Difference between revisions of "Anthropometry" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
m ({{Contracted}})
(Grammatical Edits)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[Category:Politics and social sciences]]
 
[[Category:Politics and social sciences]]
 
[[Category:Anthropology]]
 
[[Category:Anthropology]]
{{Contracted}}
+
 
 
[[Image:The speaking portrait.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Illustration from "The Speaking Portrait" (Pearson's Magazine, Vol XI, January to June 1901) demonstrating the principles of Bertillon's anthropometry.]]
 
[[Image:The speaking portrait.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Illustration from "The Speaking Portrait" (Pearson's Magazine, Vol XI, January to June 1901) demonstrating the principles of Bertillon's anthropometry.]]
'''Anthropometry''' ([[Greek language|Greek]] ανθρωπος, man, and μετρον, measure, literally meaning "measurement of humans"), in [[physical anthropology]], refers to the measurement of living human individuals for the purposes of understanding human physical variation.
+
'''Anthropometry''', or the "measure of humans", is derived from the Greek terms ανθρωπος, meaning man, and μετρον, meaning measure. The term physical anthropology refers to the measurement of living human individuals for the purposes of understanding human physical variation.
  
==Bertillon, Galton, and criminology==
+
== Alphonse Bertillon ==
 
[[Image:Anthropometry exhibit.jpg|250px|thumb|right|Anthropometry demonstrated in an exhibit from a 1921 [[eugenics]] conference.]]
 
[[Image:Anthropometry exhibit.jpg|250px|thumb|right|Anthropometry demonstrated in an exhibit from a 1921 [[eugenics]] conference.]]
The French [[savant]], [[Alphonse Bertillon]] (b. 1853), gave this name in [[1883]] to a system of [[identification]] depending on the unchanging character of certain measurements of parts of the human frame. He found by patient inquiry that several physical features and the dimensions of certain bones or bony structures in the body remain practically constant during adult life. He concluded from this that when these measurements were made and recorded systematically every single individual would be found to be perfectly distinguishable from others. The system was soon adapted to police methods, as the immense value of being able to fix a person's identity was fully realized, both in preventing false personation and in bringing home to any one charged with an offence his responsibility for previous wrongdoing. "Bertillonage," as it was called, became widely popular, and after its introduction into France in [[1883]], where it was soon credited with highly gratifying results, was applied to the administration of justice in most civilized countries. England followed tardily, and it was not until 1894 that an investigation of the methods used and results obtained was made by a special committee sent to Paris for the purpose. It reported favourably, especially on the use of the measurements for primary classification, but recommended also the adoption in part of a system of "finger prints" as suggested by [[Francis Galton]], and already practised in Bengal.  
+
The French savant, Alphonse Bertillon (b. 1853), coined the phrase physical anthropometry in 1883 to include an identification system based on unchanging measurements of the human frame. Through patient inquiry, Bertillon found that several physical features and dimensions of certain bony structures within the human body remained considerably unchanged throughout adulthood.  
 +
 
 +
From this, Bertillon concluded that when recording these measurements systematically, a single individual could be perfectly distinguished from another. When the value of Bertillon’s discovery was fully realized, his system was quickly adapted into police methodology in aims of preventing false identifications and arrests.  
 +
 
 +
This practice, adopting the name "Bertillonage", became widely popular and became internationally applied to the administration of justice in most civilized countries at the time. In 1883 the practice was introduced to the country of France, and was quickly credited with remarkable success. England’s adoption of the Bertillon system would soon follow. In 1894, a special committee based in Paris launched an investigation into the methodology used by the system and the results obtained. The investigation proved favorable, in particular regards to the use of structural measurements for primary classification. Despite its report, the committee recommended the adoption of a systematic "finger printing" program as suggested by Francis Galton, and already practiced in Bengal.
  
 
[[Image:Bertillon - Signalement Anthropometrique.png|right|thumb|250px|A chart from Bertillon's ''Identification anthropométrique'' (1893), demonstrating how to take measurements for his identification system.]]
 
[[Image:Bertillon - Signalement Anthropometrique.png|right|thumb|250px|A chart from Bertillon's ''Identification anthropométrique'' (1893), demonstrating how to take measurements for his identification system.]]
  
