Difference between revisions of "4 Maccabees" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
(New page: {{Books of the Old Testament}} The book of '''4 Maccabees''' is a homily or philosophic discourse praising the supremacy of pious reason over passion. While once accepte...)
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Books of the Old Testament}}
 
{{Books of the Old Testament}}
The book of '''4 Maccabees''' is a [[homily]] or [[philosophy|philosophic]] discourse praising the supremacy of pious reason over passion. While once accepted as a [[deuterocanonical books|deuterocanonical book]] by the [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Orthodox]], it is increasingly relegated to an appendix of [[apocrypha|apocryphal]] works, one of the [[Pseudepigrapha]].<ref name ="Harris">[[Stephen L Harris|Harris, Stephen L.]], Understanding the Bible. Palo Alto: Mayfield. 1985.</ref> The reasons for this include its inclusion of pagan thought and the differences between the dialog of the martyrs that it portrays and the one in [[2 Maccabees]]. Amongst churches other than the orthodox, it has always been regarded as completely apocryphal.
+
The book of '''4 Maccabees''' is a [[homily]] or [[philosophy|philosophic]] discourse praising the supremacy of pious [[reason]] over [[passion]]. Among churches other than the [[Orthodox Church]], it has always been regarded as [[apocryphal]].
 +
 
 +
While once accepted as a [[deuterocanonical books|deuterocanonical book]] by the [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Orthodox]], it is increasingly relegated to an appendix of [[apocrypha|apocryphal]] works, one of the [[pseudepigrapha]]. The reasons for this include its inclusion of pagan thought and the differences between the its version of the dialog of the Maccabean [[martyrs]] that it portrays and a similar one in [[2 Maccabees]].
  
 
==Synopsis==
 
==Synopsis==
The work consists of a prologue and two main sections; the first advances the philosophical thesis while the second illustrates the points made using examples drawn from [[2 Maccabees]] (principally, the [[martyr]]dom of Eleazer and the Maccabeean youths) under [[Antiochus IV]] Epiphanes. The last chapters concern the author's impressions drawn from these martyrdoms. The work thus appears to be an independent composition to [[1 Maccabees]] and 2 Maccabees, merely drawing on their descriptions to support its thesis.
+
The work consists of a prologue and two main sections. The first main section advances the philosophical thesis that "right thinking" alone can control temptation, while the second illustrates this idea using examples drawn from [[2 Maccabees]], principally, the [[martyr]]dom of Eleazer and the Maccabeean bother and their mother under [[Antiochus IV]] Epiphanes. However, the writer often places words in the mouths of the martyrs which are not found in 2 Maccabees illustrating his point. The last chapters concern the author's impressions drawn from these martyrdoms, again emphasizing the point that "thinking clearly" is the necessary and sufficient guarantee to prevent one from sin, even in the face of the cruelest [[torture]].
  
 
==Authorship and criticism==
 
==Authorship and criticism==
According to some scholars, the last chapter shows signs of later addition to the work, though this was disputed by the 19th century authors of the [[Jewish Encyclopedia]]. The dispute is based on the weak ending the book would have without the "added" chapter, as well as arguments based on style. The change of direction with chapter 27 supports the view of the work as a homily held before a Greek-speaking audience on the feast of [[Hanukkah]], as advanced by Ewald and Freudenthal, where this would be a rhetorical element to draw the listeners into the discourse. Others hold that a homily would have to be based on scriptural texts, which this work is only loosely.
+
According to some scholars, the last chapter (18) shows signs of later addition to the work, though this was disputed on the basis that the change of direction from chapter 17 fits with the view of the work as a homily read to a Greek-speaking Jewish audience on the feast of [[Hanukkah]], where this shift would be a rhetorical element to conclude and draw the listeners into the discourse. Others hold that a homily would be based more directly on scriptural texts.
  
