Difference between revisions of "4 Maccabees" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
==Authorship and criticism==
 
==Authorship and criticism==
 +
Readers of 4 Maccabees who are aware 2 Maccabees cannot help but feel that the author has allowed his philosophical agenda to interfere with the story. In 2 Maccabees, the martyrs' deaths are related in a relatively straightforward fashion, resulting in a truly touching account of Jewish heroism in the face of the horrible tyranny of [[Antiochus IV]]. 4 Maccabees, on the other hand, not only goes into excruciating detail about the torture of the martyrs, but causes them to make the author's own philosophical points for him in their conversations with each other and Antiochus.
 
[[Image:Zeno.jpg|thumb|150px|[[Zeno]], the founder of [[Stoicism]]]]
 
[[Image:Zeno.jpg|thumb|150px|[[Zeno]], the founder of [[Stoicism]]]]
 
According to some scholars, the last chapter (18) shows signs of later addition to the work, though this was disputed on the basis that the change of direction from chapter 17 fits with the view of the work as a homily read to a Greek-speaking Jewish audience on the feast of [[Hanukkah]], where this shift would be a rhetorical element to conclude and draw the listeners into the discourse. Others hold that a homily would be based more directly on scriptural texts.
 
According to some scholars, the last chapter (18) shows signs of later addition to the work, though this was disputed on the basis that the change of direction from chapter 17 fits with the view of the work as a homily read to a Greek-speaking Jewish audience on the feast of [[Hanukkah]], where this shift would be a rhetorical element to conclude and draw the listeners into the discourse. Others hold that a homily would be based more directly on scriptural texts.

Revision as of 05:30, 16 November 2008

4 Maccabees uses the story of the Maccabean martyrs to make an essential stoic philosophy point.

The book of 4 Maccabees is a homily or philosophic discourse praising the supremacy of pious reason over passion. Among churches other than the Orthodox Church, it has always been regarded as apocryphal. Like the other Jewish texts found in the Septuagint Greek version of the Bible but not known in Hebrew versions, it was also excluded from the Jewish scriptural canon.

The book takes up the story of the Maccabean martyrs told in 2 Maccabees as its primary example in proving that clear, reasonable thinking about true virtue is the key to overcoming every temptation. Though clearly the work of a pious Jew, its attitude shows strong influence from stoic philosophy.

While once accepted as a deuterocanonical book by the Orthodox, 4 Macabees is increasingly relegated to an appendix of apocryphal works, one of the pseudepigrapha. The reasons for this include its inclusion of pagan thought and the differences between its version of the dialog of the Maccabean martyrs and that of the similar dialog in 2 Maccabees.

Synopsis

The work consists of a prologue and two main sections. The first main section advances the philosophical thesis that "right thinking" alone can control temptation, while the second illustrates this idea using examples drawn from 2 Maccabees, principally, the martyrdom of Eleazer and the Maccabeean bother and their mother under Antiochus IV Epiphanes. However, the writer often places words in the mouths of the martyrs which are not found in 2 Maccabees illustrating his point in order to make his own philosophical points:

"Imitate me, O brethren, nor ever desert your station, nor abjure my brotherhood in courage: fight the holy and honourable fight of religion," says the first brother (4 Mac 9:23). "How sweet is every form of death for the religion of our fathers!... I lighten my suffering by the pleasures which are connected with virtue," cries the next (4 Mac 9:29-32)

The last chapters concern the author's impressions drawn from these martyrdoms, again emphasizing the point that "thinking clearly" and a commitment to true "virtue" is the necessary and sufficient guarantees to prevent one from falling in to sin, even in the face of the cruelest torture.

Authorship and criticism

Readers of 4 Maccabees who are aware 2 Maccabees cannot help but feel that the author has allowed his philosophical agenda to interfere with the story. In 2 Maccabees, the martyrs' deaths are related in a relatively straightforward fashion, resulting in a truly touching account of Jewish heroism in the face of the horrible tyranny of Antiochus IV. 4 Maccabees, on the other hand, not only goes into excruciating detail about the torture of the martyrs, but causes them to make the author's own philosophical points for him in their conversations with each other and Antiochus.

Zeno, the founder of Stoicism

According to some scholars, the last chapter (18) shows signs of later addition to the work, though this was disputed on the basis that the change of direction from chapter 17 fits with the view of the work as a homily read to a Greek-speaking Jewish audience on the feast of Hanukkah, where this shift would be a rhetorical element to conclude and draw the listeners into the discourse. Others hold that a homily would be based more directly on scriptural texts.

In style, the book is oratorical, but not so much as 3 Maccabees. A good amount of Stoic philosophy is cited by the author, though there is little original philosophical insight in the text. The writer appears to be an Alexandrian Jew who applied the philosophical ideas of the time to his religious ideas. This characterization is cited as the best example of syncretism between Jewish and Hellenistic thought. However, it should be noted that the book also constitutes an adamant rejection of Jewish compromise with Hellenistic culture in terms of religious practice.

The book is anonymous, but was ascribed to the first century CE Jewish historian Josephus by Eusebius and Jerome. This opinion was accepted for many years, leading to its inclusion in many editions of Josephus' works. Modern critical scholarship, however, points to great differences of language and style, so that this identification is largely abandoned today. The book is generally dated between the first century B.C.E. and the first century CE, due to its reliance on 2 Maccabees and use by Christians. It was probably written before the persecution of the Jews under Caligula, and certainly before the fall of Jerusalem in 70 C.E.

Doctrinal content

The writer believes in the immortality of the soul, but does not affirm the Pharisaic belief in the resurrection of the body, as does 2 Maccabees. Good souls are said to live forever in happiness with the patriarchs and God, but even the evil souls are held to be immortal. The suffering and martyrdom of the pious Maccabees is seen by the author to be vicarious for the Jewish nation, and the author portrays martyrdom in general as bringing atonement for the past sins of the Jews. Little is said of the military exploits of the Judas Maccabeus and his brothers, which occupies the central focus in 1 Maccabees and, to a lesser extent, 2 Maccabees.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • DeSilva, David Arthur. 4 Maccabees. Guides to apocrypha and pseudepigrapha. Sheffield, England: Sheffield Academic Press, 1998. ISBN 9781850758969
  • Henten, J. W. van. The Maccabean Martyrs As Saviours of the Jewish People: A Study of 2 and 4 Maccabees. Supplements to the Journal for the study of Judaism, v. 57. Leiden: Brill, 1997. ISBN 9789004109766
  • International Conference on the Deuterocanonical Books, Géza G. Xeravits, and József Zsengellér. The books of the Maccabees: history, theology, ideology : papers of the Second International Conference on the Deuteronomical Books, Pápa, Hungary, 9-11 June, 2005. Supplements to the Journal for the study of Judaism, v. 118. Leiden: Brill, 2007. ISBN 9789004157002

External links

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.