There were eleven measurements:
+
==Measurement==
# Height
+
Bertillon’s system divided the measurements into eleven categories including: height, stretch (as defined by the length of the body from left shoulder to right middle finger), bust (as defined by the length of one’s torso from the head to the seat, when seated), head width (measured from temple to temple), the length of one’s right ear, the length of one’s left foot, the length of one’s left middle finger, the length of one’s left cubit (or the extension from one’s elbow to the tip of one’s middle finger), the width of one’s cheeks and finally, the length of one’s little finger.  
# Stretch: Length of body from left shoulder to right middle finger when arm is raised
 
# Bust: Length of torso from head to seat, taken when seated  
 
# Length of head: Crown to forehead
 
# Width of head: Temple to temple  
 
# Length of right ear  
 
# Length of left foot
 
# Length of left middle finger
 
# Length of left cubit: Elbow to tip of middle finger
 
# Width of cheeks  
 
# Length of left little finger.
 
  
From this great mass of details, soon represented in Paris by the collection of some 100,000 cards, it was possible, proceeding by exhaustion, to sift and sort down the cards till a small bundle of half a dozen produced the combined facts of the measurements of the individual last sought. The whole of the information is easily contained in one cabinet of very ordinary dimensions, and most ingeniously contrived so as to make the most of the space and facilitate the search. The whole of the record is independent of names, and the final identification is by means of the photograph which lies with the individual's card of measurements.  
+
The accumulated details, first divided by the city of Paris into some 100,000 cards, allowed an official to sort specific measurements until the combined facts of details produced the certain individual sought. The system of information was contained in one cabinet designed to facilitate a search as efficiently as possible. Measurement records are without individual names, and final identification is achieved by means of a photograph attached to an individual's card of measurements.  
  
Anthropometrics was first used in the 19th and early 20th century in [[criminalistics]], to identifying criminals by facial characteristics. [[Francis Galton]] was a key contributor as well, and it was in showing the redundancy of Bertillon's measurements that he developed the statistical concept of [[correlation]]. Bertillon's system originally measured variables he thought were independent—such as forearm length and leg length—but Galton had realized were both the result of a single causal variable (in this case, stature).  
+
==Anthropometry and Criminalistics==
 +
 
 +
Anthropometry was first introduced in the late 19th century to the field of criminalistics, helping to identifying individual criminals by facial characteristics. Francis Galton, a key contributor to the field of criminalistics, would later find flaw with Bertillon’s system. Galton realized that variables originally believed independent, those of forearm length and leg length, could be combined into a single causal variable defined as stature. Galton, in realizing the redundancy of Bertillon’s measurements, had developed the statistical concept of correlation.  
  
 
[[Image:Galton at Bertillon's (1893).jpg|right|thumb|250px|A Bertillon record for [[Francis Galton]], from a visit to Bertillon's laboratory in 1893.]]
 
[[Image:Galton at Bertillon's (1893).jpg|right|thumb|250px|A Bertillon record for [[Francis Galton]], from a visit to Bertillon's laboratory in 1893.]]
  
Bertillon's goal was to use anthropometry as a way of identifying [[recidivism|recidivists]]—what we would today call "repeat-offense" criminals. Previously, police could only record general descriptions and names, and criminals were fond of using alternative identities. As such, it was a difficult job to identify whether or not certain individuals arrested were "first offenders" or life-long criminals. Photography of criminals had become commonplace but it had proven ungainly, as there was no coherent way to arrange visually the many thousands of photographs in a fashion which would allow easy use (an officer would have to sort through them all with the hope of finding one). Bertillon's hope was that through the use of measurements of the body, all information about the individual criminal could be reduced to a set of identifying numbers which could be entered into a large filing system.  
+
Alphonse Bertillon's goal was to use anthropometry as a way of identifying recidivists, or criminals likely to repeat their offense. Before the use of anthropometry, police officials relied solely on general descriptions and names to make arrests, and were unable to apprehend criminals employing false identities. Upon arrest, it was difficult to identify which criminals were first-time offenders and which were repeat offenders. Though the photographing of criminals had become common, it proved ineffectual as a system had not been found to visually arrange the photographs in a fashion that allowed easy use. Bertillon believed that through the use of anthropometry, all information about an individual criminal could be reduced to a set of identifying numbers which could then be entered into a large filing system.
  