In style, the book is [[oratory|oratorical]], but not so much as [[3 Maccabees]]. A good amount of [[Stoicism|Stoic philosophy]] is cited by the author, though there is little original philosophical insight in the text. The writer appears to be an [[Alexandria]]n [[Jew]] who used the philosophical ideas of the time to clothe his religious ideas. This characterization is practically without parallel in Jewish literature, and it is cited as the best example of [[syncretism]] between Jewish and Hellenistic thought. Perhaps the closest match in the [[New Testament]] is the (anonymous) [[Epistle to the Hebrews]].
+
In style, the book is [[oratory|oratorical]], but not so much as [[3 Maccabees]]. A good amount of [[Stoicism|Stoic philosophy]] is cited by the author, though there is little original philosophical insight in the text. The writer appears to be an [[Alexandria]]n [[Jew]] who applied the philosophical ideas of the time to his religious ideas. This characterization is cited as the best example of [[syncretism]] between Jewish and Hellenistic thought. However, it should be noted that the book also constitutes an adamant rejection of Jewish compromise with Hellenistic culture in terms of religious practice.
  
The book is ascribed to [[Josephus]] by [[Eusebius]] and [[Jerome]], and this opinion was accepted for many years, leading to its inclusion in many editions of Josephus' works. More modern critical scholarship points to great differences of language and style, so that this identification is largely abandoned today. The book is generally dated between the [[first century B.C.E.]] and the [[first century|first century CE]], due to its reliance on 2 Maccabees and use by [[Christianity|Christians]]. It was probably written before the persecution of the Jews under [[Caligula]], and certainly before the fall of [[Jerusalem]] in 70 C.E.
+
The book is anonymous, but was ascribed to the first century CE Jewish historian [[Josephus]] by [[Eusebius]] and [[Jerome]]. This opinion was accepted for many years, leading to its inclusion in many editions of Josephus' works. Modern critical scholarship, however, points to great differences of language and style, so that this identification is largely abandoned today. The book is generally dated between the [[first century B.C.E.]] and the [[first century|first century CE]], due to its reliance on 2 Maccabees and use by [[Christianity|Christians]]. It was probably written before the persecution of the Jews under [[Caligula]], and certainly before the fall of [[Jerusalem]] in 70 C.E.
  
 
==Doctrinal content==
 
==Doctrinal content==
The writer believes in the immortality of the soul, but denies the [[Pharisees|Pharisaic]] belief in the resurrection of the body. Good souls are said to live forever in happiness with the [[patriarchs]] and [[God]], but even the evil souls are held to be immortal. The suffering and martyrdom of the Maccabees is seen by the author to be vicarious for the Jewish nation, and the author portrays martyrdom in general as bringing atonement for the past sins of the Jews.<ref>[http://www.tentmaker.org/books/DoctrineOfRetribution.html ''History of opinions on the scriptural doctrine of retribution''], Edward Beecher, D. Appleton & Company, 1878 (original), Tentmaker publications, 2000.</ref>
+
The writer believes in the immortality of the soul, but does not affirm the [[Pharisees|Pharisaic]] belief in the resurrection of the body, as does 2 Maccabees. Good souls are said to live forever in happiness with the [[patriarchs]] and [[God]], but even the evil souls are held to be immortal. The suffering and martyrdom of the pious Maccabees is seen by the author to be vicarious for the Jewish nation, and the author portrays martyrdom in general as bringing atonement for the past sins of the Jews. Little is said of the military exploits of the Judah Maccabeus and his brothers, which occupies the central focus in 1 Maccabees and, to a lesser extent, 2 Maccabees.
 
