociology, on doing empirical research, he expected to find nothing else than a mix of them. Nevertheless, following Tönnies, without normal types one might not be able to analyze this mix.

In business usage, Gesellschaft is the German term for "company", as in Aktiengesellschaft or Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung (GmbH).

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Ferdinand Tönnies (ed. Jose Harris), Community and Civil Society, Cambridge University Press (2001), hardcover, 266 pages, ISBN 0521561191; trade paperback, Cambridge University Press (2001), 266 pages, ISBN 0521567823
  • Ferdinand Tönnies, Ferdinand Tönnies Gesamtausgabe {TG}, critical edition, 24 vols., ed. Lars Clausen et al., Berlin/New York (de Gruyter): 1998- ), see external weblink Verlagsinformationen.


Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.