Bertillon also invisioned the system as being organized in such a way that even if the number of measurements was limited the system could drastically reduce the number of potential matches, through an easy system of body parts and characteristics being labeled as "small", "medium", or "large". For example, if the length of the arm was measured and judged to be within the "medium" range, and the size of the foot was known, this would drastically reduce the number of potential records to compare against. With more measurements of hopefully independent variables, a more precise identification could be achieved, which could then be matched against photographic evidence. Certain aspects of this philosophy would also go into Galton's development of [[fingerprint]] identification as well.
+
Bertillon also envisioned his system as being organized in such a way that if recorded measurements were limited, the system would still work to drastically reduce the number of potential matches through the categorizing of characteristics as either small, medium, or large. If the length of an individual’s arm was categorized as medium, and the size of the foot known, the number of potential records an official would compare with would be drastically reduced. Bertillon believed that with more measurements of independent variables, a more precise identification system could be achieved and paired with photographic evidence. Aspects of this philosophy would reappear in Francis Galton's development of systematic fingerprinting.
  
Anthropometry, however, gradually fell into disfavour, and it has been generally supplanted by the superior system of [[fingerprint|finger print]]s. Bertillonage exhibited certain defects which were first brought to light in Bengal. The objections raised were
+
==Anthropometry and Fingerprinting==
# the costliness of the instruments employed and their liability to get out of order;
 
# the need for specially instructed measurers, men of superior education;
 
# the errors that frequently crept in when carrying out the processes and were all but irremediable.
 
Measures inaccurately taken, or wrongly read off, could seldom, if ever, be corrected, and these persistent errors defeated all chance of successful search. The process was slow, as it was necessary to repeat it three times so as to arrive at a mean result. In Bengal measurements were already abandoned by 1897, when the finger print system was adopted throughout British India. Three years later England followed suit; and as the result of a fresh inquiry ordered by the Home Office, finger prints were alone relied upon for identification.
 
  
==Anthropology and anthropometry==
+
The use of Anthropometry in a criminological environment would eventually subside, overcome by the development of systematic finger printing. Bertillon’s system of measurements exhibited certain defects which would lead to its disregard. Objections to Bertillonage’s system often included the exorbitant costs of anthropometric instruments, the need for exceptionally trained employees, and the significant opportunity for error.
 +
 
 +
Measures taken or recorded with inaccuracy could seldom, if ever, be corrected, and would defeat all chance of a successful search. Bertillonage was also deemed slow, as it was necessary to repeat the anthropometrical process three times to arrive at a mean result. In 1897, Bertillonage was replaced throughout British India by the adoption of Bengal’s finger print system. Three years later England would follow suit. As the result of a fresh inquiry ordered by the Home Office, finger prints alone would be relied upon for identification.
 +
 
 +
==Anthropometry and Anthropology==
  
 
[[Image:Head-Measurer of Tremearne (side view).jpg|right|thumb|250px|A "head-measurer" tool designed for anthropological research in the early 1910s.]]
 
[[Image:Head-Measurer of Tremearne (side view).jpg|right|thumb|250px|A "head-measurer" tool designed for anthropological research in the early 1910s.]]
  
During the early 20th century, anthropometry was used extensively by anthropologists in the United States and Europe. One of its primary uses became the attempted differentiation between supposed differences in the [[race]]s of man, and it was often employed to show ways in which races were supposedly inferior to others. The wide application of [[intelligence testing]] also became incorporated into a general anthropometric approach, and many forms of anthropometry were used for the advocacy of [[eugenics]] policies. During the 1920s and 1930s, though, members of the school of [[cultural anthropology]] of [[Franz Boas]] also began to use anthropometric approaches to discredit the concept of fixed biological race. Anthropometric approaches to these types of problems became abandoned in the years after [[the Holocaust]] in [[Nazi Germany]], who also famously relied on anthropometric measurements to distinguish "[[Aryan]]s" from [[Jew]]s. This school of physical anthropology generally went into decline during the 1940s.
+
During the early 20th century, anthropometry was extensively employed by anthropologists throughout the United States and Europe. A primary use of Anthropometry became the attempted differentiation between races of man. This study attempted to demonstrate in which ways certain races were superior to others. An application of intelligence testing was also incorporated into anthropometric study, and forms of anthropometry were used to advocate eugenics policies. During the 1920’s, members of Franz Boas’ School of Cultural Anthropology began to use anthropometric approaches to discredit the concept of fixed biological race. In later years, NAZI Germany would rely on anthropometric measurements to distinguish “Aryans” from Jews. These approaches were abandoned in the years following the Holocaust, and the teaching of physical anthropology went into general decline.  
 