 
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
Line 25: Line 26:
 
*[http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Books_of_Maccabees Encyclopedia Britannica: Books of the Maccabees]
 
*[http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Books_of_Maccabees Encyclopedia Britannica: Books of the Maccabees]
 
*[http://rosetta.reltech.org/cgi-bin/Ebind2html/TC/SweteIntro?seq=294 ''An Introduction to the Old Testament in Greek''], [[Henry Barclay Swete]], Cambridge University Press, 1914, page 280
 
*[http://rosetta.reltech.org/cgi-bin/Ebind2html/TC/SweteIntro?seq=294 ''An Introduction to the Old Testament in Greek''], [[Henry Barclay Swete]], Cambridge University Press, 1914, page 280
 
{{start box}}
 
{{succession box
 
| title= [[Books of the Bible]]
 
| years=
 
| before= [[3 Maccabees]]
 
| after= [[Book of Job|Job]]
 
}}
 
{{end box}}
 
  
 
{{Books of the Bible}}
 
{{Books of the Bible}}
  
 
[[Category:religion]]
 
[[Category:religion]]
 +
[[Category:philosophy and religion]]
 +
[[Category:bible]]
 +
[[Category:philosophy]]
 +
[[Category:Christianity]]
 +
[[Category:Judaism]]
 
{{Credit|205285747}}
 
{{Credit|205285747}}

Revision as of 04:34, 16 November 2008

Books of the

Hebrew Bible

The book of 4 Maccabees is a homily or philosophic discourse praising the supremacy of pious reason over passion. Among churches other than the Orthodox Church, it has always been regarded as apocryphal.

While once accepted as a deuterocanonical book by the Orthodox, it is increasingly relegated to an appendix of apocryphal works, one of the pseudepigrapha. The reasons for this include its inclusion of pagan thought and the differences between the its version of the dialog of the Maccabean martyrs that it portrays and a similar one in 2 Maccabees.

Synopsis

The work consists of a prologue and two main sections. The first main section advances the philosophical thesis that "right thinking" alone can control temptation, while the second illustrates this idea using examples drawn from 2 Maccabees, principally, the martyrdom of Eleazer and the Maccabeean bother and their mother under Antiochus IV Epiphanes. However, the writer often places words in the mouths of the martyrs which are not found in 2 Maccabees illustrating his point. The last chapters concern the author's impressions drawn from these martyrdoms, again emphasizing the point that "thinking clearly" is the necessary and sufficient guarantee to prevent one from sin, even in the face of the cruelest torture.

Authorship and criticism

According to some scholars, the last chapter (18) shows signs of later addition to the work, though this was disputed on the basis that the change of direction from chapter 17 fits with the view of the work as a homily read to a Greek-speaking Jewish audience on the feast of Hanukkah, where this shift would be a rhetorical element to conclude and draw the listeners into the discourse. Others hold that a homily would be based more directly on scriptural texts.

In style, the book is oratorical, but not so much as 3 Maccabees. A good amount of Stoic philosophy is cited by the author, though there is little original philosophical insight in the text. The writer appears to be an Alexandrian Jew who applied the philosophical ideas of the time to his religious ideas. This characterization is cited as the best example of syncretism between Jewish and Hellenistic thought. However, it should be noted that the book also constitutes an adamant rejection of Jewish compromise with Hellenistic culture in terms of religious practice.

The book is anonymous, but was ascribed to the first century CE Jewish historian Josephus by Eusebius and Jerome. This opinion was accepted for many years, leading to its inclusion in many editions of Josephus' works. Modern critical scholarship, however, points to great differences of language and style, so that this identification is largely abandoned today. The book is generally dated between the first century B.C.E. and the first century CE, due to its reliance on 2 Maccabees and use by Christians. It was probably written before the persecution of the Jews under Caligula, and certainly before the fall of Jerusalem in 70 C.E.

Doctrinal content

The writer believes in the immortality of the soul, but does not affirm the Pharisaic belief in the resurrection of the body, as does 2 Maccabees. Good souls are said to live forever in happiness with the patriarchs and God, but even the evil souls are held to be immortal. The suffering and martyrdom of the pious Maccabees is seen by the author to be vicarious for the Jewish nation, and the author portrays martyrdom in general as bringing atonement for the past sins of the Jews. Little is said of the military exploits of the Judah Maccabeus and his brothers, which occupies the central focus in 1 Maccabees and, to a lesser extent, 2 Maccabees.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees


External links

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.