 
During the 1940s antropometry was used by [[William Sheldon]] when evaluating his [[somatotype]]s, according to which characteristics of the body can be translated into characteristics of the mind. He also believed that [[criminality]] could be predicted according to the body type. This use of antropometry is today also outdated. Because of his extensive reliance on photographs of nude [[Ivy League]] students for his work, Sheldon ran into considerable controversy when his work became public.
 
  
==Modern anthropometry and biometrics==
+
During the 1940’s, William Sheldon employed anthropometry to evaluate somatotypes which accorded that characteristics of the body could be translated into characteristics of the mind. Sheldon also believed that one’s criminality could be predicted according to body type. Sheldon would run into considerable controversy when his work became public, relying extensively on photographs of nude Ivy League students for his studies.
  
Anthropometric studies are today conducted for numerous different purposes.  Academic anthropologists investigate the evolutionary significance of differences in body proportion between populations whose ancestors lived in different environmental settings.  Human populations exhibit similar climatic variation patterns to other large-bodied mammals, following [[Bergmann's rule]], which states that individuals in cold climates will tend to be larger than ones in warm climates, and [[Allen's rule]], which states that individuals in cold climates will tend to have shorter, stubbier limbs than those in warm climates.  On a microevolutionary level, anthropologists use anthropometric variation to reconstruct small-scale population history.  For instance, [[John Relethford]]'s studies of early twentieth-century anthropometric data from Ireland show that the geographical patterning of body proportions still exhibits traces of the invasions by the English and Norse centuries ago.
+
==Modern Anthropometry==
  
Outside academia, scientists working for private companies and government agencies conduct anthropometric studies to determine what range of sizes clothing and other items need to be manufactured in. A basically antropometric division of [[body type]]s into the categories [[endomorphic]], [[ectomorphic]] and [[mesomorphic]] derived from Sheldon's [[somatotype]]theories is today popular among people doing [[weight training]].
+
Today, anthropometric studies are conducted for various purposes. Academic anthropologists often investigate the evolutionary significance of varying physical proportions between populations stemming from ancestors of different environmental settings. Contemporary anthropometry has shown human populations to exhibit similar climatic variation to other large-bodied mammals. This finding is aligned with Bergmann's rule, stating that individuals in colder climates tend to be larger than individuals of warmer climates, and with Allen's rule, which states that individuals in cold climates will tend to have shorter, thicker limbs than those in warm climates.  
  
The US Military has conducted over 40 anthropometric surveys of U.S. Military personnel between 1945 and 1988, including the 1988 Army Anthropometric Survey (ANSUR) of men and women with its 240 measures.  Statistical data from these surveys, which encompassed over 75,000 individuals, can be found in [http://assist.daps.dla.mil/docimages/0000/40/29/54083.PD0 DOD-HDBK-743A].   
+
Anthropologists also use anthropometric variation to reconstruct small-scale population histories. In a study of 20th century Ireland, John Relethford's collection of anthropometric data exhibited geographical patterns of body proportions coinciding with historic invasions of Ireland by the English and the Norse.
 +
Aside from academia, scientists working for private companies and government agencies conduct anthropometric studies to determine the range of clothing sizes to be manufactured. Today, weight trainers often rely on basic anthropometric divisions, derived by Sheldon, for means of categorizing body type. Between 1945 and 1988, the United States Military conducted more than 40 anthropometric surveys of Military personnel, including a 1988 Army Anthropometric Survey (ANSUR) of members within its 240 measures.   
  
Today people are performing anthropometry with three-dimensional scanners. The subject has a three-dimensional scan taken of their body, and the anthropometrist extracts measurements from the scan rather than directly from the individual. This is beneficial for the anthropometrist in that they can use this scan to extract any measurement at any time.
+
Today, technology is performing anthropometry with the use of three-dimensional scanners. A three-dimensional scan taken of an individual’s body allows anthropometric officials to extract measurements from the scan rather than directly from the individual. Officials can use this scan to extract any measurement at any time.
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
Line 68: Line 63:
 
* ''Report of Home Office Committee on the Best Means of Identifying Habitual Criminals'' (1893-1894)
 
* ''Report of Home Office Committee on the Best Means of Identifying Habitual Criminals'' (1893-1894)
 
* [http://assist.daps.dla.mil/docimages/0000/40/29/54083.PD0 DOD-HDBK-743A], ''Anthropometry of US Military Personnel'' (1991)
 
* [http://assist.daps.dla.mil/docimages/0000/40/29/54083.PD0 DOD-HDBK-743A], ''Anthropometry of US Military Personnel'' (1991)
 
 
 
----
 
 
In art [[Yves Klein]] termed '''anthropometries''' his performance paintings where he covered nude women with paint, and used their bodies as paintbrushes.
 
 
  
 
==Resources==
 
==Resources==
 
'''Books'''<br>
 
''Bodyspace'' - Stephen Pheasant - A classic review of human body sizes.<br>
 
 
 
 
'''Websites'''
 
 
* [http://www.humanics-es.com/recc-ergonomics.htm Ergonomics research: Anthropometrics, ergonomic tools, product design, etc.]
 
* [http://www.humanics-es.com/recc-ergonomics.htm Ergonomics research: Anthropometrics, ergonomic tools, product design, etc.]
 
 
 
{{Credit1|Anthropometry|55976194|}}
 
{{Credit1|Anthropometry|55976194|}}

Revision as of 13:46, 17 July 2006


Illustration from "The Speaking Portrait" (Pearson's Magazine, Vol XI, January to June 1901) demonstrating the principles of Bertillon's anthropometry.

Anthropometry, or the "measure of humans", is derived from the Greek terms ανθρωπος, meaning man, and μετρον, meaning measure. The term physical anthropology refers to the measurement of living human individuals for the purposes of understanding human physical variation.

Alphonse Bertillon

Anthropometry demonstrated in an exhibit from a 1921 eugenics conference.

The French savant, Alphonse Bertillon (b. 1853), coined the phrase physical anthropometry in 1883 to include an identification system based on unchanging measurements of the human frame. Through patient inquiry, Bertillon found that several physical features and dimensions of certain bony structures within the human body remained considerably unchanged throughout adulthood.

From this, Bertillon concluded that when recording these measurements systematically, a single individual could be perfectly distinguished from another. When the value of Bertillon’s discovery was fully realized, his system was quickly adapted into police methodology in aims of preventing false identifications and arrests.

This practice, adopting the name "Bertillonage", became widely popular and became internationally applied to the administration of justice in most civilized countries at the time. In 1883 the practice was introduced to the country of France, and was quickly credited with remarkable success. England’s adoption of the Bertillon system would soon follow. In 1894, a special committee based in Paris launched an investigation into the methodology used by the system and the results obtained. The investigation proved favorable, in particular regards to the use of structural measurements for primary classification. Despite its report, the committee recommended the adoption of a systematic "finger printing" program as suggested by Francis Galton, and already practiced in Bengal.

A chart from Bertillon's Identification anthropométrique (1893), demonstrating how to take measurements for his identification system.

Measurement

Bertillon’s system divided the measurements into eleven categories including: height, stretch (as defined by the length of the body from left shoulder to right middle finger), bust (as defined by the length of one’s torso from the head to the seat, when seated), head width (measured from temple to temple), the length of one’s right ear, the length of one’s left foot, the length of one’s left middle finger, the length of one’s left cubit (or the extension from one’s elbow to the tip of one’s middle finger), the width of one’s cheeks and finally, the length of one’s little finger.

The accumulated details, first divided by the city of Paris into some 100,000 cards, allowed an official to sort specific measurements until the combined facts of details produced the certain individual sought. The system of information was contained in one cabinet designed to facilitate a search as efficiently as possible. Measurement records are without individual names, and final identification is achieved by means of a photograph attached to an individual's card of measurements.

Anthropometry and Criminalistics

Anthropometry was first introduced in the late 19th century to the field of criminalistics, helping to identifying individual criminals by facial characteristics. Francis Galton, a key contributor to the field of criminalistics, would later find flaw with Bertillon’s system. Galton realized that variables originally believed independent, those of forearm length and leg length, could be combined into a single causal variable defined as stature. Galton, in realizing the redundancy of Bertillon’s measurements, had developed the statistical concept of correlation.

A Bertillon record for Francis Galton, from a visit to Bertillon's laboratory in 1893.

Alphonse Bertillon's goal was to use anthropometry as a way of identifying recidivists, or criminals likely to repeat their offense. Before the use of anthropometry, police officials relied solely on general descriptions and names to make arrests, and were unable to apprehend criminals employing false identities. Upon arrest, it was difficult to identify which criminals were first-time offenders and which were repeat offenders. Though the photographing of criminals had become common, it proved ineffectual as a system had not been found to visually arrange the photographs in a fashion that allowed easy use. Bertillon believed that through the use of anthropometry, all information about an individual criminal could be reduced to a set of identifying numbers which could then be entered into a large filing system.

Bertillon also envisioned his system as being organized in such a way that if recorded measurements were limited, the system would still work to drastically reduce the number of potential matches through the categorizing of characteristics as either small, medium, or large. If the length of an individual’s arm was categorized as medium, and the size of the foot known, the number of potential records an official would compare with would be drastically reduced. Bertillon believed that with more measurements of independent variables, a more precise identification system could be achieved and paired with photographic evidence. Aspects of this philosophy would reappear in Francis Galton's development of systematic fingerprinting.

Anthropometry and Fingerprinting

The use of Anthropometry in a criminological environment would eventually subside, overcome by the development of systematic finger printing. Bertillon’s system of measurements exhibited certain defects which would lead to its disregard. Objections to Bertillonage’s system often included the exorbitant costs of anthropometric instruments, the need for exceptionally trained employees, and the significant opportunity for error.

Measures taken or recorded with inaccuracy could seldom, if ever, be corrected, and would defeat all chance of a successful search. Bertillonage was also deemed slow, as it was necessary to repeat the anthropometrical process three times to arrive at a mean result. In 1897, Bertillonage was replaced throughout British India by the adoption of Bengal’s finger print system. Three years later England would follow suit. As the result of a fresh inquiry ordered by the Home Office, finger prints alone would be relied upon for identification.

Anthropometry and Anthropology

A "head-measurer" tool designed for anthropological research in the early 1910s.

During the early 20th century, anthropometry was extensively employed by anthropologists throughout the United States and Europe. A primary use of Anthropometry became the attempted differentiation between races of man. This study attempted to demonstrate in which ways certain races were superior to others. An application of intelligence testing was also incorporated into anthropometric study, and forms of anthropometry were used to advocate eugenics policies. During the 1920’s, members of Franz Boas’ School of Cultural Anthropology began to use anthropometric approaches to discredit the concept of fixed biological race. In later years, NAZI Germany would rely on anthropometric measurements to distinguish “Aryans” from Jews. These approaches were abandoned in the years following the Holocaust, and the teaching of physical anthropology went into general decline.

During the 1940’s, William Sheldon employed anthropometry to evaluate somatotypes which accorded that characteristics of the body could be translated into characteristics of the mind. Sheldon also believed that one’s criminality could be predicted according to body type. Sheldon would run into considerable controversy when his work became public, relying extensively on photographs of nude Ivy League students for his studies.

Modern Anthropometry

Today, anthropometric studies are conducted for various purposes. Academic anthropologists often investigate the evolutionary significance of varying physical proportions between populations stemming from ancestors of different environmental settings. Contemporary anthropometry has shown human populations to exhibit similar climatic variation to other large-bodied mammals. This finding is aligned with Bergmann's rule, stating that individuals in colder climates tend to be larger than individuals of warmer climates, and with Allen's rule, which states that individuals in cold climates will tend to have shorter, thicker limbs than those in warm climates.

Anthropologists also use anthropometric variation to reconstruct small-scale population histories. In a study of 20th century Ireland, John Relethford's collection of anthropometric data exhibited geographical patterns of body proportions coinciding with historic invasions of Ireland by the English and the Norse. Aside from academia, scientists working for private companies and government agencies conduct anthropometric studies to determine the range of clothing sizes to be manufactured. Today, weight trainers often rely on basic anthropometric divisions, derived by Sheldon, for means of categorizing body type. Between 1945 and 1988, the United States Military conducted more than 40 anthropometric surveys of Military personnel, including a 1988 Army Anthropometric Survey (ANSUR) of members within its 240 measures.

Today, technology is performing anthropometry with the use of three-dimensional scanners. A three-dimensional scan taken of an individual’s body allows anthropometric officials to extract measurements from the scan rather than directly from the individual. Officials can use this scan to extract any measurement at any time.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Lombroso, Antropometria di 400 delinquenti (1872)
  • Roberts, Manual of Anthropometry (1878)
  • Ferri, Studi comparati di antropometria (2 vols., 1881-1882)
  • Lombroso, Rughe anomale speciali ai criminali (1890)
  • Bertillon, Instructions signalétiques pour l'identification anthropométrique (1893)
  • Livi, Anthropometria (Milan, 1900)
  • Fürst, Indextabellen zum anthropometrischen Gebrauch (Jena, 1902)
  • Report of Home Office Committee on the Best Means of Identifying Habitual Criminals (1893-1894)
  • DOD-HDBK-743A, Anthropometry of US Military Personnel (1991)

Resources

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.